RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The usage of immersive virtual reality (iVR) in the context of an intensive care unit (ICU) is scarce. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of the usage of iVR in critical patients with or without mechanical ventilation (MV) and to determine the anxiety degree before and after each session. METHODS: Analytical, descriptive, prospective, and cross-sectional research. Pilot test with 20 patients from a polyvalent ICU of a tertiary hospital. Adult patients were included, either connected or not to MV, watchful and calmed (RASS -1/+1) and without delirium (negative CAM-ICU). Oculus Go (Facebook Technologies, LLC) iVR glasses were the model used. The relaxation strategy consisted in the visualization of an experience of 15 min with scenes related to nature and fantasy, relaxing music with a plot. The sessions were individual, with the patient monitored in a fowler position or seated. The anxiety degree before and after each session was evaluated following a reduced version of the Spanish "Cuestionario de Ansiedad Estado-Rasgo (STAI-e)" and they were analysed using T samples coupled (statistical significance when p-value was <0.05). RESULTS: Incorporation of 20 patients with an average age of 63.9 years old (60% men). A total of 34 sessions of iVR were conducted. 32% patients mechanically ventilated, 32% high-flow oxygen therapy, 36% other breathing supports. 80% of the sessions were completed without serious side effects. A significant decrease in the anxiety degree was observed after each iVR session: first session mean change -2.68 (SD = 2.75), p = 0.000; second session mean change -1.86 (SD = 1.57), p = 0.021; third session mean change -1.67 (SD = 1.63), p = 0.054. CONCLUSION: The usage of iVR in the context of an ICU is feasible, even with patients mechanically ventilated. iVR reduces the anxiety degree in the critic patient, which suggests that "digital therapies" can be effective to improve the emotional state during their stay in the ICU.
RESUMO
The current COVID-19 pandemic has rendered up to 15% of patients under mechanical ventilation. Because the subsequent tracheotomy is a frequent procedure, the three societies mostly involved (SEMICYUC, SEDAR and SEORL-CCC) have setup a consensus paper that offers an overview about indications and contraindications of tracheotomy, be it by puncture or open, clarifying its respective advantages and enumerating the ideal conditions under which they should be performed, as well as the necessary steps. Regular and emergency situations are displayed together with the postoperative measures.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Consenso , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Sociedades Médicas , Traqueostomia/normas , Anestesiologia , Broncoscopia/efeitos adversos , Broncoscopia/normas , COVID-19 , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarianos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/normas , Emergências , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Otolaringologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Pandemias , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/normas , Respiração Artificial/normas , Ressuscitação , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Traqueostomia/efeitos adversos , Traqueostomia/métodosRESUMO
The current COVID-19 pandemic has rendered up to 15% of patients under mechanical ventilation. Because the subsequent tracheotomy is a frequent procedure, the three societies mostly involved (SEMICYUC, SEDAR and SEORL-CCC) have setup a consensus paper that offers an overview about indications and contraindications of tracheotomy, be it by puncture or open, clarifying its respective advantages and enumerating the ideal conditions under which they should be performed, as well as the necessary steps. Regular and emergency situations are displayed together with the postoperative measures.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Consenso , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Sociedades Médicas , Traqueostomia/normas , Anestesiologia , Broncoscopia/efeitos adversos , Broncoscopia/normas , COVID-19 , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarianos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/normas , Emergências , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Otolaringologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Pandemias , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/normas , Respiração Artificial/normas , Ressuscitação , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Traqueostomia/efeitos adversos , Traqueostomia/métodosRESUMO
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory tract infection caused by a newly emergent coronavirus, that was first recognized in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined the infection as a global pandemic and there is a health and social emergency for the management of this new infection. While most people with COVID-19 develop only mild or uncomplicated illness, approximately 14% develop severe disease that requires hospitalization and oxygen support, and 5% require admission to an intensive care unit. In severe cases, COVID-19 can be complicated by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and septic shock, and multiorgan failure. This consensus document has been prepared on evidence-informed guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary panel of health care providers from four Spanish scientific societies (Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine [SEMICYUC], Spanish Society of Pulmonologists [SEPAR], Spanish Society of Emergency [SEMES], Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation, and Pain [SEDAR]) with experience in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 and other viral infections, including SARS, as well as sepsis and ARDS. The document provides clinical recommendations for the noninvasive respiratory support (noninvasive ventilation, high flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannula) in any patient with suspected or confirmed presentation of COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure. This consensus guidance should serve as a foundation for optimized supportive care to ensure the best possible chance for survival and to allow for reliable comparison of investigational therapeutic interventions as part of randomized controlled trials.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Ventilação não Invasiva/métodos , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/diagnóstico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Consenso , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
The project "Commitment to Quality of Scientific Societies", promoted since 2013 by the Spanish Ministry of Health, seeks to reduce unnecessary health interventions that have not proven effective, have little or doubtful effectiveness, or are not cost-effective. The objective is to establish the "do not do" recommendations for the management of critically ill patients. A panel of experts from the 13 working groups (WGs) of the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) was selected and nominated by virtue of clinical expertise and/or scientific experience to carry out the recommendations. Available scientific literature in the management of adult critically ill patients from 2000 to 2017 was extracted. The clinical evidence was discussed and summarized by the experts in the course of consensus finding of each WG, and was finally approved by the WGs after an extensive internal review process carried out during the first semester of 2017. A total of 65 recommendations were developed, of which 5 corresponded to each of the 13 WGs. These recommendations are based on the opinion of experts and scientific knowledge, and aim to reduce those treatments or procedures that do not add value to the care process; avoid the exposure of critical patients to potential risks; and improve the adequacy of health resources.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/normas , Estado Terminal , Contraindicações de Medicamentos , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Apoio Nutricional , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Direitos do Paciente , Tecnologia de Alto Custo , Assistência Terminal/normas , Procedimentos DesnecessáriosRESUMO
An individualised care plan is described for a woman diagnosed with pneumonia, intubated, and on invasive mechanical ventilation, who was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). A nursing care plan was designed based on Marjory Gordon functional patterns. The most important nursing diagnoses were prioritised, using a model of clinical reasoning model (Analysis of the current status) and NANDA taxonomy. A description is presented on, death anxiety, impaired gas exchange, decreased cardiac output, dysfunctional gastrointestinal motility, risk for disuse syndrome, infection risk, and bleeding risk. The principal objectives were: to reduce the fear of the family, achieve optimal respiratory and cardiovascular status, to maintain gastrointestinal function, to avoid immobility complications, and to reduce the risk of infection and bleeding. As regards activities performed: we gave family support; correct management of the mechanical ventilation airway, cardio-respiratory monitoring, skin and nutritional status; control of possible infections and bleeding (management of therapies, care of catheters ). A Likert's scale was used to evaluate the results, accomplishing all key performance indicators which were propose at the beginning. Individualised care plans with NNN taxonomy using the veno-venous ECMO have not been described. Other ECMO care plans have not used the same analysis model. This case can help nurses to take care of patients subjected to veno-venous ECMO treatment, although more cases are needed to standardise nursing care using NANDA taxonomy.