Early viscoelastometric guided fibrinogen replacement combined with escalation of clinical care reduces progression in postpartum haemorrhage: a comparison of outcomes from two prospective observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Viscoelastometric haemostatic assays (VHA) give rapid information on coagulation status, allowing individualised resuscitation. METHODS: This paper compares outcomes from two observational studies of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in the same institution, before and after practice changed from fixed ratio empirical transfusion of coagulation products with laboratory coagulation testing to VHA-guided fibrinogen replacement incorporated into an enhanced PPH care bundle. In both studies, all blood samples were taken near 1000 mL qualitative blood loss (QBL). In Study One, QBL started once PPH was identified, and resuscitation with coagulation blood products was empirical or based on laboratory tests of coagulation. In Study Two, QBL started at delivery and VHA was used to guide fibrinogen replacement if FIBTEM A5 was <12 mm (Claus fibrinogen ≤2 g/L) or to withhold coagulation products if FIBTEM A5 was >12 mm. RESULTS: Improved PPH outcomes were observed in Study Two, with rates of measured blood loss ≥2500 mL, ≥4 units red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, fresh frozen plasma transfusion and ≥8 units of any blood product transfusion all reduced (P < 0.01). Clinically significant improvements occurred in women with fibrinogen ≤2 g/L at study entry, where the proportion of women who received ≥4 units RBC transfusion fell from 67% in Study One to 0% in Study Two (P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that use of VHA as part of an early bundle of PPH care targeting fibrinogen ≤2 g/L with fibrinogen concentrate reduces PPH progression. The greatest benefit was seen when fibrinogen levels were ≤2 g/L at first testing.

A comparison of fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through the Ambu ® Aura-i ™, the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the i-gel ™: a manikin study.

We compared the Aura-i(™) , intubating laryngeal mask airway and i-gel(™) as conduits for fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in a manikin. Thirty anaesthetists each performed two tracheal intubations through each device, a total of 180 intubations. The median (IQR [range]) time to complete the first intubation was 40 (31-50 [15-162]) s, 37 (34-48 [25-75]) s and 28 (22-35 [14-59]) s for the Aura-i, intubating laryngeal mask airway and i-gel, respectively. Tracheal intubation through the i-gel was the quickest (p < 0.01). Resistance to railroading of the tracheal tube over the fibrescope was significantly greater through the Aura-i compared with the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the i-gel (p = 0.001). There were no failures to intubate through the intubating laryngeal mask airway or the i-gel but six intubation attempts through the Aura-i were unsuccessful, in five owing to a railroading failure and in one owing to accidental oesophageal intubation. We conclude that the Aura-i does not perform as well as the intubating laryngeal mask airway or the i-gel as an adjunct for performing fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation.