[Diagnostics and therapy of achalasia]. / Diagnostik und Therapie der Achalasie.

The low incidence (1:100,000) makes primary idiopathic achalasia a problem of special importance. Patients often have a long medical history of suffering before the diagnosis is established and adequate therapy provided. Surgeons who perform antireflux surgery must be certain of detecting achalasia patients within their collective of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients to avoid contraindicated fundoplication. The current gold standard for establishing the diagnosis of achalasia is manometry. Especially in early stages, symptom evaluation, endoscopy and barium swallow lack adequate sensitivity. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is increasingly used and allows characterization of different achalasia types (i.e. type I classical achalasia, type II panesophageal pressurization and type III spasmodic achalasia) and differentiation from other motility disorders (e.g. distal esophageal spasm, jackhammer esophagus and nutcracker esophagus). For patients over 45 years of age additional endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography are recommended to exclude pseudoachalasia. A curative treatment restoring normal esophageal function does not exist; however, there are good options for symptom control. Therapy aims are abolishment of dysphagia, improvement of esophageal clearance, prevention of reflux and abolishment of chest pain. The current standard treatment is cardiomyotomy, which was first described 100 years ago by the German surgeon Ernst Heller and has been shown to be clearly superior when compared to endoscopic treatment (e.g. botox injection and balloon dilatation). Heller's myotomy procedure is preferentially performed via the laparoscopic route and combined with partial fundoplication. Currently, an alternative to performing Heller's myotomy via the endoscopic route is under intensive investigation in several centers worldwide. The peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) procedure has shown very promising initial results and warrants further clinical evaluation.

[Peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia. Literature review and own initial experience]. / Perorale endoskopische Myotomie zur Therapie der Achalasie. Literaturüberblick und eigene initiale Erfahrung.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a new, purely endoscopic procedure for treatment of achalasia. Due to the lack of incisions POEM can be regarded as a true NOTES procedure. With POEM a myotomy is created in a similar fashion to the previous standard treatment, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). The relatively free choice of length and localization of the myotomy may be regarded as advantages of POEM. The procedure starts with a mucosal incision (mucosal entry) followed by preparation of a submucosal tunnel crossing the esophagogastric junction and creation of a myotomy in an antegrade direction before the mucosal access is closed with endoscopic clip placement. Since the first description of the application of POEM in humans in 2010 by the pioneer Haruhiro Inoue, Yokohama, Japan, it has been used increasingly and investigated in some centers in Asia, the U.S.A. and also Europe. The results are very promising. Although the procedure is technically demanding it can be performed safely with low complication rates. The POEM procedure achieves very good control of dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux witch is only a rare side-effect witch is well-controllable with proton pump inhibitors (PPI). We review the currently available data from the literature and present our own initial series of 14 patients treated with POEM.

[Colonic diverticulosis and its complications: pathogenesis, classification and clinical implications]. / Die Kolondivertikulose und ihre Komplikationen: Pathogenese, Klassifikation und Klinische Implikationen.

Current understanding of the pathogenesis of colonic diverticulosis and its complications has certain implications for current therapy concepts, which are summarised here. Colonic diverticula in the Western world are pseudodiverticula predominating in the sigmoid colon. Pathogenesis is multifactorial and includes low-fibre diet, dysmotility, increased intraluminal pressure and morphological changes. Uncomplicated diverticulitis results from microperforations, contradicting the hypothesis of the "abscessed diverticulum". Administration of antibiotics for treatment is controversial. Complicated sigmoid diverticulitis is characterised by an intensive inflammatory infiltrate with macrophages. Immunosuppression and especially steroid intake are identified as risk factors. Nowadays, elective or emergency resection is generally recommended as therapy of first choice. However, contrary concepts with merely conservative treatment or drainage--even for perforated diverticulitis--are emerging. The pathogenesis of chronically recurrent diverticulitis is poorly understood and concepts are changing. Resection after the second episode is replaced by a risk-adapted strategy. Diverticular bleeding occurs due to rupture of a vas rectum at the fundus of the diverticulum. Conservative and endoscopic management is the first line and surgical resection plays a role as salvage-strategy in case of recurrent and life-threatening bleeding. Localising the bleeding, i.e., with angiography, is crucial prior to surgery. The pathophysiology of colonic diverticulosis is complex and incompletely understood and linked with several controversial issues, regarding treatment strategies.