Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater ; 109(1): 117-127, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32672384

RESUMO

To effectively apply microwell array cell delivery devices their biodegradation rate must be tailored towards their intended use and implantation location. Two microwell array devices with distinct degradation profiles, either suitable for the fabrication of retrievable systems in the case of slow degradation, or cell delivery systems capable of extensive remodeling using a fast degrading polymer, were compared in this study. Thin films of a poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(butylene terephthalate) (PEOT-PBT) and a poly(ester urethane) were evaluated for their in vitro degradation profiles over 34 weeks incubation in PBS at different pH values. The PEOT-PBT films showed minimal in vitro degradation over time, while the poly(ester urethane) films showed extensive degradation and fragmentation over time. Subsequently, microwell array cell delivery devices were fabricated from these polymers and intraperitoneally implanted in Albino Oxford rats to study their biocompatibility over a 12-week period. The PEOT-PBT implants shown to be capable to maintain the microwell structure over time. Implants provoked a foreign body response resulting in multilayer fibrosis that integrated into the surrounding tissue. The poly(ester urethane) implants showed a loss of the microwell structures over time, as well as a fibrotic response until the onset of fragmentation, at least 4 weeks post implantation. It was concluded that the PEOT-PBT implants could be used as retrievable cell delivery devices while the poly(ester urethane) implants could be used for cell delivery devices that require remodeling within a 4-12 week period.


Assuntos
Materiais Biocompatíveis/química , Poliésteres/química , Polietilenoglicóis/química , Poliuretanos/química , Alicerces Teciduais/química , Animais , Biodegradação Ambiental , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Fenômenos Mecânicos , Testes Mecânicos , Modelos Animais , Polietilenotereftalatos/química , Próteses e Implantes , Ratos , Regeneração , Resistência à Tração , Engenharia Tecidual
2.
Biomaterials ; 267: 120449, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33129188

RESUMO

The clinical success rate of islet transplantation, namely independence from insulin injections, is limited by factors that lead to graft failure, including inflammation, acute ischemia, acute phase response, and insufficient vascularization. The ischemia and insufficient vascularization both lead to high levels of oxidative stress, which are further aggravated by islet encapsulation, inflammation, and undesirable cell-biomaterial interactions. To identify biomaterials that would not further increase damaging oxidative stress levels and that are also suitable for manufacturing a beta cell encapsulation device, we studied five clinically approved polymers for their effect on oxidative stress and islet (alpha and beta cell) function. We found that 300 poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate) 55/poly(butylene terephthalate) 45 (PEOT/PBT300) was more resistant to breakage and more elastic than other biomaterials, which is important for its immunoprotective function. In addition, it did not induce oxidative stress or reduce viability in the MIN6 beta cell line, and even promoted protective endogenous antioxidant expression over 7 days. Importantly, PEOT/PBT300 is one of the biomaterials we studied that did not interfere with insulin secretion in human islets.


Assuntos
Células Secretoras de Insulina , Transplante das Ilhotas Pancreáticas , Ilhotas Pancreáticas , Materiais Biocompatíveis/metabolismo , Humanos , Insulina/metabolismo , Secreção de Insulina , Células Secretoras de Insulina/metabolismo , Ilhotas Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Estresse Oxidativo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA