Oxygen in neonatal and infant anesthesia--current practice in the UK.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing awareness of the role of oxygen free radicals in the pathogenesis of many conditions associated with prematurity, which has led to caution in the use of oxygen in neonatal resuscitation. We surveyed the practice of UK pediatric anesthetists with regard to oxygen use in neonatal and infant anesthesia. METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey of 460 UK-based members of the Association of Pediatric Anesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. RESULTS: Responses were received from 247 pediatric anesthetists (54%). Seventy-five percent of anesthetists aim to avoid the use of 100% oxygen during routine infant anesthesia and 52% aim for an FiO(2) of < 0.4 in neonates. The factors most influencing choice of carrier gas are optimal oxygenation and the avoidance of pulmonary atelectasis. Sixteen percent stated that unavailability of medical air is a factor. Opinion was divided on concern about the effects of anesthetic agents on the developing brain. Moderate levels of concern were expressed about the potential toxic effects of oxygen on the eyes and lungs of premature newborns but this concern does not extend to term newborns. Only 20% of anesthetists had any recent knowledge of these issues. CONCLUSIONS: This survey indicates that there is no consistency in attitudes and practices and demonstrates considerable variation in the use of oxygen during anesthesia in premature and newborn babies and infants. This may reflect the paucity of evidence in the anesthetic literature on the potential harmful effects of high concentrations of oxygen in vulnerable groups of infants.

Immunization and anesthesia - an international survey.

BACKGROUND: There is no direct evidence of any major interaction between immunization and commonly used anesthetic agents and techniques in children, but it is possible that immunosuppression caused by anesthesia and surgery may lead to decreased vaccine effectiveness or an increased risk of complications. In addition, diagnostic difficulty may arise if a recently immunized child suffers from postoperative pyrexia or malaise. AIM: The aim of this study was to ascertain anesthetists' attitudes and practices regarding anesthesia and immunization. METHODS: We conducted an international survey of members of the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (APAGBI) and the Society for Paediatric Anaesthesia of New Zealand and Australia (SPANZA). RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-six (52.1%) APAGBI and 86 (49.4%) SPANZA responses were analyzed. There was no consensus of approach to this theoretical risk among respondents. In total, 60% of respondents would anesthetize a child for elective surgery within 1 week of receiving a live attenuated vaccine, but 40% would not. Few hospitals have formal policies on this issue and government guidance is based on a lack of evidence for adverse events rather than positive evidence of safety. CONCLUSIONS: There is a theoretical risk associated with anesthesia and surgery in recently immunized children. An international postal survey failed to find a consensus to this risk among pediatric anesthetists. From a risk management perspective, a review of the available evidence suggests that it would be prudent to adopt a cautious approach where the timing of elective surgery is discretionary. We therefore recommend that elective surgery and anesthesia should be postponed for 1 week after inactive vaccination and 3 weeks after live attenuated vaccination in children.

General anesthesia in an infant with X-linked myotubular myopathy.

We present a 20-week-old infant with the X-linked form of myotubular myopathy who required anesthesia for a Nissen fundoplication procedure where the response to nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade was evaluated.