Efficacy of antihypertensive treatment for target organ protection in patients with masked hypertension (ANTI-MASK): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Background: Masked hypertension is associated with target organ damage (TOD) and adverse health outcomes, but whether antihypertensive treatment improves TOD in patients with masked hypertension is unproven. Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 15 Chinese hospitals, untreated outpatients aged 30-70 years with an office blood pressure (BP) of <140/<90 mm Hg and 24-h, daytime or nighttime ambulatory BP of ≥130/≥80, ≥135/≥85, or ≥120/≥70 mm Hg were enrolled. Patients had ≥1 sign of TOD: electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) ≥1400 cm/s, or urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥3.5 mg/mmol in women and ≥2.5 mg/mmol in men. Exclusion criteria included secondary hypertension, diabetic nephropathy, serum creatinine ≥176.8 µmol/L, and cardiovascular disease within 6 months of screening. After stratification for centre, sex and the presence of nighttime hypertension, eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive antihypertensive treatment or placebo. Patients and investigators were masked to group assignment. Active treatment consisted of allisartan starting at 80 mg/day, to be increased to 160 mg/day at month 2, and to be combined with amlodipine 2.5 mg/day at month 4, if the ambulatory BP remained uncontrolled. Matching placebos were used likewise in the control group. The primary endpoint was the improvement of TOD, defined as normalisation of baPWV, ACR or LVH or a ≥20% reduction in baPWV or ACR over the 48-week follow-up. The intention-to-treat analysis included all randomised patients, the per-protocol analysis patients who fully adhered to the protocol, and the safety analysis all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02893358. Findings: Between February 14, 2017, and October 31, 2020, 320 patients (43.1% women; mean age ± SD 53.7 ± 9.7 years) were enrolled. Baseline office and 24-h BP averaged 130 ± 6.0/81 ± 5.9 mm Hg and 136 ± 8.6/84 ± 6.1 mm Hg, and the prevalence of elevated baPWV, ACR and LVH were 97.5%, 12.5%, and 7.8%, respectively. The 24-h BP decreased on average (±SE) by 10.1 ± 0.9/6.4 ± 0.5 mm Hg in 153 patients on active treatment and by 1.3 ± 0.9/1.0 ± 0.5 mm Hg in 167 patients on placebo. Improvement of TOD occurred in 79 patients randomised to active treatment and in 49 patients on placebo: 51.6% (95% CI 43.7%, 59.5%) versus 29.3% (22.1, 36.5%; p < 0.0001). Per-protocol and subgroup analyses were confirmatory. Adverse events were generally mild and occurred in 38 (25.3%) and 43 (26.4%) patients randomised to active treatment and placebo, respectively (p = 0.83). Interpretation: Our results suggest that antihypertensive treatment improves TOD in patients with masked hypertension, highlighting the need of treatment. However, the long-term benefit in preventing cardiovascular complications still needs to be established. Funding: Salubris China.

May Measurement Month 2021: an analysis of blood pressure screening results from China.

We reported findings from participants screened during the May Measurement Month 2021 in China, which aimed to raise awareness of raised blood pressure (BP), and to investigate the risk factors of BP. The study participants were adults (≥18 years), ideally in whom BP had not been measured in the previous year. Blood pressure was measured three times consecutively with 1 min intervals in the sitting position, using a validated upper-arm cuff automated BP monitor (Omron HEM-7081IT), and transmitted to a central cloud database via a smartphone app. The measurement was performed in 218 844 participants in 183 sites across 31 China provinces. The mean (standard deviation) age was 47.0 (15.7) years, and 51.8% (n = 113 466) were women. The mean systolic/diastolic BP was 120.2/77.5 mmHg. Among 57 178 (26.1%) participants with hypertension, the awareness, treatment, and control rates of hypertension were 30.4% (n = 17 354), 28.7% (n = 16 369), and 17.1% (n = 9743), respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, and use of antihypertensive medication, both systolic and diastolic BP were significantly (P ≤ 0.01) higher in current smokers (n = 22 344, +0.4/+0.7 mmHg) and with moderate (n = 4780, +1.4/+4.2 mmHg) or daily alcohol intake (n = 2427, +1.3/+2.5 mmHg). Blood pressure was lower in those reporting regular exercise (n = 32 328, -2.2/-1.4 mmHg). In addition, individuals with previous COVID-19 vaccination had lower systolic and diastolic BP (n = 88 945, -1.8/-1.5 mmHg, P ≤ 0.001). In conclusion, our study showed that long-term large-scale screening for hypertension is feasible, and there is a strong association between BP and major lifestyle factors.

Control status of ambulatory blood pressure and its relationship with arterial stiffness in the China nationwide registry of treated hypertensive patients: the REACTION-ABP study.

The control rate of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) is unclear in Chinese hypertensive patients, and whether it would be associated with the ambulatory arterial stiffness indices is also unknown. From June 2018 until December 2022, 4408 treated hypertensive patients (52.8% men, average age 58.2 years) from 77 hospitals in China were registered. Ambulatory BPs were measured with validated monitors and analyzed with a web-based standardized Shuoyun system ( www.shuoyun.com.cn ). The BP control rate was the highest in the office (65.7%), moderate in the daytime (45.0%), low in the morning (34.1%), and the lowest in the nighttime (27.6%, P < 0.001). Only 21.0% had their 24 h BP perfectly controlled. The stepwise regression analyses identified that the factors associated with an imperfect 24 h BP control included male sex, smoking and drinking habits, a higher body mass index, serum total cholesterol and triglycerides, and the use of several specific types of antihypertensive drugs. After adjustment for the above-mentioned factors, the 24 h pulse pressure (PP) and its components, the elastic and stiffening PPs, were all significantly associated with an uncontrolled office and ambulatory BP status with the standardized odds ratios ranging from 1.09 to 4.68 (P < 0.05). The ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) was only associated with an uncontrolled nighttime and 24 h BP status. In conclusion, the control rates of 24 h ambulatory BP, especially that in the nighttime and morning time windows, were low in Chinese hypertensive patients, which might be associated with arterial stiffness in addition to other common risk factors.