The choreography of chromatin in RNA polymerase III regulation.

Regulation of eukaryotic gene expression involves a dynamic interplay between the core transcriptional machinery, transcription factors, and chromatin organization and modification. While this applies to transcription by all RNA polymerase complexes, RNA polymerase III (RNAPIII) seems to be atypical with respect to its mechanisms of regulation. One distinctive feature of most RNAPIII transcribed genes is that they are devoid of nucleosomes, which relates to the high levels of transcription. Moreover, most of the regulatory sequences are not outside but within the transcribed open chromatin regions. Yet, several lines of evidence suggest that chromatin factors affect RNAPIII dynamics and activity and that gene sequence alone does not explain the observed regulation of RNAPIII. Here we discuss the role of chromatin modification and organization of RNAPIII transcribed genes and how they interact with the core transcriptional RNAPIII machinery and regulatory DNA elements in and around the transcribed genes.

Locus-specific proteome decoding reveals Fpt1 as a chromatin-associated negative regulator of RNA polymerase III assembly.

Transcription of tRNA genes by RNA polymerase III (RNAPIII) is tuned by signaling cascades. The emerging notion of differential tRNA gene regulation implies the existence of additional regulatory mechanisms. However, tRNA gene-specific regulators have not been described. Decoding the local chromatin proteome of a native tRNA gene in yeast revealed reprogramming of the RNAPIII transcription machinery upon nutrient perturbation. Among the dynamic proteins, we identified Fpt1, a protein of unknown function that uniquely occupied RNAPIII-regulated genes. Fpt1 binding at tRNA genes correlated with the efficiency of RNAPIII eviction upon nutrient perturbation and required the transcription factors TFIIIB and TFIIIC but not RNAPIII. In the absence of Fpt1, eviction of RNAPIII was reduced, and the shutdown of ribosome biogenesis genes was impaired upon nutrient perturbation. Our findings provide support for a chromatin-associated mechanism required for RNAPIII eviction from tRNA genes and tuning the physiological response to changing metabolic demands.

Mutational scans reveal differential evolvability of Drosophila promoters and enhancers.

Rapid enhancer and slow promoter evolution have been demonstrated through comparative genomics. However, it is not clear how this information is encoded genetically and if this can be used to place evolution in a predictive context. Part of the challenge is that our understanding of the potential for regulatory evolution is biased primarily toward natural variation or limited experimental perturbations. Here, to explore the evolutionary capacity of promoter variation, we surveyed an unbiased mutation library for three promoters in Drosophila melanogaster. We found that mutations in promoters had limited to no effect on spatial patterns of gene expression. Compared to developmental enhancers, promoters are more robust to mutations and have more access to mutations that can increase gene expression, suggesting that their low activity might be a result of selection. Consistent with these observations, increasing the promoter activity at the endogenous locus of shavenbaby led to increased transcription yet limited phenotypic changes. Taken together, developmental promoters may encode robust transcriptional outputs allowing evolvability through the integration of diverse developmental enhancers. This article is part of the theme issue 'Interdisciplinary approaches to predicting evolutionary biology'.

Epi-Decoder: Decoding the Local Proteome of a Genomic Locus by Massive Parallel Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Combined with DNA-Barcode Sequencing.

The genome in a eukaryotic cell is packaged into chromatin and regulated by chromatin-binding and chromatin-modifying factors. Many of these factors and their complexes have been identified before, but how each genomic locus interacts with its surrounding proteins in the nucleus over time and in changing conditions remains poorly described. Measuring protein-DNA interactions at a specific locus in the genome is challenging and current techniques such as capture of a locus followed by mass spectrometry require high levels of enrichment. Epi-Decoder, a method developed in budding yeast, enables systematic decoding of the proteome of a single genomic locus of interest without the need for locus enrichment. Instead, Epi-Decoder uses massive parallel chromatin immunoprecipitation of tagged proteins combined with barcoding a genomic locus and counting of coimmunoprecipitated barcodes by DNA sequencing (TAG-ChIP-Barcode-Seq). In this scenario, DNA barcode counts serve as a quantitative readout for protein binding of each tagged protein to the barcoded locus. Epi-Decoder can be applied to determine the protein-DNA interactions at a wide range of genomic loci, such as coding genes, noncoding genes, and intergenic regions. Furthermore, Epi-Decoder provides the option to study protein-DNA interactions upon changing cellular and/or genetic conditions. In this protocol, we describe in detail how to construct Epi-Decoder libraries and how to perform an Epi-Decoder analysis.

Dense and pleiotropic regulatory information in a developmental enhancer.

Changes in gene regulation underlie much of phenotypic evolution1. However, our understanding of the potential for regulatory evolution is biased, because most evidence comes from either natural variation or limited experimental perturbations2. Using an automated robotics pipeline, we surveyed an unbiased mutation library for a developmental enhancer in Drosophila melanogaster. We found that almost all mutations altered gene expression and that parameters of gene expression-levels, location, and state-were convolved. The widespread pleiotropic effects of most mutations may constrain the evolvability of developmental enhancers. Consistent with these observations, comparisons of diverse Drosophila larvae revealed apparent biases in the phenotypes influenced by the enhancer. Developmental enhancers may encode a higher density of regulatory information than has been appreciated previously, imposing constraints on regulatory evolution.