Effectiveness of early heparin therapy on outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy.

Background: This study aimed to investigate whether early unfractionated heparin (UFH) administration provides a survival advantage for patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC). Methods: Patients hospitalized with sepsis-induced coagulopathy from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database were identified. Patients were divided into two groups, who received unfractionated heparin (UFH) subcutaneously within 24 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and the control group, who received not. The primary endpoint was intensive care unit mortality, the secondary outcomes were 7, 14, and 28-day and hospital mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) the marginal structural Cox model (MSCM) and E-value analysis were used to account for baseline differences, time-varying and unmeasured confounding factors. Results: A total of 3,377 patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy were enrolled in the study, of which 815 in unfractionated heparin group and 2,562 in control group. There was significant effect on primary and secondary outcomes with unfractionated heparin after propensity score matching (intensive care unit mortality, hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.92; 7-day, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-0.99; 14-day, HR 0.68.95% CI 0.50-0.92; 28-day, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.96; hospital mortality, HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.96), marginal structural Cox model manifested unfractionated heparin associated with decreased intensive care unit mortality in all populations (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.84), and stratification with the marginal structural Cox model indicated analysis further indicated the survival advantage only among patients with an sepsis-induced coagulopathy score of 4 (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.81). Further analysis showed that treatment with 6,250-13750 IU/day of unfractionated heparin associated with a decreased risk of intensive care unit mortality. Similar results were replicated in subgroup analysis with propensity score matching only for patients with an sepsis-induced coagulopathy score of 4 (intensive care unit mortality, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.76). Conclusion: This study found early unfractionated heparin therapy to patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Subgroup analysis further demonstrates heparin therapy decreased intensive care unit mortality primarily in patients only with SIC score of 4.

Impact of early empirical antifungal therapy on prognosis of sepsis patients with positive yeast culture: A retrospective study from the MIMIC-IV database.

Background: Mortality and other clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive among patients with fungal sepsis have not been documented, and whether antifungal therapy prior to fungal culture reports is related to decreased mortality among patients remains largely controversial. This study aimed to determine the mortality and other clinical outcomes of patients with positive yeast cultures and further investigate the effects of initial empiric antifungal therapy. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among septic patients using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. Patients with sepsis were divided into two groups based on first fungal culture status during intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and initial empirical antifungal therapy was prescribed based on physician's experience prior to fungal culture reports within 48 h. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality, 60-day all-cause mortality, length of ICU stay and length of hospital stay. Multivariate logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM), subgroup analyses and survival curve analyses were performed. Results: This study included 18,496 sepsis patients, of whom 3,477 (18.8%) had positive yeast cultures. Patients with positive yeast cultures had higher in-hospital all-cause mortality, 60-day all-cause mortality, and longer lengths of ICU stay and hospital stay than those with negative yeast cultures after PSM (all p < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that positive yeast culture was a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in the extended model. Subgroup analyses showed that the results were robust among the respiratory infection, urinary tract infection, gram-positive bacterial infection and bacteria-free culture subgroups. Interestingly, empiric antifungal therapy was not associated with lower in-hospital mortality among patients with positive yeast cultures, mainly manifested in stratification analysis, which showed that antifungal treatment did not improve outcomes in the bloodstream infection (odds ratio, OR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.16-3.91, p = 0.015) or urinary tract infection groups (OR 3.24, 95% CI: 1.48-7.11, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Culture positivity for yeast among sepsis patients was associated with worse clinical outcomes, and empiric antifungal therapy did not lower in-hospital all-cause mortality in the bloodstream infection or urinary tract infection groups in the ICU.

Early prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin alleviates mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: a retrospective analysis from the MIMIC-IV database.

Background: Minimal data exist on anticoagulation use and timing and the dose of heparin in patients with sepsis, and whether heparin use improves sepsis survival remains largely unclear. This study was performed to assess whether heparin administration would provide a survival advantage in critically ill patients with sepsis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with sepsis in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database was conducted. Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to evaluate the outcomes of prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin administered by subcutaneous injection within 48 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 60-day mortality, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) on day 7. E-Value analysis were used for unmeasured confounding. Results: A total of 6646 adult septic patients were included and divided into an early prophylactic heparin group (n = 3211) and a nonheparin group (n = 3435). In-hospital mortality in the heparin therapy group was significantly lower than that in the nonheparin group (prematched 14.7 vs 20.0%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.68-0.87], p < 0.001, and postmatched 14.9 vs 18.3%, HR 0.78, 95% CI [0.68-0.89], p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints, including 60-day mortality and length of ICU stay, differed between the heparin and nonheparin groups (p < 0.01). Early prophylactic heparin administration was associated with in-hospital mortality among septic patients in different adjusted covariates (HR 0.71-0.78, p < 0.001), and only administration of five doses of heparin was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality after PSM (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.87, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that heparin use was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy, septic shock, sequential organ failure assessment score ≥ 10, AKI, mechanical ventilation, gram-positive bacterial infection and gram-negative bacterial infection, with HRs of 0.74, 0.70, 0.58, 0.74, 0.73, 0.64 and 0.72, respectively (p <0.001). E-Value analysis suggested robustness to unmeasured confounding. Conclusions: This study found an association between early administration prophylactic heparin provided to patients with sepsis and reduced risk-adjusted mortality. A prospective randomized-controlled study should be designed to further assess the relevant findings.

Early Combination of Albumin With Crystalloid Administration Might Reduce Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: An Over 10-Year Intensive Care Survey.

Background: In updated international guidelines, combined albumin resuscitation is recommended for septic shock patients who receive large volumes of crystalloids, but minimal data exist on albumin use and the optimal timing in those with cardiogenic shock (CS). The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between resuscitation with a combination of albumin within 24 h and 30-day mortality in CS patients. Methods: We screened patients with CS from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score matching (PSM) were employed to explore associations between combined albumin resuscitation within 24 h and 30-day mortality in CS. Models adjusted for CS considered potential confounders. E-value analysis suggested for unmeasured confounding. Results: We categorized 1,332 and 254 patients into crystalloid-only and early albumin combination groups, respectively. Patients who received the albumin combination had decreased 30-day and 60-day mortality (21.7 vs. 32.4% and 25.2 vs. 34.2%, respectively, P < 0.001), and the results were robust after PSM (21.3 vs. 44.7% and 24.9 vs. 47.0%, respectively, P < 0.001) and following E-value. Stratified analysis showed that only ≥ 60 years old patients benefited from administration early albumin. In the early albumin combination group, the hazard ratios (HRs) of different adjusted covariates remained significant (HRs of 0.45-0.64, P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that resuscitation with combination albumin was significantly associated with reduced 30-day mortality in patients with maximum sequential organ failure assessment score≥10, with acute myocardial infarction, without an Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump, and with or without furosemide and mechanical ventilation (HRs of 0.49, 0.58, 0.65, 0.40, 0.65 and 0.48, respectively; P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study found, compared with those given crystalloid-only, resuscitation with combination albumin within 24 h is associated with lower 30-day mortality of CS patients aged≥60. The results should be conducted to further assess in randomized controlled trials.

Severe COVID-19-associated sepsis is different from classical sepsis induced by pulmonary infection with carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumonia (CrKP).

PURPOSE: COVID-19 is also referred to as a typical viral septic pulmonary infection by 2019-nCoV. However, little is known regarding its characteristics in terms of systemic inflammation and organ injury, especially compared with classical bacterial sepsis. This article aims to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis between COVID-19-associated sepsis and classic bacterial-induced sepsis. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, septic patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a government-designed therapy center in Shenzhen, China between January 14, 2020 and March 10, 2020, and septic patients induced by carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumonia (CrKP) admitted to the ICU of the Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen, China between January 1, 2014 and October 30, 2019 were enrolled. Demographic and clinical parameters including comorbidities, critical illness scores, treatment, and laboratory data, as well as prognosis were compared between the two groups. Risk factors for mortality and survival rate were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and survival curve, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients with COVID-19 and 63 patients with CrKP were enrolled. A direct comparison between the two groups demonstrated more serious degrees of primary lung injury following 2019-nCoV infection (indicated by lower PaO2/FiO2), but milder systemic inflammatory response, lower sequential organ failure assessment score and better functions of the organs like heart, liver, kidney, coagulation, and circulation. However, the acquired immunosuppression presented in COVID-19 patients was more severe, which presented as lower lymphocyte counts (0.8×109/L vs. 0.9×109/L). Moreover, the proportion of COVID-19 patients treated with corticosteroid therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was larger compared with CrKP patients (78.5% vs. 38.1% and 6.5% vs. 0, respectively) who required less invasive mechanical ventilation (31.6% vs. 54.0%). The incidence of hospitalized mortality and length of ICU stay and total hospital stay were also lower or shorter in viral sepsis (12.1% vs. 39.7%, 6.5 days vs. 23.0 days and 21.0 days vs. 33.0 days, respectively) (all p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained after being adjusted by age, gender, comorbidity and PaO2/FiO2. Lymphocytopenia and high acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores were common risk factors for in-hospital death. While the death cases of COVID-19 sepsis mostly occurred at the later stages of patients' hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Critical COVID-19 shares clinical characteristics with classical bacterial sepsis, but the degree of systemic inflammatory response, secondary organ damage and mortality rate are less severe. However, following 2019-nCoV infection, the level of immunosuppression may be increased and thus induce in more death at the later stage of patients' hospitalstay.