Group schema therapy combined with psychomotor therapy for older adults with a personality disorder: an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although several types of psychotherapy effectively reduce psychological distress associated with personality disorders, randomised controlled trials (RCT) have systematically excluded older patients. We aimed to examine the effectiveness of group schema therapy combined with psychomotor therapy (GST + PMT) in later life compared with treatment as usual (TAU). METHODS: We did an open-label, multicentre, RCT in eight outpatient clinics for geriatric psychiatry in the Netherlands. Adults aged 60 years or older with a full or subthreshold cluster B or C personality disorder according to DSM criteria were included and randomly assigned 1:1 to GST + PMT or TAU by an independent researcher applying a computer-generated sequence per study site when 8 to 16 patients had given informed consent; investigators and interviewers were kept blinded until end of follow-up. Included individuals received 20 weekly sessions of GST + PMT or TAU with 1 year of follow-up. The primary outcome was psychological distress, measured with the 53-item Brief Symptom Inventory. The trial was registered with International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, NTR6621. FINDINGS: Of the 145 study participants recruited between Feb 21, 2018, and Jan 21, 2020, 102 patients (median age of 69 years [IQR 63-71], 62 [61%] female) who concluded therapy before the COVID-19 pandemic (cutoff March 20, 2020) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (51 in each study group), because COVID-19 measures substantially disrupted delivery of group therapy. GST + PMT significantly improved psychological distress compared with TAU over the 6-month treatment period (Cohen's d 0·42, 95% CI 0·16 to 0·68; p=0·0016). The pre-post effect of GST + PMT remained stable during follow-up, whereas patients receiving TAU further improved, resulting in a non-significant difference between groups at 1 year (Cohen's d 0·21, 95% CI -0·07 to 0·48; p=0·14). No patients reported adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Psychotherapy focused on personality disorders is effective in later life, resulting in a faster improvement in psychopathology than TAU. Future studies should focus on increasing effectiveness by intensifying or prolonging treatment. FUNDING: Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development. TRANSLATION: For the Dutch translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Economic evaluations of mammography to screen for breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Background: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have limited resources compared to high-income countries (HICs). Therefore, it is critical that LMICs implement cost-effective strategies to reduce the burden of breast cancer. This study aimed to answer the question of whether mammography is a cost-effective breast cancer screening method in LMICs. Methods: A systematic article search was conducted through Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Econlit. Studies were included only if they conducted a full economic evaluation and focused on mammography screening in LMICs. Two reviewers screened through the title and abstract of each article and continued with full-text selection. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively. Quality assessment for each included study was conducted using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) extended checklist. Results: This review identified 21 studies economically evaluating mammography as a breast cancer screening method in LMICs. Eighteen of these studies concluded that mammography screening was a cost-effective strategy. Most studies (71%) were conducted in upper-middle-income countries (Upper MICs). The quality of the studies varied from low to good. Important factors determining cost-effectiveness are the target age group (eg, 50-59 years), the screening interval (eg, biennial or triennial), as well as any combination with other breast cancer control strategies (eg, combination with treatment strategy for breast cancer patients). Conclusions: Mammography screening appeared to be a cost-effective strategy in LMICs, particularly in Upper MICs. More studies conducted in lower-middle-income and low-income countries are needed to better understand the cost-effectiveness of mammography screening in these regions.