A study on the correlations of PRL levels with anxiety, depression, sleep, and self-efficacy in patients with prolactinoma.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the factors influencing PRL levels in patients with prolactinoma and to investigate the correlations between anxiety, depression, sleep, self-efficacy, and PRL levels. Methods: This retrospective study included 176 patients with prolactinoma who received outpatient treatment at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from May 2017 to August 2022. The general information questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) were used for data collection. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was used to analyze the factors influencing PRL levels in patients with prolactinoma. GEE single-effect analysis was used to compare PRL levels at different time points between anxiety group and nonanxiety group, between insomnia group and normal group, and between low, medium, and high self-efficacy groups. Results: The median baseline PRL level and the PRL levels at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up were 268.50 ng/ml, 122.25 ng/ml, 21.20 ng/ml, 19.65 ng/ml, and 16.10 ng/ml, respectively. Among patients with prolactinoma, 59.10% had anxiety (HADS-A score = 7.35 ± 3.34) and 28.98% had depression (HADS-D score = 5.23 ± 3.87), 9.10% had sleep disorders (AIS score = 6.10 ± 4.31) and 54.55% had low self-efficacy (GSES score = 2.13 ± 0.83). Educational level, tumor size, number of visits, sleep quality, anxiety level, and self-efficacy level were found to be factors influencing PRL levels in patients with prolactinoma (P<0.05). Higher PRL levels were observed in the anxiety group compared to the non-anxiety group (P<0.001), in the insomnia group compared to the normal group (P<0.05), and in the low self-efficacy group compared to the medium and high self-efficacy groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: PRL levels in patients with prolactinoma are related to education level, tumor size, number of visits, anxiety, self-efficacy, and sleep but not depression. PRL levels were higher in patients with anxiety, low self-efficacy, and sleep disorders.

Response-specific progestin resistance in a newly characterized Ishikawa human endometrial cancer subcell line resulting from long-term exposure to medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Progestins, particularly medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), have for a long time been used as conservative treatment for young patients with clinical stage I, grade I endometrial carcinoma. However, more than 30% of patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma display resistance to endocrine therapies at the time of presentation and most cancer patients that initially respond to progestin treatment will at some point develop resistance, resulting in tumor progression. The cellular mechanisms underlying acquired resistance to progestin are poorly understood. In order to investigate the molecular mechanisms whereby human endometrial adenocarcinoma develops resistance to progestin therapy, we have undertaken to develop human endometrial adenocarcinoma cell lines that are resistant to the growth-inhibitory effects of progestins in vitro. A progestin-resistant subcell line of Ishikawa cells was developed from Ishikawa human endometrial adenocarcinoma cells by stepwise selection in increasing concentrations of the synthetic progestin, MPA, over ten months. The doubling time of the progestin-resistant cells (34.18±3.15 h) grown routinely in the medium containing 10 µM MPA was not significantly different from the doubling time of the parent Ishikawa cells (35.14±2.68 h) grown in the absence of MPA (t=-0.331, P=0.762). Moreover, the effect of treatment with MPA shifted from suppression of growth and invasiveness, as observed in the parent Ishikawa cells, to stimulation of growth and invasiveness in the progestin-resistant Ishikawa cells. The positive rates of estrogen receptor a (ERα) and progesterone receptor B (PRB) of the progestin-resistant Ishikawa cells were significantly reduced, whilst the positive rate of ERß was significantly enhanced compared to the parent Ishikawa cells. These differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Our results indicate that long-term treatment with MPA in Ishikawa cells may give rise to a resistance effect to MPA. When the resistant subtype is acquired, treatment with MPA enhances cancer cell proliferation and invasiveness. The imbalance of ER and PR subtypes may contribute to the mechanisms involved in progestin resistance. Determination of the subtypes of ER and PR may provide important additional information on the hormone sensitivity of endometrial carcinoma.