RESUMO
Aims: To evaluate the extent and determinants of off-label non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) dosing in newly diagnosed Dutch AF patients. Methods and results: In the DUTCH-AF registry, patients with newly diagnosed AF (<6 months) are prospectively enrolled. Label adherence to NOAC dosing was assessed using the European Medicines Agency labelling. Factors associated with off-label dosing were explored by multivariable logistic regression analyses. From July 2018 to November 2020, 4500 patients were registered. The mean age was 69.6 ± 10.5 years, and 41.5% were female. Of the 3252 patients in which NOAC label adherence could be assessed, underdosing and overdosing were observed in 4.2% and 2.4%, respectively. In 2916 (89.7%) patients with a full-dose NOAC recommendation, 4.6% were underdosed, with a similar distribution between NOACs. Independent determinants (with 95% confidence interval) were higher age [odds ratio (OR): 1.01 per year, 1.01-1.02], lower renal function (OR: 0.96 per ml/min/1.73â m2, 0.92-0.98), lower weight (OR: 0.98 per kg, 0.97-1.00), active malignancy (OR: 2.46, 1.19-5.09), anaemia (OR: 1.73, 1.08-2.76), and concomitant use of antiplatelets (OR: 4.93, 2.57-9.46). In the 336 (10.3%) patients with a reduced dose NOAC recommendation, 22.9% were overdosed, most often with rivaroxaban. Independent determinants were lower age (OR: 0.92 per year, 0.88-0.96) and lower renal function (OR: 0.98 per ml/min/1.73â m2, 0.96-1.00). Conclusion: In newly diagnosed Dutch AF patients, off-label dosing of NOACs was seen in only 6.6% of patients, most often underdosing. In this study, determinants of off-label dosing were age, renal function, weight, anaemia, active malignancy, and concomitant use of antiplatelets.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in unselected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) show that clinical characteristics and dosing practices differ per region, but lack data on edoxaban. METHODS: With data from Edoxaban Treatment in routiNe clinical prActice for patients with AF in Europe (ETNA-AF-Europe), a large prospective observational study, we compared clinical characteristics (including the dose reduction criteria for edoxaban: creatinine clearance 15-50â¯ml/min, weight ≤60â¯kg, and/or use of strong pglycoprotein inhibitors) of patients from Belgium and the Netherlands (BeNe) with those from other European countries (OEC). RESULTS: Of all 13,639 patients in ETNA-AF-Europe, 2579 were from BeNe. BeNe patients were younger than OEC patients (mean age: 72.3 vs 73.9 years), and had lower CHA2DS2-VASc (mean: 2.8 vs 3.2) and HAS-BLED scores (mean: 2.4 vs 2.6). Patients from BeNe less often had hypertension (61.6% vs 80.4%), and/or diabetes mellitus (17.3% vs 23.1%) than patients from OEC. Moreover, relatively fewer patients in BeNe were prescribed the reduced dose of 30â¯mg edoxaban (14.8%) than in OEC (25.4%). Overall, edoxaban was dosed according to label in 83.1% of patients. Yet, 30â¯mg edoxaban was prescribed in the absence of any dose reduction criteria in 36.9% of 30â¯mg users (5.5% of all patients) in BeNe compared with 35.5% (9.0% of all patients) in OEC. CONCLUSION: There were several notable differences between BeNe and OEC regarding clinical characteristics and dosing practices in patients prescribed edoxaban, which are relevant for the local implementation of dose evaluation and optimisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02944019; Date of registration 24 October 2016.
RESUMO
Sometimes there is doubt as to whether or not anticoagulants should be initiated, and if so which ones, in patients with atrial fibrillation and advanced age, increased frailty, or fall risk, kidney, or liver impairment, alcohol abuse, uncontrolled hypertension, or a history of major bleeding. These subgroups have increased risk of haemorrhage as well as thromboembolism. Treatment with anticoagulants is indicated in the vital elderly, preferably with direct oral anticoagulants as demonstrated by robust data. The available study results for the other subgroups may not be (fully) generalisable to clinical practice. In such patients, a comprehensive risk assessment is therefore advised; as is discussing the pros and cons of (not) using anticoagulants and of both type of anticoagulants. Only in exceptional cases is it justified not to use anticoagulants.