Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging.

OBJECTIVE: Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) is defined as endometrial tissue that is superficial to the peritoneum. AWE is often difficult to diagnose, mimicking a broad spectrum of diseases. The aim of this study was to describe the appearance of AWE on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. METHODS: We present ten patients with AWE (12 lesions) in which MR imaging was used for diagnosis. MR imaging included T2-weighted imaging and T1-weighted imaging with fat suppression. To assess the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in endometriosis, four patients underwent additional DWI. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated using b values of 50, 400, 800 and 1,200 s/mm(2). RESULTS: In most cases, the lesion was located ventral or dorsal to the aponeurosis of the rectus oblique muscle (n = 6) or in the rectus abdominis (n = 5). MR of AWE lesions showed isointense or slightly hyperintense signal compared with muscle on T2-weighted images and showed isointense or slightly hyperintense signal compared with muscle on T1-weighted images with foci of high signal intensity, indicative of haemorrhage. The mean ADC value of AWE was 0.93 x 10(-3)/mm(2)/s. CONCLUSION: MR imaging seems to be useful in determining the location and depth of infiltration in surrounding tissue preoperatively.

Routine versus selective computed tomography of the abdomen, pelvis, and lumbar spine in blunt trauma: a prospective evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Discussion still remains whether computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen, pelvis, and lumbar spine should be performed routinely after blunt trauma with high energy impact or only in restricted situations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the additional value of a routine CT algorithm as compared with a more restricted, selective CT algorithm. MATERIALS: This prospective study consisted of 465 patients that met the inclusion criteria of our high-energy trauma protocol. All patients underwent physical examination, abdominal ultrasound (AUS), and conventional radiography (CR) of the pelvis and lumbar spine and subsequently routine CT of the abdomen, pelvis, and lumbar spine. Before CT, a subgroup of patients with abnormal physical examination or CR or AUS was prospectively defined as the selective CT group. Type and extent of injuries and impact on treatment were recorded for both the routine CT group and the selective CT subgroup. RESULTS: Of all patients, 42 received selective CT of the abdomen, 71 of the pelvis, and 48 of the lumbar spine. Compared with the algorithm with selective CT, routine CT revealed additional traumatic injuries in 15% of the patients in the abdomen, in 2.4% in the pelvis and in 8.2% in the lumbar spine. This resulted in an overall change of treatment in 6.4% (95% confidence interval, 3.7-9.0) of the patients who would not have received CT in a selective CT algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with an algorithm with selective CT, an algorithm with routine CT finds substantially more clinically relevant diagnoses, even in patients with unsuspicious clinical examination, normal CR, and normal AUS.

Assessment of a new trauma workflow concept implementing a sliding CT scanner in the trauma room: the effect on workup times.

INTRODUCTION: We developed a new shockroom resuscitation setting that includes a moveable, multislice computed tomography (CT) scanner capable of scanning patients during the initial trauma resuscitation phase without (multiple) patient transfers that previously were necessary. This enables us to perform a complete diagnostic trauma workup, without leaving the shockroom. In this study, we assess the effect of the new Trauma Workflow Concept on the initial diagnostic workup times in the trauma room. MATERIALS: Data of 100 consecutive trauma patients were collected prospectively (2005 cohort) and compared with 100 consecutive trauma patients seen in our previous trauma resuscitation setting (2003 cohort). For all patients, time management was evaluated using video registration and complemented with electronic imaging times. Patients with and without CT scanning were compared with the effect of CT scanning on complete workup time, defined as time from admission to the trauma room to time of completion of diagnostic workup. RESULTS: Patient demographics, including appliance of CT imaging were similar. Complete diagnostic workup for patients who underwent CT imaging took an average of 79 minutes (standard deviation +/- 29 minutes) in the 2005 cohort and 105 minutes (standard deviation +/- 48 minutes) in the 2003 cohort. Complete diagnostic workup without CT imaging took 56 minutes and 53 minutes for the 2005 and 2003 cohorts, respectively. There was no difference found for nonscanned patients, whereas there was a significant difference between 2005 and 2003 for scanned patients (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our new trauma workflow concept with a sliding CT scanner was significantly faster for completing the initial diagnostic workup, especially when CT imaging was required.

A longitudinal study using tibial ultrasonometry as a bone assessment technique in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

BACKGROUND: Several longitudinal studies have shown contradictory results regarding the change in bone status in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry as the bone assessment technique. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a more recently developed bone assessment technique which does not use radiation, tibial ultrasonometry, can be used for the detection of short-term changes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1997 to February 2001, 37 patients (25 boys, 12 girls, mean age 9.0 years, range 3.0-16.8 years) were included in a longitudinal study to assess changes in bone status induced by the disease itself and/or treatment. Of these 37 patients, 35 had a measurement at the start of therapy (t0), 26 at 6 months (t6), 24 at 12 months (t12), 11 at 24 months (t24) and 9 at 36 months (t36). For assessment of bone mass, the tibial ultrasound (US) device SoundScan Compact was used, which measures the speed of sound (SOS) along the cortex of the tibia over a fixed length of 5 cm at the mid-tibial point. RESULTS. The SOS standard deviation (SD) scores were significantly lower at t6, t12, t24 and t36 than at baseline (t0). The biggest change was found between t0 and t6. During follow-up, no significant correlation was found between changes from baseline of height SD scores and SOS SD scores, indicating that tibial ultrasonometry was not measuring growth. After ending therapy (t36), no further growth retardation was found. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term changes of SOS SD scores in children with ALL can be detected by tibial ultrasonometry. Tibial ultrasonometry measures a change in bone status, not growth.