The Combination of Gefitinib and Acetaminophen Exacerbates Hepatotoxicity via ROS-Mediated Apoptosis.

Gefitinib is the well-tolerated first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. As it need for analgesics during oncology treatment, particularly in the context ofthe coronavirus disease, where patients are more susceptible to contract high fever and sore throat. This has increased the likelihood of taking both gefitinib and antipyretic analgesic acetaminophen (APAP). Given that gefitinib and APAP overdose can predispose patients to liver injury or even acute liver failure, there is a risk of severe hepatotoxicity when these two drugs are used concomitantly. However, little is known regarding their safety at therapeutic doses. This study simulated the administration of gefitinib and APAP at clinically relevant doses in an animal model and confirmed that gefitinib in combination with APAP exhibited additional hepatotoxicity. We found that gefitinib plus APAP significantly exacerbated cell death, whereas each drug by itself had little or minor effect on hepatocyte survival. Mechanistically, combination of gefitinib and APAP induces hepatocyte death via the apoptotic pathway obviously. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and DNA damage accumulation are involved in hepatocyte apoptosis. Gefitinib plus APAP also promotes the expression of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) and downregulated the antioxidant factor, Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), by inhibiting p62 expression. Taken together, this study revealed the potential ROS-mediated apoptosis-dependent hepatotoxicity effect of the combination of gefitinib and APAP, in which the p62/Keap1/Nrf2 signaling pathway participates and plays an important regulatory role.

Rutin attenuates ensartinib-induced hepatotoxicity by non-transcriptional regulation of TXNIP.

Ensartinib, an approved ALK inhibitor, is used as a first-line therapy for advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer in China. However, the hepatotoxicity of ensartinib seriously limits its clinical application and the regulatory mechanism is still elusive. Here, through transcriptome analysis we found that transcriptional activation of TXNIP was the main cause of ensartinib-induced liver dysfunction. A high TXNIP level and abnormal TXNIP translocation severely impaired hepatic function via mitochondrial dysfunction and hepatocyte apoptosis, and TXNIP deficiency attenuated hepatocyte apoptosis under ensartinib treatment. The increase in TXNIP induced by ensartinib is related to AKT inhibition and is mediated by MondoA. Through screening potential TXNIP inhibitors, we found that the natural polyphenolic flavonoid rutin, unlike most reported TXNIP inhibitors can inhibit TXNIP by binding to TXNIP and partially promoting its proteasomal degradation. Further studies showed rutin can attenuate the hepatotoxicity of ensartinib without antagonizing its antitumor effects. Accordingly, we suggest that TXNIP is the key cause of ensartinib-induced hepatotoxicity and rutin is a potential clinically safe and feasible therapeutic strategy for TXNIP intervention.

Protective effect of borneol on the cutaneous toxicity of gilteritinib. / 吉列替尼皮肤毒性的机制及冰片的潜在保护作用.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of borneol on cutaneous toxicity of gilteritinib and to explore possible compounds that can intervene with the cutaneous toxicity. METHODS: C57BL/6J male mice were given gilteritinib by continuous gavage for 28 d and the damage to keratinocytes in the skin tissues was observed with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, TUNEL assay and immunohistochemistry. Human keratinocytes HaCaT were treated with gilteritinib, and cell death and morphological changes were examined by SRB staining and microscopy; apoptosis of HaCaT cells was examined by Western blotting, flow cytometry with propidium iodide/AnnexinⅤ double staining and immunofluorescence; the accumulation of cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) was examined by flow cytometry with DCFH-DA. Compounds that can effectively intervene the cutaneous toxicity of gilteritinib were screened from a natural compound library using SRB method, and the intervention effect of borneol on gilteritinib cutaneous toxicity was further investigated in HaCaT cells and C57BL/6J male mice. RESULTS: In vivo studies showed pathological changes in the skin with apoptosis of keratinocytes in the stratum spinosum and stratum granulosum in the modeling group. Invitro studies showed apoptosis of HaCaT cells, significant up-regulation of cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (c-PARP) and gamma-H2A histone family member X (γ-H2AX) levels, and increased accumulation of ROS in gilteritinib-modeled skin keratinocytes compared with controls. Screening of the natural compound library revealed that borneol showed excellent intervention effects on the death of HaCaT cells. In vitro, cell apoptosis was significantly reduced in the borneol+gilteritinib group compared to the gilteritinib control group. The levels of c-PARP, γ-H2AX and ROS in cells were significantly decreased. In vivo, borneol alleviated gilteritinib-induced skin pathological changes and skin cell apoptosis in mice. CONCLUSIONS: Gilteritinib induces keratinocytes apoptosis by causing intracellular ROS accumulation, resulting in cutaneous toxicity. Borneol can ameliorate the cutaneous toxicity of gilteritinib by reducing the accumulation of ROS and apoptosis of keratinocytes in the skin tissue.

An update on Alectinib: a first line treatment for ALK-positive advanced lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Alectinib is a second-generation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the treatment of ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is able to induce significant and durable CNS responses. However, long-term use of alectinib has been clinically reported to cause some serious and even life-threatening adverse events. There are currently no effective interventions for its adverse events, and this undoubtedly leads to delays in patient treatment and limits its long-term clinical use. AREAS COVERED: Based on the clinical trials conducted so far, we summarize the efficacy and adverse events that occurred, especially those related to cardiovascular disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and respiratory disorders. The factors that may influence alectinib selection are also described. Findings are based on a PubMed literature search of clinical and basic science research papers spanning 1998-2023. EXPERT OPINION: The significant prolongation of patient survival compared with first-generation ALK inhibitor suggests its potential as a first-line treatment for the NSCLC, but the severe adverse events of alectinib limit its long-term clinical use. Future research should focus on the exact mechanisms of these toxicities, how to alleviate the adverse events caused by alectinib clinically, and the development of next-generation drugs with reduced toxicities.

The participation of non-canonical autophagic proteins in the autophagy process and their potential as therapeutic targets.

INTRODUCTION: Autophagy is a conserved catabolic process that helps recycle intracellular components to maintain homeostasis. The completion of autophagy requires the synergistic effect of multiple canonical autophagic proteins. Defects in autophagy machinery have been reported to promote diseases, rendering autophagy a bone fide health-modifying agent. However, the clinical implication of canonical pan-autophagic activators or inhibitors has often led to undesirable side effects, making it urgent to find a safer autophagy-related therapeutic target. The discovery of non-canonical autophagic proteins has been found to specifically affect the development of diseases without causing a universal impact on autophagy and has shed light on finding a safer way to utilize autophagy in the therapeutic context. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes recently discovered non-canonical autophagic proteins, how these proteins influence autophagy, and their potential therapeutic role in the disease due to their interaction with autophagy. EXPERT OPINION: Several therapies have been studied thus far and continued research is needed to identify the potential that non-canonical autophagic proteins have for treating certain diseases. In the meantime, continue to uncover new non-canonical autophagic proteins and examine which are likely to have therapeutic implications.