Implementation of the WHO core components of an infection prevention and control programme in two sub-saharan African acute health-care facilities: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic again highlighted the need for robust health care facility infection prevention and control (IPC) programmes. WHO guidelines on the core components (CCs) of IPC programmes provides guidance for facilities, but their implementation can be difficult to achieve in resource-limited settings. We aimed to gather evidence on an initial WHO IPC implementation experience using a mixed methods approach. METHODS: A five-day training on the WHO IPC CCs was conducted at two reference acute health care facilities in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Burkina Faso. This was accompanied by a three-part mixed-methods evaluation consisting of a: (1) baseline and follow-up survey of participants' knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP), (2) qualitative assessment of plenary discussion transcripts and (3) deployment of the WHO IPC assessment framework (IPCAF) tool. Results were analysed descriptively and with a qualitative inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Twenty-two and twenty-four participants were trained at each facility, respectively. Baseline and follow-up KAP results suggested increases in knowledge related to the necessity of a dedicated IPC focal person and annual evaluations of IPC training although lack of recognition on the importance of including hospital leadership in IPC training and hand hygiene monitoring recommendations remained. Most participants reported rarely attending IPC meetings or participating in IPC action planning although attitudes shifted towards stronger agreement with the feeling of IPC responsibility and importance of an IPC team. A reocurring theme in plenary discussions was related to limited resources as a barrier to IPC implementation, namely lack of reliable water access. However, participants recognised the importance of IPC improvement efforts such as practical IPC training methods or the use of data to improve quality of care. The facilities' IPCAF scores reflected a 'basic/intermediate' IPC implementation level. CONCLUSIONS: The training and mixed methods evaluation revealed initial IPC implementation experiences that could be used to inform stepwise approaches to facility IPC improvement in resource-limited settings. Implementation strategies should consider both global standards such as the WHO IPC CCs and specific local contexts. The early involvement of all relevant stakeholders and parallel efforts to advocate for sufficient resources and health system infrastructure are critical.

[Evaluation of the Practice of Caesarean Section According to Robson's Classification in a Health District of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso]. / Évaluation de la pratique de la césarienne selon la classification de Robson dans un district sanitaire de Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

The control of the caesarean rate is nowadays an important concern for the obstetric world, the priority being to make every effort to practice a caesarean in all the women who need it only instead of reaching a specific rate. The purpose of the present study was to apply the Robson classification to the evaluation of the practice of caesarean section at the maternity of the Bogodogo District Hospital. It turned to be an analytical cross-sectional study which was carried out from January 1st, 2013 till December 31st, 2015. The information sources used included the computer base of caesarean sections, the delivery records, the operating room records, the delivery hall and the monthly activity reports. The overall hospital frequency of caesarean section was 33.3%. The rate of caesarean section expected during the same period according to the C-Model was 9.7%. Patients in groups 5 (with a scar uterus) and 6 (nulliparous with siege presentation) of the Robson classification had all a caesarean section and contributed to the overall rate of caesarean for 30 and 8.6% respectively. Low-risk women (groups 1, 2, 3 and 4) had a relative contribution of 31.3% to the overall rate of caesarean section. Improvement of the antenatal assessment of the prognosis of childbirth, particularly in the case of uterine scar or siege presentation, improvement of the quality of the supervision of the delivery work and the fight against prematurity will help to control the rate of caesarean section at the Bogodogo District Hospital.

Le contrôle du taux de césariennes est, de nos jours, une préoccupation importante pour le monde obstétrical, la priorité étant de tout mettre en œuvre pour pratiquer une césarienne chez toutes les femmes qui en ont besoin plutôt que d'atteindre un taux spécifique. La présente étude a pour objectif d'appliquer la classification de Robson à l'évaluation de la pratique de la césarienne à la maternité de l'hôpital de district de Bogodogo. Il s'agit d'une étude transversale descriptive sur une période de trois ans, du 1er janvier 2013 au 31 décembre 2015. La base informatique des dossiers de césarienne, les dossiers d'accouchement, les registres du bloc opératoire, de la salle d'accouchement et les rapports mensuels d'activités étaient les sources d'information utilisées. La fréquence hospitalière globale de césarienne était de 33,3 %. Le taux de césarienne attendu durant la même période selon le C-Model était de 9,7 %. Les patientes des groupes 5 (avec un utérus cicatriciel) et 6 (nullipares avec présentation de siège) de la classification de Robson ont toutes bénéficié d'une césarienne et ont contribué au taux global de césarienne pour respectivement 30 % et 8,6 %. La contribution relative cumulée au taux global de césarienne des groupes 1, 2, 3 et 4 (femmes à bas risque de césarienne) était de 31,3 %. L'amélioration de l'évaluation anténatale du pronostic de l'accouchement, notamment en cas de cicatrice utérine ou de présentation de siège, l'amélioration de la qualité de la surveillance du travail d'accouchement et la lutte contre la prématurité contribueront à maitriser le taux de césarienne à l'hôpital de district de Bogodogo.

The impact of incident depression on medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Depression has been correlated with suboptimal adherence to antidiabetic drugs (ADs). Most studies on this topic were cross-sectional; thus, the directionality of this relationship could not be established. The objective of this study was to measure the association between incident depression and AD nonadherence among newly treated patients with diabetes. METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study among new AD users using the Quebec public health insurance data. To avoid immortal time bias, we carried out depression diagnosis-time distribution matching by assigning a date of depression diagnosis to individuals without depression. Nonadherence (i.e.,<90% of days covered by≥1 AD) during the year following depression diagnosis (real or assigned date) was the outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analyses that adjusted for baseline adherence and other confounders were used to estimate the adjusted effect of depression on AD nonadherence. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2006, we identified 3,106 new AD users with a subsequent diagnosis of depression and 70,633 without depression, of which 52% and 49% became non-adherent to AD treatment, respectively. Among patients with depression, 52.0% were considered AD non-adherent in the year after depression diagnosis compared with 49.0% of matched patients without depression. Depression was associated with AD nonadherence after accounting for baseline adherence and other confounders with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.24 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.37). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that depression is an independent risk factor for AD nonadherence. Patients with type 2 diabetes and depression might benefit from adherence-enhancing interventions.

A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): a multicountry cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To generate a global reference for caesarean section (CS) rates at health facilities. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Health facilities from 43 countries. POPULATION/SAMPLE: Thirty eight thousand three hundred and twenty-four women giving birth from 22 countries for model building and 10,045,875 women giving birth from 43 countries for model testing. METHODS: We hypothesised that mathematical models could determine the relationship between clinical-obstetric characteristics and CS. These models generated probabilities of CS that could be compared with the observed CS rates. We devised a three-step approach to generate the global benchmark of CS rates at health facilities: creation of a multi-country reference population, building mathematical models, and testing these models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the ROC curves, diagnostic odds ratio, expected CS rate, observed CS rate. RESULTS: According to the different versions of the model, areas under the ROC curves suggested a good discriminatory capacity of C-Model, with summary estimates ranging from 0.832 to 0.844. The C-Model was able to generate expected CS rates adjusted for the case-mix of the obstetric population. We have also prepared an e-calculator to facilitate use of C-Model (www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/c-model/en/). CONCLUSIONS: This article describes the development of a global reference for CS rates. Based on maternal characteristics, this tool was able to generate an individualised expected CS rate for health facilities or groups of health facilities. With C-Model, obstetric teams, health system managers, health facilities, health insurance companies, and governments can produce a customised reference CS rate for assessing use (and overuse) of CS. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The C-Model provides a customized benchmark for caesarean section rates in health facilities and systems.

[Obstetric care in Mali: effect of organization on in-hospital maternal mortality]. / Effet de l'organisation des services de gynéco-obstétrique sur la mortalité maternelle hospitalière au Mali.

BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality is still too high in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in referral hospitals. Solutions exist but their implementation is a great issue in the poor-resources settings. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of the organization of obstetric care services on maternal mortality in referral hospitals in Mali. METHODS: This is a multicentric observational survey in 22 referral hospitals. Clinical data on 42,929 women delivering in the 22 hospitals within the 2007 to 2008 study period were collected. Organization evaluation was based on explicit criteria defined by an expert committee. The effect of the organization on in-hospital mortality adjusted on individual and institutional characteristics was estimated using multi-level logistic regression models. RESULTS: The results show that an optimal organization of obstetric care services based on eight explicit criteria reduced in-hospital maternal mortality by 41% compared with women delivering in a referral hospital with sub-optimal organization defined as non-compliance with at least one of the eight criteria (ORa=0.59; 95% CI=0.34-0.92). Furthermore, local policies that improved financial access to emergency obstetric care had a significant impact on maternal outcome. CONCLUSION: Criteria for optimal organization include the management of labor and childbirth by qualified personnel, an organization of human resources that allows timely management of obstetric emergencies, routine use of partography for all patients and availability of guidelines for the management of complications. These conditions could be easily implemented in the context of Mali to reduce in-hospital maternal mortality.