RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the discordance in sarcoma diagnoses between nonspecialized institutions following revision by dedicated sarcoma pathologists at a reference center in Brazil and the relevance of molecular pathology in this context. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of sarcoma samples initially analyzed at outside laboratories and subsequently reviewed by two specialized pathologists between January 2014 and December 2020. After obtaining demographic and tumor characteristics, pathology results were matched and classified as complete discordance (CD; benign v malignant, sarcoma v other malignancies), partial concordance (similar diagnosis of connective tumor, but different grade/histological subtype/differentiation), and complete concordance (CC). The concordance for histology or grade, and the role of molecular assessments supporting the diagnosis were also independently determined. Statistical analyses were conducted through the kappa coefficient of agreement and adherence by χ2 test, χ2 test by Person, and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: In total, 197 cases were included, with samples obtained predominately from male patients (57.9%) and localized/primary tumors (86.8%). Following revision, the most frequent final diagnoses were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (17.8%), well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (8.6%), and leiomyosarcoma (7.6%). CD was found in 13.2%, partial discordance in 45.2%, and CC in 41.6% of reviews (P < .001). We found a concordance for histology or grade of 53.5% (P < .001) and 51.8% (P < .001), respectively. Molecular assessments, comprising next-generation sequencing panels (79.5%) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (20.5%), were performed in 44 (22.3%) cases, with findings classified as of diagnostic relevance in 31.8%. CONCLUSION: In nearly 60% of the cases, the initial sarcoma diagnosis was modified when revised by a reference center and dedicated pathologists, assisted by molecular pathology techniques. These results justify the assembly of referral networks in countries with limited health care resources.
Assuntos
Sarcoma , Humanos , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Sarcoma/patologia , Sarcoma/genética , Brasil/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Patologia Molecular/métodos , CriançaRESUMO
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsies (CNBs) and surgical excisional biopsies (SEBs), samples of lymphoid proliferation from a single institution from 2013 to 2017 (N=476) were divided into groups of CNB (N=218) and SEB (N=258). The diagnostic accuracy of these samples was evaluated as a percentage of conclusive diagnosis, according to the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues . The contribution of clinical data, the assessment of sample adequacy by a pathologist during the procedure, the number and size of fragments, the needle gauge, the ancillary tests, and the type of lymphoid proliferation were also examined. The diagnostic accuracy of SEB was 97.3% and CNB 91.3% ( P =0.010). Additional factors considered essential for establishing the final diagnosis in some cases were: clinical information (20.6% CNB, 7.4% SEB; P <0.001); immunohistochemistry (96.3% CNB, 91.5% SEB; P =0.024); flow cytometry (12% CNB, 6.8% SEB; P =0.165); and other complementary tests (8.2% CNB, 17.3% SEB; P =0.058). Factors that did not influence performance were the evaluation of sample adequacy during the procedure, the number and size of fragments, and the needle gauge. Increased percentage of nondiagnostic CNB was observed in T-cell lymphomas (30%), followed by classic Hodgkin lymphoma (10.6%). The main limitation of CNB was the evaluation of morphologically heterogenous diseases. CNB is useful and safe in lymphoma diagnosis provided it is carried out by a team of experienced professionals. Having an interventional radiology team engaged with pathology is an essential component to achieve adequate rates of specific diagnoses in CNB specimens.
Assuntos
Doença de Hodgkin , Linfoma , Humanos , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Linfoma/patologia , Doença de Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Imuno-Histoquímica , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to describe the early signs and symptoms of osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma, identify symptoms that could be used to help differentiate the two types of tumors, and determine the time elapsed between the onset of signs and symptoms and the definitive diagnosis in our service, providing information and imputus for earlier diagnosis of these tumors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the medical dossiers of 365 patients under 30 years of age diagnosed with osteosarcoma or Ewing's sarcoma was performed, and the aspects of the clinical diagnosis were statistically analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The time between the onset of signs and the symptoms was 5.25 months for osteosarcoma and 8.1 months for Ewing's sarcoma, and the most frequent (89.5%) early symptom of osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma was local pain. Symptoms that might aid diagnosis included early local volume increase and the presence of fever. CONCLUSION: The time until diagnosis of both neoplasias was higher than that reported for North America and Europe. Education of the lay public and medical professionals regarding suspicious early signs and symptoms might shorten the delay of diagnosis.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Osteossarcoma , Sarcoma de Ewing , Adolescente , Adulto , Idade de Início , Neoplasias Ósseas/complicações , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Osteossarcoma/complicações , Osteossarcoma/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoma de Ewing/complicações , Sarcoma de Ewing/diagnóstico , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical aspects, diagnoses, prognostic factors, and percent progression of plasmacytoma to multiple myeloma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 103 medical records of patients suspected of plasmacytoma were surveyed covering the period between 1950 and 1998, and 30 were selected for analysis. Patients were classified into 2 groups: patients who did (n = 17) and did not (n = 13) progress to multiple myeloma. Comparative statistics regarding a variety of clinical aspects were developed. RESULTS: Patients who progressed to multiple myeloma were younger than those who did not (52.3 +/- 2.6 vs 62.6 +/- 3.4 years; mean +/- SEM; P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in gender between groups. A higher incidence of multiple recurrence was observed in patients who progressed to multiple myeloma (75%, P = 0.049). Both groups showed a prevalence of vertebral column injuries. No significant differences were found between groups regarding the disease period (from the onset of symptoms until diagnosis) (P = 0.20) and survival (P = 0.34). The average time to progression from plasmacytoma to myeloma was 41 +/- 39 months (mean +/- SD), and the progression rate was 57%. CONCLUSION: Patients who progressed to multiple myeloma were younger than those who did not. No significant differences were found between groups regarding sex, time from symptom onset to diagnosis, and survival time. In both groups, the most affected anatomic location was the vertebral column, and most affected sex was male. The average time to progression to multiple myeloma was 41 months. It was not possible to determine the factors that influenced the survival of patients with plasmacytoma or for those who progressed to multiple myeloma.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Plasmocitoma/patologia , Fatores Etários , Brasil , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/patologia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
The authors present their experience in the treatment of 24 patients with primary bone lymphoma. Eighty-one patients treated between 1955 and 1999 were evaluated, and 57 were excluded because of misdiagnosis. The male to female ratio was 7:5 and the median age was 38.5 years (range, 18-69 years). Two patients had human immunodeficiency virus. Seventeen patients had intermediate-grade lymphomas (Working Formulation), nine patients had centroblastic subtype (Kiel), and 22 patients had B immunophenotype. Nine patients had combined treatment with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and nine patients had chemotherapy alone. The mean followup was 13.2 years (range, 1.5-37.3 years). Three patients had surgery, two because of subtrochanteric fractures (one patient had closed reduction and internal fixation and the other patient had resection and endoprosthesis reconstruction). The third patient presented with myelocompression at the thoracic level, and he had decompression surgery. Only one patient had radiation therapy and two patients had no treatment. There have been no local recurrences in 17 patients (70.8%). Seven patients (29.2%) died with evidence of disease within a followup of 11 months. The results of the current study showed that patients with primary bone lymphoma have a good prognosis when they are treated with chemotherapy, regardless of whether radiation therapy was given. Surgery usually is appropriate for patients with fractures.