RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The number of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in need of oncological follow-up is growing. As a response, patient-led, home-based follow-up (PHFU) was developed, implemented and assessed. The aim of this study was to investigate how patients experienced PHFU. DESIGN: A qualitative study with individual semistructured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed through an inductive, double-coding approach. SETTING: A university medical centre in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 12 curatively treated patients with CRC who received PHFU were included after purposive sampling. RESULTS: Overall, participants (N=12) were satisfied with PHFU. The time and cost-saving aspects for patient and hospital were evidently valued. PHFU was experienced as a shared effort, but patients felt like the primary responsibility remained in the hospital. Patients mentioned a decreased personal interaction with their healthcare provider (HCP) and felt a higher threshold to ask for help. However, all major questions were still addressed. Patients felt sufficiently competent to interpret their individual test results but experienced difficulty in interpreting repeated increases in carcinoembryonic antigen levels within the normal range. Educational status, age and a complicated disease course were seen as factors limiting the applicability of PHFU, and it was expressed that PHFU should be offered as an alternative instead of a novel standard of care. CONCLUSIONS: According to patients, PHFU has great potential. However, PHFU may not be suitable for every CRC patient, and factors such as educational status, age and disease course should be taken into consideration. Patient and HCP have a shared responsibility to help successfully organise PHFU in practice.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Oncologia , Humanos , Seguimentos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao PacienteRESUMO
Several conditions can mimic the clinical presentation of inflammatory breast cancer. Three women presented with a swollen, red and painful breast which turned out to be inflammatory breast cancer after being treated as infectious mastitis. Non-puerperal bacterial mastitis may be confused with inflammatory breast cancer, leading to potentially preventable delays in diagnosis and treatment. The skin changes in inflammatory breast cancer are caused by tumour emboli within the dermal lymphatics, and not by infiltration of inflammatory cells as is suggested by the nomenclature. Patients who are treated for suspected mastitis without clinical improvement in one week should be referred to outpatient care in the surgery department to exclude underlying malignancy.