Graft dilatation and Barrett's esophagus in adults after gastric pull-up and jejunal interposition for long-gap esophageal atresia.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal replacement (ER) with gastric pull-up (GPU) or jejunal interposition (JI) used to be the standard treatment for long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). Changes of the ER grafts on a macro- and microscopic level however, are unknown. AIM: To evaluate long-term clinical symptoms and anatomical and mucosal changes in adolescents and adults after ER for LGEA. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted including all LGEA patients ≥ 16 years who had undergone GPU or JI between 1985-2003 at two tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands. Patients underwent clinical assessment, contrast study and endoscopy with biopsy. Data was collected prospectively. Group differences between JI and GPU patients, and associations between different outcome measures were assessed using the Fisher's exact test for bivariate variables and the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables. Differences with a P-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Nine GPU patients and eleven JI patients were included. Median age at follow-up was 21.5 years and 24.4 years, respectively. Reflux was reported in six GPU patients (67%) vs four JI patients (36%) (P = 0.37). Dysphagia symptoms were reported in 64% of JI patients, compared to 22% of GPU patients (P = 0.09). Contrast studies showed dilatation of the jejunal graft in six patients (55%) and graft lengthening in four of these six patients. Endoscopy revealed columnar-lined esophagus in three GPU patients (33%) and intestinal metaplasia was histologically confirmed in two patients (22%). No association was found between reflux symptoms and macroscopic anomalies or intestinal metaplasia. Three GPU patients (33%) experienced severe feeding problems vs none in the JI group. The median body mass index of JI patients was 20.9 kg/m2 vs 19.5 kg/m2 in GPU patients (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The majority of GPU patients had reflux and intestinal metaplasia in 22%. The majority of JI patients had dysphagia and a dilated graft. Follow-up after ER for LGEA is essential.

Airway Epithelial Cultures of Children with Esophageal Atresia as a Model to Study Respiratory Tract Disorders.

Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare birth defect in which respiratory tract disorders are a major cause of morbidity. It remains unclear whether respiratory tract disorders are in part caused by alterations in airway epithelial cell functions such as the activity of motile cilia. This can be studied using airway epithelial cell culture models of patients with EA. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility to culture and functionally characterize motile cilia function in the differentiated air-liquid interface cultured airway epithelial cells and 3D organoids derived from nasal brushings and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from children with EA. We demonstrate the feasibility of culturing differentiated airway epithelia and organoids of nasal brushings and BAL fluid of children with EA, which display normal motile cilia function. EA patient-derived airway epithelial cultures can be further used to examine whether alterations in epithelial functions contribute to respiratory disorders in EA.

Bacterial Colonization of the Lower Airways in Children With Esophageal Atresia.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal atresia (EA) is most often accompanied by some degree of tracheomalacia (TM), which negatively influences the airway by ineffective clearance of secretions. This can lead to lower airway bacterial colonization (LABC), which may cause recurrent respiratory tract infections (RTIs). This study aims to evaluate the prevalence and specific pathogens of LABC in EA patients. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective single-site cohort study was conducted including all EA patients that had undergone an intraoperative bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) during various routine surgical interventions. Concentrations of greater than 10 cfu were considered evidence of LABC. RESULTS: We recruited 68 EA patients, of which 12 were excluded based on the exclusion criteria. In the remaining 56 patients, a total of 90 BAL samples were obtained. In 57% of the patients, at least 1 BAL sample was positive for LABC. Respiratory symptoms were reported in 21 patients at the time of the BAL, of which 10 (48%) had LABC. Haemophilus influenzae (14%) and Staphylococcus aureus (16%) were most frequently found in the BAL samples. The number of respiratory tract infections and the existence of a recurrent fistula were significantly associated with LABC ( P = 0.008 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study showing that patients with EA have a high prevalence of bacterial colonization of the lower airways which may be a leading mechanism of severe and recurrent respiratory complications.

Thoracoscopic Repair of Esophageal Atresia.

Background: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare congenital malformation of the esophagus. Surgical treatment is required to restore the continuity of the esophagus. This can be performed through thoracotomy. However, an increasing number of hospitals is performing minimal invasive surgery (MIS). In this article, we describe the technique of thoracoscopic repair of EA in neonates in more detail and show the outcome of a patient cohort operated by young pediatric surgeons in training. Methods: Between 2014 and 2019 correction was performed in 64 EA type C patients at the UMC Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, mainly by young pediatric surgeons in training. Results: All patients were corrected through MIS, 3 days after birth. The median operation duration was 181 (127-334) minutes. Nasogastric tube feeding was started on the first postoperative day, and oral feeding 6 days postop. Postoperative complications included leakage (14.1%), stenosis (51.1%), and recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula (7.8%). Conclusion: Thoracoscopic repair of EA can be performed safely, with good outcome and all the benefits of MIS. However, it remains a challenging procedure and should be performed only in pediatric centers with a vast experience in MIS, especially when training young pediatric surgeons. These centers must have access to a multidisciplinary team of neonatologists, pediatric anesthesiologists, surgeons, and ENT specialists to ensure the best possible care in hemodynamic, respiratory, and cerebral monitoring and gastrointestinal and developmental outcome.