RESUMO
Currently, metastatic colon cancer is treated with monotherapeutic regimens such as folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOX), and leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan hydrochloride (FOLFIRI). Other treatments include biological therapies and immunotherapy with drugs such as bevacizumab, panitumumab, cetuximab, and pembrolizumab. After the research, it was found that some mutations make those treatments not as effective in all patients. In this bibliographic review, we investigated the pharmacogenetic explanations for how mutations in the genes coding for rat sarcoma virus (RAS) and rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF) reduce the effectiveness of these treatments and allow the continued proliferation of tumors. Furthermore, we note that patients with mutations in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPDY) gene usually require lower doses of therapies such as 5-fluorouracyl (5-FU) and capecitabine to avoid severe adverse effects. Some other mutations in the thymidylate synthase gene (TSYM), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR), and ATP binding cassette transporter B (ABCB1 and ABCB2) affect efficacy and security of the treatments. It is important to address the clinical implication of the oncologist in the study of gene mutations than can influence in the antitumoral response and safety of colon cancer treatments.
RESUMO
Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase (MEK) inhibitors show limited benefit in Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutant pancreatic cancer due to drug resistance. To identify mechanisms of resistance to MEK inhibitor (MEKi), we employed a differential expression analysis of MEKi-sensitive versus MEKi-resistant KRAS-mutant pancreatic cancer cell lines. Here, we report that the antigen peptide transporter 1 (TAP1) expression levels of MEKi-resistant cell lines were notably higher than those of MEKi-sensitive cell lines. Suppression of TAP1 significantly sensitized the MEKi-resistant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells to MEKi and induced higher apoptotic rate in vitro. Moreover, knockdown of TAP1 in MEKi-resistant tumor significantly decreased tumor growth in vivo. Consistently, overexpression of TAP1 in sensitive PDAC cells resulted in increased resistance to MEKi, both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that TAP1 promoted chemoresistance by enhancing the transport of MEKi out of PDAC cells, leading to reduced intracellular MEKi concentration and attenuated inhibition of KRAS signaling pathways. Moreover, TAP1 expression increased spheroid formation abilities of PDAC cells. These findings suggest that TAP1 could serve as a potential marker for predicting the response of patients to MEKi. Combination of TAP1 suppression and MEKi may provide a novel therapeutic strategy for PDAC treatment.