RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Best practices in psychosocial evaluation and care of living donor candidates and donors are not well established. METHODS: We surveyed 195 living kidney donor (LKD) transplant centers in United States from October 2021 to April 2022 querying (1) composition of psychosocial teams, (2) evaluation processes including clinical tools and domains assessed, (3) selection criteria, and (4) psychosocial follow-up post-donation. RESULTS: We received 161 responses from 104 programs, representing 53% of active LKD programs and 67% of LKD transplant volume in 2019. Most respondents (63%) were social workers/independent living donor advocates. Over 90% of respondents indicated donor candidates with known mental health or substance use disorders were initially evaluated by the psychosocial team. Validated psychometric or transplant-specific tools were rarely utilized but domains assessed were consistent. Active suicidality, self-harm, and psychosis were considered absolute contraindications in >90% of programs. Active depression was absolute contraindication in 50% of programs; active anxiety disorder was excluded 27%. Conditions not contraindicated to donation include those in remission: anxiety (56%), depression (53%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (41%). There was acceptance of donor candidates using alcohol, tobacco, or cannabis recreationally, but not if pattern met criteria for active use disorder. Seventy-one percent of programs conducted post-donation psychosocial assessment and use local resources to support donors. CONCLUSIONS: There was variation in acceptance of donor candidates with mental health or substance use disorders. Although most programs conducted psychosocial screening post-donation, support is not standardized and unclear if adequate. Future studies are needed for consensus building among transplant centers to form guidelines for donor evaluation, acceptance, and support.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Doadores Vivos , Humanos , Doadores Vivos/psicologia , Transplante de Rim/psicologia , Estados Unidos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Seleção do Doador , Saúde Mental , Nefrectomia/psicologia , Feminino , MasculinoRESUMO
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the mental health of individuals with chronic conditions such as Wilson's Disease (WD). This study investigates stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, cognitive function, vaccination rates, infection rates, and perceptions related to the pandemic and vaccines among WD patients. Methods: The study analyzed COVID-19 perceptions and vaccine attitudes of 62 adult WD patients enrolled in the international multisite WD Registry. A subgroup of 33 participants completed a series of mental health scales. The effect of working essentially, income loss, wellness activity initiation, and infection of COVID-19 during the pandemic was observed. Results: Results indicate that, overall, the pandemic did not exacerbate anxiety or cognitive function in WD patients but did lead to increased depression among essential workers. Patients experiencing income loss exhibited higher levels of stress and anxiety. Despite these challenges, WD patients showed high vaccination rates and positive attitudes towards vaccines. Discussion: The findings underscore the significant impact of the pandemic on the mental health of WD patients.
RESUMO
We surveyed living donor liver transplant programs in the United States to describe practices in the psychosocial evaluation of living donors focused on (1) composition of psychosocial team; (2) domains, workflow, and tools of the psychosocial assessment; (3) absolute and relative mental health-related contraindications to donation; and (4) postdonation psychosocial follow-up. We received 52 unique responses, representing 33 of 50 (66%) of active living donor liver transplant programs. Thirty-one (93.9%) provider teams included social workers, 22 (66.7%) psychiatrists, and 14 (42.4%) psychologists. Validated tools were rarely used, but domains assessed were consistent. Respondents rated active alcohol (93.8%), cocaine (96.8%), and opioid (96.8%) use disorder, as absolute contraindications to donation. Active suicidality (97%), self-injurious behavior (90.9%), eating disorders (87.9%), psychosis (84.8%), nonadherence (71.9%), and inability to cooperate with the evaluation team (78.1%) were absolute contraindications to donation. There were no statistically significant differences in absolute psychosocial contraindications to liver donation between geographical areas or between large and small programs. Programs conduct postdonation psychosocial follow-up (57.6%) or screening (39.4%), but routine follow-up of declined donors is rarely conducted (15.8%). Psychosocial evaluation of donor candidates is a multidisciplinary process. The structure of the psychosocial evaluation of donors is not uniform among programs though the domains assessed are consistent. Psychosocial contraindications to living liver donation vary among the transplant programs. Mental health follow-up of donor candidates is not standardized.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Transplante de Fígado , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Doadores Vivos/psicologia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Fígado/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , FígadoRESUMO
We present Academy of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry best practice guidance on depression in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, which resulted from the collaboration of Academy of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry's transplant psychiatry special interest group and Guidelines and Evidence-Based Medicine Subcommittee. Depression (which in the transplant setting may designate depressive symptoms or depressive disorders) is a frequent problem among SOT recipients. Following a structured literature review and consensus process, the Academy of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry transplant psychiatry special interest group proposes recommendations for practice: all organ transplant recipients should be screened routinely for depression. When applicable, positive screening should prompt communication with the mental health treating provider or a clinical evaluation. If the evaluation leads to a diagnosis of depressive disorder, treatment should be recommended and offered. The recommendation for psychotherapy should consider the physical and cognitive ability of the patient to maximize benefit. The first-line antidepressants of choice are escitalopram, sertraline, and mirtazapine. Treating depressive disorders prior to transplantation is recommended to prevent posttransplant depression. Future research should address the mechanism by which transplant patients develop depressive disorders, the efficacy and feasibility of treatment interventions (both pharmacological and psychotherapeutic, in person and via telemedicine), and the resources available to transplant patients for mental health care.
Assuntos
Depressão , Transplante de Órgãos , Humanos , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/terapia , Saúde Mental , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Psicoterapia/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Psychiatric symptoms are frequently reported in Wilson disease (WD); however, systematic assessments with validated measures are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We aim to report the prevalence and clinical correlates for major depressive disorder (MDD) as resulting from a multisite international WD registry. METHODS: All patients enrolled in the WD registry received structured psychiatric evaluations (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale, Perceived Stress Scale), laboratory tests, hepatology, and neurological assessments. We present the analysis of the data collected at enrollment for the first 3 years (N = 62). RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent (23) had a lifetime history (MDD), and 6% (4) met the criteria for an active major depressive episode. Depression was self-reported in 30.51% (19) at WD diagnosis. Patients with MDD had worse mental health quality-of-life (QOL) scores (median 43 vs 53.6, P = 0.006), higher severe anxiety (13.04% vs 0), higher perceived stress (median 18 vs 9, P < 0.003), and higher levels of neuroticism (median 8 vs 5.0, P = 0.002). We found no significant difference in physical health QOL and severity of neurological or liver disease. There was no significant difference in copper parameters or liver tests in those with MDD and without. The limitations of our study consist of the small sample size, the cross-sectional report, and the lack of brain copper measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime MDD is highly prevalent in WD and associated with worse mental health QOL. We did not find a significant association among liver disease, neurological disease laboratory tests, and MDD. Screening for depression should be considered in patients with WD.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Degeneração Hepatolenticular , Humanos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Degeneração Hepatolenticular/epidemiologia , Degeneração Hepatolenticular/complicações , CobreRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review and summarize the literature published between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2022, on the prevalence, risk factors and impact of depression in transplant population. RECENT FINDINGS: Depression is common in transplantation candidates and recipients, with a prevalence up to 85.8% in kidney recipients. Multiple studies have indicated after transplantation depression correlates with increased mortality and with higher healthcare utilization. Social risk factors for posttransplant depression include financial difficulties and unemployment, while less is understood about the biological substrate of depression in this population. There is evidence that dynamic psychotherapy is effective for depression in organ transplant recipients, while cognitive behavioral therapy or supportive therapy did not lead to improvement of depression in transplant recipients. For living organ donors, the rates of depression are similar to the general population, with financial factors and the clinical status of the recipient playing a significant role. SUMMARY: Depression is a common finding in transplant population. More research is needed to understand the biological substrate and risk factors and to develop effective treatment interventions.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Transplante de Órgãos , Humanos , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Transplantados , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/psicologia , Doadores VivosRESUMO
Transplant patients are frequently treated with substances that have dependence potential and/or they may have a history of substance use disorders. The Psychosocial and Ethics Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation formed a Drug Testing Workgroup with participation from members of the Pharmacy Community of Practice and members of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. The workgroup reviewed the literature regarding the following issues: the role of drug testing in patients with substance use disorders, for patients prescribed controlled substances, legal, ethical and prescription drug monitoring issues, financial and insurance issues, and which patients should be tested. We also reviewed current laboratory testing for substances. Group discussions to develop a consensus occurred, and summaries of each topic were reviewed. The workgroup recommends that transplant patients be informed of drug testing and be screened for substances prior to transplant to ensure optimal care and implement ongoing testing if warranted by clinical history. While use of certain substances may not result in the exclusion for transplantation, an awareness of the patient's practices and possible risk from substances is necessary, allowing transplant teams to screen for substance use disorders and ensure the patient is able to manage and minimize risks post-transplant.
Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Consenso , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Estados UnidosRESUMO
There is a lack of guidelines for preoperative management of psychiatric medications leading to variation in care and the potential for perioperative complications and surgical procedure cancellations on the day of surgery. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement identified preoperative psychiatric medication management as an area in which consensus could improve patient care. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide recommendations to clinicians regarding preoperative psychiatric medication management. Several categories of drugs were identified including antidepressants, mood stabilizers, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medications. Literature searches and review of primary and secondary data sources were performed for each medication/medication class. We used a modified Delphi process to develop consensus recommendations for preoperative management of individual medications in each of these drug categories. While most medications should be continued perioperatively to avoid risk of relapse of the psychiatric condition, adjustments may need to be made on a case-by-case basis for certain drugs.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Sociedades Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiologia/normas , Consenso , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Wilson disease (WD) is a chronic disorder of copper metabolism which may affect patient's quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the relationship between mental QOL (M-QOL) and physical QOL (P-QOL) and severity of the liver, neurological disease and mental health in patients with WD. METHODS: At enrollment into our multisite international WD registry, adults (n = 62) were administered examinations assessing QOL (Short-Form 12-Item Health Survey), cognition, and mood. Patients also underwent hepatology and neurological assessments. RESULTS: Patients had lower M-QOL than P-QOL scores, P = 0.0006. Patients with major depressive disorder (n = 22) had worse M-QOL scores, P = 0.0017 but not P-QOL. We found no association with impaired cognition (n = 37) and QOL. The P-QOL scores have a moderate negative association with neurological disease severity based on the Unified Wilson Disease Rating Scale score (total [r = -0.38, P < 0.003], part 2 [r = -0.50, P < 0.0001], and part 3 [r = -0.37, P = 0.004]). M-QOL was not associated with Unified Wilson Disease Rating Scale scores. Worse P-QOL, but not M-QOL, was found in higher cirrhosis severity indicated by Child-Pugh (r = -0.80, P = 0.002) and Model for End Stage Liver Disease scores (r = -0.64, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: M-QOL was associated with depression but not cognitive impairment, neurological disease, or liver disease severity, suggesting that mental health issues may affect overall QOL independent of the degree of liver or neurological disease. P-QOL was affected by the severity of neurological and liver disease but not mental health but also contributes to overall QOL in WD. An appreciation of the range of problems that affect QOL in adults with WD will help health care providers address issues that could improve overall well-being. The Short-Form 12-Item Health Survey may provide a useful instrument for QOL surveillance in WD.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Doença Hepática Terminal , Degeneração Hepatolenticular , Humanos , Saúde Mental , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: As the science of consultation-liaison psychiatry advances, the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry's Guidelines and Evidence-Based Medicine Subcommittee reviews articles of interest to help academy members remain familiar with the latest in evidence-based practice. OBJECTIVE: We identify the 10 most important articles for clinical practice in consultation-liaison psychiatry from 2020 using the new Importance and Quality instrument for assessing scientific literature. METHODS: The subcommittee published annotated abstracts for 97 articles on the academy website in 2020. Reviewers then rated all articles on clinical importance to practice and quality of scholarship using the Importance and Quality instrument. We describe the 10 articles with the highest aggregate scores and analyze the reliability of Importance and Quality instrument. RESULTS: Twenty-four raters identified the top 10 scoring articles of 2020. These articles provide practical guidance on key areas of consultation-liaison psychiatry including management of COVID-19, lithium treatment for complex patients, medical risks among patients with severe mental illness, and substance use disorders in medical settings. The assessment instrument demonstrated good to excellent interrater reliability. CONCLUSION: These articles offer valuable guidance for consultation-liaison psychiatrists regardless of their practice area. Collaborative literature reviews with standardized assessments help clinicians deliver evidence-based care and foster a high standard of practice across the specialty.
Assuntos
Psiquiatria , Encaminhamento e Consulta , COVID-19/psicologia , Cannabis/efeitos adversos , Delírio/classificação , Encefalite , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Compostos de Lítio/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Lítio/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Transtornos Mentais/mortalidade , Atenção Plena , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/psicologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: As mental health services in outpatient medical clinics expand, psychiatrists must be trained to practice in these settings. OBJECTIVES: The Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry residency education subcommittee convened a writing group with the goal of summarizing the current evidence about outpatient consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) training and providing a framework for CLP educators who are interested in developing outpatient CLP rotations within their programs. METHOD: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, and PsycINFO (via OVID) were reviewed each from inception to December 2019, for psychiatric CLP services in ambulatory settings that involved residents or fellows. The CLP education guidelines were reviewed for recommendations relevant to outpatient CLP. We also searched MedEd portal for published curriculums relevant to CLP. The group held 2 conferences to reach consensus about recommendations in setting up outpatient CLP rotations. RESULTS: Seventeen articles, 3 Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry-supported guidelines, and 8 online didactic resources were identified as directly reporting on the organization and/or impact of an outpatient CLP rotation. These manuscripts indicated that residents found outpatient CLP rotations effective and relevant to their future careers. However, the literature provided few recommendations for establishing formal outpatient CLP training experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient CLP rotations offer multiple benefits for trainees, including exposure to specific clinical scenarios and therapeutic interventions applicable only in the outpatient setting, increased continuity of care, and the unique experience of providing liaison and education to non-mental health providers. The article outlines recommendations and examples for developing outpatient CLP rotations which CLP educators can incorporate in their programs.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Internato e Residência/normas , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Psiquiatria/educação , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Currículo/normas , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Educação Médica , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The scientific literature in consultation-liaison psychiatry continually expands, and remaining familiar with the most current literature is challenging for practicing clinicians. The Guidelines and Evidence-Based Medicine Subcommittee of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry writes quarterly annotations of articles of interest to help Academy members gain familiarity with the most current evidence-based practices. These annotations are available on the Academy Website. OBJECTIVE: We identify the 10 most important manuscripts for clinical practice in consultation-liaison psychiatry from 2019. METHODS: Sixty-four abstracts were authored in 2019. Manuscripts were rated on clinical relevance to practice and quality of scholarship. The 10 articles with the highest aggregate scores from 19 raters are described. RESULTS: The resulting articles provide practical guidance for consultation psychiatrists on several topic areas including the treatment of substance use disorders. CONCLUSION: We suggest that these clinical findings should be familiar to all consultation-liaison psychiatrists regardless of practice area. Regular article reviews and summaries help busy clinicians deliver cutting-edge care and maintain a high standard of care across the specialty.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Psiquiatria/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transplant psychiatry is a subspecialty of consultation-liaison psychiatry that focused on evaluation, treatment, and research of mental health problems in organ transplant recipients and organ donors. To date, there is no literature about training programs that would ensure psychiatrists acquire the necessary knowledge and skills required to meet the clinical needs of these patients. OBJECTIVES: The author describes the implementation of an online curriculum in transplant psychiatry created at the request of physicians located outside the United States. METHOD: A 3-session online interactive course focused on knowledge relevant to transplant psychiatry was held in the fall of 2018. While the instructor was based in the United States, all attendees were located in Pakistan. The impact of the course was evaluated via precourse and postcourse surveys assessing knowledge level, interest in transplant psychiatry, and level of comfort with transplant psychiatry evaluations in the pretransplantation and posttransplantation settings. RESULTS: Nine participants attended at least one of the 3 sessions, and 6 attended all 3 sessions. There were no significant events regarding the implementation of the curriculum. The response rate to the questionnaire was 100% before the course and 88.8% after the course. Precourse and postcourse tests indicated the curriculum had a positive impact on the level of knowledge and level of confidence in addressing problems relevant to transplant psychiatry. CONCLUSIONS: Online curriculum for highly specialized areas of psychiatry is feasible and can have a positive impact on knowledge levels and confidence in addressing clinical challenges.
Assuntos
Currículo , Educação a Distância/métodos , Psiquiatria/educação , Doadores de Tecidos/psicologia , Transplante/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Paquistão , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Body image (BI) concerns have been reported to play a significant role in the psychological adaptation after organ transplantation. There is a paucity of data about BI beliefs in liver transplant recipients. We report the results of a cross-sectional study of 177 liver transplant recipients for whom we assessed BI, anxiety, depression, and quality of life (QOL) using validated instruments. Our results indicate that higher BI concerns correlated with higher levels of anxiety and depression. BI concerns were more elevated in females, younger patients, and patients with a lower income. Patients with chronic liver disease had more BI concerns than patients who received liver transplantation for acute liver failure. Specific BI concerns also correlated independently with QOL scores. We conclude that BI concerns are significant in liver transplant recipients and should be evaluated by clinicians involved in the mental health care of this population.
Assuntos
Transtornos Dismórficos Corporais/epidemiologia , Imagem Corporal/psicologia , Transplante de Fígado/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Transplantados/psicologia , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Transtornos Dismórficos Corporais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Dismórficos Corporais/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Progesterona/análogos & derivados , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Transplantados/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The psychosocial evaluation is well-recognized as an important component of the multifaceted assessment process to determine candidacy for heart transplantation, lung transplantation, and long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS). However, there is no consensus-based set of recommendations for either the full range of psychosocial domains to be assessed during the evaluation, or the set of processes and procedures to be used to conduct the evaluation, report its findings, and monitor patients' receipt of and response to interventions for any problems identified. This document provides recommendations on both evaluation content and process. It represents a collaborative effort of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) and the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine, American Society of Transplantation, International Consortium of Circulatory Assist Clinicians, and Society for Transplant Social Workers. The Nursing, Health Science and Allied Health Council of the ISHLT organized a Writing Committee composed of international experts representing the ISHLT and the collaborating societies. This Committee synthesized expert opinion and conducted a comprehensive literature review to support the psychosocial evaluation content and process recommendations that were developed. The recommendations are intended to dovetail with current ISHLT guidelines and consensus statements for the selection of candidates for cardiothoracic transplantation and MCS implantation. Moreover, the recommendations are designed to promote consistency across programs in the performance of the psychosocial evaluation by proposing a core set of content domains and processes that can be expanded as needed to meet programs' unique needs and goals.
Assuntos
Transplante de Coração/métodos , Coração Auxiliar , Transplante de Pulmão/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Transplante de Coração/psicologia , Transplante de Coração/normas , Coração Auxiliar/psicologia , Humanos , Transplante de Pulmão/psicologia , Transplante de Pulmão/normas , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Implantação de Prótese/psicologia , Implantação de Prótese/normasRESUMO
The psychosocial evaluation is well-recognized as an important component of the multifaceted assessment process to determine candidacy for heart transplantation, lung transplantation, and long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS). However, there is no consensus-based set of recommendations for either the full range of psychosocial domains to be assessed during the evaluation, or the set of processes and procedures to be used to conduct the evaluation, report its findings, and monitor patients' receipt of and response to interventions for any problems identified. This document provides recommendations on both evaluation content and process. It represents a collaborative effort of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) and the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine, American Society of Transplantation, International Consortium of Circulatory Assist Clinicians, and Society for Transplant Social Workers. The Nursing, Health Science and Allied Health Council of the ISHLT organized a Writing Committee composed of international experts representing the ISHLT and the collaborating societies. This Committee synthesized expert opinion and conducted a comprehensive literature review to support the psychosocial evaluation content and process recommendations that were developed. The recommendations are intended to dovetail with current ISHLT guidelines and consensus statements for the selection of candidates for cardiothoracic transplantation and MCS implantation. Moreover, the recommendations are designed to promote consistency across programs in the performance of the psychosocial evaluation by proposing a core set of content domains and processes that can be expanded as needed to meet programs' unique needs and goals.
Assuntos
Transplante de Coração/psicologia , Coração Auxiliar/psicologia , Transplante de Pulmão/psicologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , Testes Psicológicos/normas , Adulto , Humanos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Wilson's disease (WD) is a relatively rare autosomal recessive inherited disorder causing copper accumulation in different organs, mainly the liver and brain. Psychiatric disturbances represent a diagnostic and therapeutic issue in WD. A search for relevant articles was carried out on PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar, for papers focused on psychiatric disorders in WD published between 1985-2016. Ninety-two articles were included in this review, showing the findings from 35 observational and case-control studies and 57 case reports. This study discussed the findings on the prevalence of psychiatric symptoms in WD, their impact on the life of those diagnosed, and the efficacy of available treatments on the psychiatric outcomes of WD. Psychiatric disorders are confirmed frequent in WD, with a high prevalence of mood disorders, and contribute to worse Quality-of-Life and psychosocial outcomes. Because specific therapies for WD lead to a good life expectancy, adherence to medicaments and clinical monitoring should be warranted by a multidisciplinary approach, including a hepathologic, neurologic, and psychiatric careful evaluation and education of those affected and their relatives.