Knowledge, perceptions, and practices of axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis and management among healthcare professionals: an online cross-sectional survey.

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a group of inflammatory disorders, including axial SpA (axSpA), characterized by inflammation in the spine and sacroiliac joints. Healthcare professionals have a crucial role in diagnosing and managing axSpA. Assessing their knowledge, perceptions, and practices is essential to enhance patient care. The objective of this study is to evaluate these factors by conducting an online survey. This online survey was performed using SurveyMonkey.com to assess healthcare professionals' knowledge, perceptions, and practices related to axSpA diagnosis, management, and monitoring. The questionnaire included questions about definitions, management strategies, monitoring approaches, treatment options, and barriers to care. Convenience sampling was used, and the data were analyzed descriptively by Microsoft Excel. One hundred sixty-four healthcare professionals participated; most respondents were rheumatologists from various geographic locations (27 countries). Most participants were familiar with axSpA definitions and diagnostic criteria, demonstrating high expertise. Variations were seen in follow-up intervals and diagnostic preferences, reflecting clinical heterogeneity. Seventy-two (43.9%) individuals had a multidisciplinary team, frequently including rheumatologists, physiotherapists, and radiologists. Of the participants, 73 (44.5%) had online/telephone follow-up sessions. The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment approaches varied, pointing to the importance of personalized care. Glucocorticoid use varied among countries. Recognizing inflammatory back pain, interpreting radiographs, and diagnosing early was essential to medical education. This study provides beneficial data on healthcare professionals' knowledge, perceptions, and practices regarding axSpA. While diagnostic familiarity and multidisciplinary approach are positives, there is a potential to standardize management, improve telemedicine services, remove barriers to physical activity, and optimize treatment options.

Living with axial spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional survey of patient knowledge and perceptions.

Diagnosis and effective treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) are often delayed due to inadequate awareness and poor patient-physician communication. Some AxSpA patients fail to maintain an active lifestyle by exercising regularly, further worsening their disease management. The evolving concept of patient-centred care necessitates better understanding of patient awareness and their needs. We aimed to survey AxSpA patients to reflect on healthcare planning and management perspectives. Our self-administered questionnaire focused on perceptions of AxSpA diagnosis and management, particularly exploring issues of physical activity and active lifestyle. Satisfaction with AxSpA medical care and its accessibility, diagnostic delays, patient-physician communication, and support for disease management were also explored. This offline survey was arranged at the Department of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Internal Medicine of Jagiellonian University Medical College and Krakow University Hospital. We surveyed patients with AxSpA attending outpatient clinics between December 1st, 2023 and April 22nd, 2024. The questionnaire included questions on types of physical activities, barriers to exercising, satisfaction with medical care, patient-physician interactions, diagnostic delays, and use of teleconsultations. A total of 117 patients with AxSpA were enrolled (mean age 41.62 years). The majority (n = 93, 79.5%) were employed. There was a male predominance (69, 59%). The average diagnostic delay was 5.5 years. Notably, 104 (88.9%) responders perceived physical activity as a factor influencing their disease course. However, only 32 (27.35%) managed to exercise regularly (≥ 30 min, 2-3 times a week). The majority (70, 59.83%) were irregularly engaged in some form of physical activity, with 15 (12.8%) not exercising at all, and nearly half (48%) reported at least one barrier to maintaining a physically active lifestyle. Pain (32, 27.35%), fatigue (27, 23.08%), lack of motivation (17, 14.53%), and lack of time (12, 10.26%) were noted as barriers to exercising. The respondents preferred to exercise at home. The survey identified critical areas where patient dissatisfaction or uncertainty were notably prevalent: 38 (32.5%) were uncertain and 35 (30%) were dissatisfied with rehabilitation access. For spa therapy, 63 (53.85%) reported uncertainty and 23 (19.7%) expressed dissatisfaction. Only 48 (41%) were treated by a rehabilitation specialist last year. Only 23% of AxSpA patients took part in teleconsultations last year, and 65% preferred in-person visits. While AxSpA patients recognize the importance of physical activity, significant barriers exist to engaging them regularly in exercising. Addressing these barriers through personalized, motivational, and educational strategies could improve patient outcomes. Improving patient satisfaction with healthcare services, particularly in areas of rehabilitation and physician-patient communication, is crucial for improving the overall care of AxSpA patients.

Nurses' roles, interventions, and implications for management of rheumatic diseases.

Nurses have become integral members of multidisciplinary teams in managing rheumatic diseases, departing from their traditional patient care roles. This article provides a comprehensive review of nurses' roles, interventions, and impacts in several rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, spondyloarthritis, gout, systemic lupus erythematosus, and polymyalgia rheumatica. It has been demonstrated that care under nursing supervision is effective and safe, with benefits including disease management, quality of life, and treatment adherence. In addition, nurses play a crucial role in promoting health, educating patients, and administering biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significance of telehealth services and nurses' role in delivering remote care. However, nursing education and training challenges persist, particularly in standardization and access to postgraduate education. Efforts to enhance the role of nurses in rheumatology care are necessary to optimize patient outcomes and meet the evolving needs of individuals with rheumatic diseases. Collaboration across healthcare institutions, professional groups, and educational facilities is necessary for promoting the continual growth and advancement of rheumatology nurse practice. By equipping nurses with the requisite knowledge, expertise, and resources to deliver top-notch care, we can enhance the well-being of individuals with rheumatic diseases and foster improved overall health outcomes.

Diagnosis, monitoring, and management of axial spondyloarthritis.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic condition predominantly affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints. This article provides an in-depth overview of the current approaches to diagnosing, monitoring, and managing axSpA, including insights into developing terminology and diagnostic difficulties. A substantial portion of the debate focuses on the challenging diagnostic procedure, noting the difficulty of detecting axSpA early, particularly before the appearance of radiologic structural changes. Despite normal laboratory parameters, more than half of axSpA patients experience symptoms. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are essential for evaluating structural damage and inflammation. MRI can be beneficial when there is no visible structural damage on X-ray as it can help unravel bone marrow edema (BME) as a sign of ongoing inflammation. The management covers both non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches. Lifestyle modifications, physical activity, and patient education are essential components of the management. Pharmacological therapy, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), are explored, emphasizing individualized treatment. To effectively manage axSpA, a comprehensive and well-coordinated approach is necessary, emphasizing the significance of a multidisciplinary team. Telehealth applications play a growing role in axSpA management, notably in reducing diagnostic delays and facilitating remote monitoring. In conclusion, this article underlines diagnostic complexities and emphasizes the changing strategy of axSpA treatment. The nuanced understanding offered here is designed to guide clinicians, researchers, and healthcare providers toward a more comprehensive approach to axSpA diagnosis and care.

Diagnostic delays in systemic vasculitides.

Systemic vasculitides are among the less common disorders encountered in routine rheumatology practice. The low incidence and heterogeneous presentation at onset can potentially lead to delayed diagnosis. Not recognizing these in the early phase may prove detrimental, as some vasculitis may progress to a catastrophic course with major morbidity or mortality. The causes of diagnostic delay may vary among different types of vasculitis and may also be disease-, patient-, or physician-related. Disease-related factors include the myriad presentations with diverse and non-specific symptoms, mimicking other conditions like infections. In addition, some forms have prolonged prodromal phases before evident organ damage. Limited awareness among healthcare professionals, particularly outside rheumatology, and a lack of readily available diagnostic tools contribute to missed diagnoses. Delays in seeking care due to non-specific symptoms or lack of access to specialist care can worsen outcomes. The economic burden also increases with delayed diagnosis and damage accrual when the disease remains unrecognized or untreated for prolonged periods. Although the causes of vasculitis are numerous, including secondary causes, in this review, we focus on diagnostic delays in primary vasculitides and suggest potential steps to identify and treat these diseases early. These include educating both healthcare professionals and the public about the signs and symptoms of vasculitis; expanding the rheumatology workforce and facilitating timely referrals; implementing readily available and reliable tests for early detection; and streamlining care and diagnostic pathways. Such measures have the potential to improve the overall outcomes of the disease, with prolonged remission, minimal damage accrual, and improved quality of life.

Pain catastrophizing in rheumatic diseases: prevalence, origin, and implications.

Pain is a crucial factor in rheumatic disorders, and reducing it is a primary goal of successful treatment. Adaptive pain-coping strategies can enhance this improvement, but maladaptive approaches such as pain catastrophizing may worsen overall patient well-being. This narrative review aims to provide a concise overview of the existing knowledge on pain catastrophizing in the most prevalent specific rheumatic disorders. The objective of this study was to improve understanding of this phenomenon and its implications, as well as to pinpoint potential directions for future research. We conducted searches in the MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, and DOAJ bibliography databases to identify articles related to pain catastrophizing in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondylarthritis, systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and osteoarthritis (non-surgical treatment). Data extraction was performed on November 1, 2023. The investigators screened the identified articles to determine their relevance and whether they met the inclusion criteria. Following a bibliography search, which was further expanded by screening of citations and references, we included 156 records in the current review. The full-text analysis centred on pain catastrophizing, encompassing its prevalence, pathogenesis, and impact. The review established the role of catastrophizing in amplifying pain and diminishing various aspects of general well-being. Also, potential treatment approaches were discussed and summarised across the examined disorders. Pain catastrophizing is as a significant factor in rheumatic disorders. Its impact warrants further exploration through prospective controlled trials to enhance global patient outcomes.

Axial Spondyloarthritis: an overview of the disease.

Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic, inflammatory, immune-mediated rheumatic disease that comprises two subsets, non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA, and belongs to a heterogeneous group of spondyloarthritides (SpA). Over the years, the concept of SpA has evolved significantly, as reflected in the existing classification criteria. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the genetic and immunological basis of axSpA, in studying the processes of chronic inflammation and pathological new bone formation, which are pathognomonic for the disease. As a result, new medication therapies were developed, which bring more effective ways for disease control. This review presents a brief overview of the literature related to these aspects of disease after summarising the available information on the topic that we considered relevant. Specifically, it delves into recent research illuminating the primary pathological processes of enthesitis and associated osteitis in the context of inflammation in axSpA. The exploration extends to discussion of inflammatory pathways, with a particular focus on Th1/Th17-mediated immunity and molecular signaling pathways of syndesmophyte formation. Additionally, the review sheds light on the pivotal role of cytokine dysregulation, highlighting the significance of the IL-23/17 axis and TNF-α in this intricate network of immune responses which is decisive for therapeutic approaches in the disease.

Borrelia burgdorferi and autoimmune mechanisms: implications for mimicry, misdiagnosis, and mismanagement in Lyme disease and autoimmune disorders.

The genus Borrelia encompasses a diverse group of spirochetes transmitted primarily by ticks, with Borrelia burgdorferi causing Lyme disease, which is prevalent in North America and Europe. Borrelia's structural adaptations and ability to persist in diverse host tissues underscore its pathogenic potential. Beyond traditional infectious responses, Borrelia engages in complex interactions with the host immune system, contributing to autoimmune mechanisms such as molecular mimicry and persistent infections. This intricate interplay manifests in symptoms resembling various autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, local scleroderma, and systemic sclerosis. However, these associations lack a precise explanation, emphasizing the need for further investigation. The cases of misdiagnosis between Lyme borreliosis and autoimmune diseases highlight the critical importance of accurate diagnostics and adherence to guidelines. Understanding Borrelia's impact on immune responses is pivotal for advancing diagnostics and targeted therapeutic interventions in Lyme borreliosis and its potential autoimmune implications.

The interplay between rheumatic diseases and pulmonary health.

Patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs) are prone to a number of comorbidities, particularly those affecting the respiratory system due to inflammatory and autoimmune mechanisms. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and inflammatory idiopathic myopathies (IIMs) often present with progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD). The prevalence of ILD varies among patients with RDs, with 11% in RA, 47% in SSc, and 41% in IIMs. Some diagnostic markers, including KL-6, cytokines TNF-α and IL-6, and autoantibodies (anti-CCP), play a crucial role in assessing and predicting the course of pulmonary involvement in RDs. Lung fibrosis is a progressive disorder in SSc and RA, limiting the effiency of therapeutic interventions. Re-evaluating treatment approaches with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is crucial for understanding their impact on the risk of lung affections. Despite initial concerns surrounding methotrexate, recent evidence points to its benefits in RA-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Recognizing the intricate relationship between autoimmune RDs and lung affections is crucial for formulating effective treatment strategies. Emphasis is placed on collaborative efforts of rheumatologists and pulmonologists for early diagnosis, comprehensive care, and optimal patient outcomes in RA-ILD.

Examining the clinical and radiological landscape of rhupus: navigating the challenges in disease classification.

Rhupus, in the broad sense, refers to an overlap between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and lupus. However, there is a paucity of data on the appropriate diagnostic/classification criteria that should be used to define rhupus. Hence, we undertook this narrative review to analyze the clinical characteristics, radiology, and treatment with a focus on diagnostic challenges and defining features of rhupus. The databases of Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and DOAJ were searched for relevant articles using the following keywords: ("Rhupus"), ("lupus" AND "erosive" AND "arthritis"), and ("lupus" AND "rheumatoid arthritis" AND "overlap"). Studies have used a variety of classification criteria for rhupus of which a combination of the latest classification criteria for RA and lupus along with positive anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide, anti-Smith, and anti-dsDNA antibodies seem most relevant. The majority of rhupus cohorts report the onset of the disease as RA (two-thirds of rhupus patients) followed by the development of features of lupus at an average interval of 3-11.3 years. The radiographic features and distribution of erosions are similar to RA. However, ultrasonography and MRI reveal erosions in pure lupus related arthritis as well. This makes the reliability of radiologic tools for the evaluation of rhupus supportive at the most. Extra-articular features in rhupus are mild with major organ involvement in the form of neuropsychiatric lupus and lupus nephritis being rare. We have further discussed the fallacies of the various classification criteria and proposed a theme for classifying rhupus which needs to be tested and validated in future studies. Our current state of understanding supports rhupus as an overlap of SLE and RA with articular disease similar to RA with the extra-articular disease being milder than SLE. Developing standardized classification criteria for rhupus will help in the early diagnosis and prevention of articular damage in patients with rhupus.

Post-stroke rehabilitation in the peri-pandemic COVID-19 era.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which arose in late 2019, caused extensive destruction, impacting a substantial proportion of the worldwide population and leading to millions of deaths. Although COVID-19 is mainly linked to respiratory and pulmonary complications, it has the potential to affect neurologic structures as well. Neurological involvement may manifest as minimal and reversible; however, a notable proportion of cases have exhibited pronounced neurological consequences, such as strokes. Endothelial inflammation, hypercoagulation, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system alterations, and cardiogenic embolism are the pathophysiological mechanisms of stroke under COVID-19 circumstances. Physical activity and exercise have improved several aspects of post-stroke recovery, including cardiovascular health, walking capacity, and upper limb strength. They are commonly used to assist stroke survivors in overcoming their motor restrictions. Furthermore, stroke rehabilitation can incorporate a range of specific techniques, including body-weight-supported treadmill applications, constraint-induced movement therapy, robotic rehabilitation interventions, transcranial direct current stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and prism adaptation training. Under pandemic conditions, there were several barriers to neurological rehabilitation. The most significant of these were individual's fear of infection, which caused them to postpone their rehabilitation applications and rehabilitation areas being converted into COVID-19 units. The primary emphasis had turned to COVID-19 treatment. Several valuable data and views were gained in reorganizing rehabilitation during the pandemic, contributing to establishing future views in this regard.

Rehabilitation of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and comorbidities: unmet needs.

Comorbidities may contribute to inadequate response to therapy and accelerate disability in various rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Cardiovascular, oncological, and infectious comorbidities are common in rheumatic patients. The rehabilitation of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) with comorbidities requires a multidisciplinary approach to improving patients' functional mobility, slowing down the disease progression and minimizing the risks of complications. The evidence suggests that cardiac rehabilitation can be implemented in daily practice in patients with IRDs to reduce mortality for those with established risk factors. Physical exercises reduce the severity, improve the clinical course, and reduce hospitalization rates in patients with rheumatic diseases. A rehabilitation program with focused physical therapy can lead to functional improvements and reduction of disease activity in patients with lowered quality of life (QoL). Health professionals should provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with rheumatic diseases and comorbidities to initiate the self-management of their diseases and prevent complications.

Designing, Conducting, and Reporting Survey Studies: A Primer for Researchers.

Survey studies have become instrumental in contributing to the evidence accumulation in rapidly developing medical disciplines such as medical education, public health, and nursing. The global medical community has seen an upsurge of surveys covering the experience and perceptions of health specialists, patients, and public representatives in the peri-pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 period. Currently, surveys can play a central role in increasing research activities in non-mainstream science countries where limited research funding and other barriers hinder science growth. Planning surveys starts with overviewing related reviews and other publications which may help to design questionnaires with comprehensive coverage of all related points. The validity and reliability of questionnaires rely on input from experts and potential responders who may suggest pertinent revisions to prepare forms with attractive designs, easily understandable questions, and correctly ordered points that appeal to target respondents. Currently available numerous online platforms such as Google Forms and Survey Monkey enable moderating online surveys and collecting responses from a large number of responders. Online surveys benefit from disseminating questionnaires via social media and other online platforms which facilitate the survey internationalization and participation of large groups of responders. Survey reporting can be arranged in line with related recommendations and reporting standards all of which have their strengths and limitations. The current article overviews available recommendations and presents pointers on designing, conducting, and reporting surveys.

Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading.

The concept of research integrity (RI) refers to a set of moral and ethical standards that serve as the foundation for the execution of research activities. Integrity in research is the incorporation of principles of honesty, transparency, and respect for ethical standards and norms throughout all stages of the research endeavor, encompassing study design, data collecting, analysis, reporting, and publishing. The preservation of RI is of utmost importance to uphold the credibility and amplify the influence of scientific research while also preventing and dealing with instances of scientific misconduct. Researchers, institutions, journals, and readers share responsibilities for preserving RI. Researchers must adhere to the highest ethical standards. Institutions have a role in establishing an atmosphere that supports integrity ideals while also providing useful guidance, instruction, and assistance to researchers. Editors and reviewers act as protectors, upholding quality and ethical standards in the dissemination of research results through publishing. Readers play a key role in the detection and reporting of fraudulent activity by critically evaluating content. The struggle against scientific misconduct has multiple dimensions and is continuous. It requires a collaborative effort and adherence to the principles of honesty, transparency, and rigorous science. By supporting a culture of RI, the scientific community may preserve its core principles and continue to contribute appropriately to society's well-being. It not only aids present research but also lays the foundation for future scientific advancements.

Diabetes mellitus in rheumatic diseases: clinical characteristics and treatment considerations.

New pathophysiological insights are now available on comorbidities in rheumatic diseases (RDs). Several nationwide studies point to the fact that comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with various RDs. Genetic factors, intensity of systemic inflammation, anti-inflammatory potential of therapeutic agents, and duration of RDs have been insufficiently explored in the context of comorbidities. Some disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have demonstrated a potential to improve the glycemic control while glucocorticoids (GCs) have worsened it, particularly in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Anti-TNFalpha agents in combination with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have been associated with a reduced risk of DM in patients with RA, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Sjögren syndrome (SS), and SLE. Better understanding of confounding factor of currently available antirheumatic therapies in patients with DM and RDs will pave the way for a tailored approach, limiting the severity of clinical manifestations and reducing the mortality risk.

Revisiting articular syndrome in the peri-pandemic COVID-19 era.

Articular syndrome is often the presentation of a person's various rheumatic or related diseases. It includes both arthralgia and arthritis, with objective signs of joint inflammation defining the latter. This syndromic approach to joint pain enables a scientific method for early diagnosis of common rheumatic conditions without compromising the recognition of uncommon conditions. This review explores common rheumatic conditions associated with articular syndrome, including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It supports the early differentiation of uncommon but emerging entities such as reactive arthritis (ReA). The aim of the review is to comprehensively overview various forms of articular syndrome to update rheumatologists' and allied health specialists' knowledge. Epidemiology, clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic strategies are discussed in the context of articular syndrome. The challenges emerging in the peri-pandemic COVID-19 era are highlighted. The improved understanding of the spectrum of clinical conditions and disease states presenting with articular syndrome may facilitate early diagnosis, optimal management, and enhanced patient outcomes within the realm of rheumatology.

New-onset systemic vasculitis following SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination: the trigger, phenotype, and outcome.

The global health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed the capacity of healthcare systems to cope with the rapidly spreading infection and its associated complications. Among these complications, autoimmune phenomena such as systemic vasculitis emerged as a significant challenge. Both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the vaccines developed to combat it appeared to induce clinical manifestations resembling various types of systemic vasculitis, affecting large, medium, and small vessels. These virus- or vaccine-induced vasculitides exhibited a distinct natural history and course from de novo vasculitis, as they were more responsive to steroid therapy and some mild cases even resolved spontaneously. Notably, there have been no confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination triggering variable vessel vasculitis like Behcet's disease or Kawasaki disease. IgA vasculitis, which is predominantly a pediatric condition, was more prevalent in adults after COVID-19 infection and they had a favorable outcome with glucocorticoid treatment. The impact of immunosuppression, especially B-cell-depleting agents, on the immunogenicity of the vaccine was evident, but there was no significant increase in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in these patients compared to the general population. Considering their relatively benign course, these post-COVID or post-vaccine vasculitides seem to be amenable to 0.8 to 1 mg/kg prednisolone or equivalent, which could be gradually tapered. The need for immunosuppression and the duration of steroid therapy should be determined on an individual basis. While the world still reels from the perils of a deadly pandemic, the aftermath continues to haunt. Our narrative review aims to explore the effects of COVID and the vaccine on systemic vasculitis, as well as the effect of disease and immunosuppression on the immunogenicity of the COVID vaccine.

Cardiovascular issues in rheumatic diseases.

Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in rheumatic diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Timely detection and monitoring of cardiovascular affections by advanced visualization techniques may improve outcomes across most rheumatic diseases. Although high-grade inflammation and (auto)immune pathways are well known for their negative effects on the heart and vasculature, cardiovascular risk estimation remains one of the unresolved critical issues in rheumatic diseases. The issue is complicated further in view of the latest reports on enhanced atherogenesis in the setting of fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis, where inflammation is seemingly not a major pathogenic factor. The intensity of systemic inflammation has been associated with major vascular events in some large cohort studies of inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Experts advocate for tight control of systemic inflammation and modifiable cardiovascular risk factors for reducing the overall risk of vascular events. Increasing patients' and specialists' knowledge and skills in cardiovascular monitoring and prevention is warranted to solve some of the cardiovascular issues in rheumatic diseases. Key Points • Cardiovascular issues are prevalent across all age groups of patients with rheumatic diseases. • Large cohort studies suggest that the intensity of systemic inflammation is a powerful predictor of vascular events in rheumatic diseases. • Reliable and widely tested tools for predicting vascular events in inflammatory rheumatic diseases are currently unavailable. • Empowering patients with rheumatic diseases and first-contact specialists with knowledge and skills to monitor and reduce cardiovascular risk factors' effects is a promising strategy.