Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 31(29): 3681-7, 2013 Oct 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24002496

RESUMO

PURPOSE: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are associated with early relapse and poor survival. Quizartinib potently and selectively inhibits FLT3 kinase activity in preclinical AML models. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Quizartinib was administered orally at escalating doses of 12 to 450 mg/day to 76 patients (median age, 60 years; range, 23 to 86 years; with a median of three prior therapies [range, 0 to 12 therapies]), enrolled irrespective of FLT3-ITD mutation status in a phase I, first-in-human study in relapsed or refractory AML. RESULTS: Responses occurred in 23 (30%) of 76 patients, including 10 (13%) complete remissions (CR) of any type (two CRs, three CRs with incomplete platelet recovery [CRp], five CRs with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) and 13 (17%) with partial remissions (PRs). Of 17 FLT3-ITD-positive patients, nine responded (53%; one CR, one CRp, two CRis, five PRs); of 37 FLT3-ITD-negative patients, five responded (14%; two CRps, three PRs); of 22 with FLT3-ITD-indeterminate/not tested status, nine responded (41%; one CR, three CRis, five PRs). Median duration of response was 13.3 weeks; median survival was 14.0 weeks. The most common drug-related adverse events (> 10% incidence) were nausea (16%), prolonged QT interval (12%), vomiting (11%), and dysgeusia (11%); most were ≤ grade 2. The maximum-tolerated dose was 200 mg/day, and the dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 QT prolongation. FLT3-ITD phosphorylation was completely inhibited in an in vitro plasma inhibitory assay. CONCLUSION: Quizartinib has clinical activity in patients with relapsed/refractory AML, particularly those with FLT3-ITD, and is associated with an acceptable toxicity profile.


Assuntos
Benzotiazóis/uso terapêutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Sequências de Repetição em Tandem , Tirosina Quinase 3 Semelhante a fms/antagonistas & inibidores , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Benzotiazóis/efeitos adversos , Eletrocardiografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Tirosina Quinase 3 Semelhante a fms/genética
2.
N Engl J Med ; 366(19): 1759-69, 2012 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22571200

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide has tumoricidal and immunomodulatory activity against multiple myeloma. This double-blind, multicenter, randomized study compared melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide induction followed by lenalidomide maintenance (MPR-R) with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) or melphalan-prednisone (MP) followed by placebo in patients 65 years of age or older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients who were ineligible for transplantation to receive MPR-R (nine 4-week cycles of MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy until a relapse or disease progression occurred [152 patients]) or to receive MPR (153 patients) or MP (154 patients) without maintenance therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 30 months. The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with MPR-R (31 months) than with MPR (14 months; hazard ratio, 0.49; P<0.001) or MP (13 months; hazard ratio, 0.40; P<0.001). Response rates were superior with MPR-R and MPR (77% and 68%, respectively, vs. 50% with MP; P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively, for the comparison with MP). The progression-free survival benefit associated with MPR-R was noted in patients 65 to 75 years of age but not in those older than 75 years of age (P=0.001 for treatment-by-age interaction). After induction therapy, a landmark analysis showed a 66% reduction in the rate of progression with MPR-R (hazard ratio for the comparison with MPR, 0.34; P<0.001) that was age-independent. During induction therapy, the most frequent adverse events were hematologic; grade 4 neutropenia was reported in 35%, 32%, and 8% of the patients in the MPR-R, MPR, and MP groups, respectively. The 3-year rate of second primary tumors was 7% with MPR-R, 7% with MPR, and 3% with MP. CONCLUSIONS: MPR-R significantly prolonged progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for transplantation, with the greatest benefit observed in patients 65 to 75 years of age. (Funded by Celgene; MM-015 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00405756.).


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Administração Oral , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Lenalidomida , Quimioterapia de Manutenção , Masculino , Melfalan/efeitos adversos , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/epidemiologia , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Prednisona/efeitos adversos , Talidomida/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA