Hospital-level variation in costs of elective nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: With the aging population in the United States, the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms is shifting to older ages. Given changing demographic characteristics and increasing health care expenditures, the present study evaluated the degree of center-level variation in the cost of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: We identified all adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations for elective repair of nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the 2017 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Hierarchical mixed-effects models were used to rank hospitals based on risk-adjusted costs. The interclass coefficient was used to calculate the amount of variation attributable to hospital-level characteristics. High-cost hospitals were classified as centers in the top decile of costs. The association of high-cost hospitals status with outcomes of interest was examined. RESULTS: An estimated 62,626 patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and 5,011 (8.0%) were managed at high-cost hospitals. Compared with non-high-cost hospitals, high-cost hospitals were more commonly large (52.6% vs 48.3%) metropolitan (78.3% vs 66.9%) teaching centers (all P < .001). The interclass coefficient found that 28% of the observed variation in cost is attributable to hospital factors. After adjustment, high-cost hospitals were associated with increased odds of gastrointestinal (adjusted odds ratio = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05-1.90) and infectious (adjusted odds ratio = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14-1.59) complications. Finally, the Elixhauser index (ß = +$2,700/unit; 95% CI, $2,500-$3,000) and open repair (ß = +$4,100; 95% CI, $3,100-$5,200) were associated with increased costs. CONCLUSION: We observed significant variation in cost attributable to center-level differences. Our findings have implications for reimbursement paradigms and the establishment of quality and cost benchmarks in the elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Prospective derivation and validation of a NECROtizing Soft tissue InfectionS (NECROSIS) score: An EAST multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Although several risk indices have been developed to aid in the diagnosis of NSTIs, these instruments suffer from varying levels of reproducibility and failure to incorporate key clinical variables in model development. The objective of this study was to derive and validate a clinical risk index score - NECROSIS - for identifying NSTIs in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients being evaluated for severe skin and soft tissue infections. METHODS: We performed a prospective study across 16 sites in the US of adult EGS patients with suspected NSTIs over a 30-month period. Variables analyzed included demographics, admission vitals and labs, physical exam, radiographic, and operative findings. The main outcome measure was the presence of NSTI diagnosed clinically at the time of surgery. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for the presence of NSTI using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the Akaike information criteria. RESULTS: Of 362 patients, 297 (82%) were diagnosed with a NSTI. Overall mortality was 12.3%. Multivariate analysis identified 3 independent predictors for NSTI: systolic blood pressure ≤ 120 mmHg, violaceous skin, and WBC ≥15 (x103/uL). Multivariate modelling demonstrated Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit (p = 0.9) with a c-statistic for the prediction curve of 0.75. Test characteristics of the NECROSIS score were similar between the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: NECROSIS is a simple and potentially useful clinical index score for identifying at-risk EGS patients with NSTIs. Future validation studies are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria, Level III.

Management of Gallstone Pancreatitis: A Review.

Importance: Gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) is the leading cause of acute pancreatitis, accounting for approximately 50% of cases. Without appropriate and timely treatment, patients are at increased risk of disease progression and recurrence. While there is increasing consensus among guidelines for the management of mild GSP, adherence to these guidelines remains poor. In addition, there is minimal evidence to guide clinicians in the treatment of moderately severe and severe pancreatitis. Observations: The management of GSP continues to evolve and is dependent on severity of acute pancreatitis and concomitant biliary diagnoses. Across the spectrum of severity, there is evidence that goal-directed, moderate fluid resuscitation decreases the risk of fluid overload and mortality compared with aggressive resuscitation. Patients with isolated, mild GSP should undergo same-admission cholecystectomy; early cholecystectomy within 48 hours of admission has been supported by several randomized clinical trials. Cholecystectomy should be delayed for patients with severe disease; for severe and moderately severe disease, the optimal timing remains unclear. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is only useful for patients with suspected cholangitis or biliary obstruction, although the concomitance of these conditions in patients with GSP is rare. Modality of evaluation of the common bile duct to rule out concomitant choledocholithiasis varies and should be tailored to level of concern based on objective measures, such as laboratory results and imaging findings. Among these modalities, intraoperative cholangiography is associated with reduced length of stay and decreased use of ERCP. However, the benefit of routine intraoperative cholangiography remains in question. Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment of GSP is dependent on disease severity, which can be difficult to assess. A comprehensive review of clinically relevant evidence and recommendations on GSP severity grading, fluid resuscitation, timing of cholecystectomy, need for ERCP, and evaluation and management of persistent choledocholithiasis can help guide clinicians in diagnosis and management.

Immediate Operative Trauma Assessment Score: A Simple and Reliable Predictor of Mortality in Trauma Patients Undergoing Urgent/Emergent Surgery.

Objective: Many current trauma mortality prediction tools are either too intricate or rely on data not readily available during a trauma patient's initial evaluation. Moreover, none are tailored to those necessitating urgent or emergent surgery. Our objective was to design a practical, user-friendly scoring tool using immediately available variables, and then compare its efficacy to the widely-known Revised Trauma Score (RTS). Methods: The adult 2017-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried to identify patients ≥18 years old undergoing any urgent/emergent operation (direct from Emergency Department to operating room). Patients were divided into derivation and validation groups. A three-step methodology was used. First, multiple logistic regression models were created to determine risk of death using only variables available upon arrival. Second, the weighted average and relative impact of each independent predictor was used to derive an easily calculated Immediate Operative Trauma Assessment Score (IOTAS). We then validated IOTAS using AUROC and compared it to RTS. Results: From 249 208 patients in the derivation-set, 14 635 (5.9%) died. Age ≥65, Glasgow Coma Scale score <9, hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg), and tachycardia (>120/min) on arrival were identified as independent predictors for mortality. Using these, the IOTAS was structured, offering scores between 0-8. The AUROC for this was .88. A clear escalation in mortality was observed across scores: from 4.4% at score 1 to 60.5% at score 8. For the validation set (250 182 patients; mortality rate 5.8%), the AUROC remained consistent at .87, surpassing RTS's AUROC of .83. Conclusion: IOTAS is a novel, accurate, and now validated tool that is intuitive and efficient in predicting mortality for trauma patients requiring urgent or emergent surgeries. It outperforms RTS, and thereby may help guide clinicians when determining the best course of action in patient management as well as counseling patients and their families.

The Impact of Postoperative COVID-19 Infection on 30-day Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Introduction: Preoperative Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections are associated with postoperative adverse outcomes. However, there is limited data on the impact of postoperative COVID-19 infection on postoperative outcomes of common general surgery procedures.Objective: To evaluate the impact of postoperative COVID-19 diagnosis on laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes.Methods: Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, acute cholecystitis, or gallstone pancreatitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with or without intraoperative cholangiogram were identified using the 2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients with and without a postoperative COVID-19 diagnosis. Coarsened Exact Matching was used to match the groups based on preoperative risk factors, and outcomes were compared.Results: A total of 47,948 patients were included. In the aggregate cohort, 31% were male, and mean age was 50 years. Age, BMI, smoking, COPD, CHF, preoperative sepsis, and ASA class were significantly different between the two groups. After matching, there were no differences in characteristics. 30-day morbidity (OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.1), pneumonia (OR = 5.0, 95% CI 1.7-15.0), DVT (OR = 8.22, 95% CI 1.0-66), reoperation (OR = 9.3, 95% CI 1.2-73.8), and readmission (OR = 4.8, 95% CI 2.3-10.1) continued to be significantly worse in the matched cohort.Conclusion: Postoperative COVID-19 infection was associated with worse outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These findings suggest that even postoperative COVID-19 diagnosis increases the risk for adverse outcomes in patients recovering from laparoscopic cholecystectomy and may indicate that precautions should be taken and new COVID-19 infections even after surgery should be closely monitored.

Association of rurality with short-term outcomes of peripheral vascular trauma.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral vascular trauma is a major contributing factor to long-term disability and mortality among patients with traumatic injuries. However, an analysis focusing on individuals at a high risk of experiencing limb loss due to rural and urban peripheral vascular trauma is lacking. METHOD: This was a retrospective analysis of the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients (≥18 years) undergoing open or endovascular procedures after admission for peripheral vascular trauma were identified using the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients from rural regions were considered Rural, whereas the remainder comprised Urban. The primary outcome of the study was primary amputation. Multivariable regression models were developed to evaluate rurality with outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of 29,083 patients, 4,486 (15.6%) were Rural. Rural were older (41 [28-59] vs 37 [27-54] years, P < .001), with a similar distribution of female sex (23.0 vs 21.3%, P = .09) and transfers from other facilities (2.8 vs 2.5%, P = .34). After adjustment, Rural status was not associated with the odds of mortality (P = .82), with urban as reference. Rural status was, however, associated with greater odds of limb amputation (adjusted odds ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.47-2.32) and reduced index hospitalization cost by $7,100 (95% confidence interval $3,500-10,800). Additionally, compared to patients from urban locations, rurality was associated with similar odds of non-home discharge and 30-day readmission. Over the study period, the marginal effect of rurality on the risk-adjusted rates of amputation significantly increased (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo peripheral vascular trauma management in rural areas appear to increasingly exhibit a higher likelihood of amputation, with lower incremental costs and a lower risk of 30-day readmission. These findings underscore disparities in access to optimal trauma vascular care as well as limited resources in rural regions.

The Relationship Between the COVID-19 Pandemic and Pediatric Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic created difficulties in access to care. There was also increased penetrating trauma in adults, which has been attributed to factors including increased firearm sales and social isolation. However, less is known about the relationship between the pandemic and pediatric trauma patients (PTPs). This study aimed to investigate the national incidence of penetrating trauma in PTPs, hypothesizing a higher rate with onset of the pandemic. We additionally hypothesized increased risk of complications and death in penetrating PTPs after the pandemic versus prepandemic. METHODS: We included all PTPs (aged ≤17-years-old) from the 2017-2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, dividing the dataset into two eras: prepandemic (2017-2019) and pandemic (2020). We performed subset analyses of the pandemic and prepandemic penetrating PTPs. Bivariate analyses and a multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Of the 474,524 PTPs, 123,804 (26.1%) were from the pandemic year. The pandemic era had increased stab wounds (3.3% versus 2.8%, P > 0.001) and gunshot wounds (5.5% versus 4.0%, P < 0.001) compared to the prepandemic era. Among penetrating PTPs, the rates and associated risk of in-hospital complications (2.6% versus 2.8%, P = 0.23) (odds ratio 0.90, confidence interval 0.79-1.02, P = 0.11) and mortality (4.9% versus 5.0%, P = 0.58) (odds ratio 0.90, confidence interval 0.78-1.03, P = 0.12) were similar between time periods. CONCLUSIONS: This national analysis confirms increased penetrating trauma, particularly gunshot wounds in pediatric patients following onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this increase, there was no elevated risk of death or complications, suggesting that trauma systems adapted to the "dual pandemic" of COVID-19 and firearm violence in the pediatric population.

Association of anesthetic modality and other variables on 1-year functional patency of cephalic-based arteriovenous fistulae.

OBJECTIVE: Some studies suggest that regional anesthesia provides better patency for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis access as compared to local and general anesthesia. This study evaluates the impact of anesthetic modality on long term fistula function at 12 months. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing cephalic vein-based hemodialysis access in consecutive cases between 2014 and 2019 was conducted from five safety net hospitals. The primary endpoint was functional patency at 12 months. Subset analysis individually evaluated cephalic-based lower forearm and wrist vs upper arm AVFs. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models evaluated the relationship between anesthetic modality and fistula function at 12 months. RESULTS: There were 818 cephalic-based fistulas created during the study period. The overall 12-month functional patency rate was 78.7%, including an 81.3% patency for upper arm AVF and 73.3% for wrist AVF (P = .009). There was no statistically significant difference among patients with functional and nonfunctional AVFs at 12 months with respect to anesthetic modality when comparing regional, local, and general anesthesia (P = .343). Multivariate regression analysis identified that history of AVF/arteriovenous graft (odds ratio [OR], 0.24; P = .007), receiving intraoperative systemic anticoagulation (OR, 2.49; P < .001), and vein diameter (OR, 1.85; P = .039) as independently associated with AVF functional patency at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: There was no association between anesthetic modality and functional patency of cephalic-based AVFs at 12 months. Further studies are needed to better define which patients may benefit from regional anesthesia.

Changes in surgical mortality during COVID-19 pandemic by patients' race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status among US older adults: a quasi-experimental event study model.

OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in the 30-day surgical mortality rate after common surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic and investigate whether its impact varies by urgency of surgery or patient race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. DESIGN: We used a quasi-experimental event study design to examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical mortality rate, using patients who received the same procedure in the prepandemic years (2016-2019) as the control, adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital fixed effects (effectively comparing patients treated at the same hospital). We conducted stratified analyses by procedure urgency, patient race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status (dual-Medicaid status and median household income). SETTING: Acute care hospitals in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65-99 years who underwent one of 14 common surgical procedures from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 30-day postoperative mortality rate. RESULTS: Our sample included 3 620 689 patients. Surgical mortality was higher during the pandemic, with peak mortality observed in April 2020 (adjusted risk difference (aRD) +0.95 percentage points (pp); 95% CI +0.76 to +1.26 pp; p<0.001) and mortality remained elevated through 2020. The effect of the pandemic on mortality was larger for non-elective (vs elective) procedures (April 2020: aRD +0.44 pp (+0.16 to +0.72 pp); p=0.002 for elective; aRD +1.65 pp (+1.00, +2.30 pp); p<0.001 for non-elective). We found no evidence that the pandemic mortality varied by patients' race and ethnicity (p for interaction=0.29), or socioeconomic status (p for interaction=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: 30-day surgical mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic peaked in April 2020 and remained elevated until the end of the year. The influence of the pandemic on surgical mortality did not vary by patient race and ethnicity or socioeconomic status, indicating that once patients were able to access care and undergo surgery, surgical mortality was similar across groups.

Association of Residency Applicants' Hobbies and Subsequent Technical Proficiency Ratings as General Surgery Chief Residents: A Multi-Institutional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether participation in certain hobbies (e.g., participation in sports, playing musical instruments, or other hobbies requiring fine motor skills), preresidency, are associated with higher technical skills ratings at the time of residency graduation. DESIGN: Faculty members from 14 general surgery residency programs scored individual graduates from 2017 to 2020 on their technical skills using a 5-point Likert scale. Hobbies for these residents were collected from their Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) data. A single reviewer classified each ERAS hobby into predefined categories including musical instruments, sports requiring hand-eye coordination, team sports, and activities necessitating hand-eye coordination. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for the relationship between each category of hobby-as well as the total number of hobbies in each category-and the outcome of surgical faculty ratings of residents' technical surgical skills during their last year of residency. A proportional odds model including the above predictive variables was also fit to the data. SETTING: Fourteen general surgery residency programs. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residency graduates from 14 different programs from 2017 to 2020. RESULTS: There were 296 residents across 14 institutions. The average ranking of residents' technical skills was 3.24 (SD 1.1). A total of 40% of residents played sports involving hand-eye coordination, 31% played team sports, 28% participated in nonsport hobbies that require eye-hand coordination, and 20% played musical instruments. Correlation coefficients were not statistically significant for any of the categories. In the proportional odds model, none of the variables were associated with statistically significant increased odds of a higher technical skills rating. CONCLUSIONS: There was no correlation between general surgery chief residents' technical skills as rated by faculty, and self-reported pre-residency hobbies on the ERAS application. These findings suggest such hobbies prior to residency are unlikely to predict future technical skills prowess.

Association of race and ethnicity with initial surgical hemodialysis access type in a safety net system.

OBJECTIVES: Prior studies have found lower arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation rates in Black and Hispanic patients. Whether this is due to health care disparities or other differences is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the racial/ethnic differences in initial surgical access type within a high-volume, safety net system with predominantly Black and Hispanic populations. METHODS: A retrospective review of initial hemodialysis (HD) access in consecutive cases between 2014 and 2019 was conducted from all five safety net hospitals in a health care system that primarily treats underserved patients. Patient data collected included race, ethnicity, sex, comorbidities, and initial arteriovenous (AV) access type (AV fistula [AVF] vs AV graft [AVG]). The rates of cephalic vein-based AVF (CAVF; radiocephalic, brachiocephalic) were compared with basilic and brachial vein AVF (BAVF), because the latter are performed as two stages. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were adjusted for demographic and clinical variables to evaluate the relationship between race/ethnicity, surgical access type, and comorbid conditions. RESULTS: We included 1334 patients (74% Hispanic, 9% Black, 7% Asian, 2% White, 8% other) who underwent first-time surgical HD access creation. The majority were male (818 [63%]). Medical comorbidities were equal among groups, except for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and stroke, which were higher in Black patients (P < .005 and P = .005, respectively). Overall, 1303 patients (98%) underwent AVF creation and 31 AVG creation (2%), with no difference between race/ethnicity in AVF vs AVG creation. Of the AVF cohort, 991 (76%) had a CAVF and 312 (24%) had a BAVF. Males were more likely than females to get a CAVF (65% vs 35%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Within our safety net health system, where most patients are under-represented minorities, nearly all patients undergoing HD access had an AVF as their initial surgery with no difference in race/ethnicity. AVF type received differed by race, with Black patients twice as likely to undergo BAVF, which required two stages. Further studies are needed to identify the reasons for these differences.

Practical Guide to Survey Research in Surgical Education.

This Guide to Statistics and Methods describes aspects of methods of survey research in surgical education, important considerations, and pitfalls and limitations.

Preserving and Enhancing Resident Autonomy-Strategies for Surgical Educators.

This Viewpoint suggests measures to improve surgical resident autonomy and thereby produce capable and resilient surgeons.

Combined Arterial and Venous Lower Extremity Injury.

This case-control study assesses the need for prophylactic fasciotomy and delayed fasciotomy in combined arterial and venous injury compared with those with isolated artery or vein injury.

Implications of Using Chatbots for Future Surgical Education.

This quality improvement study investigates whether a chatbot can accurately answer surgery clerkship multiple-choice questions, explain incorrect answers, assess question difficulty, and generate a high-quality examination question.

Creating an Optimal Learning Environment in the Operating Room: Lessons From the Soccer Field.

For trainees, the operating room (OR) often represents an educational sanctuary, where for a few hours they can focus on their craft, rather than on phone calls, pages, and the never-ending task of electronic health record documentation. The OR provides a unique opportunity for unfettered one-on-one time with an attending surgeon at their side, where they can learn the art of surgery without interruption. It is vitally important to maximize learning in the OR, yet evidence suggests that it is not always an ideal educational environment. Considering the recent excitement over the World Cup soccer tournament (full disclosure: the senior author is an Argentine immigrant and soccer fan), in this article, we provide evidence-based ideas and suggestions on how to optimize learning in the OR using some analogies from the soccer field.

Effect of surgical timing on outcomes after cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective and single-center studies have demonstrated that early cholecystectomy is associated with shorter length of stay in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis. However, these studies are not powered to detect differences in adverse events. Using a nationally representative cohort, we evaluated the association of timing for cholecystectomy with clinical outcomes and resource use in patients with gallstone pancreatitis. METHODS: All adult hospitalizations for gallstone pancreatitis were tabulated from the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes, patient comorbidities and operative characteristics were determined. Patients with end-organ dysfunction or cholangitis were excluded to isolate those with only mild gallstone pancreatitis. Major adverse events were defined as a composite of 30-day mortality and perioperative (cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, infectious, and thromboembolic) complications. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was divided into Early (within 2 days of admission) and Late (>2 days after admission) cohorts. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were then used to evaluate the association of cholecystectomy timing with major adverse events and secondary outcomes of interest, including postoperative hospital duration of stay, costs, non-home discharge, and readmission rate within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: Of an estimated 129,451 admissions for acute gallstone pancreatitis, 25.6% comprised the Early cohort. Compared to patients in the Early cohort, Late cohort patients were older (56 [40-69] vs 53 [37-66] years, P < .001), more likely male (36.6 vs 32.8%, P < .001), and more frequently underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (22.2 vs 10.9%, P < .001). In addition, the Late cohort had higher unadjusted rates of major adverse events and index hospitalization costs, compared to Early. After risk adjustment, late cholecystectomy was associated with higher odds of major adverse events (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.29-1.51) and overall adjusted hospitalization costs by $2,700 (95% confidence interval 2,400-2,800). In addition, compared to the Early group, those in the Late cohort had increased odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.23) and non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.31-1.55). CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy >2 days after admission for mild gallstone pancreatitis was independently associated with increased major adverse events, costs, 30-day readmissions, and non-home discharge. Given the significant clinical and financial consequences, reduced timing to surgery should be prioritized in the overall management of this patient population.