CE: Overcoming Movement-Evoked Pain to Facilitate Postoperative Recovery.

ABSTRACT: Severe postoperative movement-evoked pain (MEP) can be immobilizing, instilling in patients the fear that further activity will produce unbearable pain. This impedes healing and restoration of function while also extending time to recovery. Therefore, it is critical to manage MEP effectively through timely evaluation and comprehensive care planning. This article builds on recent calls to standardize testing of MEP to inform care planning in a way that both reduces pain and improves functioning. Subsequent reassessment of MEP can guide the refinement of therapy. Although this approach may seem intuitive, it challenges common practices that focus too heavily on pain intensity, resulting in overtreating, undertreating, or not treating pain, while ignoring the risks of immobility and the importance of movement for improving functional capacity. The authors propose a multifaceted approach to overcoming MEP that nurse clinicians, educators, researchers, and compliance professionals can use to enhance the quality and safety of nursing practice.

CE: Assessing Movement-Evoked Pain.

ABSTRACT: One of the most common and nuanced tasks that nurses perform is pain assessment, particularly in acute postoperative settings where frequent reassessments are needed. Most assessments are limited to obtaining a pain intensity score with little attention paid to the conditions necessitating the assessment or the factors contributing to the pain. Pain is frequently assessed during rest, but seldom during periods of movement or activity, which is a crucial omission given that acute postoperative movement-evoked pain (MEP) is intense and a common barrier to healing and restoration of function. In addition to physical limitations, MEP can impede cognitive, emotional, and social functioning in ways that can contribute to chronic pain, mood disorders, and disability. Professional and regulatory standards are moving away from a focus on pain intensity to an emphasis on its context, impact on function, and associated distress. Thus, there are many driving forces compelling nurses to integrate MEP assessments into practice to expedite the restoration of biopsychosocial functioning in postoperative patients. The authors discuss the clinical significance of a MEP assessment as well as protocols and tools for completing such assessments.

[Pain registration: for the benefit of the inspectorate or the patient?]. / Pijnregistratie niet voor Inspectie maar voor patiënt.

Increasing attention is currently being directed to the measurement and treatment of pain. A recent study concluded that the implementation of a patient safety programme was successful because 99% of the hospitals indicated that they measure postoperative pain. However, another recent study, evaluating this safety programme, concluded that hospitals could improve the implementation of pain measurements, as only 56% of the postoperative patients were subject to standardized pain measurements during the first 3 days following surgery. The reason for this notable difference may be the tendency to implement pain registration mainly for external justification purposes. The attitude towards pain needs to change; too often it is still considered as an uninteresting side effect of treatment. Insight in the internal utility and effects of pain registration might help to further improve the quality of postoperative pain management. Acute Pain Service teams should have a facilitating role.

['Postoperative pain treatment' practice guideline revised]. / Herziene richtlijn 'Postoperatieve pijn'.

On the initiative of the Dutch Association of Anaesthesiologists, a multidisciplinary workgroup has revised the 2003 practice guideline on 'Postoperative pain treatment' for adults and children. The main reason for revision was the availability of new drugs and new methods of administration. The most important deviations from the previous edition are the following. The organisation of care has been amended according to the current themes of the Safety Management System in the Netherlands, and a prediction model for postoperative pain was added. The drugs oxycodone, S-ketamine, pregabalin, gabapentin and metamizole were added, as well as new methods of administration and techniques for preventing postoperative pain. This revised guideline is more conservative than the previous one in the choice of epidural analgesia. In patients with relative contraindications for epidural analgesia, peripheral and locoregional blocks or multimodal pain treatment are advised. In the case of postoperative nausea and vomiting, administration of dexamethasone, droperidol and 5-HT3-antagonists is recommended, preferably in combination. Non-medicinal treatment options are not recommended.