Clinical insight meets scientific innovation to develop a next generation ERT for Pompe disease.

Years of research into the structure, processing, and function of acid alpha-glucosidase led to the development and 2006 approval of alglucosidase alfa (recombinant human acid alpha-glucosidase, Myozyme®/Lumizyme®), an enzyme replacement therapy and the first approved treatment for Pompe disease. Alglucosidase alfa has been a lifesaving treatment for patients with infantile-onset Pompe disease and radically improved daily life for patients with late-onset Pompe disease; however, long-term experience with alglucosidase alfa unraveled key unmet needs in these populations. Despite treatment, Pompe disease continues to progress, especially from a skeletal muscle perspective, resulting in a multitude of functional limitations. Strong collaboration between the scientific and patient communities led to increased awareness of Pompe disease, a better understanding of disease pathophysiology, knowledge of the clinical course of the disease as patients surpassed the first decade of life, and the strengths and limitations of enzyme replacement therapy. Taken together, these advancements spurred the need for development of a next generation of enzyme replacement therapy and provided a framework for progress toward other novel treatments. This review provides an overview of the development of avalglucosidase alfa as a model to highlight the interaction between clinical experience with existing treatments, the role of the clinician scientist, translational research at both system and cellular levels, and the iterative and collaborative process that optimizes the development of therapeutics.

Efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa on forced vital capacity percent predicted in treatment-naïve patients with late-onset Pompe disease: A pooled analysis of clinical trials.

Background: The efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa (AVA) versus alglucosidase alfa (ALG) on forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVCpp) in patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) has been assessed in the Phase 3 COMET trial (NCT02782741). Due to the rarity of LOPD and thus small sample size in COMET, additional data were analyzed to gain further insights into the efficacy of AVA versus ALG. Methods: Data from treatment-naive patients with LOPD were pooled from COMET and Phase 1/2 NEO1/NEO-EXT (NCT01898364/NCT02032524) trials for patients treated with AVA, and Phase 3 LOTS trial (NCT00158600) for patients treated with ALG. Regression analyses using mixed models with repeated measures consistent with those pre-specified in COMET were performed post-hoc. Analyses were adjusted for trials and differences in baseline characteristics. Four models were developed: Model 1 considered all trials; Model 2 included Phase 3 trials; Model 3 included Phase 3 trials and was adjusted for baseline ventilation use; Model 4 included COMET and NEO1/NEO-EXT (i.e., AVA trials only). Results: Overall, 100 randomized patients from COMET (AVA, n = 51, ALG, n = 49), 60 from LOTS (ALG arm only), and three patients from NEO1/NEO-EXT (who received open-label AVA only) were considered for analysis. Mean age at enrollment was similar across trials (45.3-50.3 years); however, patients from LOTS had a longer mean duration of disease versus COMET and NEO1/NEO-EXT trials (9.0 years and 0.5-2.2 years, respectively) and younger mean age at diagnosis (36.2 years and 44.7-48.6 years, respectively). Least squares mean (95% confidence interval) improvement from baseline in FVCpp at Week 49-52 for AVA versus ALG was 2.43 (-0.13; 4.99) for COMET (n = 98); 2.31 (0.06; 4.57) for Model 1 (n = 160); 2.43 (0.21; 4.65) for Model 2 (n = 157); 2.80 (0.54; 5.05) for Model 3 (n = 154); and 2.27 (-0.30; 4.45) for Model 4 (n = 101). Conclusions: Models 1 to 3, which had an increased sample size versus COMET, demonstrated a nominally significant effect on FVCpp favoring AVA versus ALG after 1 year of treatment, consistent with results from COMET.

Real-world evidence study finds no new-onset diabetes or drug-related hyperglycemia in Pompe disease patients treated with avalglucosidase alfa.

Avalglucosidase alfa therapy for Pompe disease is diluted in dextrose 5% solution in water (D5W) for infusion, which raises questions about the potential for hyperglycemia or worsening diabetes. Using United States insurance claims data, we assessed the impact of biweekly infusions on hyperglycemia, new-onset diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, and prediabetes in patients with Pompe disease. After starting avalglucosidase alfa treatment, 1 of 26 patients had one claim for hyperglycemia, which was attributed to acute pancreatitis.

Real-world outcomes from a series of patients with late onset Pompe disease who switched from alglucosidase alfa to avalglucosidase alfa.

Introduction: Pompe disease is an inherited, progressive neuromuscular disorder caused by deficiency of lysosomal acid α-glucosidase and accumulation of glycogen in tissues, resulting in cellular dysfunction, muscle damage, and functional disabilities. Enzyme replacement therapy with alglucosidase alfa (Myozyme/Lumizyme) has led to better outcomes, but many patients have plateaued or declined despite treatment. The second-generation ERT avalglucosidase alfa (Nexviazyme) was designed to have enhanced cellular uptake via the conjugation of additional bis-mannose-6-phosphate residues. There have been trials comparing the efficacy of alglucosidase and avalglucosidase, but there remains a need for more real-world data on patients who switched from alglucosidase to avalglucosidase. Methods: A chart review was conducted on n = 15 patients with late-onset Pompe disease followed at a single center who switched from alglucosidase to avalglucosidase and continued for at least 6 months. Results: A total of n = 8/15 patients received alglucosidase for more than 3 years prior to switching, and n = 7/15 received it for more than 5 years prior to switching. There were statistically significant improvements in CK, Hex4, and AST with mean differences of -104.8 U/L, -3.0 mmol/molCr, and -14.7 U/L, respectively, post-switch. 6-Minute Walk Test; comfortable gait speed; Gait, Stairs, Gower, Chair; and Quick Motor Function Test scores improved or stabilized in most patients post-switch (n = 8/12, n = 11/12, n = 9/12, n =7/11, respectively). Of n = 7 patients with pulmonary function testing, n = 4/7 had improved upright FVC. Patient-reported outcomes revealed improvements in dyspnea (n = 4/4), physical function (n = 3/4), fatigue (n = 2/3), and lower back pain (n = 3/3). Avalglucosidase was well tolerated without infusion-associated reactions, and all n = 7 patients on home infusions continued receiving ERT at home. Anti-drug antibodies were seen in n = 9/10 of patients on alglucosidase and n = 8/13 of those on avalglucosidase, with titers below 12,800 in a majority of patients. We also present the first outcome data for a patient with LOPD who is non-ambulatory and a full-time wheelchair user; she demonstrated meaningful improvements in quality of life and motor function with the switch. Discussion: In summary, improved outcomes were seen in most patients, with a subset whose decline persisted. This study presents evidence that switching from alglucosidase to avalglucosidase may be associated with improved outcomes in certain patients with LOPD.

Applying the win ratio method in clinical trials of orphan drugs: an analysis of data from the COMET trial of avalglucosidase alfa in patients with late-onset Pompe disease.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials for rare diseases often include multiple endpoints that capture the effects of treatment on different disease domains. In many rare diseases, the primary endpoint is not standardized across trials. The win ratio approach was designed to analyze multiple endpoints of interest in clinical trials and has mostly been applied in cardiovascular trials. Here, we applied the win ratio approach to data from COMET, a phase 3 trial in late-onset Pompe disease, to illustrate how this approach can be used to analyze multiple endpoints in the orphan drug context. METHODS: All possible participant pairings from both arms of COMET were compared sequentially on changes at week 49 in upright forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted and six-minute walk test (6MWT). Each participant's response for the two endpoints was first classified as a meaningful improvement, no meaningful change, or a meaningful decline using thresholds based on published minimal clinically important differences (FVC ± 4% predicted, 6MWT ± 39 m). Each comparison assessed whether the outcome with avalglucosidase alfa (AVA) was better than (win), worse than (loss), or equivalent to (tie) the outcome with alglucosidase alfa (ALG). If tied on FVC, 6MWT was compared. In this approach, the treatment effect is the ratio of wins to losses ("win ratio"), with ties excluded. RESULTS: In the 2499 possible pairings (51 receiving AVA × 49 receiving ALG), the win ratio was 2.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-4.29, p = 0.005) when FVC was compared before 6MWT. When the order was reversed, the win ratio was 2.02 (95% CI, 1.13-3.62, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: The win ratio approach can be used in clinical trials of rare diseases to provide meaningful insight on treatment benefits from multiple endpoints and across disease domains.

Effect of avalglucosidase alfa on disease-specific and general patient-reported outcomes in treatment-naïve adults with late-onset Pompe disease compared with alglucosidase alfa: Meaningful change analyses from the Phase 3 COMET trial.

BACKGROUND: The Phase 3 COMET trial (NCT02782741) comparing avalglucosidase alfa and alglucosidase alfa included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessments in treatment-naïve patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). Here, we further characterize results from disease-specific and general patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. METHODS: Adults who participated in the COMET trial receiving avalglucosidase alfa or alglucosidase alfa (both 20 mg/kg biweekly) during the 49-week double-blind treatment period were included in the analysis. Proportions of patients exceeding meaningful change thresholds at Week 49 were compared post hoc between treatment groups. PROs and their meaningful change thresholds included: Pompe Disease Severity Scale (PDSS; decrease 1.0-1.5 points), Pompe Disease Impact Scale (PDIS; decrease 1.0-1.5 points), Rasch-built Pompe-specific Activity Scale (R-PAct; change from unable to able to complete activity), 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12; physical component summary [PCS] score: increase ≥6 points, mental component summary [MCS] score: increase ≥7 points), EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L; improvement of ≥1 category), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC; any improvement). RESULTS: The analysis included 99 adult patients (avalglucosidase alfa n = 50; alglucosidase alfa n = 49). Patients who received avalglucosidase alfa had significantly greater odds of achieving a meaningful change versus alglucosidase alfa for the PDSS Shortness of Breath (OR [95% CI] 11.79 [2.24; 62.18]), Fatigue/Pain (6.24 [1.20; 32.54]), Morning Headache (13.98 [1.71; 114.18]), and Overall Fatigue (5.88 [1.37; 25.11]) domains, and were significantly more likely to meet meaningful change thresholds across multiple PDSS domains (all nominal p < 0.05). A numerically greater proportion of patients in the avalglucosidase alfa group were able to complete selected activities of the R-PAct compared with the alglucosidase alfa group. Significantly greater proportions of patients who received avalglucosidase alfa achieved meaningful improvements for EQ-5D-5L usual activities dimension, EQ visual analog scale, and all four PGIC domains. The proportion of patients with improvements in SF-12 PCS and MCS was greater in the avalglucosidase alfa group versus alglucosidase alfa group, but was not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These analyses show that avalglucosidase alfa improves multiple symptoms and aspects of daily functioning, including breathing and mobility. This supports the clinical relevance of the effects of avalglucosidase alfa on HRQoL for patients with LOPD.

Post-hoc Nonparametric Analysis of Forced Vital Capacity in the COMET Trial Demonstrates Superiority of Avalglucosidase Alfa vs Alglucosidase Alfa.

In the COMET trial of patients with late-onset Pompe disease, greater improvement in upright forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted was observed with avalglucosidase alfa (AVA) vs alglucosidase alfa (ALGLU) (estimated treatment difference: 2.43%). The pre-specified mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis demonstrated non-inferiority of AVA (P = 0.0074) and narrowly missed superiority (P = 0.063; 95% CI: -0.13-4.99). We report superiority of AVA in two post-hoc analyses that account for an extreme outlier participant with low FVC and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at baseline: MMRM excluding the outlier (P = 0.013) and non-parametric analysis of all data with repeated measures analysis of covariance (P = 0.019).

Transcriptomic characterization of clinical skeletal muscle biopsy from late-onset Pompe patients.

Pompe disease is a rare lysosomal storage disorder arising from recessive mutations in the acid α-glucosidase gene and resulting in the accumulation of glycogen, particularly in the cardiac and skeletal muscle. The current standard of care is administration of enzyme replacement therapy in the form of alglucosidase alfa or the recently approved avalglucosidase alfa. In order to better understand the underlying cellular processes that are disrupted in Pompe disease, we conducted gene expression analysis on skeletal muscle biopsies obtained from late-onset Pompe disease patients (LOPD) prior to treatment and following six months of enzyme replacement with avalglucosidase alfa. The LOPD patients had a distinct transcriptomic signature as compared to control patient samples, largely characterized by perturbations in pathways involved in lysosomal function and energy metabolism. Although patients were highly heterogeneous, they collectively exhibited a strong trend towards attenuation of the dysregulated genes following just six months of treatment. Notably, the enzyme replacement therapy had a strong stabilizing effect on gene expression, with minimal worsening in genes that were initially dysregulated. Many of the cellular process that were altered in LOPD patients were also affected in the more clinically severe infantile-onset (IOPD) patients. Additionally, both LOPD and IOPD patients demonstrated enrichment across several inflammatory pathways, despite a lack of overt immune cell infiltration. This study provides further insight into Pompe disease biology and demonstrates the positive effects of avalglucosidase alfa treatment.

Model-Informed Approach Supporting Approval of Nexviazyme (Avalglucosidase Alfa-ngpt) in Pediatric Patients with Late-Onset Pompe Disease.

In August 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration approved Nexviazyme (avalglucosidase alfa-ngpt) for intravenous infusion to treat patients 1 year of age and older with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). The effectiveness and safety were studied in patients with LOPD and patients with infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD). The dosage(s) tested in clinical trials was 20 mg/kg every other week (qow) in patients with LOPD and 20 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg qow in patients with IOPD. While patients 3 years old and greater with LOPD were eligible for participation in the pivotal trial, the youngest patient enrolled was 16 years old. Therefore, pediatric patients with LOPD were not well represented in the clinical trial. The prevalence of LOPD in pediatrics is extremely low. Thus, conducting a clinical trial in pediatric patients with LOPD would be challenging. Given the similar pathophysiology, mechanism of action, and disease manifestations across the age spectrum of patients with LOPD, the approved dosages for pediatric patients younger than 16 years old with LOPD were based on extrapolation of efficacy using a model-informed exposure bridging strategy, leveraging the safety data from pediatric patients with IOPD. Specifically, the exposure associated with 20 mg/kg qow in adult patients with LOPD was the target exposure for bridging of efficacy. The safety data obtained with 40 mg/kg qow in patients with IOPD was leveraged to support approval in pediatric patients with LOPD aged 1 year and older. This article illustrates a regulatory use of model-informed extrapolation approach for dose selection in pediatric patients with a rare disease.

Safety and efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa in individuals with infantile-onset Pompe disease enrolled in the phase 2, open-label Mini-COMET study: The 6-month primary analysis report.

PURPOSE: Mini-COMET (NCT03019406; Sanofi) is a phase 2, open-label, ascending-dose, 3-cohort study, evaluating avalglucosidase alfa safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in individuals with infantile-onset Pompe disease aged <18 years who previously received alglucosidase alfa and showed clinical decline (cohorts 1 and 2) or suboptimal response (cohort 3). METHODS: During a 25-week primary analysis period, cohorts 1 and 2 received avalglucosidase alfa 20 and 40 mg/kg every other week, respectively, for 6 months, whereas cohort 3 individuals were randomized (1:1) to receive avalglucosidase alfa 40 mg/kg every other week or alglucosidase alfa (current stable dose) for 6 months. RESULTS: In total, 22 individuals were enrolled (cohort 1 [n = 6], cohort 2 [n = 5], cohort 3-avalglucosidase alfa [n = 5], and cohort 3-alglucosidase alfa [n = 6]). Median treatment compliance was 100%. None of the individuals discontinued treatment or died. Percentages of individuals with treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across dose and treatment groups. No serious or severe treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred. Trends for better motor function from baseline to week 25 were observed for 40 mg/kg every other week avalglucosidase alfa compared with either 20 mg/kg every other week avalglucosidase alfa or alglucosidase alfa up to 40 mg/kg weekly. CONCLUSION: These data support the positive clinical effect of avalglucosidase alfa in patients with infantile-onset Pompe disease previously declining on alglucosidase alfa.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and exploratory efficacy of the novel enzyme replacement therapy avalglucosidase alfa (neoGAA) in treatment-naïve and alglucosidase alfa-treated patients with late-onset Pompe disease: A phase 1, open-label, multicenter, multinational, ascending dose study.

This multicenter/multinational, open-label, ascending-dose study (NCT01898364) evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and exploratory efficacy of repeat-dose avalglucosidase alfa (neoGAA), a second-generation, recombinant acid α-glucosidase replacement therapy, in late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). Patients ≥18 years, alglucosidase alfa naïve (Naïve) or previously receiving alglucosidase alfa for ≥9 months (Switch), with baseline FVC ≥50% predicted and independently ambulatory, received every-other-week avalglucosidase alfa 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg over 24 weeks. 9/10 Naïve and 12/14 Switch patients completed the study. Avalglucosidase alfa was well-tolerated; no deaths/life-threatening serious adverse events (SAEs). One Naïve patient withdrew for study drug-related SAEs (respiratory distress/chest discomfort). Infusion-associated reactions (IARs) affected 8 patients. Most treatment-emergent AEs/IARs were non-serious with mild-to-moderate intensity. At screening, 5 Switch patients tested positive for anti-avalglucosidase alfa antibodies; on-treatment, 2 Switch and 9 Naïve patients seroconverted. Post-infusion, avalglucosidase alfa plasma concentrations declined monoexponentially (t1/2z∼1.0 h). AUC was 5-6 × higher in the 20 vs 5 mg/kg group. Pharmacokinetics were similar between Switch and Naïve groups and over time. Baseline quadriceps muscle glycogen was low (∼6%) in most patients, generally remaining unchanged thereafter. Exploratory efficacy parameters (pulmonary function/functional capacity) generally remained stable or improved. Avalglucosidase alfa's well-tolerated safety profile and exploratory efficacy results support further avalglucosidase alfa development.