Adalimumab-induced manic episode in an adolescent with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease in children, and adalimumab is one of the primary treatment options. Although it is widely used for inflammatory diseases, there is limited research on its safety and efficacy in patients with psychiatric disorders or in those with inflammatory diseases who also have comorbid psychiatric conditions. CASE REPORT: We report a 12-year-old adolescent boy who presented with emotional instability for 1 year, exacerbated leading to hospital admission in the past month. Upon detailed evaluation after admission, it was found that the patient's emotional fluctuations may be related to the use of Adalimumab. Follow-up after psychiatric inpatient treatment revealed that the patient did not experience emotional excitement again after discontinuing Adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Although tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors have positive effects on the emotional, cognitive, and physical functions of patients with inflammatory diseases, their use may induce mood swings in patients with comorbid mood disorders. This is particularly important for adolescents with rapid mood changes, where greater caution is required. Further research is necessary to clarify the correlation between the adverse effects of these drugs and their impact on patients with bipolar disorder.

6-Thioguanine nucleotide levels are associated with infliximab but not adalimumab levels in inflammatory bowel disease patients on combination therapy.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurine co-therapy with anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) agents is associated with higher anti-TNFα drug levels and reduced immunogenicity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the association between 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) and anti-TNFα levels and the optimal 6-TGN threshold level associated with higher anti-TNFα levels in combination therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional multicentre study of patients with IBD on combination anti-TNFα and thiopurine maintenance therapy between January 2015 and August 2021. Primary outcomes were infliximab and adalimumab levels. Secondary outcomes were antibodies to infliximab (ATI) or adalimumab (ATA). Univariable and multivariable linear regression were performed to identify variables associated with anti-TNFα levels. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to define the optimal 6-TGN cut-off levels associated with therapeutic anti-TNFα levels. RESULTS: The study included 743 paired 6-TGN and anti-TNFα levels (640 infliximab and 103 adalimumab). 6-TGN levels were associated with infliximab levels, but not adalimumab levels, on univariable and multivariable regression. The optimal 6-TGN cut-off associated with therapeutic infliximab levels (≥5 mcg/mL) was 261 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cell (RBC) (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.57) for standard infliximab dosing and 227.5 pmol/8 × 108 RBC (AUC = 0.58) for escalated dosing. For therapeutic adalimumab levels (≥7.5 mcg/mL), the 6-TGN cut-off was 218.5 pmol/8 × 108 RBC (AUC = 0.59) for standard adalimumab dosing and 237.5 pmol/8 × 108 RBC (AUC = 0.63) for escalated dosing. CONCLUSION: 6-TGN levels were weakly associated with infliximab but not adalimumab levels in combination therapy. 6-TGN levels in the lower end of the therapeutic range (230-260 pmol/8 × 108 RBC) may be adequate to maintain higher infliximab levels, particularly with escalated infliximab dosing.

Disseminated, fatal reactivation of bovine tuberculosis in a patient treated with adalimumab: a case report and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are known to increase the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation, though cases involving Mycobacterium bovis are rarely reported. CASE PRESENTATION/RESULTS: We describe a case of disseminated TB with M. bovis in a 78-year-old woman with a negative Interferon-Gamma-Release Assay (IGRA), taking adalimumab due to rheumatoid polyarthritis, which resulted in a fatal outcome. The atypical clinical and histopathological features were initially interpreted as sarcoidosis. The case occurred in Switzerland, an officially bovine tuberculosis-free country. The whole genome sequence of the patient's cultured M. bovis isolate was identified as belonging to the animal lineage La1.2, the main genotype in continental Europe, but showed significant genetic distance from previously sequenced Swiss cattle strains. In a literature review, four cases of bovine tuberculosis reactivation under TNFi treatment were identified, with pulmonal, oral and intestinal manifestations. Similar to our patient, two cases presented a negative IGRA before TNFi initiation, which later converted to positive upon symptomatic presentation of M. bovis infection. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of TB in immunosuppressed patients, the limited sensitivity of IGRA, and the importance of considering TB reactivation even in regions declared free of bovine tuberculosis. Detailed patient histories, including potential exposure to unpasteurized dairy products, are essential for guiding preventive TB treatment before TNFi initiation.

Comment on "Adalimumab Dose Reduction and Withdrawal in Stable Non-Infectious Pediatric Uveitis: An Open- Label, Prospective, Pilot Study".

The study by P. D. Yuan et al. titled "Adalimumab Dose Reduction and Withdrawal in Stable Non-Infectious Pediatric Uveitis: An Open-Label, Prospective, Pilot Study" examines dose reduction and withdrawal strategies in managing pediatric uveitis with adalimumab (ADA). The study aims to optimize treatment protocols by minimizing drug exposure while maintaining disease control. However, the open-label design introduces potential bias, and the absence of a control group limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions. The small sample size and short follow-up period further constrain the study's robustness. Methodological refinements, including a randomized controlled trial design with a larger sample size, extended follow-up, detailed adverse event data, standardized tapering protocols, and incorporation of objective outcome measures, are recommended to enhance the reliability and generalizability of the findings. These improvements could significantly inform clinical practice and contribute to the evidence base for pediatric uveitis management.

Real-World Treatment Persistence Among Advanced Therapy-Naïve or -Experienced Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab or Adalimumab.

INTRODUCTION: Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS: Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients. RESULTS: At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29-4.16); p < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63-2.45); p < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07-3.44); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76-6.44); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82-3.26); p < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01-1.54); p = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00-3.21); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09-7.35); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 254). CONCLUSION: This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.

Effect of adalimumab treatment on inflammatory and hematological parameters in patients with Hidradenitis suppurativa.

OBJECTIVE: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a chronic inflammatory disease that typically manifests after puberty, is characterised by painful nodules, abscesses, draining sinus tracts, and scars in areas rich in apocrine glands such as the axillary and inguinal regions. In recent years, blood-based biomarkers such as the Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), Monocyte/Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR), Mean Platelet Volume (MPV), Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) and Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) have been used as significant indicators of systemic inflammation. While there are few studies evaluating these biomarkers in HS, the response of these markers to treatment has only been assessed in one study to date. Our study aims to investigate the effect of adalimumab treatment on blood-based systemic inflammation biomarkers in HS, where inflammation plays a significant role. METHODS: The study included 42 adult patients who received adalimumab treatment at our dermatology and venereology clinic between January 2020 and January 2023. Medical records for complete blood count results of the patients were retrospectively reviewed. All systemic inflammation-based biomarkers were calculated from the absolute values of the complete blood count. The SII was calculated with the following formula: (neutrophil count × platelet count/lymphocyte count). The PIV was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count/lymphocyte count). Values before the treatment and at the 12th week of treatment were compared. RESULTS: When the changes in the inflammatory parameters of the patients were examined, it was found that NLR (2.13 ± 0.87 vs 2.26 ± 1.12), PLR (111.01 ± 39.89 vs 99.43 ± 35.34), MLR (0.27 ± 0.11 vs 0.28 ± 0.12), MPV (9.59 ± 0.71 vs 9.70 ± 0.79), SII (680.79 ± 330.18 vs 687.89 ± 442.66), and PIV (552.02 ± 330.71 vs 605.05 ± 415.96) values did not change statistically significantly after treatment (p > 0.05). While there was a significant decrease in platelet count compared to before treatment, no statistically significant difference was found in the other evaluated blood cells. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab treatment has not had a significant effect on systemic inflammation markers in HS, an inflammatory disease. More studies are needed to evaluate the effect of adalimumab on these markers in HS.

Lichenoid Drug Eruption Secondary to Adalimumab: A Case Report.

Adalimumab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), is widely prescribed for many autoimmune diseases and chronic inflammatory skin diseases such as hidradenitis suppurative, psoriasis, etc. We report a case of lichenoid drug eruption secondary to adalimumab, a rare side effect, in a 62-year-old female with ulcerative colitis. The skin eruption appeared two weeks after initiating adalimumab. A skin biopsy was taken, and the histopathological findings correlated with a lichenoid drug eruption. Although rare, drug-induced lichen planus has been associated with adalimumab. Early recognition and a high index of suspicion are key in the prompt management of these cases. The discontinuation of adalimumab must be carefully weighed against its therapeutic benefits, as the discontinuation might trigger a severe form of inflammation in the primary autoimmune disease being treated. Extreme caution, early intervention, and a multidisciplinary approach are best for the overall well-being and optimal care of the individual.

Guselkumab Reduces Disease- and Mechanism-Related Biomarkers More Than Adalimumab in Patients with Psoriasis: A VOYAGE 1 Substudy.

Background: Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by activation of IL-23-driven IL-17-producing T cell and other IL-23 receptor-positive IL-17-producing cell responses. Selective blockade of IL-23p19 with guselkumab was superior to blockade of TNF-α with adalimumab (ADA) in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Objective: Pharmacodynamic responses of guselkumab versus ADA were compared in patients with psoriasis in VOYAGE 1. Design: Inflammatory cytokine serum levels were assessed (n = 118), and lesional and nonlesional skin biopsies were collected (n = 38) in patient subsets at baseline and 4, 24, and 48 weeks after treatment to evaluate pharmacodynamic responses of guselkumab versus those of ADA. Results: Guselkumab provided rapid reductions in serum IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22 levels by week 4 versus at baseline, which were maintained through weeks 24 and 48 (P < .001). The magnitude of reduction of IL-17A and IL-22 at week 48 and IL-17F at weeks 4, 24, and 48 were greater with guselkumab than with ADA (all P < .05). In the skin, guselkumab reduced the expression of IL-23/IL-17 pathway-associated and psoriasis-associated genes. Conclusion: These data provide extensive characterization of pharmacodynamic anti-inflammatory responses to IL-23p19 and TNF-α inhibition in human blood and tissue over time with FDA-approved doses of guselkumab and ADA. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.govClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02207231).

Adalimumab-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis: A case report.

Clinical Key Message: In patients receiving anti-TNF-α drugs for ankylosing spondylitis, monitoring purpuric and ischemic skin lesions is crucial. This case underscores the significance of identifying and addressing drug-induced vasculitis while stressing the necessity for prompt evaluation and exploration of alternative treatment options to safeguard patient well-being. Abstract: The case discusses a 38-year-old female with a history of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who presented with skin lesions, including purpuric skin lesions and ischemia of her right foot digits, after initiating treatment with adalimumab. After excluding other potential causes, such as infections and malignancies, the patient received a diagnosis of moderate-sized vascular vasculitis associated with adalimumab use. Discontinuation of adalimumab and treatment with high dose glucocorticoids and intravenous pulse of cyclophosphamide resulted in the resolution of her ischemic lesions. This case underscores the importance of considering drug-related side effects in patients with new skin lesions, particularly in the context of rheumatic diseases such as AS.

Summary of Research: Effects of Adalimumab-adbm Versus Adalimumab Reference Product on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from VOLTAIRE-RA.

This Summary of Research overviews the results of a study that looked at patient-reported outcomes in the VOLTAIRE-RA trial (NCT02137226), originally published in Rheumatology and Therapy. A biosimilar is a biologic medicine made to be very similar to the original biologic medicine (also known as the reference product). The VOLTAIRE-RA trial compared the efficacy and safety of an adalimumab biosimilar (Cyltezo®, adalimumab-admb) with the adalimumab reference product, Humira®, in people with rheumatoid arthritis. As part of the VOLTAIRE-RA study, participants took either adalimumab-adbm or adalimumab reference product for 24 weeks. Patient-reported outcomes were captured after 12 weeks and after 24 weeks of treatment to assess the effects of treatment on each participant's health-related quality of life. People with rheumatoid arthritis who were given adalimumab-adbm or adalimumab reference product experienced similar clinically meaningful improvements in their health-related quality of life after 12 weeks of treatment. A high proportion of people in this trial who were given adalimumab-adbm or adalimumab reference product reported greater improvement versus a reference US population matched by age and sex. This is notable, as it represents a treatment goal that was difficult to achieve in earlier rheumatoid arthritis trials of non-biologic treatments.

Effects of Adalimumab-adbm Versus Adalimumab Reference Product on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from VOLTAIRE-RA.

INTRODUCTION: This post hoc analysis of VOLTAIRE-RA compared patient-reported outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before and after treatment with biosimilar adalimumab-adbm or adalimumab reference product. METHODS: HRQoL was assessed by 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS, respectively) and domain scores at baseline and weeks 12/24. Results were considered clinically meaningful if improvements were greater than or equal to minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) of 2.5 for PCS and MCS and 5.0 for domain scores. Comparisons with age- and sex-matched norms and treatment-associated changes in domain scores from baseline were quantified using spydergrams and the health utility SF-6D measure. All comparisons between treatment groups were descriptive in nature. RESULTS: No differences in PCS scores were reported between treatment groups at baseline or weeks 12/24. MCS scores slightly favored the reference product group at baseline, and differences in scores at weeks 12/24 generally reflected those differences. Improvements in PCS scores greater than or equal to MCID at weeks 12/24 were reported by over 65% of patients in both treatment groups, while over 56% experienced improvements in MCS scores greater than or equal to MCID at weeks 12/24. Similar proportions receiving reference product and adalimumab-adbm reported scores greater than or equal to US age- and sex-matched normative values at week 24: 14-39% versus 15-36%, respectively, compared with baseline (1-17%). CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate to severely active RA, adalimumab-adbm and adalimumab reference product were both associated with clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36 PCS, MCS, and domain scores that were highly similar at weeks 12/24. The high proportion of patients reporting scores greater than or equal to normative values in both treatment groups is notable, as this represents a treatment goal that was difficult to achieve in earlier RA trials. Video abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION: VOLTAIRE-RA (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02137226; EudraCT number, 2012-002945-40). Video abstract (MP4 29755 KB).

Nodal T-Follicular Helper Cell Lymphoma, Angioimmunoblastic-Type, Diagnosed in a Patient with Psoriasis Following COVID-19 Vaccination under Adalimumab Treatment: A Causal Association?

Biologics have expanded the armamentarium for psoriasis, but there has been a growing concern about the risk of lymphoma in patients under tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor and methotrexate. Besides, the mRNA-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination was known to stimulate the proliferation of T-follicular helper cells. We report a case of a patient with psoriasis under adalimumab developing nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic-type following the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. We suspect that adalimumab, methotrexate, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, previous reactive lymphoid hyperplasia and psoriasis per se predispose our patient to a lymphoma-prone condition, and the two doses of the mRNA vaccine act as the last straw.

Patient preferences for adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide study from the GETAID.

Background: Several adalimumab preparations are now available for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Comparative satisfaction and tolerability are unknown. Objectives: This study investigated IBD patient satisfaction with approved adalimumab biosimilars and their originator. Design: In this cross-sectional study, we included 941 consecutive adalimumab-treated patients with IBD across 45 centres affiliated with the Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du tube Digestif who completed a satisfaction questionnaire comprising four items each rated by a 10-point scale. Methods: The differences in responses were performed using a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's honest significant difference test. Results: The most commonly used drugs at inclusion were Humira® (436/941, 46.3%), Amgevita® (177/941, 18.8%) and Hulio® (105/941, 11.2%). The mean overall satisfaction rate with adalimumab was 8.5 (standard deviation 1.8). Overall satisfaction was significantly higher in patients treated with Humira (8.6 (1.5)), Hulio (8.6 (1.8)) or Amgevita (8.5 (1.4)) (p < 0.05). Satisfaction with the subcutaneous injection form was higher for patients treated with Yuflyma® (9.0 (1.4)), Humira (8.9 (1.3)) and Hulio (8.9 (1.7)) (p < 0.05). A total of 299 patients (31.8%) described injection site reactions. In all, 223 patients (23.7%) reported being previously treated with another adalimumab of which (32/223, 14.3%) discontinued treatment due to side effects. Conclusion: In this real-world setting, patients with IBD had a high level of satisfaction with adalimumab treatment, with some differences in terms of overall satisfaction and satisfaction with the injection device.

De novo manifestations during adalimumab treatment in Behçet's syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment response may be variable across organ manifestations of Behçet syndrome (BS). We aimed to determine the frequency of de novo manifestations during adalimumab treatment. METHODS: We conducted a chart review of all BS patients who received adalimumab in our center between 2008 and 2023. Demographic data, reasons for initiating adalimumab, concurrent medications, previous treatments, and outcomes were recorded. We defined de novo manifestations as new BS manifestations that occurred for the first time during treatment with adalimumab. For patients with vascular involvement, a new vascular event at another vessel was also considered as a de novo manifestation. RESULTS: Among the 335 patients, a de novo manifestation developed in 14 (4%) patients. De novo manifestations were vascular involvement in 5 patients, arthritis in 3, anterior uveitis in 2, nervous system involvement in 2, gastrointestinal involvement in 1, and epididymitis in 1 patient. The primary reasons for adalimumab treatment were vascular involvement in 5 patients, uveitis in 4, arthritis in 3, mucocutaneous involvement in 1, and epididymitis in 1 patient. Upon the development of de novo manifestation, adalimumab was switched to another biologic in 4 patients, dose was intensified in 3, colchicine, conventional immunosuppressives, and/or glucocorticoids were added in 5, and topical eye drops were added in 2 patients, leading to remission of de novo manifestations in all patients. CONCLUSION: De novo manifestations were infrequent (4%) among BS patients treated with adalimumab. Of these, 57% were major organ involvement, mainly vascular involvement. None of the patients developed posterior uveitis.

A narrative review of the literature: The role of biologics and JAK inhibitors in vitiligo.

Vitiligo is a chronic depigmenting disorder that significantly impacts the quality of life of patients. Though there have been significant advancements in targeted therapies in skin diseases such as psoriasis or eczema, the progress in the treatment of vitiligo has been slow, with minimal studies assessing the effect of biologics, though there has been recent evidence of the effectiveness of JAK inhibition. This paper reviews the published case reports and studies for the use of systemic targeted therapies including biologics and JAK inhibitors in vitiligo.

Analysis of the shorter drug survival times for Janus kinase inhibitors and interleukin-17 inhibitors compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in a real-world cohort of axial spondyloarthritis patients - a retrospective analysis from the RHADAR network.

In recent years Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have joined tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) as approved disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) for moderate to severe forms of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Drug survival in axSpA patients has not been well studied in a real-world outpatient scenario since the approval of JAKi. We aimed to analyze the three drug classes based on modes of actions (MoA) for their persistence rates among German axSpA outpatients. A retrospective analysis of the RHADAR database for axSpA patients with a new initiation of TNFi, IL-17i, or JAKi treatment between January 2015 and October 2023 was conducted. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox regressions for drug discontinuation. 1222 new biological DMARD (TNFi [n = 954], IL-17i [n = 190]) or JAKi (n = 78) treatments were reported. The median drug survival was 31 months for TNFi, 25 for IL-17i, and 18 for JAKi. The corresponding 2-year drug survival rate was 79.6%, 72.6%, and 62.8% for TNFi, IL-17i, and JAKi, respectively. The probability for discontinuation for JAKi was significantly higher compared with TNFi (HR 1.91 [95% CI 1.22-2.99]) as well as for IL-17i compared with TNFi (HR 1.43 [95% CI 1.02-2.01]), possibly related to more frequent use of TNFis as first-line therapy. IL-17i and JAKi discontinuation probabilities were similar. Primary non-response was the reason for drug discontinuation in most cases across all MoA. TNFi treatment might persist longer than JAKi and IL-17i in German axSpA outpatients, possibly related to more severe or refractory disease in patients with JAKi-treated or IL-17i-treated axSpA.

Clinical Course of Bio Naive Ulcerative Colitis Patients Five Years After Initiation of Adalimumab in a Nationwide Cohort.

Background: There is limited data on the long-term clinical outcomes of bio-naïve ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who are initiated on adalimumab (ADA). Our study aims to evaluate the clinical course of a nationwide cohort of bio naïve UC patients who were started on ADA, and then followed for 5 years after initiation of the drug. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the US Veteran Affairs Healthcare System (VAHS). Bio naïve UC patients were followed for 5 years after initiation of ADA. The primary outcome was to determine the time to discontinuation of ADA and if patients achieved endoscopic remission by the end of follow-up. Results: A total of 387 patients were included among whom 193 (49.87%) had pancolitis. The highest rate of ADA discontinuation was within the first year, with the elderly having a higher rate of discontinuation (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.14-2.45) and those on concomitant immunomodulators having a lower rate of discontinuation (HR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48-1.03). In total, 125 (32.30%) patients remained on ADA at the end of their maximum follow-up. 54 (43.90%) achieved endoscopic remission. Conclusion: Among bio-naive UC patients who were started on ADA, a third were still on the drug at the end of 5 years and half had endoscopic remission. The rate of discontinuation was highest within the first year of initiation, but patients continued to stop the drug over the course of follow-up.

Clinical Guide to Navigating the Landscape of Biosimilars for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Annual out-of-pocket expenditures for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are estimated to be as high as $41,000, with medications, such as biologics, being one of the main cost contributors. Although biologics have revolutionized IBD management, these medications are costly owing to their molecular makeup and manufacturing processes. Biosimilars, which are biologic medications that are highly similar to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved reference product with no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, or potency, offer the same therapeutic benefits at a reduced cost. Other additional benefits offered with biosimilars include increased treatment access and fostered development of new therapeutic options. Despite the expansion of biosimilars in IBD, their adoption and utilization have been suboptimal in the United States. This article provides an overview of the biosimilar landscape in IBD, including FDA-approved biosimilars available, and a clinical guide to navigate switching to biosimilars in various clinical scenarios based on current evidence.

Adverse Event Profiles of Adalimumab in Children: A Disproportionality Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and subsequently approved for pediatric treatment of various autoimmune diseases in children of different ages. Due to genetic differences between children and adults in terms of physiology and immunity, there is a need to explore the safety of adalimumab in children in the real world. The aim of this study is to identify potential adverse event (AE) signals associated with the use of adalimumab in pediatric patients (<18 years old) using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: AEs associated with adalimumab in pediatric patients reported in the FAERS database from the first quarter (Q1) of 2017 to the third quarter (Q3) of 2022 were systematically gathered. Reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the information component (IC), and the empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) were used to assess the relationship between adalimumab and AEs in children. RESULTS: Out of 8,363,304 reports collected from the FAERS database during the study period, 3819 reports on children on adalimumab were identified. Adalimumab-related AEs reports were concentrated on 10 toxicity areas and a total of 202 positive signals were detected, of which injection site papule (ROR = 261.97) and intestinal fistula (ROR = 122.09) had the strongest signals. Unexpected significant AEs, including intestinal obstruction, immunodeficiency, abdominal abscess, and Takayasu's arteritis might also occur. In comparison with patients of all ages in the same time window, the median onset time of children was shorter (99 vs. 149 days). Most of the AE cases occurred in children within the first 1 (1.71%), 2 (8.12%), and 3 months (8.39%) and had early failure types after adalimumab initiation. Methotrexate, folic acid, prednisone, azathioprine, and mesalamine were the top five drugs used concomitantly for adalimumab-associated AEs. CONCLUSIONS: When adalimumab is used in children, especially in the first 3 months of treatment, in addition to the AEs recorded in the drug package insert, close attention should be paid to the new potential AEs off-label to ensure the safety of adalimumab in children.

Intravenous Golimumab in the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Its Associated Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of intravenous golimumab infusion in treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated anterior uveitis. METHODS: This study was a retrospective observation case series. Electronic records of patients diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated anterior uveitis who received intravenous golimumab infusion were examined. RESULTS: A total of 24 eyes of 13 patients were included in this study. During 12 months before starting intravenous golimumab, the median grade of anterior chamber reaction was 1 (range: 0.5-3), and the median number of flare-ups was 1 (1-3). During 12 months following the start of intravenous golimumab, the median grade of anterior chamber reaction was 0 (range: 0-1), and the median number of flare-ups was 0 (range: 0-1). Before starting intravenous golimumab, the average number of immunomodulatory agents was 2.6 ± 1.0 with a range of 2 to 5. The average age of patients at the time of starting intravenous golimumab was 13.69 ± 5.23 years (range between 5 and 22). A total of 11 (84.6%) patients responded to intravenous golimumab. The medication was discontinued in one patient due to ineffectiveness and in another patient due to the development of psoriasis as an adverse effect. Cystoid macular edema was present in six eyes of three patients which resolved in all six eyes after starting intravenous golimumab. CONCLUSION: Intravenous golimumab proves to be efficacious and safe for inducing and sustaining remission in JIA and JIA-associated uveitis. Nonetheless, further robust studies with larger sample sizes are needed to substantiate our findings.