Eliminating first trimester combined testing: Consequences for early detection of significant fetal anomalies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether implementation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing for aneuploidy as a first-tier test and subsequent abolition of first trimester combined testing (FCT) affected the first trimester detection (<14 weeks) of certain fetal anomalies. METHODS: We performed a geographical cohort study in two Fetal Medicine Units between 2011 and 2020, including 705 fetuses with prenatally detected severe brain, abdominal wall and congenital heart defects. Cases were divided into two groups: before (n = 396) and after (n = 309) cfDNA introduction. The primary outcome was the first trimester detection rate (<14 weeks) overall and for non-chromosomal anomalies solely. RESULTS: Overall, gastroschisis, AVSD and HLHS were detected more often in the first trimester in the before group compared to the after group, respectively 54.5% versus 18.5% (p = 0.004), 45.9% versus 26.9% (p = 0.008) and 30% versus 3.4% (p = 0.005). After exclusion of chromosomal anomalies identifiable through cfDNA testing, the detection of AVSD remained higher in the before group (43.3% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.02), leading to a possible earlier gestation at termination. The termination of pregnancy (TOP) rate did not differ among the groups. In the after group, referrals for suspected anomalies following a dating scan between 11 and 14 weeks significantly increased from 17.4% to 29.1% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study underscores the value of a scan dedicated to fetal anatomy in the first trimester as we observed a decline in the early detection of certain fetal anomalies (detectable in the first trimester) subsequent to the abolition of FCT.

Validation of Reference Charts for Mid-Trimester Fetal Biometry.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess charts proposed for international use in the Intergrowth-21st Project. METHODS: Ultrasound data were collected from 43,923 healthy singleton pregnancies examined at 18-23 weeks of gestation in the Netherlands. Fetal measurements were converted into Z-scores using previous and current Dutch reference charts and Intergrowth charts. The distributions of the Z-scores were compared with the expected standard normal distribution. RESULTS: In the Dutch population, Intergrowth curves perform well for head circumference and biparietal diameter, but not for abdominal circumference (AC, Z- score = 0.43) and femur length (FL, Z-score = 0.26). Similar findings have been reported in other European countries. Compared with the population in the Intergrowth study, Dutch women are relatively tall (170 vs. 162 cm) and sturdy (67 vs. 61 kg) with a moderately high BMI. Maternal size, in particular maternal height, is positively correlated with birthweight. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst the establishment of the Intergrowth charts is an important step towards worldwide uniformity, for now locally derived charts still perform better, especially for AC and FL. Results from our validation study indicate that distinction between normal and pathologically small babies may be improved by taking maternal size into account.

Prevalence, diagnosis and outcome of cleft lip with or without cleft palate in The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the accuracy and timing of diagnosis of fetal cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL ± P) in the years following the introduction of a national screening program, and to assess the completeness and accuracy of information in The Netherlands Perinatal Registry. METHODS: A list was obtained of cases with a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of CL ± P from two fetal medicine units between 2008 and 2012. All cases of CL ± P were included irrespective of the presence or absence of additional anomalies. Cases were included if the estimated date of delivery was between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012. RESULTS: During the study period, 330 cases of CL ± P were identified, with a prevalence of 15 per 10 000 pregnancies. The number of cases that were detected before 24 weeks' gestation increased during the study period, while the rate of termination of pregnancy did not change significantly (P = 0.511). CL ± P was isolated in 217 (66%) cases and karyotype was abnormal in 69 (21%) cases. In 5% of the cases in which CL ± P seemed to be isolated during the 18-23-week anomaly scan, postnatal array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) revealed an abnormal karyotype and 50% of these cases had major additional anomalies. Examination of data from The Netherlands Perinatal Registry demonstrated that in 37% of cases CL±P was not recorded in the pregnancy records. CONCLUSION: CL ± P is increasingly being diagnosed prenatally, without a significant effect on the rate of pregnancy termination. Further improvement in the diagnostic accuracy may be achieved by advocating prenatal array-CGH to reduce the frequency of unexpected anomalies being diagnosed after birth. It is important that healthcare providers register accurately the presence or absence of anomalies in the birth records to ensure that, in the future, data from The Netherlands Perinatal Registry can be relied upon to monitor prevalence. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Timing of detection of anencephaly in The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the gestational age at detection and prevalence of anencephaly in the North of The Netherlands over a 5-year period. METHODS: A case list of all cases of anencephaly from two fetal medicine units was compiled. Cases were included if the estimated due date was between 1 August 2008 and 31 July 2013. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of anencephaly was 5.4 per 10.000 pregnancies (n = 110). The majority of cases (69%) was detected before 18 weeks' gestation. Factors determining successful early diagnosis were competence level of the sonographers, with a significantly higher detection rate when scans were performed by a sonographer licensed by the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) for nuchal translucency measurement (p = 0.001), and gestational age at or beyond 11 weeks of gestation (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Improving detection of anencephaly in the first trimester requires ultrasound screening at or after 11 weeks of gestation, performed by experienced sonographers trained in recognizing fetal anomalies. Sonographers should be instructed that the goal of the first trimester scan is not only to measure nuchal translucency thickness but also to exclude major anomalies.

[Shift in the self-perceived health of 55-64-year olds between 1992 and 2002]. / Verschuiving van de ervaren gezondheid van 55-64-jarigen tussen 1992/'93 en 2002/'03. Verklarende factoren.

OBJECTIVE: Self-perceived health describes how a person perceives his or her own health. It is a widely used measure of health status. The aim of this study is to investigate the stability of self-perceived health between 1992/'93 and 2002/'03 of men and women aged 55-64 and to what extent a possible shift can be explained by demographic factors, lifestyle factors and objective health. METHODS: Data of two age-, sex- and region-stratified samples are used from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA), an ongoing cohort study in a population-based sample of older persons in the Netherlands. Self-perceived health is defined by the answer to the following question: How would you rate your health in general? with possible answers: 1 = excellent, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = sometimes good/sometimes poor and 5 = poor. In the analyses, answers 4 and 5 are combined because of the small number of answers in the category 'poor'. The difference in self-perceived health between the two cohorts is tested using the chi2-test. Multinomial regression analyses are used to examine which cohort and/or period factors are responsible for the cohort difference. RESULTS: The youngest cohort rated more excellent and poor health than the oldest, and less good and fair health. The youngest cohort had a higher prevalence of chronic illness, functional limitation and depressive symptoms, which negatively affected self-perceived health. The cohort and period factors do not significantly contribute to the explanation of the cohort difference. CONCLUSION: There is a small shift in self-perceived health over time. In comparison with the oldest cohort the self-perceived health of the youngest improved, taken the deteriorated objective health of the youngest cohort into account.