An academic-health department partnership to expand adolescent access to care and FNP student clinical experiences.

More than 90,000 qualified applicants were rejected from nursing schools in 2021 due in part to the national shortage of nurse practitioner (NP) preceptors and clinical placements. One model that has the potential to address this shortage by enhancing and expanding NP clinical training sites is the academic-practice partnership. In this article, the authors describe the development of a novel academic-practice partnership between a college of nursing and a health department and report the outcomes of a partnership activity that provided wellness visits for adolescents. Through this partnership, the graduate nursing program increased adolescent-focused clinical experiences for family nurse practitioner students by 87.6 h; added one adolescent clinical site for nine NP students; and delivered a total of 34 school and sports physicals, 81 immunizations, and 65 screening tests for adolescent-aged clients. Through this feasible, mutually beneficial, and innovative academic-practice partnership, the graduate nursing program and health department successfully expanded clinical placement experiences for NP students and improved access to wellness care for adolescents. The partnership model can be utilized to not only expand clinical opportunities for NP students but also improve access to care and health outcomes for our local communities.

Building a research-focused academic practice partnership: A stepwise approach.

The 20th century began a period of reform in nursing education and practice, with more nurses receiving advanced degrees and serving in key leadership roles throughout healthcare organizations. During this period, the transformation of the healthcare delivery system encouraged innovation and collaboration between academic nursing programs and other healthcare entities to develop partnerships based on a shared vision and goals. As a result, nurses are negotiating academic-practice partnership agreements and leading interprofessional teams to meet the needs of collaborating organizations. This article describes a stepwise approach to building a research-focused academic practice partnership, from a needs assessment to an evaluation of the partnership.

Academic-practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing education: A theory-guided scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a scoping review of the existing literature regarding academic-practice partnership in evidence-based nursing education, with the goal of gathering evidence to support the establishment of such partnerships. BACKGROUND: Academic-practice partnerships play a crucial role in overcoming separation of theory and practice in evidence-based nursing education and promoting the adoption of evidence-based nursing practice. However, there is a lack of scoping review of related literature. DESIGN: This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute updated methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, Educational Resource Information Centre (ERIC) and five gray websites between November and December, 2022. A total of 10515 articles were retrieved, 26 articles were included in the scoping review. Two reviewers reviewed the articles, screened literature, and extracted data, independently. A third researcher was involved when consensus is needed. Practice-academic partnership logic model was used to analysis and synthesis the results. RESULTS: Main themes included inputs (time, instructional resources, partnership agreement, key stakeholder commitment, shared mission, leadership support, common vision, instructional design, mutual respect, and instructional objectives), activities (ongoing communication and shared decision-making), outputs (action plan: evidence-based nursing project plans and educational resources), outcomes (improved evidence-based nursing competency, enhanced quality of nursing care, career advancement and personal development, increased evidence-based nursing projects, improve evidence-based nursing education, heightened academic achievement, increased engagement in evidence-based nursing, increased networking opportunities, and improved staff satisfaction), facilitators (sufficient inputs, effective activities, and clear partnership structure, ongoing feedback, and positive outcomes), and barriers (insufficient inputs). CONCLUSIONS: Inputs and activities could lead to outputs and outcomes. Facilitators and barriers could influence the degree of outputs and outcomes. Academic-practice partnerships can overcome the barriers of disconnection between theory and practice in evidence-based nursing education, and further promote education and research by leveraging the strengths of both parties, resulting in a mutually beneficial collaboration.

Exploring stakeholders' perspectives on the adaptation of the Living Lab approach to dementia care: A qualitative study.

Collaborative research can promote knowledge translation and help to link care practice and research. Academic-practice partnerships enable joint research projects in collaboration between care professionals, researchers, patients, and other stakeholders. This qualitative study was conducted during the adaptation phase of the Living Lab Dementia, an academic-practice partnership for collaborative research on long-term dementia care. The aim was to explore stakeholders' perspectives on linking care practice and research in a sustainable, research-focused partnership. Data were collected in fifteen qualitative interviews with representatives from three stakeholder groups: nursing care professionals, people with dementia, and nursing researchers. Thematic Framework Analysis resulted in five themes: (1) Access, (2) Expectations, (3) Shaping the collaboration, (4) Linking Pins, and (5) Participation. The findings suggest that care professionals expect support in implementing research results into practice. Researchers should take the lead in shaping the collaboration and create opportunities for stakeholders to get involved.

Developing Nurse Practitioners for Hospitalist Roles: Lessons Learned From an Academic Practice Partnership.

Background: There are numerous benefits to academic practice partnerships. While there is great emphasis on the new graduate nurse transition to practice, there is less intention placed on the new nurse practitioner (NP) role transition. In a rural teaching hospital, leadership perceived a need for more support to successfully transition NPs into hospitalist practice roles. Objective: One academic practice partnership developed and implemented a grant-funded program to support advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) transition to practice at a rural teaching hospital. Methods: Informed by the results of a needs assessment, faculty and practice partners delivered lecture content in a face-to-face setting during scheduled hours. Results: Although the content was well received, attendance to and engagement with the program were suboptimal. Conclusions: Upon reflection, the program team gained valuable lessons regarding role expectations, intentional interdisciplinary collaboration, timing, alignment, delivery format, and the need for a dedicated program coordinator. Implications for nursing: APRN transition programs can provide much-needed support with dedicated structure, clear communication, and individualized content. It can also be a recruitment and retention strategy for healthcare organizations.

The Association for Nursing Professional Development National Preceptor Practice Analysis Study: An Exploration of Precepting in Perioperative Settings.

Preceptors are an important part of meeting perioperative workforce demands. A secondary analysis of data collected for the 2020 Association for Nursing Professional Development National Preceptor Practice Analysis Study focused on 400 perioperative nurse preceptors and compared their responses to nonperioperative preceptors. Most perioperative respondents had participated in preceptor training; they spent significantly more time orienting experienced nurse preceptees in the perioperative specialty and its diverse settings (eg, orthopedic surgery, open-heart surgery) than preceptors in nonperioperative settings and specialties. Perioperative preceptors spent significantly less time precepting students, suggesting the presence of an opportunity to address the nursing shortage by promoting student exposure to the perioperative setting. To align with the AORN position statements on orientation and nurse residencies, perioperative nurse leaders should ensure that properly educated preceptors are available to assist RNs who are transitioning to perioperative practice. The Ulrich Precepting Model provides an evidence-based framework for preceptor training.

A Perioperative Specialty Elective to Address the Perioperative Nursing Shortage: Student Perspectives and Outcomes.

To help solve the perioperative nursing shortage, it is imperative that health care leaders understand why students choose or do not choose to pursue a career in perioperative nursing. In May 2021, we published the results of a specialty elective course evaluation from a leadership and perioperative services personnel perspective; in the current article, we examine the same program from the students' perspective. We distributed survey links to undergraduate nursing students to evaluate their perioperative knowledge before and after completing the course. Students reported large gains in knowledge, critical thinking, teamwork, and confidence at course completion, but the posttest mean number of students with an interest in pursuing perioperative nursing was lower than the pretest mean. This realization is perceived as a positive outcome of the perioperative elective course because it may lead to a decrease in turnover among newly hired perioperative nurses.

Patient-Centered Care Through Nurse Practitioner-Led Integrated Behavioral Health: A Case Study.

Integrated behavioral health can improve primary care and mental health outcomes. Access to behavioral health and primary care services in Texas is in crisis because of high uninsurance rates, regulatory restrictions, and lack of workforce. To address gaps in access to care, a partnership formed among a large local mental health authority in central Texas, a federally designated rural health clinic, and the Texas A&M University School of Nursing to create an interprofessional team-based health care delivery model led by nurse practitioners in rural and medically underserved areas of central Texas. Academic-practice partners identified 5 clinics for an integrated behavioral health care delivery model. From July 1, 2020, through December 31, 2021, a total of 3183 patient visits were completed. Patients were predominantly female (n = 1719, 54%) and Hispanic (n = 1750, 55%); 1050 (33%) were living at or below the federal poverty level; and 1400 (44%) were uninsured. The purpose of this case study was to describe the first year of implementation of the integrated health care delivery model, barriers to implementation, challenges to sustainability, and successes. We analyzed data from multiple sources, including meeting minutes and agendas, grant reports, direct observations of clinic flow, and interviews with clinic staff, and identified common qualitative themes (eg, challenges to integration, sustainability of integration, outcome successes). Results revealed implementation challenges with the electronic health record, service integration, low staffing levels during a global pandemic, and effective communication. We also examined 2 patient cases to illustrate the success of integrated behavioral health and highlighted lessons learned from the implementation process, including the need for a robust electronic health record and organizational flexibility.

Academic-practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing education: Protocol of a theory-guided scoping review.

AIM: This theory-guided scoping review aims to provide an overview of existing literature about academic-practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing education. BACKGROUND: Academic-practice partnership is an approach to improve evidence-based nursing education, to promote evidence-based nursing practice which could reduce the nursing care discrepancy, improve the nursing care quality and patient safety, reduce healthcare costs and promote nursing professional development. However, the related research is limited and there is a lack of systematic review of related literature. DESIGN: A scoping review guided by the theories of the Practice-Academic Partnership Logic Model and the JBI Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare. METHODS: The researchers will use JBI guidelines for scoping reviews and related theories to guide this theory-guided scoping review. The researchers will systematically search Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Educational Resource Information Centre (ERIC) using major search concepts including academic-practice partnership, evidence-based nursing practice and education. Two reviewers will be responsible for independent literature screening and data extraction. Discrepancies would be solved by a third reviewer. EXPECTED RESULTS: This scoping review will identify related research gaps to provide implications for researchers and identify specific information to provide implications for developing interventions of academic-practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing education. REGISTRATION NUMBER: This scoping review had been registered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/83rfj).

An Examination of the Career Choices of Nursing Graduates After Completing a Perioperative Elective.

In light of the perioperative nursing shortage, academic leaders at a mid-Atlantic school of nursing and leaders of three health care systems implemented an academic-practice partnership with the goal of increasing interest in this specialty. Nursing researchers used a descriptive study design to collect data from nursing alumni who participated in the perioperative elective between 2017 and 2021. They found that 25 (38%) of 65 graduates who participated in the elective entered perioperative nursing and 38 (68%) of 56 graduates who answered a question on considering future employment as a perioperative nurse indicated they would do so regardless of their current employment status. Graduates who participated in the elective and experienced a perioperative capstone placement had low anticipated turnover scores and intended to remain in a perioperative position. Academic and health care leaders should consider academic-practice partnerships as a strategy to recruit and retain perioperative nurses.

The Ambulatory Dedicated Education Unit (DEU): An important example of academic practice partnership in ambulatory care.

BACKGROUND: Academic Practice Partnerships (APPs) work synergistically to support mutual goals and educate the nursing workforce of the future. Enhanced recognition of the need for undergraduate nursing educational experiences in ambulatory care has increased the importance of Ambulatory APPs specifically. One mechanism for building Ambulatory APPs and shifting clinical education into multiple spheres of care is the Ambulatory Dedicated Education Unit (DEU). METHODS: Partners at the University of Minnesota and Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota developed an Ambulatory DEU in early 2019. Barriers to educating nursing students in the ambulatory setting were effectively mitigated through the design of the DEU and mutual efforts to sustain the Ambulatory APP through flexibility and adaptation. RESULTS: The Ambulatory DEU clinical learning model is a strong example of an effective Ambulatory APP. The DEU was effective in overcoming eight common barriers to clinical learning in ambulatory settings and engaged 28 expert ambulatory registered nurses in the clinical teaching of between 25 and 32 senior Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) students each year. Each student participating in the DEU experienced 90 h of ambulatory clinical learning. The Ambulatory DEU is in its fourth year and remains an effective mechanism for engaging nursing students in the competencies and complex care of ambulatory nursing. CONCLUSION: Increasingly complex nursing care is being provided in ambulatory care settings. The DEU is an effective mechanism to prepare students in the ambulatory sphere of care and is a unique opportunity for ambulatory practice partners to learn and grow from participating in a partnered teaching environment.

Registered nurse mentors' experiences from co-creation in higher education targeting enhancement of mentorship practices in nursing homes: A qualitative study.

AIM: To explore registered nurse (RN) mentors' experiences of participating in the co-creation of a digital educational resource intended to enhance mentorship practices of first-year nursing students in clinical placement in nursing homes. DESIGN: An interpretive, descriptive qualitative study design. METHODS: Data were collected through two focus group interviews with 15 RN mentors (n = 15) participating in co-creative workshops. The co-creative process entailed four co-creative workshops conducted over a 17-month period (June 2019 to end of Oct 2020). Focus group interviews were conducted following the second and third workshops (i.e., in Dec 2019 and in Oct 2020) and data were analysed using thematic analysis. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist was used to report the findings. RESULTS: The analysis identified three themes: (1) co-creative reflective dialogues contributed to knowledge development and increased motivation among mentors; (2) the co-creative approach facilitated and validated the nursing academic-practice tripartite partnership; and (3) effectiveness of workshop structure in facilitating collaboration and mitigating power inequities. CONCLUSION: A co-creative process provides notable opportunities to advocate for mentorship needs and to enhance mentorship practices in nursing homes. IMPACT: Our study adds to the evidence on co-creation in nursing education, providing insights on the co-creative process and methodology. Higher Education Institutions are uniquely positioned to act as a co-creative arena for the academic-practice collaboration and for the development of educational resources within nursing education. Co-creation may facilitate stronger academic-practice partnership that may more effectively impact mentorship practices in nursing homes and health care system effectiveness. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: The RNs included in the study were involved in the co-creative process as active contributors informing the digital educational resource content and design.

Differences in evidence-based nursing practice competencies of clinical and academic nurses in China and opportunities for complementary collaborations: A cross-sectional study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the evidence-based nursing practice (EBNP) competencies of clinical and academic nurses and their collaboration needs for supporting EBNP. BACKGROUND: Academic-practice partnerships have strong potential to overcome the key barriers to EBNP. However, there is little known about the collaboration needs of clinical and academic nurses for EBNP. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: We recruited clinical and academic nurses online during November 2021 to January 2022. Using a reliable and validated scale and adapted questionnaires, data were collected relating to demographic information, EBNP-related resources availability, EBNP competencies and EBNP collaboration needs. These data were described using descriptive statistical methods. The t test, χ2 test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to evaluate if the different responses between clinical and academic nurses were statistically significant. This study was reported following the STROBET checklist. RESULTS: Two 240 clinical nurses and 232 academic nurses submitted questionnaires. There was no difference in overall EBNP competence between clinical and academic nurses. However, clinical nurses reported lower levels of competence and stronger intentions to collaborate with academic nurses when searching for, appraising, and synthesising evidence. Academic nurses reported lower levels of competence and stronger intentions to collaborate with clinical nurses for disseminating and implementing evidence. CONCLUSION: Clinical and academic nurses both reported high needs for collaborating to overcome their perceived role limitations. Clinical and academic nurses have different strengths and limitations in EBNP. These role differences and intentions to collaborate for different dimensions of EBNP competence suggest that clinical and academic nursing roles could be complementary to each other, offering opportunities for synergistic collaborations to better support overall EBNP. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Healthcare and academic institutions should promote academic-practice partnerships as opportunities to gain complementary expertise on different dimensions of EBNP, and to improve nurses' competencies and confidence in EBNP overall.

The Value and Impacts of Academic Public Health Departments.

The academic health department (AHD) is a partnership between an academic institution and a governmental health agency. These partnerships are meant to provide mutual benefits that include opportunities for student field placements and internships, practice-informed curriculum, and practice-based research. The term academic health department dates back only to 2000, although there are several examples of academic-practice partnerships prior to that date. In addition to AHDs that have been established over the past two decades, other forms of academic-practice engagement provide similar mutual benefits, such as prevention research centers and public health training centers. Current research on AHDs explores how these partnerships matter regarding the outputs, outcomes, and impacts of the units that comprise them. This review also considers the most recent perspectives on how AHDs have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic and how they might advance public health's efforts to address structural racism and promote health equity.

Using an academic-practice partnership to enhance ambulatory care nursing skills.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory nursing services are essential to healthcare in communities, but nursing curricula often omit ambulatory care training. The purpose of this project was to enhance ambulatory care competencies among nursing students and provide ongoing education for practicing nurses through an academic-practice partnership. METHODS: A four-year externally funded project targeted enhancements to undergraduate nursing curricula and development activities. Students received didactic content and clinical experiences and were evaluated to assess critical ambulatory care nursing skills. Existing continuing education offerings were enhanced with team-based practice content. RESULTS: Despite pandemic-related clinical training changes, data from multiple quarters showed improvement in students' perceptions of self-efficacy (1.7-4.28-point increases) and actual performance (3.46-4.05-point increases) of core competencies on the 20-point evaluation scales. In addition, students rated simulations favorably, with scores ranging from 1.4 to 1.9 on the 2-point subscales. CONCLUSION: An academic-practice partnership provides mutually beneficial opportunities for enhancing the ambulatory care nursing workforce through undergraduate education and training and professional development for practicing nurses.

Creating an academic-practice partnership in a primary care pediatric clinic.

There is increasing demand for primary care nationally, and advanced practice registered nurses are uniquely suited to meet this demand. Academic nursing programs are responding to this challenge by expanding graduate nurse practitioner (NP) programs, but they are limited by availability of student clinical placement sites and dedicated preceptors. We addressed these limitations by developing an academic-practice partnership between a College of Nursing pediatric nurse practitioner (PNP) program and a primary care clinic within an academic pediatric hospital. A novel PNP faculty role was developed with teaching, patient care, and clinical precepting responsibilities. This partnership increased access to pediatric primary care services within the local underserved community, increased the number of teaching faculty members and clinical preceptors, and expanded clinical education opportunities for PNP students.

Preparing BSN students for a new workplace: Experiences in a COVID-19 designated unit as an RN extender.

Academic nursing programs were impacted by the onset of the pandemic with the challenges of social distancing, detecting, and controlling the spread of the virus. Many traditionally campus-based, face-to-face programs transitioned quickly to include virtual activities for classes, laboratories, and clinical experiences for students. Initially direct patient care clinical activities came to a halt due to concerns for student safety and overwhelming numbers of COVID-19 cases stressing health system resources. However, as COVID-19 cases began to rise and hospitals struggled with staffing shortages, it became necessary to explore how nursing students could contribute to relieving the staffing burden while obtaining critical education as RN Extenders. Students that participated in the RN Extender program were seniors entering the nursing workforce within the next two months. Significant student screening and preparation was provided to support students serving as RN Extenders in COVID-19 units. The prior working relationships and personal contact between academic and practice leaders, a sense of equal participation, clear and realistic expectations of the benefits and responsibilities of each group were crucial. Building ongoing and frequent opportunities for formal and informal communication among all stakeholders was vital and the major contributor to the success of this program.

What's Love Got to Do With It: Teaching the Next Generation of Nurses.

Many professional medical and nursing organizations call for the reform and revision of formal nursing education. As nursing faculty work to prepare the next generations of nurses, the model of Relationship-Based Care is an ideal infrastructure for curriculum design. This paper responds to the call for transforming nursing education with a model that includes love, Relationship-Based Care, the I2E2 Model of Change, and an academic-practice partnership.

An academic-practice partnership during COVID-19 pandemic: Transitioning from a clinical to virtual fellowship.

AIMS: Discuss the needed modifications that occurred to the academic-practice oncology partnership during the COVID-19 pandemic. BACKGROUND: To meet the workforce needs of nurses who care for adults with cancer, an academic-practice partnership was created in 2016. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing, North Carolina Cancer Hospital and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center collaborated to provide structured clinical and didactic practice experiences for undergraduate nursing students interested in oncology nursing. With COVID-19, nursing students were not permitted to be in the clinical setting. DESIGN: Discursive paper. METHOD: An innovative and collaborative partnership created reflective and interactive activities. The majority of the learning activities were created at the revised Bloom's taxonomy level of application or higher, with some encompassing multiple levels. Students engaged in a variety of meaningful experiences requiring multiple learning processes that promoted professional development in the interpersonal and critical thinking domains. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the challenges of COVID-19, the delivery of oncology nurse fellowship was successful because of innovative virtual strategies. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Our academic-practice partnership allowed the nursing students to develop their interpersonal and critical thinking skills without entering the clinical site. This is an approach encouraged by the authors for other schools of nursing. This manuscript is submitted as a Special Issue Discursive Article, and thus, the authors declare that an EQUATOR Checklist has not been used.

Honors students in the health professions: An academic-practice partnership for developing interprofessional competencies through simulation.

Abundant literature supports the value of interprofessional education (IPE) in health profession programs, but few studies focus on undergraduate honors students. The goals of this academic-practice partnership quality improvement project were to increase awareness of IPE, provide experiential opportunities to learn the principles of interprofessional practice, assess perceptions of readiness for practice, and to explore motivations and learning expectations of undergraduate nursing and pre-medical honors students. Average scores on the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) increased in several areas after the IPE simulation experiences, with small to medium effect sizes (Cohen's d) on individual items and two subscales (Teamwork & Collaboration and Positive Professional Identity). Themes identified in the narrative data were opportunity, fun, self-awareness, situational awareness, and the value of teamwork. These findings add to literature on honor students' expectations and motivations for learning and can be used in designing interprofessional collaborative learning activities for undergraduate health profession students.