Feeding and swallowing outcomes following mandibular distraction osteogenesis: an analysis of 22 non-isolated paediatric cases.

Patients with mandibular hypoplasia and upper airway obstruction are at an increased risk of feeding and swallowing difficulties. Little has been described regarding these outcomes following mandibular distraction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mandibular distraction on feeding and swallowing function. A retrospective study was performed on 22 patients with non-isolated mandibular hypoplasia and severe upper airway obstruction treated with mandibular distraction. Median age at first mandibular distraction was 3.1 years (interquartile range 2.3-6.0 years) and the median follow-up time was 3.5 years (interquartile range 2.0-9.4 years). Prior to mandibular distraction, feeding difficulties were present in 18 patients. Swallowing difficulties were present in 20 patients, all of whom had problems in the oral phase of swallowing, while 11 patients had additional problems in the pharyngeal phase. Following mandibular distraction, at the time of follow-up, feeding difficulties persisted in 13 patients. Swallowing difficulties in the oral phase remained present in all 20 patients, while pharyngeal phase problems persisted in seven patients. In conclusion, feeding and swallowing difficulties are highly prevalent in non-isolated patients and often persist following mandibular distraction. Moreover, these can be the reason that decannulation cannot be accomplished. Hence, awareness and close follow-up by a specialized speech therapist is of paramount importance.

Functional outcomes in patients with facial dysostosis and severe upper airway obstruction.

An increased risk of upper airway obstruction (UAO) is seen in up to 95% of patients with facial dysostosis. Secondary to respiratory problems are feeding difficulties and increased nutritional requirements. Little has been described regarding these outcomes in this patient population. Hence, a retrospective cohort study was performed to gather data on functional outcomes. Eighteen patients with facial dysostosis and severe UAO were included. The median follow-up time was 3.42 years. A tracheostomy tube was placed in 13 patients, of whom 10 subsequently underwent mandibular distraction. Three of the five patients without a tracheostomy underwent mandibular distraction as the primary surgical treatment; the remaining two patients were treated conservatively with oxygen supplementation. At presentation, 13 patients had feeding difficulties. Overall malnutrition was present in 16 patients during follow-up. At the end of follow-up, severe UAO was present in 12 patients, feeding difficulties in seven patients, and malnutrition in four patients, while two patients died. In conclusion, patients with facial dysostosis have a high prevalence of severe UAO, feeding difficulties, and malnutrition. Importantly, mandibular distraction has limited success in treating severe UAO in these patients. Close follow-up by a specialized craniofacial team is of paramount importance to manage the long-term consequences.