Considerations in the Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Left Heart Disease.

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (PH-LHD) remains the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension globally. Etiologies include heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction and left-sided valvular heart diseases. Despite the increasing prevalence of PH-LHD, there remains a paucity of knowledge about the hemodynamic definition, diagnosis, treatment modalities, and prognosis among clinicians. Moreover, clinical trials have produced mixed results on the usefulness of pulmonary vasodilator therapies for PH-LHD. In this expert review, we have outlined the critical role of meticulous hemodynamic evaluation and provocative testing for cases of diagnostic uncertainty. Therapeutic strategies-pharmacologic, device-based, and surgical therapies used for managing PH-LHD-are also outlined. PH-LHD in advanced heart failure, and the role of mechanical circulatory support in PH-LHD is briefly explored. An in-depth understanding of PH-LHD by all clinicians is needed for improved recognition and outcomes among patients with PH-LHD.

Grading of Aortic Valve Calcification Severity and Risk Stratification in Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Thresholds of aortic valve calcification (AVC) to define hemodynamically moderate aortic stenosis (AS) from mild are lacking. We aimed to establish a novel grading classification of AVC as quantified by computed tomography and determine its prognostic value. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 915 patients with at least mild AS (mean age 70±12 years, 30% women) from a multicenter prospective registry. All patients underwent Doppler-echocardiography and noncontrast computed tomography within 3 months. Primary end point was the occurrence of all-cause death. Receiver operating characteristic curves analyses were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of sex-specific thresholds of AVC to identify hemodynamically moderate AS. Optimal thresholds (ie, with best sensitivity/specificity) of AVC to distinguish moderate (aortic valve area 1.0-1.5 cm2 and mean gradient 20-39 mm Hg) from mild AS (aortic valve area >1.5 cm2 and mean gradient <20 mm Hg) were AVC ≥360 arbitrary units in women and ≥1037 arbitrary units in men. Based on the guidelines' thresholds for severe AS and the new thresholds in our study for moderate AS, 312 (34%) patients had mild, 253 (28%) moderate, and 350 (38%) severe AVC. During a mean follow-up of 5.6±3.9 years, 183 (27%) deaths occurred. In Cox multivariable models, AVC remained associated with an increased risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio per grade increase, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.53-2.56]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A novel grading classification of anatomic AS severity based on sex-specific thresholds of AVC provides significant prognostic value for predicting mortality. These findings support the complementarity of computed tomography-calcium scoring to Doppler-echocardiography to corroborate AS severity and enhance risk stratification in patients with AS.

Prognostic value of extraaortic-valvular cardiac damage in patients with moderate aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.

PURPOSE: The extraaortic-valvular cardiac damage (EVCD) Stage has shown potential for risk stratification for patients with aortic stenosis (AS). This study aimed to examine the usefulness of the EVCD Stage in risk stratification of patients with moderate AS and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: Clinical data from patients with moderate AS (aortic valve area, .60-.85 cm2/m2; peak aortic valve velocity, 2.0-4.0 m/s) and reduced LVEF (LVEF 20%-50%) were analyzed during 2010-2019. Patients were categorized into three groups: EVCD Stages 1 (LV damage), 2 (left atrium and/or mitral valve damage), and 3/4 (pulmonary artery vasculature and/or tricuspid valve damage or right ventricular damage). The primary endpoint included a composite of cardiac death and heart failure hospitalization, with non-cardiac death as a competing risk. RESULTS: The study included 130 patients (mean age 76.4 ± 6.8 years; 62.3% men). They were categorized into three groups: 26 (20.0%) in EVCD Stage 1, 66 (50.8%) in Stage 2, and 48 (29.2%) in Stage 3/4. The endpoint occurred in 54 (41.5%) patients during a median follow-up of 3.2 years (interquartile range, 1.4-5.1). Multivariate analysis indicated EVCD Stage 3/4 was significantly associated with the endpoint (hazard ratio 2.784; 95% confidence interval 1.197-6.476; P = .017) compared to Stage 1, while Stage 2 did not (hazard ratio 1.340; 95% confidence interval .577-3.115; P = .500). CONCLUSION: The EVCD staging system may aid in the risk stratification of patients with moderate AS and reduced LVEF.

High-Degree Atrioventricular Block and Torsades De Pointes in Severe Aortic Stenosis Treated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) significantly elevates cardiovascular risk, predisposing patients to high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block and life-threatening tachyarrhythmias, including torsades de pointes (TdP). This case report presents a patient with severe AS who developed high-degree AV block and, subsequently, TdP, highlighting the interplay between bradycardia and mechanisms that trigger ventricular tachycardias. The case underscores the importance of identifying and managing these risk factors to improve patient outcomes.

High prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in a surgical aortic valve replacement cohort: an observational study.

Study Objectives: A high prevalence of sleep apnea has been reported among transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients; however, the prevalence of sleep apnea in the younger and relatively healthier population of surgical AVR (SAVR) patients is unknown. Methods: We assessed the prevalence of sleep apnea and overall sleep quality in patients having SAVR. Participants aged 50-89 were eligible for recruitment. All participants completed type II HST before SAVR. Sleep apnea was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 events/hour. The current use of positive airway pressure was exclusionary. Results: The 46 participants (32 males/14 females) had a mean age of 66.6 years, body mass index of 30, AHI of 23.5, and obstructive AHI of 22.0. Only four participants had a prior sleep apnea diagnosis, yet all but one had sleep apnea on type II sleep testing. Two-thirds of sleep apnea was moderate or severe (AHI ≥ 15). A quarter of respiratory events were defined by arousals without desaturations. Whereas most sleep parameters resembled those of similarly aged community cohorts, mean percentage of N3 was reduced, accounting for only 3.8% of total sleep time. Conclusions: Type II home sleep testing (HST) revealed a 97.8% prevalence of sleep apnea in this sample, most of which was undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea. Roughly two-thirds of sleep apnea was moderate or severe. Such a high impact of obstructive sleep apnea among patients with severe aortic valve disease deserves further investigation on potential underlying mechanisms and clinical implications.

Trial Designs A44002PZS Electronic Physician Notification to Facilitate the Recognition and Management of Severe Aortic Stenosis: Rationale, design, and methods of the randomized controlled DETECT AS Trial.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis causes substantial morbidity and mortality when left untreated, yet recent data suggest its undertreatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of electronic physician notification to facilitate the guideline-directed management of patients with severe aortic stenosis. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that patients with severe aortic stenosis who are in the care of physicians who receive the notification are more likely to undergo aortic valve replacement within 1-year. METHODS/DESIGN: The Electronic Physician Notification to Facilitate the Recognition and Management of Severe Aortic Stenosis (DETECT AS) trial is a randomized controlled trial and quality improvement initiative designed to evaluate the efficacy of electronic provider notification versus usual clinical care in the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis. Providers ordering an echocardiogram with findings potentially indicative of severe aortic stenosis, defined by an aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2, are randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive electronic notification (intervention) or usual care. Providers in the notification arm are sent a notification within the electronic health record inbox outlining customized guideline recommendations for the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis based on the 2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines for Valvular Heart Diseases for the index and all subsequent echocardiograms. Providers in the control arm receive no notification. Randomization continues until 940 patients have been enrolled. SETTING: Multi-centered, academic health system OUTCOMES: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with severe AS receiving an aortic valve replacement within 1-year of the index echocardiogram. Secondary endpoints include mortality, heart failure hospitalization, transthoracic echocardiogram utilization/surveillance, aortic stenosis billing code diagnosis, and cardiology/Heart Valve Team referral. CONCLUSION: The DETECT AS trial will provide insight into whether electronic notification of providers on the presence of severe aortic stenosis and associated clinical guideline recommendations will facilitate recognition and guideline-directed management of severe aortic stenosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05230225, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05230225.

Lipoprotein (a) and lipid-lowering treatment from the perspective of a cardiac surgeon. An impact on the prognosis in patients with aortic valve replacement and after heart transplantation.

Lipoprotein(a) is a recognized risk factor for ASCVD. There is still no targeted therapy for Lp(a), however, drugs such as pelacarsen, olpasiran, zerlasiran, lepodisiran and muvalaplin are in clinical trials and have been shown to be effective in significantly reducing Lp(a) levels. Moreover, elevated Lp(a) levels significantly affect the prognosis of patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR) and heart transplantation (HTx). Therefore, the assessment of Lp(a) concentration in these patients will allow for a more accurate stratification of their cardiovascular risk, and the possibility of lowering Lp(a) will allow for the optimization of this risk. In this article, we summarized the most important information regarding the role of Lp(a) and lipid-lowering treatment in patients after AVR and HTx.

Left ventricular reverse remodeling and reduction of interstitial fibrosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) structural and functional changes have been reported in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI); however, the relationship between change in LV structure and systolic function and tissue characteristics assessed via cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) post-TAVI has been not fully elucidated. This study aimed to investigate this relationship in patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI and CMRI. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 65 patients who underwent TAVI and CMRI at the 6-month follow-up were analyzed. The relationship between percent changes in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and LV mass (LVM) (⊿LVEDV, ⊿LVESV, ⊿LVEF, and ⊿LVM) and those in the native T1 value (⊿native T1) was analyzed using a correlation analysis. Moreover, extracellular volume fraction (ECV) value changes were analyzed. RESULTS: The ⊿native T1 significantly decreased from 1292.8 (1269.9-1318.4) ms at pre-TAVI to 1282.3 (1262.6-1310.2) ms at the 6-month follow-up (P = 0.022). A significant positive correlation between ⊿LVEDV, ⊿LVESV, and ⊿LVM and ⊿native T1 (r = 0.351, P = 0.004; r = 0.339, P = 0.006; r = 0.261, P = 0.035, respectively) and a tendency toward a negative correlation between ⊿LVEF and ⊿native T1 (r = -0.237, P = 0.058) were observed. The ECV value increased significantly from 26.7 % (25.3-28.3) to 28.2 % (25.7-30.5) (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in native T1 might be associated with LV reverse remodeling. Evaluating structural and functional changes using CMRI may be useful for patient management.

Wearable device-measured moderate to vigorous physical activity and risk of degenerative aortic valve stenosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Physical activity has proven effective in preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but its role in preventing degenerative valvular heart disease (VHD) remains uncertain. This study aimed to explore the dose-response association between moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) volume and the risk of degenerative VHD among middle-aged adults. METHODS: A full week of accelerometer-derived MVPA data from 87 248 UK Biobank participants (median age 63.3, female: 56.9%) between 2013 and 2015 were used for primary analysis. Questionnaire-derived MVPA data from 361 681 UK Biobank participants (median age 57.7, female: 52.7%) between 2006 and 2010 were used for secondary analysis. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of incident degenerative VHD, including aortic valve stenosis (AS), aortic valve regurgitation (AR), and mitral valve regurgitation (MR). The secondary outcome was VHD-related intervention or mortality. RESULTS: In the accelerometer-derived MVPA cohort, 555 incident AS, 201 incident AR, and 655 incident MR occurred during a median follow-up of 8.11 years. Increased MVPA volume showed a steady decline in AS risk and subsequent AS-related intervention or mortality risk, levelling off beyond approximately 300 min/week. In contrast, its association with AR or MR incidence was less apparent. The adjusted rates of AS incidence (95% confidence interval) across MVPA quartiles (Q1-Q4) were 11.60 (10.20, 13.20), 7.82 (6.63, 9.23), 5.74 (4.67, 7.08), and 5.91 (4.73, 7.39) per 10 000 person-years. The corresponding adjusted rates of AS-related intervention or mortality were 4.37 (3.52, 5.43), 2.81 (2.13, 3.71), 1.93 (1.36, 2.75), and 2.14 (1.50, 3.06) per 10 000 person-years, respectively. Aortic valve stenosis risk reduction was also observed with questionnaire-based MVPA data [adjusted absolute difference Q4 vs. Q1: AS incidence, -1.41 (-.67, -2.14) per 10 000 person-years; AS-related intervention or mortality, -.38 (-.04, -.88) per 10 000 person-years]. The beneficial association remained consistent in high-risk populations for AS, including patients with hypertension, obesity, dyslipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: Higher MVPA volume was associated with a lower risk of developing AS and subsequent AS-related intervention or mortality. Future research needs to validate these findings in diverse populations with longer durations and repeated periods of activity monitoring.

Patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis gain the least benefit from TAVI among all hemodynamic subtypes.

BACKGROUND: Substantial controversy exists regarding the clinical benefit of patients with severe paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (PLF-LG AS) from TAVI. Therefore, we compared post-TAVI benefit by long-term mortality (all-cause, CV and SCD), clinical improvement of heart failure symptoms, and cardiac reverse remodelling in guideline-defined AS subtypes. METHODS: We prospectively included 250 consecutive TAVI patients. TTE, 6mwt, MLHFQ, NYHA status and NT-proBNP were recorded at baseline and 6 months. Long-term mortality and causes of death were assessed. RESULTS: 107 individuals suffered from normal EF, high gradient AS (NEF-HG AS), 36 from low EF, high gradient AS (LEF-HG), 52 from "classic" low-flow, low-gradient AS (LEF-LG AS), and 38 from paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS (PLF-LG AS). TAVI lead to a significant decrease in MLHFQ score and NT-proBNP levels in all subtypes except for PLF-LG. Regarding reverse remodelling, a significant increase in EF and decrease in LVEDV was present only in subtypes with reduced baseline EF, whereas a significant decrease in LVMI and LAVI could be observed in all subtypes except for PLF-LG. During a follow-up of 3-5 years, PLF-LG patients exhibited the poorest survival among all subtypes (HR 4.2, P = 0.0002 for CV mortality; HR 7.3, P = 0.004 for SCD, in comparison with NEF-HG). Importantly, PLF-LG was independently predictive for CV mortality (HR 2.9 [1.3-6.9], P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: PLF-LG patients exhibit the highest mortality (particularly CV and SCD), the poorest symptomatic benefit and the least reverse cardiac remodelling after TAVI among all subtypes. Thus, this cohort seems to gain the least benefit.

Cardiac output in patients with small annuli undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with self-expanding versus balloon expandable valve (COPS-TAVI).

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on cardiac output in patients with small aortic annuli undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) according to the implanted platform of balloon-expandable (BEV) compared to self-expanding valves (SEV). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis and small annuli who underwent successful TAVI. Cardiac output was measured using echocardiography within 4 weeks following TAVI. Data were recorded and analysed by an experienced operator who was not aware of the type of the implanted valve. RESULTS: 138 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 57 % underwent TAVI with BEV. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were comparable between the two platforms, except for more frequent previous cardiac surgery and smaller indexed aortic valve in the BEV group. There was no relationship between computed tomography-derived aortic annulus area and cardiac output post TAVI. When compared to patients who underwent TAVI with BEV, those with SEV had larger cardiac output [mean difference - 0.50 l/min, 95 % CI (-0.99, -0.01)] and cardiac index [mean difference - 0.20 l/min/m2, 95 % CI (-0.47, 0.07)], although the latter did not reach statistical significance. Unlike patients with small body surface area, in those with large body surface area both cardiac output and cardiac index were statistically larger in patients who underwent SEV compared to BEV. CONCLUSION: Cardiac output, as measured by echocardiography, was larger in patients with small annuli who underwent TAVI procedure with SEV compared to BEV. Such difference was more evident in patients with large body surface area.

Sutureless Valves, a "Wireless" Option for Patients With Aortic Valve Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Transcatheter technologies triggered the recent revision of the guidelines that progressively widened the indications for the treatment of aortic stenosis. On the surgical realm, a technology avoiding the need for sutures to anchor the prosthesis to the aortic annulus has been developed with the aim to reduce the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and simplify the process of valve implantation. In addition to a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)-like stent that exerts a radial force, these so-called "rapid deployment valves" or "sutureless valves" for aortic valve replacement also have cuffs to improve sealing and reduce the risk of paravalvular leak. Despite promising, the actual advantage of sutureless valves over traditional surgical procedures (surgical aortic valve replacement) or TAVR is still debated. This review summarizes the current comparative evidence reporting outcomes of "sutureless valves" for aortic valve replacement to TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement in the treatment of aortic valve stenosis.

Complex aortic plaques: hidden danger in aortic stenosis. Role of transesophageal echocardiography.

Aortic stenosis is associated with aortic plaques in up to 85% of cases because they share risk factors and pathogenic pathways. Intrinsically, complex aortic plaques carry a high risk of stroke, which has also been demonstrated in the context of aortic stenosis, especially in patients who underwent percutaneous or surgical replacement. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the imaging test of choice to detect plaques in the thoracic aorta and classify them as complex plaques. Furthermore, the 3D modality allows us to better specify its dimensions and anatomical characteristics, such as added thrombi or the presence of ulcers inside. This review aims to evaluate the use of TEE to detect complex aortic plaques in patients with an indication for percutaneous or surgical aortic valve replacement. To highlight the association between aortic stenosis and complex aortic plaques, we attached to the review some TEE studies from our experience.

La estenosis aórtica se asocia con placas aórticas hasta en un 85% de los casos, porque comparten factores de riesgo y vías patogénicas. Intrínsecamente, las placas aórticas complejas conllevan un alto riesgo de accidente cerebrovascular, lo que también se ha demostrado en el contexto de estenosis aórtica, especialmente en pacientes sometidos a reemplazo percutáneo o quirúrgico. La ecocardiografía transesofágica (ETE) es la prueba de imagen de elección para detectar placas en la aorta torácica y clasificarlas como placas complejas. Además, la modalidad 3D nos permite precisar mejor sus dimensiones y características anatómicas como trombos añadidos o la presencia de úlceras en su interior. Esta revisión tiene como objetivo evaluar el uso de ETE para detectar placas aórticas complejas en pacientes con indicación de reemplazo valvular aórtico percutáneo o quirúrgico. Para resaltar la asociación de estenosis aórtica y placas aórticas complejas adjuntamos a la revisión algunos estudios de ETE de nuestra experiencia.

Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) in Patients With Sarcoidosis.

Introduction Data regarding clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with sarcoidosis is lacking. This study aims to clarify the clinical outcomes of TAVR vs SAVR in patients with sarcoidosis. Methods Data was collected from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2019 using validated ICD-10-CM codes for sarcoidosis, TAVR, and SAVR. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who underwent TAVR and those who underwent SAVR. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-squared test to determine clinical outcomes of TAVR vs SAVR in patients with sarcoidosis. Results The prevalence of sarcoidosis was 0.23% among total study patients (n=142,420,378). After exclusions, the prevalence of TAVR was 650 (49%) and SAVR was 675 (51%) in patients with sarcoidosis. Patients who underwent TAVR were on average older (74 vs 65 years old, p=0.001), and more likely to be female (57 vs 40%, p<0.001) compared to patients who underwent SAVR. The TAVR cohort had higher rates of congestive heart failure (CHF) (77.7 vs 42.2%, p=0.001), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (42.3 vs 24.4% p=0.001), anemia (5.4 vs 2.2%, p=0.004), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (1.5 vs 0%, p=0.004), and hypothyroidism (31.5 vs 16.3%, p=0.001) compared to the SAVR cohort. Inpatient mortality post-procedure was higher in the SAVR cohort compared to the TAVR cohort (15 vs 0, p=0.001). Regarding post-procedure complications, respiratory complications were more common in the SAVR cohort (4.4 vs 0%, p=0.001), while TAVR was associated with a higher incidence of permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion (2.15 vs 0.8%, p=0.001). There was no statistical difference in the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) (0.8 vs 1.5%, p=0.33), AKI requiring hemodialysis (0 vs. 0.7%, p=0.08), or stroke (0.8 vs 0.7, p=1) post-procedure between the two cohorts. Conclusion This study found that in the sarcoidosis population, TAVR was associated with reduced mortality, shorter hospital length of stay, and lower hospitalization costs in comparison to SAVR.

Long-Term Outcomes Following the Ross Procedure in Neonates and Infants: A Multi-Institutional Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: For neonates and infants with aortic valve pathology, the Ross procedure has historically been associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Data regarding long-term durability are lacking. METHODS: The international, multi-institutional Ross Collaborative included six tertiary-care centers. Infants who received a Ross operation between 1996-2016 (allowing a minimum five years of follow-up) were retrospectively identified. Serial echocardiograms were examined to study evolution in neoaortic size and function. RESULTS: Primary diagnoses for the 133 patients (n=30 neonates) included isolated aortic stenosis (AS; 14%, n=19), Shone complex (14%, n=19), and AS+other (excluding Shone complex; n=95, 71%) including arch obstruction (n=55), left ventricular hypoplasia (n=9), and mitral disease (>moderate stenosis or regurgitation, n=31). At the time of Ross, median age was 96 (IQR 36-186) days and median weight was 4.4 (3.6-6.5) kg. In-hospital mortality occurred in 13/133 (10%) patients (4/30 [13%] neonates). Post-discharge mortality occurred in 10/120 (8%) patients at a median 298 days post-Ross. Post-Ross neoaortic dilatation occurred, peaking at 4-5 standard deviations above normal at 2-3 years before returning to near-baseline z-score at a median follow-up of 11.5 [6.4-17.4] years. Autograft/LVOT reintervention was required in 5/120 (4%) patients at a median 10.3 [4.1-12.8] years. Freedom from >moderate neoaortic regurgitation (AR) was 86% at 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Neonates and infants experience excellent post-discharge survival and long-term freedom from autograft reintervention and AR following Ross. Neoaortic dilatation normalizes in this population in the long-term. Increased consideration should be given to Ross in neonates and infants with aortic valve disease.

Prognostic Implications and Alterations in Left Atrial Deformation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

AIMS: To evaluate the prognostic implications of left atrial reservoir strain-defined diastolic dysfunction (LARS-DD) grade in patients undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis (AS) and to determine if post-TAVI LARS was more closely associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation than pre-TAVI LARS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pre-TAVI LARS-DD was evaluated by speckle-tracking echocardiography and was assigned as grade 0 to 1 (LARS≥24%), grade 2 (LARS≥19 to <24%) and grade 3 (LARS<19%). Patients were followed-up for the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality from the date of TAVI. For the secondary endpoint, patients with pre- and post-TAVI LARS measurements and no history of atrial fibrillation were evaluated for the occurrence of new-onset atrial fibrillation. A total of 601 patients (median age 81 [76-85] years, 53% male) were included. Overall, 169 patients (28%) were LARS-DD grade 0/1, 96 patients (16%) were LARS-DD grade 2 and 336 (56%) were LARS-DD grade 3. Over a median follow-up of 40 (IQR 26-58) months, a total of 258 (43%) patients died. In a comprehensive multivariable Cox regression model, LARS-DD grade was independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.28 per one-grade increase, 95%CI 1.07-1.53, P=0.007). For the secondary endpoint of new-onset atrial fibrillation, a total of 285 patients were evaluated. Post-TAVI LARS (SDHR 1.14 per 1%<20%, 95%CI 1.05-1.23, P=0.0009), but not pre-TAVI LARS (P=0.93) was independently associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing LARS-DD grade was independently associated with long-term post-TAVI survival in patients with severe AS. Post-TAVI LARS was closely related to the occurrence of new-onset atrial fibrillation.

Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

IMPORTANCE: Guidelines recommend the use of Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. However, a paucity exists in DSE data when LVEF>35%. OBJECTIVE: To examine the diagnostic accuracy of DSE, in patients with low-gradient AS with a wide range of LVEF and to examine the interaction between the diagnostic accuracy of DSE and LVEF. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with mean-gradient<40 mmHg, AVA<1.0 cm2, and stroke volume index≤35 mL/m2 undergoing DSE and Cardiac Computer Tomography (C-CT) were identified from three prospectively collected patient cohorts, and stratified according to LVEF; LVEF<35%, LVEF 35-50% & LVEF>50%. EXPOSURE: DSE and C-CT was performed on patients with low-gradient AS MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Severe AS was defined as AVC score ≥2000 AU among men, and ≥1200 AU for women on C-CT. RESULTS: Of 221 patients included in the study, 78 (35%) presented with LVEF<35%, 67 (30%) with LVEF 35-50%, and 76 (34%) with LVEF>50%. Mean-gradient and Vmax during DSE showed significantly diagnostic heterogeneity between LVEF groups, being most precise when LVEF<35% (both AUC=0.90), albeit with optimal thresholds of 30 mmHg & 377 cm/s, and a limited diagnostic yield in patients with LVEF≥35% (AUC=0.67 & 0.66 in LVEF 35-50% and AUC=0.65 & 0.60 in LVEF≥50%). Using guideline thresholds led to a sensitivity/specificity of 49%/84% for all patients with LVEF<50%. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: While DSE is safe and leads to an increase in stroke volume in patients with low-gradient AS regardless of LVEF, the association between DSE gradients and AS severity assessed by C-CT demonstrates important heterogeneity depending on LVEF, with highest accuracy in patients with LVEF<35%.