"Under the hood": artificial intelligence in personalized radiotherapy.

This review presents and discusses the ways in which artificial intelligence (AI) tools currently intervene, or could potentially intervene in the future, to enhance the diverse tasks involved in the radiotherapy workflow. The radiotherapy framework is presented on 2 different levels for the personalization of the treatment, distinct in tasks and methodologies. The first level is the clinically well-established anatomy-based workflow, known as adaptive radiation therapy. The second level is referred to as biology-driven workflow, explored in the research literature and recently appearing in some preliminary clinical trials for personalized radiation treatments. A 2-fold role for AI is defined according to these 2 different levels. In the anatomy-based workflow, the role of AI is to streamline and improve the tasks in terms of time and variability reductions compared to conventional methodologies. The biology-driven workflow instead fully relies on AI, which introduces decision-making tools opening uncharted frontiers that were in the past deemed challenging to explore. These methodologies are referred to as radiomics and dosiomics, handling imaging and dosimetric information, or multiomics, when complemented by clinical and biological parameters (ie, biomarkers). The review explicitly highlights the methodologies that are currently incorporated into clinical practice or still in research, with the aim of presenting the AI's growing role in personalized radiotherapy.

Optimization and validation of low-field MP2RAGE T1 mapping on 0.35T MR-Linac: Toward adaptive dose painting with hypoxia biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic MR-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) dose painting for hypoxia has potential to improve treatment outcomes, but clinical implementation on low-field MR-Linac faces substantial challenges due to dramatically lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) characteristics. While quantitative MRI and T1 mapping of hypoxia biomarkers show promise, T1-to-noise ratio (T1NR) optimization at low fields is paramount, particularly for the clinical implementation of oxygen-enhanced (OE)-MRI. The 3D Magnetization Prepared (2) Rapid Gradient Echo (MP2RAGE) sequence stands out for its ability to acquire homogeneous T1-weighted contrast images with simultaneous T1 mapping. PURPOSE: To optimize MP2RAGE for low-field T1 mapping; conduct experimental validation in a ground-truth phantom; establish feasibility and reproducibility of low-field MP2RAGE acquisition and T1 mapping in healthy volunteers. METHODS: The MP2RAGE optimization was performed to maximize the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of T1 values in white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) brain tissues at 0.35T. Low-field MP2RAGE images were acquired on a 0.35T MR-Linac (ViewRay MRIdian) using a multi-channel head coil. Validation of T1 mapping was performed with a ground-truth Eurospin phantom, containing inserts of known T1 values (400-850 ms), with one and two average (1A and 2A) MP2RAGE scans across four acquisition sessions, resulting in eight T1 maps. Mean (± SD) T1 relative error, T1NR, and intersession coefficient of variation (CV) were determined. Whole-brain MP2RAGE scans were acquired in 5 healthy volunteers across two sessions (A and B) and T1 maps were generated. Mean (± SD) T1 values for WM and GM were determined. Whole-brain T1 histogram analysis was performed, and reproducibility was determined with the CV between sessions. Voxel-by-voxel T1 difference maps were generated to evaluate 3D spatial variation. RESULTS: Low-field MP2RAGE optimization resulted in parameters: MP2RAGETR of 3250 ms, inversion times (TI1/TI2) of 500/1200 ms, and flip angles (α1/α2) of 7/5°. Eurospin T1 maps exhibited a mean (± SD) relative error of 3.45% ± 1.30%, T1NR of 20.13 ± 5.31, and CV of 2.22% ± 0.67% across all inserts. Whole-brain MP2RAGE images showed high anatomical quality with clear tissue differentiation, resulting in mean (± SD) T1 values: 435.36 ± 10.01 ms for WM and 623.29 ± 14.64 ms for GM across subjects, showing excellent concordance with literature. Whole-brain T1 histograms showed high intrapatient and intersession reproducibility with characteristic intensity peaks consistent with voxel-level WM and GM T1 values. Reproducibility analysis revealed a CV of 0.46% ± 0.31% and 0.35% ± 0.18% for WM and GM, respectively. Voxel-by-voxel T1 difference maps show a normal 3D spatial distribution of noise in WM and GM. CONCLUSIONS: Low-field MP2RAGE proved effective in generating accurate, reliable, and reproducible T1 maps with high T1NR in phantom studies and in vivo feasibility established in healthy volunteers. While current work is focused on refining the MP2RAGE protocol to enable clinically efficient OE-MRI, this study establishes a foundation for TOLD T1 mapping for hypoxia biomarkers. This advancement holds the potential to facilitate a paradigm shift toward MR-guided biological adaptation and dose painting by leveraging 3D hypoxic spatial distributions and improving outcomes in conventionally challenging-to-treat cancers.

Technical note: Phantom-based evaluation of CBCT dose calculation accuracy for use in adaptive radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: High-quality 3D-anatomy of the day is needed for treatment plan adaptation in radiotherapy. For online x-ray-based CBCT workflows, one approach is to create a synthetic CT or to utilize a fan-beam CT with corresponding registrations. The former potentially introduces uncertainties in the dose calculation if deformable image registration is used. The latter can introduce burden and complexity to the process, the facility, and the patient. PURPOSE: Using the CBCT of the day, acquired on the treatment device, for direct dose calculation and plan adaptation can overcome these limitations. This study aims to assess the accuracy of the calculated dose on the CBCT scans acquired on a Halcyon linear accelerator equipped with HyperSight. METHODS: HyperSight's new CBCT reconstruction algorithm includes improvements in scatter correction, HU calibration of the imager, and beam shape adaptation. Furthermore, HyperSight introduced a new x-ray detector. To show the effect of the implemented improvements, gamma comparisons of 2%/2 mm, 2%/1 mm, and 1%/1 mm were made between the dose distribution in phantoms calculated on the CBCT reconstructions and the simulation CT scans, considering this the standard of care. The resulting gamma passing rates were compared to those obtained with the Halcyon 3.0 reconstruction and hardware without HyperSight's technologies. Various anatomical phantoms for dosimetric evaluations on brain, head and neck, lung, breast, and prostate cases have been used in this study. RESULTS: The overall results demonstrated that HyperSight outperformed the Halcyon 3.0 version. Based on the gamma analysis, the calculated dose using HyperSight was closer to the CT scan-based doses than the calculated dose using iCBCT Halcyon 3.0 for most cases. Over all plans and gamma criteria, Halcyon 3.0 achieved an average passing rate of 92.9%, whereas HyperSight achieved 98.1%. CONCLUSION: Using HyperSight CBCT images for direct dose calculation, for example, in (online) plan adaptation, seems feasible for the investigated cases.

Validation of MLC leaf open time calculation methods for PSQA in adaptive radiotherapy with tomotherapy units.

BACKGROUND: Treatment delivery safety and accuracy are essential to control the disease and protect healthy tissues in radiation therapy. For usual treatment, a phantom-based patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) is performed to verify the delivery prior to the treatment. The emergence of adaptive radiation therapy (ART) adds new complexities to PSQA. In fact, organ at risks and target volume re-contouring as well as plan re-optimization and treatment delivery are performed with the patient immobilized on the treatment couch, making phantom-based pretreatment PSQA impractical. In this case, phantomless PSQA tools based on multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf open times (LOTs) verifications provide alternative approaches for the Radixact® treatment units. However, their validity is compromised by the lack of independent and reliable methods for calculating the LOT performed by the MLC during deliveries. PURPOSE: To provide independent and reliable methods of LOT calculation for the Radixact® treatment units. METHODS: Two methods for calculating the LOTs performed by the MLC during deliveries have been implemented. The first method uses the signal recorded by the build-in detector and the second method uses the signal recorded by optical sensors mounted on the MLC. To calibrate the methods to the ground truth, in-phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements have been conducted on a Radixact® treatment unit. The methods were validated by comparing LOT calculations with in-phantom ionization chamber LOT measurements performed on two Radixact® treatment units. RESULTS: The study shows a good agreement between the two LOT calculation methods and the in-phantom ionization chamber measurements. There are no notable differences between the two methods and the same results were observed on the different treatment units. CONCLUSIONS: The two implemented methods have the potential to be part of a PSQA solution for ART in tomotherapy.

Artificial intelligence for treatment delivery: image-guided radiotherapy.

Radiation therapy (RT) is a highly digitized field relying heavily on computational methods and, as such, has a high affinity for the automation potential afforded by modern artificial intelligence (AI). This is particularly relevant where imaging is concerned and is especially so during image-guided RT (IGRT). With the advent of online adaptive RT (ART) workflows at magnetic resonance (MR) linear accelerators (linacs) and at cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) linacs, the need for automation is further increased. AI as applied to modern IGRT is thus one area of RT where we can expect important developments in the near future. In this review article, after outlining modern IGRT and online ART workflows, we cover the role of AI in CBCT and MRI correction for dose calculation, auto-segmentation on IGRT imaging, motion management, and response assessment based on in-room imaging.

TransAnaNet: Transformer-based Anatomy Change Prediction Network for Head and Neck Cancer Patient Radiotherapy.

Background: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) can compensate for the dosimetric impact of anatomic change during radiotherapy of head neck cancer (HNC) patients. However, implementing ART universally poses challenges in clinical workflow and resource allocation, given the variability in patient response and the constraints of available resources. Therefore, early identification of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who would experience significant anatomical change during radiotherapy (RT) is of importance to optimize patient clinical benefit and treatment resources. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of using a vision-transformer (ViT) based neural network to predict radiotherapy induced anatomic change of HNC patients. Methods: We retrospectively included 121 HNC patients treated with definitive RT/CRT. We collected the planning CT (pCT), planned dose, CBCTs acquired at the initial treatment (CBCT01) and fraction 21 (CBCT21), and primary tumor volume (GTVp) and involved nodal volume (GTVn) delineated on both pCT and CBCTs for model construction and evaluation. A UNet-style ViT network was designed to learn the spatial correspondence and contextual information from embedded image patches of CT, dose, CBCT01, GTVp, and GTVn. The deformation vector field between CBCT01 and CBCT21 was estimated by the model as the prediction of anatomic change, and deformed CBCT01 was used as the prediction of CBCT21. We also generated binary masks of GTVp, GTVn and patient body for volumetric change evaluation. We used data from 100 patients for training and validation, and the remaining 21 patients for testing. Image and volumetric similarity metrics including mean square error (MSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), dice coefficient, and average surface distance were used to measure the similarity between the target image and predicted CBCT. Results: The predicted image from the proposed method yielded the best similarity to the real image (CBCT21) over pCT, CBCT01, and predicted CBCTs from other comparison models. The average MSE and SSIM between the normalized predicted CBCT to CBCT21 are 0.009 and 0.933, while the average dice coefficient between body mask, GTVp mask, and GTVn mask are 0.972, 0.792, and 0.821 respectively. Conclusions: The proposed method showed promising performance for predicting radiotherapy induced anatomic change, which has the potential to assist in the decision making of HNC Adaptive RT.

The potential of mixed carbon-helium beams for online treatment verification: a simulation and treatment planning study.

Objective.Recently, a new and promising approach for range verification was proposed. This method requires the use of two different ion species. Due to their equal magnetic rigidity, fully ionized carbon and helium ions can be simultaneously accelerated in accelerators like synchrotrons. At sufficiently high treatment energies, helium ions can exit the patient distally, reaching approximately three times the range of carbon ions at an equal energy per nucleon. Therefore, the proposal involves adding a small helium fluence to the carbon ion beam and utilizing helium as an online range probe during radiation therapy. This work aims to develop a software framework for treatment planning and motion verification in range-guided radiation therapy using mixed carbon-helium beams.Approach.The developed framework is based on the open-source treatment planning toolkit matRad. Dose distributions and helium radiographs were simulated using the open-source Monte Carlo package TOPAS. Beam delivery system parameters were obtained from the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center, and imaging detectors along with reconstruction were facilitated by ProtonVDA. Methods for reconstructing the most likely patient positioning error scenarios and the motion phase of 4DCT are presented for prostate and lung cancer sites.Main results.The developed framework provides the capability to calculate and optimize treatment plans for mixed carbon-helium ion therapy. It can simulate the treatment process and generate helium radiographs for simulated patient geometry, including small beam views. Furthermore, motion reconstruction based on these radiographs seems possible with preliminary validation.Significance.The developed framework can be applied for further experimental work with the promising mixed carbon-helium ion implementation of range-guided radiotherapy. It offers opportunities for adaptation in particle therapy, improving dose accumulation, and enabling patient anatomy reconstruction during radiotherapy.

A reference-point-method-based online proton treatment plan re-optimization strategy and a novel solution to planning constraint infeasibility problem.

Objective. Propose a highly automated treatment plan re-optimization strategy suitable for online adaptive proton therapy. The strategy includes a rapid re-optimization method that generates quality replans and a novel solution that efficiently addresses the planning constraint infeasibility issue that can significantly prolong the re-optimization process.Approach. We propose a systematic reference point method (RPM) model that minimizes the l-infinity norm from the initial treatment plan in the daily objective space for online re-optimization. This model minimizes the largest objective value deviation among the objectives of the daily replan from their reference values, leading to a daily replan similar to the initial plan. Whether a set of planning constraints is feasible with respect to the daily anatomy cannot be known before solving the corresponding optimization problem. The conventional trial-and-error-based relaxation process can cost a significant amount of time. To that end, we propose an optimization problem that first estimates the magnitude of daily violation of each planning constraint. Guided by the violation magnitude and clinical importance of the constraints, the constraints are then iteratively converted into objectives based on their priority until the infeasibility issue is solved.Main results.The proposed RPM-based strategy generated replans similar to the offline manual replans within the online time requirement for six head and neck and four breast patients. The average targetD95and relevant organ at risk sparing parameter differences between the RPM replans and clinical offline replans were -0.23, -1.62 Gy for head and neck cases and 0.29, -0.39 Gy for breast cases. The proposed constraint relaxation solution made the RPM problem feasible after one round of relaxation for all four patients who encountered the infeasibility issue.Significance. We proposed a novel RPM-based re-optimization strategy and demonstrated its effectiveness on complex cases, regardless of whether constraint infeasibility is encountered.

The effects of mega-voltage CT scan parameters on offline adaptive radiation therapy.

TomoTherapy involves image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using Mega-voltage CT (MVCT) for each treatment session. The acquired MVCT images can be utilized for the retrospective assessment of dose distribution. The TomoTherapy provides 18 distinct imaging conditions that can be selected based on a combination of algorithms, acquisition pitch, and slice interval. We investigated the accuracy of dose calculation and deformable image registration (DIR) depending on MVCT scan parameters and their effects on adaptive radiation therapy (ART). We acquired image values for density calibration tables (IVDTs) under 18 different MVCT conditions and compared them. The planning CT (pCT) was performed using a thoracic phantom, and an esophageal intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan was created. MVCT images of the thoracic phantom were acquired under each of the 18 conditions, and dose recalculation was performed. DIR was performed on the MVCT images acquired under each condition. The accuracy of DIR, depending on the MVCT scan parameters, was compared using the mean distance to agreement (MDA) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The dose distribution calculated on the MVCT images was deformed using deformed vector fields (DVF). No significant differences were observed in the results of the 18 IVDTs. The esophageal IMRT plan also showed a small dose difference. Regarding verifying the DIR accuracy, the MDA increased, and the DSC decreased as the acquisition pitch and slice interval increased. The difference between the dose distributions after dose mapping was comparable to that before DIR. The MVCT scan parameters had little effect on ART.

Prospects for online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study is to examine the impact of kV-CBCT-based online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) on dosimetric parameters in comparison to image-guided-radiotherapy (IGRT) in consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck region from a prospective registry. METHODS: The study comprises all consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck area who were treated with kV-CBCT-based online ART or IGRT-modus at the linear-accelerator ETHOS™. As a measure of effectiveness, the equivalent-uniform-dose was calculated for the CTV (EUDCTV) and organs-at-risk (EUDOAR) and normalized to the prescribed dose. As an important determinant for the need of ART the interfractional shifts of anatomic landmarks related to the tongue were analyzed and compared to the intrafractional shifts. The latter determine the performance of the adapted dose distribution on the verification CBCT2 postadaptation. RESULTS: Altogether 59 consecutive patients with tumors in the head-and-neck-area were treated from 01.12.2021 to 31.01.2023. Ten of all 59 patients (10/59; 16.9%) received at least one phase within a treatment course with ART. Of 46 fractions in the adaptive mode, irradiation was conducted in 65.2% of fractions with the adaptive-plan, the scheduled-plan in the remaining. The dispersion of the distributions of EUDCTV-values from the 46 dose fractions differed significantly between the scheduled and adaptive plans (Ansari-Bradley-Test, p = 0.0158). Thus, the 2.5th percentile of the EUDCTV-values by the adaptive plans amounted 97.1% (95% CI 96.6-99.5%) and by the scheduled plans 78.1% (95% CI 61.8-88.7%). While the EUDCTV for the accumulated dose distributions stayed above 95% at PTV-margins of ≥ 3 mm for all 8 analyzed treatment phases the scheduled plans did for margins ≥ 5 mm. The intrafractional anatomic shifts of all 8 measured anatomic landmarks were smaller than the interfractional with overall median values of 8.5 mm and 5.5 mm (p < 0.0001 for five and p < 0.05 for all parameters, pairwise comparisons, signed-rank-test). The EUDOAR-values for the larynx and the parotid gland were significantly lower for the adaptive compared with the scheduled plans (Wilcoxon-test, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The mobile tongue and tongue base showed considerable interfractional variations. While PTV-margins of 5 mm were sufficient for IGRT, ART showed the potential of decreasing PTV-margins and spare dose to the organs-at-risk.

Deformable image registration for composite planned doses during adaptive radiation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Some patients have significant anatomic changes during radiotherapy, necessitating an adaptive repeat CT-simulation and re-planning. This yields two unique planning datasets that introduce uncertainty into total dose records. This study explored the impact of using deformable image registration (DIR) to spatially align repeat CT-simulation images and calculate total planned dose distributions. MATERIALS & METHODS: Data from 5 head-and-neck, 5 lung, and 5 sarcoma patients who had unanticipated re-planning during radiotherapy were analyzed in a treatment planning system (RayStation v6.1 RaySearch Laboratories). Total planned doses to normal tissues were calculated using two methods and the previously generated manual contours defined on each CT. The first method, termed 'parameter addition', simply sums the relevant DVH metrics from the initial and re-planned distributions without spatially registering the CTs. The second, termed 'dose accumulation', uses a validated hybrid contour/intensity-based DIR algorithm to deform initial CT and dose distribution onto the repeat CT and re-planning dose distribution. DVH metrics from the summed distribution on the repeat CT are then calculated. Dose differences for organs-at-risk between parameter addition and dose accumulation ≥100 cGy were assumed to be clinically relevant. To elucidate whether relevant differences were due to registration accuracy or contouring variability between CTs, the analysis was repeated using contours on the first CT and the same contours deformed to the repeat CT with DIR. RESULTS: For all patients, high overall DIR accuracy was verified visually (qualitatively) and numerically (quantitatively) using image similarity and contour-based metrics. All head-and-neck and lung patients, and one sarcoma patient (11 of 15 total) had dose differences between parameter addition and dose accumulation ≥100 cGy, with absolute mean differences of 160 cGy (range 101-436 cGy) seen in 41 of 205 total DVH criteria. In 22 of these 41 criteria, these differences were attributed to contouring variability between CTs. After correcting for contouring variations using DIR, the mean absolute differences in 7 of these 22 criteria with a relevant result (across 6 patients) was 146 cGy (range 100-502 cGy). In only 4 DVH criteria, the DIR mapped contours had higher variations than the original contours. One lung patient had a DVH criteria exceeding the clinical dose constraint by 125 cGy with parameter addition, and with accurate DIR and dose accumulation, the criteria was actually 97 cGy lower than the constraint. CONCLUSIONS: The use of DIR to generate total planned dose records revealed substantial dose differences in most cases compared to commonly used clinical methods (i.e. parameter addition), and altered the planned acceptance criteria in a minority. DIR is recommended to be used for future adaptive re-plans to generate total planned dose records and facilitate accurate re-contouring. More accurate dose records may also improve our understanding of clinical outcomes.

Treatment of Central Nervous System Tumors on Combination MR-Linear Accelerators: Review of Current Practice and Future Directions.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent visualization of central nervous system (CNS) tumors due to its superior soft tissue contrast. Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has historically been limited to use in the initial treatment planning stage due to cost and feasibility. MRI-guided linear accelerators (MRLs) allow clinicians to visualize tumors and organs at risk (OARs) directly before and during treatment, a process known as online MRgRT. This novel system permits adaptive treatment planning based on anatomical changes to ensure accurate dose delivery to the tumor while minimizing unnecessary toxicity to healthy tissue. These advancements are critical to treatment adaptation in the brain and spinal cord, where both preliminary MRI and daily CT guidance have typically had limited benefit. In this narrative review, we investigate the application of online MRgRT in the treatment of various CNS malignancies and any relevant ongoing clinical trials. Imaging of glioblastoma patients has shown significant changes in the gross tumor volume over a standard course of chemoradiotherapy. The use of adaptive online MRgRT in these patients demonstrated reduced target volumes with cavity shrinkage and a resulting reduction in radiation dose to uninvolved tissue. Dosimetric feasibility studies have shown MRL-guided stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for intracranial and spine tumors to have potential dosimetric advantages and reduced morbidity compared with conventional linear accelerators. Similarly, dosimetric feasibility studies have shown promise in hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT). Next, we explore the potential of MRL-based multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and genomically informed radiotherapy to treat CNS disease with cutting-edge precision. Lastly, we explore the challenges of treating CNS malignancies and special limitations MRL systems face.

Inter-Breath-Hold Geometric and Dosimetric Variations in Organs at Risk during Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Implications for Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death, with nearly 60,000 cases each year and less than a 10% 5-year overall survival rate. Radiation therapy (RT) is highly beneficial as a local-regional anticancer treatment. As anatomical variation is of great concern, motion management techniques, such as DIBH, are commonly used to minimize OARs toxicities; however, the variability between DIBHs has not been well studied. Here, we present an unprecedented systematic analysis of patients' anatomical reproducibility over multiple DIBH motion-management technique uses for pancreatic cancer RT. We used data from 20 patients; four DIBH scans were available for each patient to design 80 SBRT plans. Our results demonstrated that (i) there is considerable variation in OAR geometry and dose between same-subject DIBH scans; (ii) the RT plan designed for one scan may not be directly applicable to another scan; (iii) the RT treatment designed using a DIBH simulation CT results in different dosimetry in the DIBH treatment delivery; and (iv) this confirms the importance of adaptive radiation therapy (ART), such as MR-Linacs, for pancreatic RT delivery. The ART treatment delivery technique can account for anatomical variation between referenced and scheduled plans, and thus avoid toxicities of OARs because of anatomical variations between DIBH patient setups.

Case Report: MR-LINAC-guided adaptive radiotherapy for gastric cancer.

Background: The stomach is one of the most deformable organs. Its shape can be easily affected by breathing movements, and daily diet, and it also varies when the body position is different. The susceptibility of stomach has made it challenging to treat gastric cancer using the conventional image-guided radiotherapy, i.e., the techniques based on kilovoltage X-ray imaging. The magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is usually implemented using a hybrid system MR-LINAC. It is feasible to implement adaptive radiotherapy using MR-LINAC for deformable organs such as stomach. In this case report, we present our clinical experience to treat a gastric cancer patient using MR-LINAC. Case description: The patient is a 58-year-old male who started having black stools with no apparent cause a year ago. Gastroscopy result showed pancreatic cancer, pathology: adenocarcinoma on gastric cancer biopsy, adenocarcinoma on gastric body minor curvature biopsy. The patient was diagnosed with gastric cancer (adenocarcinoma, cTxN+M1, stage IV, HER-2 positive). The patient was treated in 25 fractions with radiotherapy using MR-LINAC with online adaptive treatment plans daily. The target area in daily MR images varied considerably when compared with the target area on the CT simulation images. During the course of treatment, there have even been instances where the planned target area where the patient received radiotherapy did not cover the lesion of the day. Conclusion: Online adaptive MRgRT can be a meaningful innovation for treating malignancies in the upper abdomen. The results in the current study are promising and are indicative for further optimizing online adaptive MRgRT in patients with inoperable tumors of the upper abdomen.

A quantitative CBCT pipeline based on 2D antiscatter grid and grid-based scatter sampling for image-guided radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative accuracy is critical for expanding the role of cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging from target localization to quantitative treatment monitoring and plan adaptations in radiation therapy. Despite advances in CBCT image quality improvement methods, quantitative accuracy gap between CBCT and multi-detector CT (MDCT) remains. PURPOSE: In this work, a physics-driven approach was investigated that combined robust scatter rejection, raw data correction and iterative image reconstruction to further improve CBCT image quality and quantitative accuracy, referred to as quantitative CBCT (qCBCT). METHODS: QCBCT approach includes tungsten 2D antiscatter grid hardware, residual scatter correction with grid-based scatter sampling, image lag, and beam hardening correction for offset detector geometry linac-mounted CBCT. Images were reconstructed with iterative image reconstruction to reduce image noise. qCBCT was evaluated using a variety of phantoms to investigate the effect of object size and its composition on image quality, and image quality was benchmarked against clinical CBCT and gold standard MDCT images used for treatment planning. RESULTS: QCBCT provided statistically significant improvement in CT number accuracy and reduced image artifacts when compared to clinical CBCT images. When compared to gold standard MDCT, mean HU errors in qCBCT and clinical CBCT were 17 ± 9 and 38 ± 29 HU, respectively. Magnitude of phantom size dependent HU variations were comparable between MDCT and qCBCT images. With iterative reconstruction, contrast-to-noise ratio improved by 25% when compared to clinical CBCT protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of novel scatter suppression techniques and other data correction methods in qCBCT provided CT number accuracy comparable to gold standard MDCT used for treatment planning. This approach may potentially improve CBCT's promise in fulfilling the tasks that demand high quantitative accuracy, such as online dose calculations and treatment response assessment, in image guided radiation therapy.

A multi-center survey on adaptive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer in Malaysia.

The survey is to assess the current state of adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for head and neck (H&N) cases among radiotherapy centers in Malaysia and to identify any implementation limitations. An online questionnaire was sent to all radiotherapy centers in Malaysia. The 24-question questionnaire consists of general information about the center, ART practices, and limitations faced in implementing ART. 28 out of 36 radiotherapy centers responded, resulting in an overall response rate of 78%. About 52% of the responding centers rescanned and replanned less than 5% of their H&N patients. The majority (88.9%) of the respondents reported the use Cone Beam Computed Tomography alone or in combination with other modalities to trigger the ART process. The main reasons cited for adopting ART were weight loss, changes in the immobilization fitting, and anatomical variation. The adaptation process typically occurred during week 3 or week 4 of treatment. More than half of the respondents require three days or more from re-simulation to starting a new treatment plan. Both target and organ at risk delineation on new planning CT relied heavily on manual delineation by physicians and physicists, respectively. All centers perform patient-specific quality assurance for their new adaptive plans. Two main limitations in implementing ART are "limited financial resources or equipment" and "limitation on technical knowledge". There is a need for a common consensus to standardize the practice of ART and address these limitations to improve the implementation of ART in Malaysia.

DAART: a deep learning platform for deeply accelerated adaptive radiation therapy for lung cancer.

Purpose: The study aimed to implement a novel, deeply accelerated adaptive radiation therapy (DAART) approach for lung cancer radiotherapy (RT). Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death, and RT is the preferred medically inoperable treatment for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the current lengthy workflow, it takes a median of four weeks from diagnosis to RT treatment, which can result in complete restaging and loss of local control with delay. We implemented the DAART approach, featuring a novel deepPERFECT system, to address unwanted delays between diagnosis and treatment initiation. Materials and methods: We developed a deepPERFECT to adapt the initial diagnostic imaging to the treatment setup to allow initial RT planning and verification. We used data from 15 patients with NSCLC treated with RT to train the model and test its performance. We conducted a virtual clinical trial to evaluate the treatment quality of the proposed DAART for lung cancer radiotherapy. Results: We found that deepPERFECT predicts planning CT with a mean high-intensity fidelity of 83 and 14 HU for the body and lungs, respectively. The shape of the body and lungs on the synthesized CT was highly conformal, with a dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.91, 0.97, and Hausdorff distance (HD) of 7.9 mm, and 4.9 mm, respectively, compared with the planning CT scan. The tumor showed less conformality, which warrants acquisition of treatment Day1 CT and online adaptive RT. An initial plan was designed on synthesized CT and then adapted to treatment Day1 CT using the adapt to position (ATP) and adapt to shape (ATS) method. Non-inferior plan quality was achieved by the ATP scenario, while all ATS-adapted plans showed good plan quality. Conclusion: DAART reduces the common online ART (ART) treatment course by at least two weeks, resulting in a 50% shorter time to treatment to lower the chance of restaging and loss of local control.

Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A Review of CT-based Techniques.

Adaptive radiation therapy is a feedback process by which imaging information acquired over the course of treatment, such as changes in patient anatomy, can be used to reoptimize the treatment plan, with the end goal of improving target coverage and reducing treatment toxicity. This review describes different types of adaptive radiation therapy and their clinical implementation with a focus on CT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy. Depending on local anatomic changes and clinical context, different anatomic sites and/or disease stages and presentations benefit from different adaptation strategies. Online adaptive radiation therapy, where images acquired in-room before each fraction are used to adjust the treatment plan while the patient remains on the treatment table, has emerged to address unpredictable anatomic changes between treatment fractions. Online treatment adaptation places unique pressures on the radiation therapy workflow, requiring high-quality daily imaging and rapid recontouring, replanning, plan review, and quality assurance. Generating a new plan with every fraction is resource intensive and time sensitive, emphasizing the need for workflow efficiency and clinical resource allocation. Cone-beam CT is widely used for image-guided radiation therapy, so implementing cone-beam CT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy can be easily integrated into the radiation therapy workflow and potentially allow for rapid imaging and replanning. The major challenge of this approach is the reduced image quality due to poor resolution, scatter, and artifacts. Keywords: Adaptive Radiation Therapy, Cone-Beam CT, Organs at Risk, Oncology © RSNA, 2023.

A new workflow of the on-line 1.5-T MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop a new workflow for 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR)-guided on-line adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) and assess its feasibility in achieving dose constraints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical data of patients who underwent on-line adaptive radiation therapy using a 1.5-T MR linear accelerator (MR-Linac). The workflow in MRgART was established by reviewing the disease site, number of fractions, and re-planning procedures. Five cases of prostate cancer were selected to evaluate the feasibility of the new workflow with respect to achieving dose constraints. RESULTS: Between December 2021 and September 2022, 50 consecutive patients underwent MRgART using a 1.5-T MR-Linac. Of these, 20 had prostate cancer, 10 had hepatocellular carcinoma, 6 had pancreatic cancer, 5 had lymph node oligo-metastasis, 3 had renal cancer, 3 had bone metastasis, 2 had liver metastasis from colon cancer, and 1 had a mediastinal tumor. Among a total of 247 fractions, 235 (95%) were adapt-to-shape (ATS)-based re-planning. The median ATS re-planning time in all 50 cases was 17 min. In the feasibility study, all dose constraint sets were met in all 5 patients by ATS re-planning. Conversely, a total of 14 dose constraints in 5 patients could not be achieved by virtual plan without using adaptive re-planning. These dose constraints included the minimum dose received by the highest irradiated volume of 1 cc in the planning target volume and the maximum dose of the rectal/bladder wall. CONCLUSION: A new workflow of 1.5-T MRgART was established and found to be feasible. Our evaluation of the dose constraint achievement demonstrated the effectiveness of the workflow.