Differentiating interstitial lung diseases from other respiratory diseases using electronic nose technology.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) may be difficult to distinguish from other respiratory diseases due to overlapping clinical presentation. Recognition of ILD is often late, causing delay which has been associated with worse clinical outcome. Electronic nose (eNose) sensor technology profiles volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath and has potential to detect ILD non-invasively. We assessed the accuracy of differentiating breath profiles of patients with ILD from patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and lung cancer using eNose technology. METHODS: Patients with ILD, asthma, COPD, and lung cancer, regardless of stage or treatment, were included in a cross-sectional study in two hospitals. Exhaled breath was analysed using an eNose (SpiroNose) and clinical data were collected. Datasets were split in training and test sets for independent validation of the model. Data were analyzed with partial least squares discriminant and receiver operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS: 161 patients with ILD and 161 patients with asthma (n = 65), COPD (n = 50) or lung cancer (n = 46) were included. Breath profiles of patients with ILD differed from all other diseases with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.00) in the test set. Moreover, breath profiles of patients with ILD could be accurately distinguished from the individual diseases with an AUC of 1.00 (95% CI 1.00-1.00) for asthma, AUC of 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.00) for COPD, and AUC of 0.98 (95% CI 0.94-1.00) for lung cancer in test sets. Results were similar after excluding patients who never smoked. CONCLUSIONS: Exhaled breath of patients with ILD can be distinguished accurately from patients with other respiratory diseases using eNose technology. eNose has high potential as an easily accessible point-of-care medical test for identification of ILD amongst patients with respiratory symptoms, and could possibly facilitate earlier referral and diagnosis of patients suspected of ILD.

Evaluation of different classification methods using electronic nose data to diagnose sarcoidosis.

Electronic nose (eNose) technology is an emerging diagnostic application, using artificial intelligence to classify human breath patterns. These patterns can be used to diagnose medical conditions. Sarcoidosis is an often difficult to diagnose disease, as no standard procedure or conclusive test exists. An accurate diagnostic model based on eNose data could therefore be helpful in clinical decision-making. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the performance of various dimensionality reduction methods and classifiers in order to design an accurate diagnostic model for sarcoidosis. Various methods of dimensionality reduction and multiple hyperparameter optimised classifiers were tested and cross-validated on a dataset of patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis (n= 224) and other interstitial lung disease (n= 317). Best performing methods were selected to create a model to diagnose patients with sarcoidosis. Nested cross-validation was applied to calculate the overall diagnostic performance. A classification model with feature selection and random forest (RF) classifier showed the highest accuracy. The overall diagnostic performance resulted in an accuracy of 87.1% and area-under-the-curve of 91.2%. After comparing different dimensionality reduction methods and classifiers, a highly accurate model to diagnose a patient with sarcoidosis using eNose data was created. The RF classifier and feature selection showed the best performance. The presented systematic approach could also be applied to other eNose datasets to compare methods and select the optimal diagnostic model.

Exhaled breath analysis in interstitial lung disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a need for better noninvasive tools to diagnose interstitial lung disease (ILD) and predict disease course. Volatile organic compounds present in exhaled breath contain valuable information on a person's health and may be a novel biomarker in ILD. In this review, we will give an overview of the basic principles of breath analysis, summarize the available evidence in ILD, and discuss future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS: An increasing number of studies on exhaled breath analysis were performed over the last decade in patients with ILD, using two methods for exhaled breath analysis: gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose technology. Most studies showed high accuracy for diagnosis of ILD, but study design and methods widely varied. Studies investigating the potential of electronic nose technology to predict treatment response and disease behavior are ongoing. SUMMARY: The majority of studies using exhaled breath analysis in ILD show promising results for diagnostic purposes, but validation studies are lacking. Larger prospective longitudinal studies using standardized methods are needed to collect the evidence required for developing an approved diagnostic medical test.

Diagnostic Performance of Electronic Nose Technology in Sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing sarcoidosis can be challenging, and a noninvasive diagnostic method is lacking. The electronic nose (eNose) technology profiles volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath and has potential as a point-of-care diagnostic tool. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can eNose technology be used to distinguish accurately between sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and healthy control subjects, and between sarcoidosis subgroups? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, exhaled breath of patients with sarcoidosis and ILD and healthy control subjects was analyzed by using an eNose (SpiroNose). Clinical characteristics were collected from medical files. Partial least squares discriminant and receiver-operating characteristic analyses were applied to a training and independent validation cohort. RESULTS: The study included 252 patients with sarcoidosis, 317 with ILD, and 48 healthy control subjects. In the validation cohorts, eNose distinguished sarcoidosis from control subjects with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.00 and pulmonary sarcoidosis from other ILD (AUC, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.93) and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (AUC, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.00). Exhaled breath of sarcoidosis patients with and without pulmonary involvement, pulmonary fibrosis, multiple organ involvement, pathology-supported diagnosis, and immunosuppressive treatment revealed no distinctive differences. Breath profiles differed between patients with a slightly and highly elevated soluble IL-2 receptor level (median cutoff, 772.0 U/mL; AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.92). INTERPRETATION: Patients with sarcoidosis can be distinguished from ILD and healthy control subjects by using eNose technology, indicating that this method may facilitate accurate diagnosis in the future. Further research is warranted to understand the value of eNose in monitoring sarcoidosis activity.

Patient Reported Experiences and Delays During the Diagnostic Pathway for Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Multinational European Survey.

Introduction: Pulmonary fibrosis includes a spectrum of diseases and is incurable. There is a variation in disease course, but it is often progressive leading to increased breathlessness, impaired quality of life, and decreased life expectancy. Detection of pulmonary fibrosis is challenging, which contributes to considerable delays in diagnosis and treatment. More knowledge about the diagnostic journey from patients' perspective is needed to improve the diagnostic pathway. The aims of this study were to evaluate the time to diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis, identify potential reasons for delays, and document patients emotions. Methods: Members of European patient organisations, with a self-reported diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis, were invited to participate in an online survey. The survey assessed the diagnostic pathway retrospectively, focusing on four stages: (1) time from initial symptoms to first appointment in primary care; (2) time to hospital referral; (3) time to first hospital appointment; (4) time to final diagnosis. It comprised open-ended and closed questions focusing on time to diagnosis, factors contributing to delays, diagnostic tests, patient emotions, and information provision. Results: Two hundred and seventy three participants (214 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 28 sarcoidosis, 31 other) from 13 countries responded. Forty percent of individuals took ≥1 year to receive a final diagnosis. Greatest delays were reported in stage 1, with only 50.2% making an appointment within 3 months. For stage 2, 73.3% reported a hospital referral within three primary care visits. However, 9.9% reported six or more visits. After referral, 76.9% of patients were assessed by a specialist within 3 months (stage 3) and 62.6% received a final diagnosis within 3 months of their first hospital visit (stage 4). Emotions during the journey were overall negative. A major need for more information and support during and after the diagnostic process was identified. Conclusion: The time to diagnose pulmonary fibrosis varies widely across Europe. Delays occur at each stage of the diagnostic pathway. Raising awareness about pulmonary fibrosis amongst the general population and healthcare workers is essential to shorten the time to diagnosis. Furthermore, there remains a need to provide patients with sufficient information and support at all stages of their diagnostic journey.