miR-99a-5p as a biomarker for lymph node metastasis prediction in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic lymph node involvement influences therapy decisions and serves as a prognostic indicator in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, many early-stage patients with clinically negative lymph nodes exhibit no metastasis upon surgical staging. This study aimed to identify differentially expressed miRNAs capable of distinguishing pathologically positive (pN+) from negative (pN0) nodes in OSCC patients without clinical evidence of lymph node metastases (cN0). METHODS: Expression levels of 798 miRNAs were assessed in tumor samples from 10 pN+ and 10 pN0 patients using the Nanostring nCounter platform. Validation was performed in an independent cohort of 15 pN+ and 24 pN0 patients through RT-qPCR. RESULTS: Eight miRNAs exhibited differential expression between pN0 and pN+ patients. Notably, hsa-miR-99a-5p demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in predicting patients at higher risk of positive lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight hsa-miR-99a-5p as a potential biomarker for detecting lymph node metastasis in primary OSCC tumors.

Human Papillomavirus DNA Detection by Droplet Digital PCR in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tumor Tissue from Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: High-risk human papillomavirus infection impacts staging and prognosis of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs). Determination of HPV status in tumor tissue by p16-immunohistochemistry (p16-IHC) can be challenging; therefore, complementary methodologies could be useful in a clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: To test for accuracy and clinical relevance of HPV-DNA detection in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty OPSCCs were tested for p16-IHC status followed by HPV-16/18 DNA detection/quantification in FFPE-recovered DNA using ddPCR. Accuracy for HPV status determination and association with patient information were also evaluated. RESULTS: 32.0% (16/50) of the cases were p16-IHC positive (p16 +), 42.0% (21/50) had detectable levels of HPV-16 DNA, and none were positive for HPV-18 DNA. A higher median viral load of HPV-16 DNA was observed in p16 + cases (p < 0.0001). Concordance between p16-IHC and HPV-16 DNA ranged from 78.0 to 86.0% and accuracy rates were between 78.0 and 86.0%. P16-IHC and HPV-16 DNA detection was associated with gender, smoking status, and tumor subsite, while only HPV-16 DNA was associated with cT stage. The combination of HPV positivity by p16-IHC and ddPCR showed higher overall survival rates in comparison with p16 + /HPV-DNA- and p16 - /HPV-DNA- results. CONCLUSIONS: Type-specific HPV-DNA detection by ddPCR is highly specific but moderately sensitive for the determination of HPV status and showed clinical relevance, mainly when associated with p16-IHC status. Results highlight the importance of performing HPV-DNA testing in combination with p16-IHC for proper identification of HPV-associated OPSCC and to improve clinical management of OPSCC patients.