A rare case report of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia with an uncommon CALM2 mutation.

Background: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a primary arrhythmia disorder characterized by syncope or sudden cardiac death and typically caused by a gain-of-function of the Ryanodine Receptor Type 2 (RyR2) mutation. Calmodulin is a calcium-binding protein responsible for many intracellular signalling pathways and disruptions in function or regulation may lead to potentially fatal arrhythmias. We present a case of a young patient with CPVT found to have an unusual, potentially causative, Calmodulin 2-a protein coding gene (CALM2) mutation. Case summary: A 21-year-old female with autism was brought to the ED following cardiac arrest. Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia was captured on electrocardiogram. Propranolol was initiated, and patient had no further episodes of ventricular arrhythmia. A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted, and further genetics testing was done. Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing (PGnome®-RAPID) resulted heterozygous variant of uncertain significance in CALM2 gene NM_001743.5 for variant c.136G>A. Discussion: To the authors' knowledge, this is the third known record of such mutation in accordance with the International Calmodulin Registry (n = 74). Identification of CALM mutations can help advance the understanding of genetic underpinnings of arrhythmias and underscore necessity of genetic screening and personalized treatment strategies. Subcutaneous ICDs offer a promising therapeutic option while minimizing risks associated with traditional transvenous ICDs.

Advanced heart failure and heart transplantation in adult congenital heart disease in the current era.

BACKGROUND: Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) may undergo heart transplantation (HTx) despite increased risk of poor short-term outcomes due to factors including surgical complexity and antibody sensitization. We assessed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with ACHD in the current era referred for HTx at a single high-volume transplant center. METHODS: From 2010 to 2020, 37 ACHD patients were evaluated for HTx. ACHD HTx recipients were compared to non-ACHD HTx recipients matched for age, sex, listing status, and prior cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Of the 37 patients with ACHD, eight (21.6%) were declined for HTx. Of 29 ACHD patients listed, 19 (65.5%) underwent HTx. Compared with non-ACHD HTx controls, the ACHD HTx recipients had more treated cellular (21.1% vs. 15.8%, P = .010) and antibody-mediated (15.8% vs. 10.5%, P = .033) rejection. There was no difference in hospital readmission or allograft vasculopathy at 1 year. There was a nonsignificant higher 1-year mortality in ACHD HTx recipients (21.1% vs. 7.9%, P = .21). CONCLUSION: At a high-volume transplant center, ACHD patients undergoing HTx appear to have a marginally higher risk of rejection, but no significant increase in 1-year mortality. With careful selection and management, HTx for patients with ACHD may be feasible in the current era.