Corrigendum: Effectiveness of perindopril/amlodipine fixed-dose combination in the treatment of hypertension: a systematic review.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1156655.].

Single-Pill Combination Therapy of Amlodipine, Telmisartan, and Chlorthalidone in the Management of Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Hypertension is a major cause of cardiovascular disease and death worldwide. Low-dose combination therapy is a promising approach for managing hypertension due to its safety and efficacy. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of a single-pill, low-dose combination of amlodipine, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone for essential hypertension based on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and searched the Cochrane, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases until July 01, 2024, using the following search string: (telmisartan) AND (amlodipine) AND (chlorthalidone) AND (randomized OR randomly). The quality of the RCTs was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary endpoint was the mean change in sitting systolic blood pressure (BP), with secondary endpoints including BP target achievement rates, BP response rates, and serious treatment-related adverse events. Overall, three RCTs met the inclusion criteria and exhibited a low risk of bias. The doses in the combination pill ranged from 2.5 to 5 mg of amlodipine, 20 to 80 mg of telmisartan, and 4.167 to 25 mg of chlorthalidone. Control groups varied, including usual care, amlodipine 10 mg, and dual therapy of telmisartan and amlodipine. Results showed significant reductions in mean sitting systolic and diastolic BP, improved BP control and response rates, and a generally safe profile with no significant differences in serious adverse events. Despite encouraging data, results should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity in doses and control groups. Further research should address the long-term effects and explore predictors of response to this therapy.

A single-dose, randomized, crossover bioequivalence study of levamlodipine besilate tablets in healthy subjects.

Levamlodipine, the levorotatory form of amlodipine racemate, has a blood pressure-lowering effect that is twice that of the racemate. The study aims to establish a foundation for the clinical application of the test drug by conducting a phase I clinical bioequivalence trial, comparing its bioequivalence and safety with the reference drug in healthy Chinese subjects. Recruiting 26 healthy subjects for separate bioequivalence trials in both fasting and fed conditions. The subjects will orally administer 2.5-mg test drug and 5-mg reference drug. A chiral method was used for bioanalytics and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was employed to quantify the (S)-amlodipine concentrations at various time points after administration. In fasting condition, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ are 100.24%, 103.63%, and 103.24%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) fall within the range of 80-125%, satisfying the established bioequivalence criteria. Similarly, upon oral administration of the drugs in the fed condition, the GMRs for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ are 96.48%, 99.90%, and 99.62%, respectively. The corresponding 90% CIs are within the limits of 80-125%, meeting the predefined bioequivalence standards. Furthermore, both drugs exhibited favorable safety profiles. The results show that the two drugs are bioequivalent in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. The two drugs both had similar PK parameters and good safety.

Phase III randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety of amlodipine and candesartan cilexetil combination for hypertension treatment.

Effective antihypertensive therapy is essential for achieving optimal blood pressure (BP) control and reducing cardiovascular events. This double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial aimed to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of a combination of amlodipine (AML) and candesartan cilexetil (CC) versus AML monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension (HTN). After a 4-week run-in period with AML 5 mg, patients whose HTN remained uncontrolled (diastolic BP [DBP]) ≥ 90 mmHg and < 120 mmHg) were randomized to receive either AML + CC or AML alone for 8 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in DBP and systolic BP (SBP). The primary safety measure was the incidence of adverse events (AEs). A total of 174 participants were included in the efficacy analysis. After 8 weeks, DBP decreased by -9.92 ± 0.86 mmHg in the AML + CC arm and - 2.08 ± 0.86 mmHg in the AML arm (p < 0.0001). SBP decreased by -14.27 ± 1.39 mmHg in the AML + CC arm versus - 2.77 ± 1.39 mmHg in the AML arm (p < 0.0001). AEs occurred in 11.24% of the AML + CC group and 5.62% of the AML group (p = 0.1773). AML + CC combination therapy demonstrated superior efficacy with good tolerance, making it a promising option for patients with inadequately controlled hypertension on amlodipine alone.

Stability-indicating RP-HPLC method development and validation for the quantification of amlodipine besylate and valsartan tablets in solid oral dosage form.

The present study discusses the development of simple, rapid, specific, precision, accuracy, stability indicating the HPLC method for the analysis of amlodipine besylate and valsartan tablet dosage form. The chromatographic separation was achieved using phosphate buffer with 1% triethyl amine (pH 3.0) as mobile phase-A and mixed Methanol and buffer in the ratio of (65:35)(v/v) as mobile phase-B. The detection of components was made at 237 nm for amlodipine besylate and valsartan. Analytical techniques should enrich sensitivity and specificity for the estimation of pharmaceutical drug products. Evaluated stress studies under different types of ICH conditions. The optimized HPLC method was validated as per the current ICH guidelines. The validated HPLC method was obtained highly specific with linearity ranging between 25 and 200 µgmL-1 of amlodipine besylate and 40-320 µgmL-1 of valsartan and both components correlation coefficient was > 0.999. The method showed high accuracy more than 97%. In stress studies, amlodipine besylate and valsartan were found to be sensitive to acid stress conditions and oxidation stress conditions. The method was found to be suitable for the quality control of amlodipine besylate and valsartan in the tablet as well as in stability-indicating studies. The method was applied to the analysis of stability samples.

Phase 1 Evaluation of the Bioequivalence and Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of a Novel Fixed-Dose Combination of Ezetimibe, Atorvastatin, and Amlodipine.

A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ezetimibe, atorvastatin, and amlodipine has been developed to improve medication adherence among patients with cardiovascular diseases. In a randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, fixed-sequence study involving 34 participants (Study 1), the potential drug-drug interaction between ezetimibe/atorvastatin FDC and amlodipine was evaluated. Additionally, a randomized, open-label, crossover study with 60 participants (Study 2) compared the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of ezetimibe/atorvastatin/amlodipine FDC to those of individual formulations. Co-administration of the ezetimibe/atorvastatin FDC and amlodipine did not significantly alter the PKs of either drug. However, amlodipine resulted in a slight increase in systemic exposure to atorvastatin by approximately 23%. Geometric mean ratios (FDC to individual formulations) and 90% confidence intervals of area under the time-concentration curve at steady state during dosing interval (AUCτ, ss) and maximum concentration at steady state (Cmax, ss) or amlodipine, atorvastatin, and ezetimibe were all within the bioequivalent range (0.8-1.25), confirming bioequivalence. Moreover, the FDC of ezetimibe, atorvastatin, and amlodipine exhibited comparable tolerability to corresponding individual formulations.

Evaluation of amlodipine against strains of Candida spp. in planktonic cells, developing biofilms and mature biofilms.

Aim: To evaluate the antifungal activity of amlodipine against strains of Candida spp. and to its possible mechanism of action.Methods: Broth microdilution tests were used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration, while the synergistic activity was evaluated by calculating the fractional inhibitory concentration index. The action of amlodipine against biofilms was determined using the MTT assay and its possible mechanism of action was investigated through flow cytometry tests.Results: Amlodipine showed MICs ranging from 62.5 to 250 µg/ml, in addition to action against pre-formed and forming biofilms, with reductions between 50 and 90%. Amlodipine increases the externalization of phosphatidylserine and reduces the cell viability of fungal cells, suggesting apoptosis.Conclusion: Amlodipine had good antifungal activity against planktonic cells and biofilms of Candida spp., by leading the cells to apoptosis.

Candida is a type of fungus that can cause diseases. This fungus became stronger over time and drugs can no longer kill them easily, so it is important to find new drugs. We decided to study whether amlodipine, a drug used for heart disease, has action against Candida. We discovered that amlodipine make fungi weaker. We still need to do more studies to find out if amlodipine can help prevent Candida diseases.

A sustainable HPLC method coupled with diode array detection for versatile quantification of telmisartan, chlorthalidone and amlodipine in a fixed-dose antihypertensive formulation and dissolution studies.

Cardiovascular diseases, especially hypertension, stand as prominent contributors to global mortality. Hypertension, often referred to as a silent killer syndrome, necessitates the use of multiple medications for effective control and management. A new environmentally friendly HPLC-DAD method is introduced in this study for the concurrent analysis of telmisartan (TEL), chlorthalidone (CHT) and amlodipine besylate (AML), in both pure forms and combined pharmaceutical dosage form. An isocratic elution mode was employed to achieve chromatographic separation, utilizing an Inertsil C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5.0 µm) and a mobile phase mixture of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer (pH 3.0 ± 0.1) with ratio of 35:65, v/v. The separation was achieved within 10 min at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The proposed method's validation was carried out following the guidelines outlined by the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). The achieved linearity range was 1.0-140.0 µg/mL for TEL and 1.0-100.0 µg/mL for CHT and AML with quantification limits of 0.061, 0.177, and 0.313 µg/mL for TEL, CHT, and AML, respectively. The fixed combination tablet dosage form demonstrated acceptable release profile, as indicated by the in-vitro dissolution studies. The studied dissolution media were phosphate buffer pH 7.5, 0.01 N HCl, and water, utilizing a USP type II apparatus at 37 ± 0.5 °C with a stirring rate of 75 rpm. The proposed method was applied successfully for the quality assessment of Telma-ACT® Tablets with good precision and accuracy. Various tools were used for evaluating the level of greenness, including Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), Analytical Greenness Metric for Sample Preparation (AGREEprep), Analytical Eco-Scale (AES), and Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS). These tools had confirmed the eco-friendliness of the proposed method. Additionally, the newly introduced White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), and the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) have been specifically developed to evaluate the sustainability and the applicability of the method.

Calcium channel blocker overdose: Not all the same toxicity.

AIMS: Calcium channel blocker (CCB) overdose remains an important poisoning, with increasing availability of dihydropyridines. We aimed to compare the severity and treatment of CCB overdoses. METHODS: We reviewed CCB overdoses presenting to two toxicology services from 2014 to 2023. We extracted prospectively collected data from a clinical database, including demographics, dose, co-ingestants, complications, treatments and outcomes, to compare different CCBs. RESULTS: There were 236 overdoses; median age 55 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 41-65 years); 130 (55%) were females. Dihydropyridine overdoses increased significantly: median of nine cases annually (IQR: 8.8-12.3) during the study compared to a median of three cases annually (IQR: 1-4.3; P < 0.001) in the 10 years prior. The commonest agent was amlodipine (147), then lercanidipine (28), diltiazem (27), verapamil (23) and felodipine (11). Median defined daily dose ingested was higher for dihydropyridines, and cardiac co-ingestants were common except verapamil. Median length of stay was 21 h (IQR: 13-43 h), which was similar except longer for diltiazem (median, 39 h). Fifty-six patients (24%) were admitted to intensive care, more often for diltiazem (14; 52%) and verapamil (7; 30%). Dysrhythmias occurred in 19 patients (diltiazem [9], verapamil [8], amlodipine [2]), and included 13 junctional dysrhythmias. Hypotension occurred in 91 patients (39%), 62 (26%) received inotropes/vasopressors (adrenaline 32 [52%], noradrenaline 48 [77%]), 21 (9%) high-dose insulin and 44 (19%) calcium. Adrenaline and high-dose insulin were more commonly given in diltiazem and verapamil overdoses, compared to vasopressors in dihydropyridine overdoses. Acute kidney injury occurred in 39 patients. Seven (3%) patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Dihydropyridines were the commonest CCB overdoses, with amlodipine making up half. More severe toxicity occurred with diltiazem and verapamil.

Evaluation of analytical greenness metric for an eco-friendly method developed through the integration of green chemistry and quality-by-design for the simultaneous determination of Nebivolol hydrochloride, Telmisartan, Valsartan, and Amlodipine besylate.

In recent years, the field of analytical chemistry has witnessed a notable shift towards the adoption of greener chromatographic methods, aiming to minimize the environmental impact. An effective strategy involves substituting conventional harmful organic solvents with environmentally friendly alternatives, reducing the use of hazardous chemicals that contribute to environmental concerns. However, separating drug substances without the use of buffers and organic solvents presence is a big challenge. To overcome this challenge, a combination of quality-by-design (QbD) and green analytical chemistry (GAC) was employed in this study for method development. A high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was successfully developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of Nebivolol hydrochloride, Telmisartan, Valsartan, and Amlodipine besylate. The method utilized a mobile phase composed of a mixture of 0.1 % formic acid in water (pH: 2.5) and ethanol. A regular octadecyl silica (ODS) column was employed, and UV detection at 220 nm was utilized. The method exhibited linearity within the concentration range of 25-75 µg/mL for Telmisartan and 150-450 µg/mL for Nebivolol Hydrochloride, Valsartan, and Amlodipine besylate and the correlation coefficient was greater than 0.999 for all the analytes. Limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were determined as 0.01 and 0.04 µg/mL for Telmisartan, 0.06 and 0.20 µg/mL for Nebivolol Hydrochloride, 0.08 and 0.25 µg/mL for Amlodipine besylate, and 0.14 and 0.46 µg/mL for Valsartan, respectively. The developed method underwent thorough validation, encompassing various parameters such as linearity, accuracy, precision, LOD, LOQ, robustness, and ruggedness. The mean recovery values were observed to range between 98.86 % and 99.89 %. The accuracy demonstrated was consistently above 98.98 % for both intra-day and inter-day precisions were with the relative standard deviations less than 2 %. To establish its robustness, a quality-by-design-based experimental design (DoE) approach was implemented. Additionally, the method's environmental friendliness was evaluated using the Analytical Greenness metric (AGREE) an analytical eco scale, both confirming its alignment with sustainable practices and reduced ecological impact. The sustainability of the solvent used in the current study was evaluated by Green Solvents Selecting Tool (GSST) Further, the developed method greenness was evaluated with the green analytical tools such as Analytical method greenness score (AMGS) and using the recently released White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) using RGB assessment tool. By employing this greener approach to chromatography method, this study contributes to the ongoing efforts in analytical chemistry to promote sustainable practices and minimize the environmental footprint of analytical methods.

Association between calcium-channel blockers and gingival enlargement: A case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: As reported by the existing literature, calcium-channel blockers (CCB) can lead to gingival enlargement. The aims of this study were to investigate the factors associated with gingival enlargement in patients on CCB and to assess the saliva and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) profile of patients on CCB with gingival enlargement. METHODS: A total of 131 participants were included. Data were collected from 91 patients taking CCB for treatment of systemic hypertension. The presence of drug-induced gingival enlargement (DIGE) was assessed clinically and associated with patient factors. Patients with DIGE were group-matched for gender and ethnicity with an equal number of consecutive CCB non-DIGE patients (control 1), no-CCB no-DIGE (control 2) and periodontally healthy with no DIGE (control 3) for the saliva and GCF analysis. A bead-based multiplex immunoassay was used to assess a panel of biomarkers. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of patients on CCB were diagnosed with DIGE. Lack of daily interdental cleaning and self-reported diagnosis of type II diabetes were associated with the diagnosis of DIGE. When analysing patients only on CCB, those with DIGE had higher GCF levels of vascular endolthelial growth factor (VEGF) (p = 0.032), epidermal growth factor (EGF) (p = 0.030) and matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) (p = 0.008). Among the salivary markers, only MMP-8 showed a statistically significant difference across groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating saliva and GCF biomarkers in patients with DIGE and different control groups, suggesting that causes of the overgrowth might involve inflammatory processes, tissue damage pathways, and potentially an impact on growth factors like VEGF. Future research should verify these results in independent populations and explore the underlying pathogenic mechanisms in-depth. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Calcium-channel blockers (CCB) can lead to gingival enlargement. This study confirms lack of interdental cleaning and type II diabetes as risk factors. Elevated levels of VEGF, EGF, and MMP-8 in gingival crevicular fluid and MMP-8 in saliva suggest inflammatory processes and growth factors might play roles in this condition.

Novel Insights into Amlodipine-Induced Gingival Enlargement: A Clinical and Molecular Perspective.

This study aimed to identify risk factors for amlodipine-induced gingival enlargement, assess quality of life, and analyze gingival tissue. This cross-sectional study involved hypertensive patients on amlodipine, divided into groups with and without gingival enlargement. Assessments included sociodemographic data, clinical evaluations, and clinical parameters. Quality of life was assessed using OHIP-14 and WB-HRQoL scales. Gingival tissue samples were analyzed for oxidative status and key molecules using RT-PCR and colorimetric assays. The study included 32 patients with no significant sociodemographic differences between groups (p > 0.05). Patients with gingival enlargement had higher systolic blood pressure (139.63 ± 10.743 vs. 128.38 ± 7.249, p = 0.028) and higher OHIP-14 scores. The RT-PCR analysis showed significant differences in IL-6, TNF-α, IL-33, ST2, TGF-ß1, FGF-2, CTGF, VEGF-D, and KGF expression. IL-6, TNF-α, ST2, and FGF-2 expression levels were lower in patients taking amlodipine, with and without gingival enlargement. TGF-ß1 and CTGF expression levels were highest in patients with amlodipine-induced gingival enlargement. SOD activity was also highest in these patients, whereas MDA levels were higher in patients with gingival enlargement without amlodipine. Our study highlights the impact of amlodipine-induced gingival enlargement on oral health and quality of life, emphasizing fibrosis and oxidative stress, and suggests the need for integrated healthcare approaches and further research.

A Rapid, Sensitive, and High-throughput Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Antihypertensive Drug Combinations in Dog Plasma by UHPLC-MS/MS: The Assessment of Predicable Bioequivalence of In-vitro Dissolution Condition.

BACKGROUND: Essential hypertension is a common clinical disease and a risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide are commonly used antihypertensive drugs. The aim of this study was to establish a robust UPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide in dog plasma. At the same time, the in vivo and in vitro release studies were conducted, and a preliminary in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) evaluation was performed. METHODS: The bioequivalence experiment was conducted with a double-crossed design. Three major components were extracted and analyzed by UHPLC-MS/MS. With the MRM scan, olmesartan and amlodipine were quantified by fragment conversion (m/z 447.10→190.10) and (m/z 408.95→294.00) under positive ESI mode, while hydrochlorothiazide was quantified with fragment conversion (m/z 295.90→268.90) under negative ESI mode. The in vitro release studies were performed using a USP paddle, and the dissolution medium was chosen from pH 6.0 to pH 6.8 according to the BCS classification of compounds. The IVIVC was calculated using the Wagner-Nelson equation. RESULTS: The linear ranges of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide in the plasma were 5.0-2500, 0.1-50, and 3.0-1500 ng/mL, respectively. All accuracies were within 3.8% of the target values, and the findings revealed that intra-day and inter-day accuracies were less than 12.1%. Moreover, the recoveries exceeded 88.3%, the matrix effect tests were positive, and the stability tests were positive. With the establishment of correlation, the distinguishable dissolution condition (pH 6.8) was selected as the predictable condition. CONCLUSION: The established method was suitable for the preclinical pharmacokinetic study of tripartite drugs with strong specificity and high sensitivity. Through the evaluation of IVIVC, the connection between in vivo and in vitro drug testing was initially established.

Non-surgical Treatment of Severe Drug-Influenced Gingival Enlargement: A Report of Two Cases.

Drug-influenced gingival enlargement (DIGE) is a well-known adverse drug reaction associated with multiple medications. Although a benign condition, DIGE can have a significant impact on patients' aesthetic comfort and function. A surgical resection approach is usually proposed to treat severe and generalized DIGE. In this report, we describe the cases of a 47-year-old male and a 58-year-old male, both presenting with severe and generalized DIGE associated with amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker used for hypertension treatment. A non-surgical, cause-related approach, including drug substitution and repeated sessions of mechanical instrumentation, led to the complete resolution of severe DIGE, with no recurrence observed after 18 months in Case 1 and 12 months in Case 2. Throughout the observation period, the bleeding on probing score decreased from 100% at baseline to 10% or less, and the number of periodontal sites with probing pocket depth ≥ 5 mm decreased by more than 90% compared to the initial assessment. Both patients reported a high level of satisfaction with the treatment outcomes. These successful results should encourage clinicians to give greater consideration to non-surgical management of DIGE as a less invasive option before proceeding to surgical treatments.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between the Fixed-Dose Combination of Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin 10/20 Mg and the Fixed-Dose Combination of Telmisartan/Amlodipine 80/5 Mg in Healthy Subjects.

Background: Management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, which are common comorbid risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, require multiple medications. The development of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) containing ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, telmisartan, and amlodipine aims to enhance patient adherence and persistence, but the potential interactions among the four medications have not been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between the FDC of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg (ER) and the FDC of telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg (TA). Methods: An open-label, single-sequence, three-period, three-treatment crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. All subjects received ER for 7 days, TA for 9 days and ER combined with TA for 7 days during each treatment period. For PK analysis of total/free ezetimibe, rosuvastatin, telmisartan, and amlodipine, serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours at steady state. Safety profiles were assessed throughout the study. Results: Thirty-eight subjects were enrolled, and 34 subjects completed the study. The systemic exposure to each active ingredient after coadministration of the two FDCs was similar to that after each FDC alone. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for the maximum plasma concentration (µg/L) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (h·µg/L) of the combination therapy to monotherapy, assessed at steady state, were as follows: total ezetimibe, 1.0264 (0.8765-1.2017) and 0.9359 (0.7847-1.1163); free ezetimibe, 1.5713 (1.2821-1.9257) and 0.9941 (0.8384-1.1788); rosuvastatin, 2.1673 (1.7807-2.6379) and 1.1714 (0.9992-1.3733); telmisartan, 1.0745 (0.8139-1.4186) and 1.1057 (0.8379-1.4591); and amlodipine, 0.9421 (0.8764-1.0126) and 0.9603 (0.8862-1.0405). Both combination therapy and monotherapy were well tolerated by the subjects. Conclusion: The coadministration of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg and ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg was well tolerated in healthy subjects, and the PK interaction between those two FDCs was not clinically significant.

Amlodipine Ocular Delivery Restores Ferning Patterns and Reduces Intensity of Glycosylated Peak of Carrageenan-Induced Tear Fluid: An In-Silico Flexible Docking with IL-ß1.

BACKGROUND: The tear ferning test can be an easy clinical procedure for the evaluation and characterization of the ocular tear film. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the restoration of tear ferning patterns and reduction of glycosylation peak after amlodipine application in carrageenan-induced conjunctivitis. METHODS: At the rabbit's upper palpebral region, carrageenan was injected for cytokine-mediated conjunctivitis. Ferning pattern and glycosylation of the tear fluid were characterized using various instrumental analyses. The effect of amlodipine was also examined after ocular instillation and flexible docking studies. RESULTS: Optical microscopy showed a disrupted ferning of the tear collected from the inflamed eye. FTIR of the induced tear fluid exhibited peaks within 1000-1200 cm-1, which might be due to the protein glycosylation absent in the normal tear spectrogram. The glycosylation peak reduced significantly in the tear sample collected from the amlodipine-treated group. Corresponding energy dispersive analysis showed the presence of sulphur, indicating protein leakage from the lacrimal gland in the induced group. The disappearance of sulphur from the treated group indicated its remedial effect. The flexible docking studies revealed a stronger binding mode of amlodipine with Interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß). The reduction in the intensity of the glycosylated peak and the restoration offering are probably due to suppression of IL-1ß. CONCLUSION: This study may be helpful in obtaining primary information for drug discovery to be effective against IL-1ß and proving tear fluid as a novel diagnostic biomarker.

Topical amlodipine-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for enhanced burn wound healing: A repurposed approach.

Burn wounds are a complicated process with ongoing psychological and physical issues for the affected individuals. Wound healing consists of multifactorial molecular mechanisms and interactions involving; inflammation, proliferation, angiogenesis, and matrix remodeling. Amlodipine (ADB), widely used in cardiovascular disorders, demonstrated antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in some non-cardiovascular studies. It was reported that amlodipine is capable of promoting the healing process by regulation of collagen production, extracellular matrix, re-epithelialization and wound healing through its vasodilation and angiogenic activity. The objective of the current study is to appraise the wound healing capacity of amlodipine-loaded SLN (ADB-SLN) integrated into a hydrogel. The in-vitro characterization revealed that the optimized formulation was nanometric (190.4 ± 1.6 nm) with sufficiently high entrapment efficiency (88 % ± 1.4) and sustained ADB release (85.45 ± 4.45 % after 12 h). Furthermore, in-vivo evaluation was conducted on second-degree burns induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats. ADB-SLN gel revealed a high wound contraction rate and a significant improvement in skin regeneration and inflammatory biomarkers levels, confirming its efficiency in enhancing wound healing compared to other tested and commercial formulations. To conclude, the present findings proved that ADB-SLN integrated hydrogel offers a promising novel therapy for burn wound healing with a maximum therapeutic value.

Corrigendum: Effectiveness of perindopril/amlodipine fixed-dose combination in the treatment of hypertension: a systematic review.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1156655.].

Binder-free and efficient voltammetric sensor based on Zn-Ca2CuO3 nanoparticles for simultaneous determination of amlodipine, acetaminophen, and ascorbic acid in hypertension patients.

Amlodipine (AM) is a long active calcium channel blocker used to relax blood vessels by preventing calcium ion transport into the vascular walls and its supporting molecules acetaminophen (AP) and ascorbic acid (AA) are recommended for hypertension control and prevention. Considering their therapeutic importance and potential side effects due to over dosage, we have fabricated a sensor for individual and simultaneous determination of AA, AP, and AM in pharmaceuticals and human urine using novel Zn-doped Ca2CuO3 nanoparticles modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE). Optimally doped Ca2CuO3 (2.5 wt% Zn at Cu site) enhanced the detection of target molecules over much wider concentration ranges of 50 to 3130 µM for AA, 0.25 to 417 µM for AP, and 0.8 to 354 µM for AM with the corresponding lowest detection limits of 14 µM, 0.05 µM, and 0.07 µM, respectively. Furthermore, the Zn-Ca2CuO3/GCE exhibited excellent selectivity and high sensitivity even in the presence of several potential interfering agents. The usefulness of the developed electrode was tested using an amlodipine besylate tablet and urine samples of seven hypertension patients under medication. The results confirmed the presence of a significant amount of AP and AM in six patients' urine samples indicating that the personalized medication is essential and the quantum of medication need to be fixed by knowing the excess medicines excreted through urine. Thus, the Zn-Ca2CuO3/GCE with a high recovery percentage and good sensitivity shall be useful in the pharmaceutical and biomedical sectors.