Targeted Inhibition of Lymphovascular Invasion Formation with CREKA Peptide-Modified Silicasomes to Boost Chemotherapy in Bladder Cancer.

Despite its significant clinical efficacy as a first-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer, cisplatin-based chemotherapy provides a limited benefit for patients with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), which is characterized by the presence of tumor emboli within blood vessels and associated with enhanced cisplatin resistance and metastatic potential. Notably, platelets, a critical component of LVI, hinder the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors and facilitate metastasis. Consequently, platelet function inhibition holds the potential to disrupt LVI formation, as well as augment the antitumor activity of cisplatin. Herein, we developed a tumor microenvironment-targeted nanodrug with lipid-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles (silicasomes) that synergistically combines cisplatin with an antiplatelet agent, tirofiban, for bladder cancer treatment. The customized nanodrug can concurrently prevent LVI formation and enhance the chemotherapeutic efficacy without significant adverse effects. This study supports the integration of chemotherapy and antiplatelet therapy via a silicasome-based nanosystem as a highly promising strategy for bladder cancer management.

When Revascularization May Be Appropriate in Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis.

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a condition that involves the narrowing of one or both renal arteries, most commonly caused by either atherosclerosis or fibroplasia. RAS can present in a multitude of clinical manifestations involving hypertension (HTN), heart failure, and renal failure. Current recommendations for treating patients with RAS involve strict medical therapy often without invasive therapies. However, in more complicated patients with RAS, recent clinical studies and guidelines have offered varying recommendations, which has presented challenges in managing these cases. This review aims to summarize current evidence to best evaluate which patients with RAS may benefit from renal artery revascularization as opposed to medical therapy alone.

Antithrombotic Strategies with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Long-term outcomes of patients with advanced heart failure treated with durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been augmented due to improved durability and hemocompatibility on the backbone of pump engineering enhancements. The incidence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events (pump thrombosis, stroke and non-surgical bleeding events) are device-specific and vary by type of engineered pump. A fully magnetically levitated rotor containing LVAD in concert with use of antithrombotic therapy has successfully overcome an increased risk of thrombosis albeit with only modest reduction in bleeding events. Modifications to antithrombotic strategies have focused on reduced dose vitamin K antagonist use or use of direct oral anticoagulants with demonstration of safety, and progress in reduction of mucosal bleeding episodes with elimination of antiplatelet agents. This review outlines the current landscape of advances in anticoagulation management in LVAD patients, highlighting the need for ongoing research and cautious application of emerging therapies and technologies.

Ticagrelor monotherapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: An individual patient-level meta-analysis from TICO and T-PASS trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) tend to be excluded or under-represented in randomized clinical trials evaluating the effects of potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS: Individual patient data were pooled from randomized clinical trials that included STEMI patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation and compared ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term (≤3 months) DAPT versus ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT in terms of centrally adjudicated clinical outcomes. The co-primary outcomes were efficacy outcome (composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and safety outcome (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding) at 1 year. FINDINGS: The pooled cohort contained 2,253 patients with STEMI. The incidence of the primary efficacy outcome did not differ between the ticagrelor monotherapy group and the ticagrelor-based DAPT group (1.8% versus 2.0%; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49-1.61; p = 0.684). There was no difference in cardiac death between the groups (0.6% versus 0.7%; HR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.32-2.46; p = 0.822). The incidence of the primary safety outcome was significantly lower in the ticagrelor monotherapy group (2.3% versus 4.0%; HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.35-0.92; p = 0.020). No heterogeneity of treatment effects was observed for the primary outcomes across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI treated with DES implantation, ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term DAPT was associated with lower major bleeding without an increase in the risk of ischemic events compared with ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT. Further research is necessary to extend these findings to non-Asian patients. FUNDING: This study was funded by Biotronik (Bülach, Switzerland).

Non-invasive recanalization of first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent thrombosis due to stent fracture and coronary artery aneurysm after clopidogrel treatment 15 years after implantation.

In 2020, a 48-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital due to unstable angina. In 2005, three first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (1st-SESs) had been deployed to his right coronary artery (RCA). Over the past 10 years or so, the patient has been treated with single antiplatelet therapy using aspirin. Coronary angiography (CAG) revealed severe stenosis in the left circumflex artery (LCx) and total occlusion at the proximal portion of the stented RCA. Furthermore, fluoroscopy showed multiple 1st-SES fractures. After ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention of the LCx, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was resumed by adding the P2Y12 inhibitor clopidogrel to aspirin. Two months later, CAG revealed complete recanalization and multiple peri-stent coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) in the RCA. Intravascular ultrasound revealed late-acquired stent malapposition (LSM) and formation of true aneurysms. Coronary angioscopy showed the uncovered struts of the 1st-SES and mural red thrombus. DAPT was continued thereafter, and 8 months later, follow-up CAG showed no significant RCA restenosis. To date, the patient remains free from cardiovascular events. This report documents a rare case of thrombotic occlusion of a 1st-SES with LSM, CAA, and stent fractures followed by non-invasive recanalization after clopidogrel treatment 15 years after 1st-SES implantation. Learning objective: Stent thrombosis due to stent fracture and coronary aneurysm can occur even years after first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent (1st-SES) implantation. Risk assessment using coronary imaging should be made and long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) should be recommended in patients with a high risk of stent thrombosis after 1st-SES implantation. In cases of stent thrombosis of the 1st-SES, resuming DAPT, including P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, may be a useful non-invasive treatment option.

Navigating Aspirin Hypersensitivity in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Aspirin hypersensitivity continues to be a major clinical challenge in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), particularly in those requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the absence of a validated alternative antiplatelet regimen. Although true aspirin allergies are uncommon, they can manifest with severe reactions such as angioedema or anaphylaxis, highlighting the critical role of diagnostic challenge tests and tolerance induction strategies. Here, a 61-year-old female with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis presented with new-onset heart failure and elevated troponins in the setting of a hypertensive emergency. A subsequent left heart catheterization revealed severe multivessel disease, but PCI was deferred due to her history suggestive of aspirin-induced angioedema and the absence of a known optimal approach in this scenario. Given the feasibility of completing a desensitization protocol, aspirin desensitization was pursued, facilitating the successful placement of a drug-eluting stent. This case highlights the need for validated protocols to manage aspirin hypersensitivity, as the current treatment paradigm necessitates a highly individualized approach by the treating clinician.

Early detection of resistance to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention using the VerifyNow test and associated factors.

Resistance to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), including aspirin and clopidogrel, in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) leads to the inability to prevent thrombotic complications. The present study aimed to evaluate early resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel in patients following PCI using the VerifyNow test and associated factors. A total of 50 patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who underwent emergency PCI and received DAPT were recruited in the present study. The detection of resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel was performed using the VerifyNow system. Resistance to aspirin was determined with VerifyNow Aspirin >550 aspirin reaction units (ARU). Resistance to clopidogrel was determined with VerifyNow P2Y12 >208 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). The resistance rate to aspirin was 14%, while the resistance rate to clopidogrel was higher, at 34%. There were 2 patients with resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel (4%). Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that diabetes, the use of ß-blockers, and low levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit were associated with resistance to clopidogrel. Following multivariable logistic regression analysis, only the use of ß-blockers was truly associated with resistance to clopidogrel. On the whole, the results of the present study may also prove to be helpful in the selection of therapeutic drugs for patients undergoing PCI and who are diagnosed with ACS.

Pathological Evaluation of Predictors for Delayed Endothelial Coverage After Currently Available Drug-eluting Stent Implantation in Coronary Arteries: Impact of Lesions With Acute and Chronic Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after currently available drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation to prevent stent thrombosis (ST) remains controversial. Delayed healing is frequently identified as a leading cause of ST in the early phase. However, a thorough pathological investigation into strut coverage after currently available DES implantation is lacking-a gap addressed in the current study. METHODS: From our autopsy registry of 199 stented lesions, 4,713 struts from 66 currently available DES-stented lesions with an implant duration ≤370 days were histologically evaluated. Endothelial coverage was defined as the presence of luminal endothelial cells overlying struts and an underlying smooth muscle cell layer. The stented lesions were classified into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n = 40) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) (n = 26) groups and were compared. Endothelial coverage predictors were identified through logistic analysis. RESULTS: Although ACS and CCS lesions presented comparable clinical characteristics, including age, sex, and cause of death, the latter exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis than the former (33.3% vs. 65.2%; p = 0.02, 7.7% vs. 30.4%; p = 0.02). The poststent implant median duration was significantly shorter in ACS lesions than in CCS lesions (13 [IQR 5-26 days] vs. 40 [IQR 16-233 days]; p < 0.01). The endothelial coverage percentage was 3.5% at 30 days and 27.7% at 90 days after currently available DES implantation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis implicated implant duration of ≤90 days [odds ratio (OR), 0.009; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.006-0.012; p < 0.01], superficial calcification (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07-0.17; p < 0.01), ACS culprit site (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.94; p = 0.039), and circumferentially durable polymer-coated DES (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.24-0.41; p < 0.01) as delayed endothelial coverage predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial coverage was limited at 90 days after currently available DES implantation, and the ACS culprit site and circumferentially durable polymer-coated DES were identified as independent predictors of delayed endothelial coverage. Our findings suggest the importance of underlying plaque morphology and stent technology for vessel healing after such implantation.

One-Month Duration Compared with Twelve-Month Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Elective Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Disease: Bleeding and Ischaemic Outcomes.

Background/Objectives: The need to determine the safest duration of dual antiplatelet therapy duration after elective angioplasty to reduce bleeding events without an adverse effect on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains a challenge. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, single-centre cohort study, we identified all patients who underwent PCI for de novo coronary disease for stable angina between January 2015 and November 2019. We compared 1-month and 12-month durations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to determine if there was any difference in the primary outcome of major bleeding. The secondary outcome was a patient-oriented composite endpoint of all-cause mortality; any myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularisation; and the individual components of this composite endpoint. Data were analysed using Cox regression models and cumulative hazard plots. Results: A total of 1025 patients were analysed, of which 340 received 1 month of DAPT and 685 received 12 months of DAPT. There was no difference in major bleeding between the two groups (2.6% vs. 2.5% respectively). On univariable cox regression analysis, no characteristics were predictors of major bleeding. A proportion of 99.7% of patients in the 1-month DAPT arm were treated with a DCB strategy, whilst 93% in the 12-month DAPT group were treated with a DES. There was no difference between the two groups with regards to the composite patient-oriented MACE (11% vs. 12%, respectively) or any individual component of this. These results were unchanged after propensity score matched analysis. Conclusions: A 1-month duration of DAPT, for which 99.7% of patients were treated with a DCB strategy, appears safe and effective when compared with a 12-month duration of DAPT with no difference in major bleeding or MACE.

Aspirin-free P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review.

Background: A modified antiplatelet therapy approach after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), specifically reducing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration and transitioning to P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, may offer advantages in terms of bleeding risk reduction. However, the impact of initiating aspirin-free P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy immediately after PCI is not yet fully understood. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until January 2024 for studies that examined the use of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy as a treatment approach without initial DAPT following PCI. Results: Four single-arm pilot prospective studies and 1 randomized controlled trial were included. In acute coronary syndrome patients with P2Y12 monotherapy following aspirin withdrawal immediately after PCI, the occurrence rates of the primary ischemic and bleeding endpoint were 2.91 % (8 out of 275 patients) and 1.09 % (3 out of 275 patients) respectively, whereas both the incidence rates of the primary ischemic and bleeding endpoints were 0.25 % (1 out of 407 patients) in individuals with stable coronary artery disease. In the STOPDAPT-3 trial comparing the effect of aspirin-free prasugrel monotherapy with standard DAPT after PCI, no differences were found in the primary ischemic or bleeding endpoints and most secondary outcomes (death, stroke, and myocardial infarction). However, there was an increased risk of coronary revascularization and stent thrombosis in the no-aspirin group. Conclusions: Single-arm studies suggest the safety and feasibility of aspirin-free P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy without initial DAPT after PCI in selected patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary artery disease. However, the safety and efficacy of this aspirin-free approach compared with standard DAPT strategies following PCI still require further investigation.

Safety and efficacy of single antiplatelet therapy in a large cohort of patients treated with sirolimus-coated balloon: Post hoc analysis from the prospective EASTBOURNE registry.

BACKGROUND: Drug coated balloons (DCB) are potentially less thrombogenic than drug eluting stents (DES). AIMS: To explore the safety and the feasibility of single antiplatelet therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-coated balloons. METHODS: The All-comers Sirolimus-coated Balloon European Registry (EASTBOURNE) is a prospective investigator-driven registry assessing the performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) in a real-world population. This prespecified post hoc analysis aimed at comparing the outcome in patients prescribed either single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT); choice of antiplatelet agent and duration of the regimen were at operator's discretion in both groups. Primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were bleeding grade 3-5 according to The Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 12 months follow-up. RESULTS: Among 2123 patients enrolled in the study between September 2016 and November 2020, 113 patients (5.8 %) received SAPT while 1826 patients (94.1 %) received DAPT after SCB. The majority of the patients underwent DCB PCI for de novo lesions (n = 1091, 56.3 %) while 848 patients (47.7 %) had DCB revascularization for in-stent restenosis. No cases of TLR occurred in the SAPT group within one month after the index procedure, and no acute occlusive events were recorded during follow up in patients taking a single antiplatelet agent. Moreover, no differences in terms of TLR were observed between SAPT vs DAPT regimens nor in case of de novo treatment with an overall rate of TLR at 12 months of 7.7 % for SAPT and 5.6 % for DAPT (p = 0.6). The cumulative rate of MACE at 12 months was not different between SAPT and DAPT regimens (n = 12 [11.2 %] vs. n = 162 [8.9 %], p = 0.4), and results were consistent in the de novo and in-stent restenosis groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our post hoc analysis of the EASTBOURNE registry suggests that the use of single antiplatelet agent after sirolimus-DCB PCI for both de novo or in-stent restenosis lesions is safe and effective and can help to contain the risk of bleeding in a selected population. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: The manuscript aims to explore the feasibility of a single antiplatelet regimen following angioplasty using drug coated balloon with sirolimus. Among 2123 patients treated with sirolimus coated balloon (SCB), 113 patients (5.8 %) received a single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) while 1826 patients (94.1 %) received dual antiplatelet therapy DAPT. No cases of target lesion revascularization occurred in the SAPT group within one month after the index procedure, and no acute occlusive events were recorded during follow up in patients taking a single antiplatelet agent. The cumulative rate of major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months was not different between SAPT and DAPT regimens and results were consistent in the de novo and in-stent restenosis groups.

Does one size really fit all? The case for personalized antiplatelet therapy in interventional cardiology.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), with aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, is currently recommended as a default for patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, controversies arise over the role of aspirin, the optimal duration of DAPT after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, the choice of P2Y12 inhibitor and the variability in individual responses to antiplatelet agents. Recent data indicate that monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor may have adequate anti-ischemic effects with lower bleeding risk. Additionally, discrepancies in DAPT duration recommendations and the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor, provides more uncertainty. We ask the question "does one size really fits all?" or should a more personalized strategy should be implemented.

Diseases affecting the heart and blood circulation are the leading cause of death worldwide. Treatment with drugs that prevents platelets from clumping (called antiplatelets) like aspirin plus another drug group (called P2Y12 inhibitors) like clopidogrel, ticagrelor and prasugrel, is currently recommended as a default for patients after heart attack and/or in whom coronary stents are inserted. However, it is very well documented that the response of any individual to these drugs is highly variable, and that the patients who don't respond as well to them are at increased risk of having clot events in their coronary arteries. On the other hand, people who respond to the drugs very sensitively have a higher bleeding risk. Despite these observations, there is no attempt to test the response of individuals patients to their antiplatelet drugs in routine practice. This review article looks in detail and whether the currently used strategy of "One size fits all" should be changed, given that there may well now be the chance to perform routine testing on everyone, and personalize their treatment accordingly.

Racial and ethnic differences in restarting antiplatelet therapy in patients with primary intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There has long been clinical disagreement over the resumption of antiplatelet therapy in patients with primary intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of restarting antiplatelet therapy after ICH among different races and ethnicities. METHODS: All relevant medical studies involving adults with antiplatelet-associated ICH published in PubMed, The Cochrane Library and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to March 2024 were sourced. Outcome measures were thromboembolic events (stroke and myocardial infarction) and recurrence of ICH. After assessing study heterogeneity and publication bias, we performed a meta-analysis using random-effects model to assess the strength of association between resumption of antiplatelet therapy and our outcomes.The review was not registered and the review protocol was not prepared. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included, with 9758 ICH patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that restarting antiplatelet therapy was associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence or aggravation of cerebral hemorrhage in Asians[OR = 1.48, 95% CI (1.13-1.94), P = 0.004]; in Caucasians, on the contrary, reinitiation of antiplatelet therapy was not associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence or aggravation of cerebral hemorrhage [OR = 0.85, 95% CI (0.67-1.06), P = 0.149]. Reinitiation of antiplatelet therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of cerebral infarction [OR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.39-0.96), P = 0.033]. Restarting antiplatelet therapy after cerebral hemorrhage was not associated with a higher incidence rate of mortality [OR = 0.79, 95% CI (0.57, 1.08), P = 0.138], myocardial infarction [OR = 2.40, 95%CI (0.53,10.79), P = 0.253], hemiparesis [OR = 0.38, 95%CI (0.03,4.81), P = 0.451], neurological deficit [OR = 0.86,95%CI(0.32,2.33),P = 0.766]. CONCLUSION: Reinstitution of antiplatelet therapy after ICH was associated with a lower risk of thromboembolic complications.Resumption of antiplatelet therapy was not associated with a higher incidence of cerebral hemorrhage in Caucasians, but may be associated with a higher risk of cerebral hemorrhage recurrence in Asian populations.

Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) comprise more than a quarter of all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and are at higher risk of adverse events. We sought to reexamine the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) postpercutaneous coronary intervention in patients with DM. Methods: We systematically included randomized controlled trials comparing any 2 of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT that reported major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), net adverse clinical events (NACE), bleeding, or stent thrombosis in DM, and performed a frequentist network meta-analysis. We also performed a sensitivity analysis of trials that exclusively enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome. Results: In 16 randomized controlled trials comprising 16,376 adults with DM, there was no significant difference in NACE, MACE, stent thrombosis, or major bleeding between pairwise comparisons of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT, except for a signal for lower bleeding with 3 months of DAPT compared to 12 (risk ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99). Sensitivity analysis of trials that solely included acute coronary syndrome similarly showed no significant difference in MACE between 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT. Conclusions: Our study found no meaningful difference in NACE or MACE between pairwise comparisons of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of DAPT by study-level meta-analysis of patients with DM, with lower bleeding risk observed with 3 months than with 12 months of DAPT. This finding may provide clinicians greater flexibility to personalize patients' DAPT duration based on other non-DM comorbidities that might affect bleeding or thrombosis risk.

Impact of Antiplatelet Therapy on 5-Year Outcomes After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Deferral of Revascularization in Nonsignificant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Background: Because the clinical benefit of antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease (CAD) remains poorly understood, we evaluated it in patients after fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided deferral of revascularization. Methods and Results: From the J-CONFIRM (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients with Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), we investigated 265 patients with deferred lesions who did not require APT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A 2-year landmark analysis assessed the relationship between APT at 2 years and 5-year major cardiac adverse events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization). Of the 265 patients, 163 (61.5%) received APT. The 5-year MACE did not significantly differ between the APT and non-APT groups after adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics (9.2% vs. 6.9%, inverse probability weighted hazard ratio, 1.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.53-3.69]; P=0.49). There was a marginal interaction between the effect of APT on MACE and FFR values (< or ≥0.84) (P for interaction=0.066). Conclusions: The 5-year outcomes after FFR-guided deferral of revascularization did not significantly differ between the APT and non-APT groups, suggesting that APT might not be a critical requirement for nonsignificant obstructive CAD patients not requiring APT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Updated Assessment of Practice Patterns of Perioperative Management of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy in Interventional Pain Management.

BACKGROUND: The role of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy is well known for its primary and secondary prevention of sequela from cardiovascular disease by decreasing the incidence of acute cerebral, cardiovascular, peripheral vascular, and other thrombo-embolicevents. The overwhelming data show that the risk of thrombotic events is significantly higher than that of bleeding during surgery after antiplatelet drug discontinuation. It has been assumed that discontinuing antiplatelet therapy prior to performing interventional pain management techniques is a common practice, even though doing so may potentially increase the risk of acute cerebral and cardiovascular events. A survey of practice patterns was conducted in 2012, since then the risks associated with thromboembolic events and bleeding, has not been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To conduct an updated assessment of the perioperative antiplatelet and anticoagulant practice patterns of U.S. interventional pain management physicians and compare this with data collected in 2012 with 2021 data regarding practice patterns of continuing or discontinuing anticoagulant therapy. STUDY DESIGNn: Postal survey of interventional pain management physicians. STUDY SETTING: Interventional pain management practices in the United States. METHODS: The survey was conducted based on online responses of the members of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) in 2021. The survey was designed similar to the 2012 survey to assess updated practice patterns. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent out to 1,700 members in October 2021. Out of these, 185 members completed the survey, while 105 were returned due to invalid addresses. The results showed that 23% changed their practice patterns during the previous year. The results also showed that all physicians discontinued warfarin therapy with the majority of physicians accepting an INR of 1.5 as a safe level. Low dose aspirin (81 mg) was discontinued for 3 to 7 days for low-risk procedures by 8% of the physicians, 34% of the physicians for moderate or intermediate risk procedures, whereas they were discontinued by 76% of the physicians for high-risk procedures. High dose aspirin (325 mg) was discontinued at a higher rate. Antiplatelet agents, including dipyridamole, cilostazol, and Aggrenox (aspirin, extended-release dipyridamole) were discontinued from 3 to 5 days by 18%-23% of the physicians for low-risk procedures, approximately 60% of the physicians for moderate or intermediate-risk procedures, and over 90% of the physicians for high-risk procedures. Platelet aggregation inhibitors clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticlopidine, and ticagrelor were discontinued for 3 to 5 days by approximately 26% to 41% for low-risk procedures, almost 90% for moderate or intermediate-risk procedures, and over 97% for high-risk procedures. Thrombin inhibitor dabigatran was discontinued by 33% of the physicians for low-risk procedures, 92% for moderate or intermediate-risk procedures, and 99% for high-risk procedures. Anti-Xa agents, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and Edoxaban were discontinued in over 25% of the physicians for low-risk procedures, approximately 90% for moderate or intermediate-risk procedures, and 99% for high-risk procedures. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its being an online survey of the membership of one organization in one country, that there was only a 11.6% response rate, and the sample size is relatively small. Underreporting in surveys is common. Further, the incidence of thromboembolic events or epidural hematomas was not assessed. CONCLUSION: The results in the 2021 survey illustrate a continued pattern of discontinuing antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in the perioperative period. The majority of discontinuation patterns appear to fall within guidelines.