Automated Prognosis Marker Assessment in Breast Cancers Using BLEACH&STAIN Multiplexed Immunohistochemistry.

Prognostic markers in routine clinical management of breast cancer are often assessed using RNA-based multi-gene panels that depend on fluctuating tumor purity. Multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) holds the potential for an improved risk assessment. To enable automated prognosis marker detection (i.e., progesterone receptor [PR], estrogen receptor [ER], androgen receptor [AR], GATA3, TROP2, HER2, PD-L1, Ki67, TOP2A), a framework for automated breast cancer identification was developed and validated involving thirteen different artificial intelligence analysis steps and an algorithm for cell distance analysis using 11+1-marker-BLEACH&STAIN-mfIHC staining in 1404 invasive breast cancers of no special type (NST). The framework for automated breast cancer detection discriminated normal glands from malignant glands with an accuracy of 98.4%. This approach identified that five (PR, ER, AR, GATA3, PD-L1) of nine biomarkers were associated with prolonged overall survival (p ≤ 0.0095 each) and two of these (PR, AR) were found to be independent risk factors in multivariate analysis (p ≤ 0.0151 each). The combined assessment of PR-ER-AR-GATA3-PD-L1 as a five-marker prognosis score showed strong prognostic relevance (p < 0.0001) and was an independent risk factor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.0034). Automated breast cancer detection in combination with an artificial intelligence-based analysis of mfIHC enables a rapid and reliable analysis of multiple prognostic parameters. The strict limitation of the analysis to malignant cells excludes the impact of fluctuating tumor purity on assay precision.

6q deletion is frequent but unrelated to patient prognosis in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Deletions involving the long arm of chromosome 6 have been reported to occur in breast cancer, but little is known about the clinical relevance of this alteration. METHODS: We made use of a pre-existing tissue microarray with 2197 breast cancers and employed a 6q15/centromere 6 dual-labeling probe for fluorescence in situ (FISH) analysis RESULTS: Heterozygous 6q15 deletions were found in 202 (18%) of 1099 interpretable cancers, including 19% of 804 cancers of no special type (NST), 3% of 29 lobular cancers, 7% of 41 cribriform cancers, and 28% of 18 cancers with papillary features. Homozygous deletions were not detected. In the largest subset of NST tumors, 6q15 deletions were significantly linked to advanced tumor stage and high grade (p < 0.0001 each). 6q deletions were also associated with estrogen receptor negativity (p = 0.0182), high Ki67 proliferation index (p < 0.0001), amplifications of HER2 (p = 0.0159), CCND1 (p = 0.0069), and cMYC (p = 0.0411), as well as deletions of PTEN (p = 0.0003), 8p21 (p < 0.0001), and 9p21 (p = 0.0179). However, 6q15 deletion was unrelated to patient survival in all cancers, in NST cancers, or in subsets of cancers defined by the presence or absence of lymph-node metastases. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that 6q deletion is a frequent event in breast cancer that is statistically linked to unfavorable tumor phenotype and features of genomic instability. The absence of any prognostic impact argues against a clinical applicability of 6q15 deletion testing in breast cancer patients.

Up-regulation of lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 (LPCAT1) is linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Dysregulation of lipid metabolism is common in cancer. Lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 (LPCAT1) has been implicated with various cancer types. Here we analyzed by immunohistochemistry its expression in 2,197 breast cancers. LPCAT1 staining was found in 97.8% of 1,774 interpretable tumors, including 48.1% with weak, 28.7% with moderate, and 14.4% with strong expression. The frequency of LPCAT1 positivity depended on the histological tumor type. Moderate or strong LPCAT1 positivity was more common in cancers of no special type (NST) (46.2%) than in lobular carcinomas (25.9%; p<0.0001). Strong LPCAT1 was associated with BRE grade, tumor cell proliferation and overall survival in all cancers and in the subgroup of NST cancers (p<0.0001, each). In the subset of NST cancers the prognostic effect of LPCAT1 expression was independent of pT, and BRE grade (p<0.0001 each). A comparison with molecular features showed that LPCAT1 was strongly associated with estrogen receptor negativity (p<0.0001), progesterone receptor negativity (p<0,0001), amplification of HER2 (p<0.0001) and MYC (p=0.0066), as well as deletions of PTEN (p<0.0001) and CDKNA2 (p=0.0151). It is concluded that LPCAT1 overexpression is linked to adverse tumor features and poor prognosis in breast cancer. These data also highlight the important role of lipid metabolism in breast cancer biology.

A shift from membranous and stromal syndecan-1 (CD138) expression to cytoplasmic CD138 expression is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Syndecan-1 (CD138) is a transmembrane proteoglycan expressed in normal and malignant tissues. It is of interest because of a possible prognostic effect in tumors and as a target for Indatuximab, a monoclonal antibody coupled to a cytotoxic agent. To assess the prognostic role of CD138 expression in breast cancer (BCa), a tissue microarray containing 1535 BCa specimens was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Cytoplasmic, membranous, and stromal CD138 staining was separately analyzed. In normal breast tissue, CD138 staining was limited to epithelial cell membranes. In cancers, membranous staining tended to become weaker or even disappeared (38.3% of cancers with absence of membranous staining) but cytoplasmic and stromal staining newly appeared in 29.7% and 58.1% of cancers. Loss of membranous epithelial CD138 staining as well as presence of cytoplasmic and stromal CD138 positivity were-to a variable degree-associated with high pT, high grade, nodal metastasis, estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+, and poor overall patient survival. A combined analysis of epithelial and stromal CD138 expression revealed a link to overall patient survival (P < .0001) with best prognosis for patients with stromal positivity and absence of cytoplasmic staining, the worst prognosis for cancers with cytoplasmic staining and stromal negativity and intermediate prognosis for patients having either cytoplasmic staining or stromal negativity. In multivariate analyses, CD138 was not independent of established prognostic features. In summary, these data reveal a compartment depending prognostic effect of CD138 expression in BCa with cytoplasmic positivity being linked to aggressive cancer and stromal CD138 being linked to a more favorable prognosis.

Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating the Impact of Lymphoscintigraphy as Part of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: SenSzi (GBG80) Trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of the current work was to clarify whether a preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) enhances staging accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase III trial, patients with cN0 early breast cancer or extensive/high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ planned for standard radioactive-labeled colloid LSG with subsequent SLNB were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive SLNB either with knowledge of the LSG findings or without. As the false-negative rate of SLNB correlates with the number of resected sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), our primary end point was the mean number of histologically detected SLNs per patient. One thousand one hundred two evaluable patients were necessary to demonstrate noninferiority of SLNB without LSG. Stratified one-sided 95% CI for the difference (without LSG - with LSG) in the mean number of histologically detected SLNs had to be greater than -0.27 (10% noninferiority margin). Stratification was performed according to tumor focality and trial site. Additional predefined secondary end points (rates of node-positive patients and of completion axillary lymph node dissection) were analyzed to rule out differences in the reliable detection of nodal metastases. RESULTS: Between May 2014 and October 2015, 1,198 patients were randomly assigned in 23 German and Swiss breast centers. Modified intention-to-treat analysis (n = 1,163) showed a mean number of histologically detected SLNs of 2.21 with LSG and 2.26 without LSG (difference 0.05; stratified 95% CI, -0.18 to infinity), thus establishing noninferiority of omitting preoperative LSG. Secondary end points displayed no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: We show that SLNB is equally effective irrespective of the surgeon's knowledge of preoperative LSG results. SLNB without LSG will speed up the preoperative workflow and reduce cost.

p16 overexpression and 9p21 deletion are linked to unfavorable tumor phenotype in breast cancer.

Overexpression of the p16 tumor suppressor, but also deletion of its gene locus 9p21, is linked to unfavorable tumor phenotype and poor prognosis in breast cancer. To better understand these contradictory observations, and to clarify the prognostic impact of p16 expression and 9p21 deletion, a tissue microarray (TMA) with 2,197 breast cancers was analyzed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry (FISH) for 9p21 deletion and p16 expression. p16 immunostaining was weak in 25.6%, moderate in 7.1%, and strong in 12.7% of 1,684 evaluable cancers. Strong p16 staining was linked to advanced tumor stage (p = 0.0003), high-grade (p < 0.0001), high tumor cell proliferation (p < 0.0001), negative hormone receptor (ER/PR) status (p < 0.0001 each), and shorter overall survival (p = 0.0038). 9p21 deletion was found in 15.3% of 1,089 analyzable breast cancers, including 1.7% homozygous and 13.6% heterozygous deletions. 9p21 deletion was linked to adverse tumor features, including high-grade (p < 0.0001) and nodal positive cancers (p = 0.0063), high cell proliferation (p < 0.0001), negative hormone receptor (ER/PR) status (p ≤ 0.0006), and HER2 amplification (p = 0.0078). Patient outcome was worse in 9p21 deleted than in undeleted cancers (p = 0.0720). p16 expression was absent in cancers harboring homozygous 9p21 deletions, but no difference in p16 expression was found between cancers with (59.2% p16 positive) and without heterozygous 9p21 deletion (51.3% p16 positive, p = 0.0256). In summary, p16 expression is unrelated to partial 9p21 deletion, but both alterations are linked to aggressive breast cancer phenotype. High-level p16 expression is a strong predictor of unfavorable disease course in breast cancer.