RESUMO
AIM: To analyze laparotomy closure quality (suture/wound length ratio; SL/WL) and short term complications (surgical site occurrence; SSO) of conventional midline and transverse abdominal incisions in elective and emergency laparotomies with a longterm, absorbent, elastic suture material. METHOD: Prospective, monocentric, non-randomized, controlled cohort study on short stitches with a longterm resorbable, elastic suture (poly-4-hydroxybutyrate, [p-4OHB]) aiming at a 6:1 SL/WL-ratio in midline and transverse, primary and secondary laparotomies for elective and emergency surgeries. RESULTS: We included 351 patients (â: 208; â: 143) with midline (n = 194), transverse (n = 103), and a combined midline/transverse L-shaped (n = 54) incisions. There was no quality difference in short stitches between elective (n = 296) and emergency (n = 55) operations. Average SL/WL-ratio was significantly higher for midline than transverse incisions (6.62 ± 2.5 vs 4.3 ± 1.51, p < 0.001). Results in the first 150 patients showed a reduced SL/WL-ratio to the following 200 suture closures (SL/WL-ratio: 5.64 ± 2.5 vs 6.1 ± 2.3; p < 0.001). SL/WL-ratio varied insignificantly among the six surgeons participating while results were steadily improving over time. Clinically, superficial surgical site infections (SSI, CDC-A1/2) were encountered in 8%, while 4,3% were related to intraabdominal complications (CDC-A3). An abdominal wall dehiscence (AWD) occurred in 22/351 patients (6,3%)-twice as common in emergency than elective surgery (12,7 vs 5,1%)-necessitating an abdominal revision in 86,3% of cases. CONCLUSION: We could show that a short stitch 6:1 SL/WL-ratio with a 2-0 single, ultra-long term, absorbent, elastic suture material can be performed in only 43% of cases (85% > 4:1 SL/WL-ratio), significantly better in midline than transverse incisions. Transverse incisions should preferably be closed in two layers to achieve a sufficient SL/WL-ratio equivalent to the median incision. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01938222.
Assuntos
Parede Abdominal , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais , Humanos , Músculos Abdominais/cirurgia , Parede Abdominal/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Herniorrafia , Laparotomia/efeitos adversos , Laparotomia/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Técnicas de Sutura , Suturas , Masculino , FemininoRESUMO
The 1year incisional hernia rate of 9-30 % has been tolerated for decades. Even in the 1970s and 1980s there was evidence that supported reducing suture tension. Recently, the traditional 4:1 relationship between suture and wound length, which has been passed on for years, has been questioned. After first experimental and clinical data suggested an advantage by reducing the width and interval of stitches by 50 %, the prospective randomized STITCH study has now provided evidence by significantly lowering the 1year hernia rate from 21 % to 13 %. For surgeons this means less of a revolution and more of an innovative evolution of a long-established technique. Before introduction of the technique quality assurance must be carried out with documentation of performance indicators (e.g. number of stitches, length of thread incorporated and wound length).