A Study on the Incidence and Impact of Dysglycemia in Non-diabetic Sepsis Patients.

Context Dysglycemia is common in severe sepsis and is associated with a poor prognosis. There is a limited amount of research on stress-induced dysglycemia in non-diabetic sepsis patients. Aim This study aims to estimate the incidence of dysglycemia among non-diabetic patients presenting with sepsis at the Emergency Department and to determine its correlation with gender, age, APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) scores, diagnosis, and duration of hospital stay. Materials and methods The study was conducted at a medical college hospital in Kochi from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. A minimum sample size of 77 was derived after a pilot study, with a 95% confidence interval and 10% allowable error. A total of 100 non-diabetic sepsis patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed with regard to gender, age, diagnosis, glycemic status (hypo/hyper/normoglycemic), APACHE II scores, and hospital stay duration. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (Released 2011; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York) software. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentage. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation) and median (Q1-Q3). To test the statistical significance of the association between the presence of various factors (gender, age, diagnosis) and dysglycemia, the chi-square test was used. To test the statistical significance of the difference in the mean age and APACHE II score values with dysglycemia, an independent sample t-test was used. To test the statistical significance of the difference in the median hospital stay with dysglycemia, the Whitney U test was used. Data were represented as mean ± SD, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results The incidence of dysglycemia in the inclusion group was 49% (hypoglycemia in 16% and hyperglycemia in 33% of cases), and it increased with age (p=0.002). The majority of the dysglycemic patients fell into the age group >40 years. Dysglycemia was 54.8% in pneumonia and 66.7% in gastrointestinal sepsis ( p=0.138). Dysglycemia increased with an increase in APACHE II scores (p=0.017). The median hospital stay was almost the same in both normoglycemics and dysglycemics. Conclusion Dysglycemia is a frequent complication in non-diabetic patients with sepsis. It increased with age and APACHE II score, but it does not prolong the duration of hospital stay, nor is it associated with the diagnosis.

Damage control surgery in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies: prognostic value of SOFA, APACHEII, and Mannheim peritonitis index.

This study aimed to analyze the prognostic value of the SOFA, APACHE II, and MPI (Mannheim Peritonitis Index) scores in the indication for Damage Control Surgery (DCS) in non-trauma. Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing DCS between 2014 and 2019. SOFA and APACHE II scores were calculated using parameters preceding DCS, while MPI was based on surgical descriptions. Statistical analysis: Qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, and quantitative variables using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The Student's T test was employed for mean comparisons. The sample comprised 104 patients (59 males), with a median age of 63.5 years, of whom 52 (50%) were ASA IV. Operative findings leading to DCS included peritonitis (54; 51.9%), intestinal ischemia (39; 37.5%), inability to close the abdomen (8; 7.6%), and bleeding (3; 2.9%). The mortality rate was 75% (78/104). Thirty patients (28.8%) died after DCS; the remainder underwent one (35; 33.6%), two (21; 20.2%); three (8; 7.7%), and four or more (10;9.7%) revision procedures. The median lengths of ICU and hospital stays were 12.5 and 20.5 days, respectively. The median score values were as follows: SOFA: 12 (0-38), APACHE II: 25 (2-47), and MPI: 26 (8-43). Besides ASA classification (p = 0.03), mortality risk was influenced by: age (≤ 65 years vs. > 65 years; p = 0.04), SOFA (≤ 10 vs. > 10; p = 0.03), APACHE II (≤ 25 vs. > 25; p = 0.04), and MPI (≤ 25 vs. > 25; p = 0.003). The SOFA, APACHE II, and MPI scores proved to be valuable tools in the prognostic assessment of patients undergoing DCS in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies.

Enhancing clinical data retrieval with Smart Watchers: a NiFi-based ETL pipeline for Elasticsearch queries.

BACKGROUND: The aim is to develop and deploy an automated clinical alert system to enhance patient care and streamline healthcare operations. Structured and unstructured data from multiple sources are used to generate near real-time alerts for specific clinical scenarios, with an additional goal to improve clinical decision-making through accuracy and reliability. METHODS: The automated clinical alert system, named Smart Watchers, was developed using Apache NiFi and Python scripts to create flexible data processing pipelines and customisable clinical alerts. A comparative analysis between Smart Watchers and the legacy Elastic Watchers was conducted to evaluate performance metrics such as accuracy, reliability, and scalability. The evaluation involved measuring the time taken for manual data extraction through the electronic patient record (EPR) front-end and comparing it with the automated data extraction process using Smart Watchers. RESULTS: Deployment of Smart Watchers showcased a consistent time savings between 90% to 98.67% compared to manual data extraction through the EPR front-end. The results demonstrate the efficiency of Smart Watchers in automating data extraction and alert generation, significantly reducing the time required for these tasks when compared to manual methods in a scalable manner. CONCLUSIONS: The research underscores the utility of employing an automated clinical alert system, and its portability facilitated its use across multiple clinical settings. The successful implementation and positive impact of the system lay a foundation for future technological innovations in this rapidly evolving field.

Optimizing patient outcomes in severe pneumonia: the role of multiplex PCR in the treatment of critically ill patients.

Herein, we evaluated the optimal timing for implementing the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (FA-PP) in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). Respiratory samples from 135 MICU-admitted patients with acute respiratory failure and severe pneumonia were examined using FA-PP. The cohort had an average age of 67.1 years, and 69.6% were male. Notably, 38.5% were smokers, and the mean acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-II (APACHE-II) score at initial MICU admission was 30.62, and the mean sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA) was 11.23, indicating sever illness. Furthermore, 28.9, 52.6, and 43% of patients had a history of malignancy, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, respectively. Community-acquired pneumonia accounted for 42.2% of cases, whereas hospital-acquired pneumonia accounted for 37%. The average time interval between pneumonia diagnosis and FA-PP implementation was 1.9 days, and the mean MICU length of stay was 19.42 days. The mortality rate was 50.4%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified two variables as significant independent predictors of mortality: APACHE-II score (p = 0.033, OR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.11), history of malignancy (OR = 3.89, 95% CI 1.64-9.26). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that early FA-PP testing did not provide a survival benefit. The study suggested that the FA-PP test did not significantly impact the mortality rate of patients with severe pneumonia with acute respiratory failure. However, a history of cancer and a higher APACHE-II score remain important independent risk factors for mortality.

Comparison of Four Severity Assessment Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients for Predicting Patient Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study From a Single Tertiary Center in Central India.

Background and aim A variety of scoring systems are employed in intensive care units (ICUs) with the objective of predicting patient morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to compare four different severity assessment scoring systems, namely, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II (SAPS II) to predict prognosis of all patients admitted to a mixed medical ICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in central India. Methods The prospective observational study included 1136 patients aged 18 years or more, admitted to the mixed medical ICU. All patients underwent severity assessment using the four scoring systems, namely APACHE II, SOFA, REMS, and SAPS II, after admission. Predicted mortality was calculated from each of the scores and actual patient outcomes were noted. Receiver operating curve analysis was undertaken to identify the cut-off value of individual scoring systems for predicting mortality with optimum sensitivity and specificity. Calibration and discrimination were employed to ascertain the validity of each scoring model. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses among the study participants were conducted to identify the best scoring system, after adjusting for potential confounders. Results Final analysis was done on 957 study participants (mean (±SD) age-58.4 (±12.9) years; males-62.2%). The mortality rate was 14.7%. APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, and REMS scores were significantly higher among the non-survivors as compared to the survivors (p<0.05). SAPS II was found to have the highest AUC of 0.981 (p<0.001). SAPS II score >58 had 93.6% sensitivity, 94.1% specificity, 73.3% PPV, 98.8% NPV, and 94.0% diagnostic accuracy in predicting mortality. This scoring system also had the best calibration. Binary logistic regression showed that all four scoring systems were significantly associated with ICU mortality. After adjusting for each other, only SAPS II remained significantly associated with ICU mortality. Conclusion Both SAPS II and APACHE II were observed to have good calibration and discriminatory power; however, SAPS II had the best prediction power suggesting that it may be a useful tool for clinicians and researchers in assessing the severity of illness and mortality risk in critically ill patients.

Value of APACHE II, SOFA and CardShock scoring as predictive tools for cardiogenic shock: A single-centre pilot study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the value of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and CardShock scoring systems in predicting the risk of in-hospital, 30 day and 3 year mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). METHODS: This was a single-centre observational study conducted between May 2016 and December 2017. Data from consecutive patients with CS admitted to the intensive cardiac care unit (ICCU) were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The study group comprised 63 patients with CS {median age 71.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 59-82]; 42 men}: 32 patients with ischaemic and 31 with non-ischaemic aetiology. The median APACHE II, SOFA and CardShock scores were 13 (IQR, 9.9-19.0) points, 8.0 (IQR, 6.0-10.0) points and 3.0 (IQR, 2.0-5.0) points, respectively. The in-hospital, 30 day and 3 year mortality rates were 39.7%, 41.3% and 77.8%, respectively. APACHE II and SOFA scores were significantly higher in the group of patients who died at 30 days (P = 0.043 and P = 0.045, respectively). The CardShock score was higher in patients with CS who died in hospital (P = 0.007) and within 30 days (P = 0.004). No score was statistically significant for 3 year mortality. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis showed that the CardShock score had the highest value in predicting in-hospital and 30 day mortality relative to APACHE II and SOFA, with a cut-off score of 5 points [AUC: 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.81; P = 0.001] and 4 points (AUC: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.60-0.82; P < 0.001), respectively. The Bayesian Weibull model demonstrated the utility of all scales in estimating short-term risk in patients with CS, with the impact of APACHE II and SOFA on patient life expectancy decreasing to a non-significant level at approximately 32 days and CardShock at 33 days. The forest plots derived from the Bayesian logistic regression analysis show significant estimated coefficients with 94% highest density interval (HDI) for in-hospital and 30 day mortality. The use of invasive or non-invasive ventilation, a higher heart rate and a less negative fluid balance showed an unfavourable prognosis. Survival was associated with being in the pre-CS class, with a higher glomerular filtration rate and a higher platelet count. CONCLUSIONS: APACHE II and SOFA could be used for the risk stratification of patients with CS admitted to the ICCU. CardShock proved to be a more appropriate tool for assessing short-term prognosis in patients with CS of all aetiologies, suggesting that there is potential for its promotion for use in daily clinical practice.

Towards better mortality prediction in cancer patients in the ICU: a comparative analysis of prognostic scales: systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive ability of mortality prediction scales in cancer patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using a search algorithm in October 2022. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, Virtual Health Library (BVS), and Medrxiv. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 scale. SETTING: ICUs admitting cancer patients. PARTICIPANTS: Studies that included adult patients with an active cancer diagnosis who were admitted to the ICU. INTERVENTIONS: Integrative study without interventions. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Mortality prediction, standardized mortality, discrimination, and calibration. RESULTS: Seven mortality risk prediction models were analyzed in cancer patients in the ICU. Most models (APACHE II, APACHE IV, SOFA, SAPS-II, SAPS-III, and MPM II) underestimated mortality, while the ICMM overestimated it. The APACHE II had the SMR (Standardized Mortality Ratio) value closest to 1, suggesting a better prognostic ability compared to the other models. CONCLUSIONS: Predicting mortality in ICU cancer patients remains an intricate challenge due to the lack of a definitive superior model and the inherent limitations of available prediction tools. For evidence-based informed clinical decision-making, it is crucial to consider the healthcare team's familiarity with each tool and its inherent limitations. Developing novel instruments or conducting large-scale validation studies is essential to enhance prediction accuracy and optimize patient care in this population.

Comparison of Critical Illness Score in Patients Admitted to Intermediate Care Units of a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study from Karachi, Pakistan.

Introduction: Intermediate care units (IMCUs) serve as step-up units for emergency department patients and as step-down units for critically ill patients transferred from intensive care units. This study compares four critical illness scores for assessment of acutely ill patients and their accuracy in predicting mortality in patients admitted to IMCU. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study on patients aged ≥18 admitted to IMCU of Aga Khan University Hospital from 2017 to 2019. All patients admitted to IMCU from the emergency room were included in the study. Patient's record were reviewed for demographic data, physiological and laboratory parameters. Critical illness scores were calculated from these variables for each patient. Results: A total of 1192 patients were admitted to the IMCU, of which 923 (77.4%) medical records were finally analyzed. The mean (SD) age of participants was 62 years (± 16.5) and 469 (50.8%) were women. The overall hospital mortality rate of patients managed in IMCU was 6.4% (59/923 patients). The median scores of APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II and MEWS were 16 (IQR 11-21), 4 (IQR 2-6), 36 (IQR 30-53) and 3 (IQR 2-4) points respectively. AUC for SAPS II was 0.763 (95% CI: 0.71-0.81), SOFA score was 0.735 (95% CI: 0.68-0.79) and MEWS score was 0.714 (95% CI: 0.66-0.77). The lowest ROC curve was 0.584 (95% CI: 0.52-0.64) for APACHE II. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study found that SAPS II, followed by SOFA and MEWS scores, provided better discrimination in stratifying critical illness in patients admitted to IMCU of a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.

The Utility of Serial Lipid Measurements as a Potential Predictor of Sepsis Outcome: A Prospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background and aim: Sepsis is the major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients admitted to an intensive care unit worldwide. Currently, procalcitonin (PCT) is a widely used prognostic marker for sepsis. The high cost of estimating Procalcitonin limits its utility in all health facilities. Lipid profile, being a frequently done routine investigation, is studied in sepsis patients to predict the prognosis of sepsis. This study was aimed to assess the association between lipid profile parameters, procalcitonin and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. Materials and methods: It is a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care hospital in the Department of Biochemistry in collaboration with the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). We included 80 sepsis patients from medical and surgical ICUs. Among them, 59 (74%) survived and 21 (26%) expired. Serum lipid profile, procalcitonin and variables required for APACHE II score are measured at two intervals, one during admission and on day 5. All the parameters were compared between the survivors and the non-survivors. Results: Serum PCT levels were reduced on day 5 [3.32 (1.27-11.86)] compared to day 0 [13.42 (5.77-33.18)] in survivors. In survivors, Total Cholesterol, LDL-C and Non-HDL-C were significantly elevated on day 5 compared to day 0. In non-survivors, HDL-C significantly decreased on day 5. Between survivors and non-survivors, HDL-C significantly decreased on day 5 (23.88 ± 10.19 vs 16.67 ± 8.27 mg/dl). A Negative correlation was observed between HDL-C & PCT. Conclusion: Serum Lipid profile levels, namely Total cholesterol, HDL-C and LDL-C, have possible associations with the severity of sepsis. HDL-C have a negative association with the clinical scoring system in sepsis patients. Overall, the findings from our study suggest that lipid profile parameters have possible implications in predicting the outcome of patients with sepsis.

A small opening in the storm clouds: overview of the registry-based study on the management of thyroid storm.

Due to the high mortality rate of TS, effective guidance for its diagnosis and treatment is essential. The diagnostic criteria introduced by the JTA in 2012, along with the Burch-Wartofsky Point Scale, constitute valuable tools for the diagnosis of TS. In 2016, Guidelines on the management of TS were produced by the JTA and the JES. Recently, a prospective multicenter register-based study compared the prognosis and outcome of 110 new-onset TS patients with the results of previous comparable studies and evaluated the efficacy of the Guidelines. The study revealed higher APACHE II scores and significant correlations between lower BMI, post-resuscitation shock, and fever with outcomes and, overall, improved TS prognosis. Most patients in the study received methimazole and potassium iodide, the timely administration of which was linked to lower fatality rates. Adherence to treatment guidelines correlates with lower mortality rates, emphasizing the importance of experienced multidisciplinary teams in ICU settings and the necessity for periodic review of the guidelines to enhance therapeutic approaches and reduce mortality.

Synergizing Survival: Uniting Acute Gastrointestinal Injury Grade and Disease Severity Scores in Critical Care Prognostication.

How to cite this article: Patnaik RK, Karan N. Synergizing Survival: Uniting Acute Gastrointestinal Injury Grade and Disease Severity Scores in Critical Care Prognostication. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(6):529-530.

Exploring Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Microbial Clues and Biomarker Insights from a Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common complication in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The incidence rates of VAP vary, and it poses significant challenges due to microbial resistance and the potential for adverse outcomes. This study aims to explore the microbial profile of VAP and evaluate the utility of biomarkers and illness severity scores in predicting survival. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 130 patients diagnosed with VAP. Microbial analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, as well as measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels, were performed. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were calculated to assess illness severity. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine correlations and associations. Results: The study revealed that Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) (50.7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) (27.69%) were the most identified microorganisms in VAP cases. SOFA (p-value < 0.0001) and APACHE II (p-value < 0.0001) scores were effective in assessing the severity of illness and predicting mortality in VAP patients. Additionally, our investigation highlighted the prognostic potential of CRP levels (odds ratio [OR]: 0.980, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.968 to 0.992, p = 0.001). Elevated levels of CRP were associated with reduced survival probabilities in VAP patients. Conclusion: This study highlights the microbial profile of VAP and the importance of biomarkers and illness severity scores in predicting survival. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the need for appropriate management strategies to combat microbial resistance and improve outcomes in VAP patients.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of ICU-Admitted Patients with Guillain-Barre Syndrome: A Report from a Large Teaching Hospital in South Iran.

Background: Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) is the most prevalent acute peripheral polyneuropathy disorder. The disparities between populations and variations in the major risk factors highlight the importance of country-specific studies. This study aimed to report clinical characteristics and outcomes of ICU-admitted patients with GBS in an academic medical center in Iran. Methods: The data were collected retrospectively from all patients with GBS admitted to Namazi Hospital, affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, (Shiraz, Iran), between March 2016 to March 2021. Specialized neurological information and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score were recorded. The SPSS software was used to analyze the data. The analyzed data were reported as numbers and percentages, or mean±SD, or median(Interquartile). Results: The study included 132 GBS patients, with an average age of 47.87±15.4 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1.69:1. More than half of the patients (58.5%) were classified as having an axonal disease. In patients with axonal illness, 51.4% of patients had lower limb powers<3, while only 36% of those had the demyelinating disease. This group also required mechanical ventilation more frequently (54% vs. 46%) and for a longer duration (26 [9-37] vs. 10 [1-61]) days. Pneumonia and sepsis were each observed in 16% of patients, and 12% developed a urinary tract infection. The most common type of GBS was acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP). Only 6 (3.8%) patients died. Conclusion: The axonal type of GBS was more frequent, and these patients required mechanical ventilation more frequently and for a longer duration than those in other electrophysiological categories. A preprint version of the manuscript is available at DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2181605/v1.

Calcitriol in Sepsis-A Single-Centre Randomised Control Trial.

Background/Objectives: Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Sepsis is a significant cause of hospital admission and the leading reason for admission to the ICU and is associated with high mortality. Vitamin D has shown promising immunomodulatory effects by upregulating the antimicrobial peptide, cathelicidin. However, previous studies analysing the use of calcitriol in sepsis have shown variable results and did not utilise APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) scores as endpoints. This study evaluates the efficacy of intramuscular calcitriol in patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis, focusing on its impact on APACHE II scores. The primary aim was to determine if intramuscular calcitriol improved APACHE II scores from day 1 to day 7 or discharge from the ICU, whichever was earlier. Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality, ventilator days, vasopressor days, ICU stay length, adverse events, and hospital-acquired infections in ICU patients. Methods: This was a triple-blinded phase III randomised control trial. A total of 152 patients with suspected sepsis were block-randomised to receive either intramuscular calcitriol (300,000 IU) (n = 76) or a placebo (n = 76). The trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI No: CTRI 2019/01/17066) following ethics committee approval and was not funded. Results: There was no significant difference in APACHE II scores between the calcitriol and placebo groups from day 1 to day 7 (p = 0.382). There were no significant changes in 28-day mortality (14.4% vs. 17%, p = 0.65), number of days on a ventilator (5 vs. 5, p = 0.84), number of days on vasopressors (3 vs. 3, p = 0.98), length of ICU stay (10 days vs. 11 days, p = 0.78), adverse events (27.6% vs. 19.7%, p = 0.25), and hospital-acquired infections (17.1% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.82). Conclusions: There was no effect of intramuscular calcitriol in patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis.

Elevating Smart Manufacturing with a Unified Predictive Maintenance Platform: The Synergy between Data Warehousing, Apache Spark, and Machine Learning.

The transition to smart manufacturing introduces heightened complexity in regard to the machinery and equipment used within modern collaborative manufacturing landscapes, presenting significant risks associated with equipment failures. The core ambition of smart manufacturing is to elevate automation through the integration of state-of-the-art technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), machine-to-machine (M2M) communication, cloud technology, and expansive big data analytics. This technological evolution underscores the necessity for advanced predictive maintenance strategies that proactively detect equipment anomalies before they escalate into costly downtime. Addressing this need, our research presents an end-to-end platform that merges the organizational capabilities of data warehousing with the computational efficiency of Apache Spark. This system adeptly manages voluminous time-series sensor data, leverages big data analytics for the seamless creation of machine learning models, and utilizes an Apache Spark-powered engine for the instantaneous processing of streaming data for fault detection. This comprehensive platform exemplifies a significant leap forward in smart manufacturing, offering a proactive maintenance model that enhances operational reliability and sustainability in the digital manufacturing era.

Prediction of adverse drug reactions in geriatric patients admitted to intensive care units. / [Artículo traducido] Predicción de reacciones adversas a medicamentos en pacientes geriátricos ingresados en unidades de cuidados intensivos.

INTRODUCTION: Intensive Care Units (ICUs) pose challenges in managing critically-ill patients with polypharmacy, potentially leading to Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), particularly in the elderly. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the severity and clinical prognosis scores used in ICUs correlate with the prediction of ADRs in aged patients admitted to an ICU. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted in a Brazilian University Hospital ICU. APACHE II and SAPS 3 assessed clinical prognosis, while GerontoNet ADR Risk Score and BADRI evaluated ADR risk at ICU admission. Severity of the patients' clinical conditions was evaluated daily based on the SOFA score. Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) screening was performed daily through the identification of ADR triggers. RESULTS: 1295 triggers were identified (median 30 per patient, IQR = 28), with 15 suspected ADRs. No correlation was observed between patient severity and ADRs at admission (p=0.26), during hospitalization (p=0.91), or at follow-up (p=0.77). There was also no association between death and ADRs (p=0.28) or worse prognosis and ADRs (p>0.05). Higher BADRI scores correlated with more ADRs (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that employing the severity and clinical prognosis scores used in Intensive Care Units is not sufficient to direct active pharmacovigilance efforts, which are therefore indicated for critically ill patients.

An ontology-based tool for modeling and documenting events in neurosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) plays a pivotal role in enhancing patient safety during neurosurgical procedures. This vital technique involves the continuous measurement of evoked potentials to provide early warnings and ensure the preservation of critical neural structures. One of the primary challenges has been the effective documentation of IOM events with semantically enriched characterizations. This study aimed to address this challenge by developing an ontology-based tool. METHODS: We structured the development of the IOM Documentation Ontology (IOMDO) and the associated tool into three distinct phases. The initial phase focused on the ontology's creation, drawing from the OBO (Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology) principles. The subsequent phase involved agile software development, a flexible approach to encapsulate the diverse requirements and swiftly produce a prototype. The last phase entailed practical evaluation within real-world documentation settings. This crucial stage enabled us to gather firsthand insights, assessing the tool's functionality and efficacy. The observations made during this phase formed the basis for essential adjustments to ensure the tool's productive utilization. RESULTS: The core entities of the ontology revolve around central aspects of IOM, including measurements characterized by timestamp, type, values, and location. Concepts and terms of several ontologies were integrated into IOMDO, e.g., the Foundation Model of Anatomy (FMA), the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) and the ontology for surgical process models (OntoSPM) related to general surgical terms. The software tool developed for extending the ontology and the associated knowledge base was built with JavaFX for the user-friendly frontend and Apache Jena for the robust backend. The tool's evaluation involved test users who unanimously found the interface accessible and usable, even for those without extensive technical expertise. CONCLUSIONS: Through the establishment of a structured and standardized framework for characterizing IOM events, our ontology-based tool holds the potential to enhance the quality of documentation, benefiting patient care by improving the foundation for informed decision-making. Furthermore, researchers can leverage the semantically enriched data to identify trends, patterns, and areas for surgical practice enhancement. To optimize documentation through ontology-based approaches, it's crucial to address potential modeling issues that are associated with the Ontology of Adverse Events.

The Role of Programmed Cell Death 1/Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) Axis in Sepsis-Induced Apoptosis.

Background and Objectives: Sepsis involves a dysregulated host response, characterized by simultaneous immunosuppression and hyperinflammation. Initially, there is the release of pro-inflammatory factors and immune system dysfunction, followed by persistent immune paralysis leading to apoptosis. This study investigates sepsis-induced apoptosis and its pathways, by assessing changes in PD-1 and PD-L1 serum levels, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) severity scores. Materials and Methods: This prospective, observational, single-centre study enrolled 87 sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit at the County Emergency Clinical Hospital in Târgu Mureș, Romania. We monitored the parameters on day 1 (the day sepsis or septic shock was diagnosed as per the Sepsis-3 Consensus) and day 5. Results: Our study found a statistically significant variation in the SOFA score for the entirety of the patients between the studied days (p = 0.001), as well as for the studied patient groups: sepsis, septic shock, survivors, and non-survivors (p = 0.001, p = 0.003, p = 0.01, p = 0.03). On day 1, we found statistically significant correlations between CD8+ cells and PD-1 (p = 0.02) and PD-L1 (p = 0.04), CD4+ and CD8+ cells (p < 0.0001), SOFA and APACHE II scores (p < 0.0001), and SOFA and APACHE II scores and PD-L1 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01). On day 5, we found statistically significant correlations between CD4+ and CD8+ cells and PD-L1 (p = 0.03 and p = 0.0099), CD4+ and CD8+ cells (p < 0.0001), and SOFA and APACHE II scores (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The reduction in Th CD4+ and Tc CD8+ lymphocyte subpopulations were evident from day 1, indicating that apoptosis is a crucial factor in the progression of sepsis and septic shock. The increased expression of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis impairs costimulatory signalling, leading to diminished T cell responses and lymphopenia, thereby increasing the susceptibility to nosocomial infections.

Value of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score in predicting hospital mortality for postoperative brain tumor patients in intensive care units in Japan: A retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) is based on the data of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and often correlates with disease severity and prognosis. However, no prognostic predictors exist based on ICU admission data for patients with brain tumors, and no studies have reported an association between APACHE II and prognosis in patients with brain tumors. The Japanese Intensive Care Patients Database (JIPAD) was established to improve the quality of care delivered in intensive care medicine in Japan. We used JIPAD to examine factors associated with in-hospital mortality based on available data of postoperative patients with brain tumors admitted to the ICU. METHODS: Patients aged ≥16 years enrolled in JIPAD between April 2015 and March 2018 after surgical brain tumor resection or biopsy of brain tumors. We examined factors related to outcomes at discharge based on blood tests and medical procedures performed during ICU admission, tumor type, and APACHE II score. RESULTS: Among the 1454 patients (male:female ratio: 1:1.1, mean age: 62 years) in the study, 32 (2.2 %) died during hospital stay. In multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.70, [95 % confidence interval, CI 1.22-6.00]), malignant tumor (OR 2.51 [95 % CI 1.13-5.55]), and APACHE II score ≥15 (OR 2.51 [95 % CI 3.08-14.3]) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: By picking up cases with a high risk of in-hospital death at an early stage, it is possible to improve methods of treatment and support for the patient's family.

Interleukin-6 in Sepsis-Promising but Yet to Be Proven.

How to cite this article: Sinha S. Interleukin-6 in Sepsis-Promising but Yet to Be Proven. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):629-631.