Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mov Disord ; 32(6): 932-936, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28436572

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cysteamine has been demonstrated as potentially effective in numerous animal models of Huntington's disease. METHODS: Ninety-six patients with early-stage Huntington's disease were randomized to 1200 mg delayed-release cysteamine bitartrate or placebo daily for 18 months. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the UHDRS Total Motor Score. A linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures was used to assess treatment effect, expressed as the least-squares mean difference of cysteamine minus placebo, with negative values indicating less deterioration relative to placebo. RESULTS: At 18 months, the treatment effect was not statistically significant - least-squares mean difference, -1.5 ± 1.71 (P = 0.385) - although this did represent less mean deterioration from baseline for the treated group relative to placebo. Treatment with cysteamine was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of cysteamine was not demonstrated in this study population of patients with Huntington's disease. Post hoc analyses indicate the need for definitive future studies. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Assuntos
Cisteamina/farmacologia , Eliminadores de Cistina/farmacologia , Doença de Huntington/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Cisteamina/administração & dosagem , Cisteamina/efeitos adversos , Eliminadores de Cistina/administração & dosagem , Eliminadores de Cistina/efeitos adversos , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Can J Psychiatry ; 48(10): 675-80, 2003 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14674050

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Since publication of the DSM-IV, there remains a group of patients with depression and anxiety symptoms who are not well classified. We therefore wanted to determine more accurately the type of patients best described by the term "anxious depression." We also wanted to review the literature to assess the most appropriate treatment(s) for these patients. METHOD: We surveyed the medical literature published after 1994 for all articles containing the relevant terms and assessed all possible articles in detail to determine those relevant to the diagnosis and those that involved relevant clinical studies. RESULTS: The term anxious depression can encompass 3 groups of patients: those with comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD) and an anxiety disorder, those with MDD but with subthreshold anxiety symptoms, and those with subthreshold depressive and subthreshold anxiety symptoms (also called mixed anxiety and depressive disorder). CONCLUSIONS: Based upon our literature review, we believe that the term anxious depression should only be used for the second group; that is, those patients with an MDD and subthreshold anxiety symptoms. From our literature review to determine the most appropriate treatment for this group of patients, it appears likely that drugs inhibiting the reuptake of both noradrenaline and serotonin may have greater clinical utility than single-action drugs such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). However, it is also clear that much more research needs to be undertaken in this important patient group so that we can better understand its prevalence, clinical features, and treatment.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Comorbidade , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA