Correlation analysis of risk factors for cervical lymphatic metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify and analyze the risk factors associated with Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis (CNM) in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (PTC) patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study involving the clinicopathological data of 2384 PTC patients admitted to our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020. All relevant data were statistically processed and analyzed. RESULTS: The related risk factors for Central Lymph Node Metastasis (CLNM) were gender (male), age (≤ 30 years old), tumor lesion size (> 0.855 cm), and multifocal tumor foci. The ROC curve revealed that the critical value for predicting CLNM based on tumor lesion size was 0.855 (sensitivity = 57.9%, specificity = 69%, AUC = 0.269, and P < 0.05). Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis (LLNM) was positively correlated with tumor diameter. Specifically, the LLNM rate increased with the tumor diameter. LLNM occurrence was significantly higher in zones II, III, and IV than in zones I and V. Although the BRAF gene mutation detection assay has certain clinical benefits in diagnosing PTC and LLNM, no statistically significant difference was found in its relationship with central and lateral neck lymph node metastases (P = 0.741). CONCLUSION: Our findings revealed that CLNM is associated with gender (male), age (≤ 30 years old), tumor lesion size (> 0.855 cm), and multiple tumor lesions in PTC patients. Central Lymph Node Dissection (CLND) is recommended for patients with these risk factors. On the other hand, preoperative ultrasound examination, fine-needle pathological examination, and genetic testing should be used to determine whether Lateral Cervical Lymph Node Dissection (LLND) is needed.

Correlation Analyses between Histological Staging and Molecular Alterations in Tumor-Derived and Cell-Free DNA of Early-Stage Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.

Here, we investigate the correlation and statistical analyses between histological staging and molecular alterations in tumor-derived (tdDNA) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) obtained from early-stage primary cutaneous melanoma (PCM) patients using digital PCR (dPCR) for the detection of the BRAF p.V600E somatic pathogenic variant. In the prospective study, a total of 68 plasma and paired tdDNA samples, and in the retrospective cohort, a total of 100 tdDNA samples were analyzed using dPCR and reverse hybridization StripAssay. The Breslow depth (BD) and Clark level were applied to categorize the study population. Our results demonstrate that dPCR is a highly sensitive and specific method for the detection of BRAF p.V600E somatic variants in cfDNA samples from PCM patients. A strong correlation was detected between BD and cfDNA concentration in all mutant and negative cases, between the tdDNA concentration and the tumor-derived variant allele frequency (VAF) of BRAF p.V600E, between the tdVAF and the cfVAF in all cases, and between the cfDNA and cfVAF in mutant cases. The tdVAF and cfVAF of BRAF p.V600E and cfDNA concentration were the highest in Clark's V category. The cfDNA concentration was statistically significantly higher in Clark's III, IV, and V groups compared to cases with a better prognosis. It can also be explained by the fact that cases with a more advanced stage classification release more cfDNA into the peripheral circulation.

Pathological and Prognostic Characterization of Craniopharyngioma Based on the Expression of TrkA, ß-Catenin, Cell Cycle Markers, and BRAF V600E Mutation.

We collected 61 craniopharyngioma (CP) specimens to investigate the expression of TrkA, ß-catenin, BRAF gene mutation, and NTRK1 fusion in CP. There were 37 male and 24 female individuals with a median age of 34 years (range, 4-75 years). Histologically, there were 46 cases of adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP), 14 cases of papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP), and 1 case with a mixed adamantinomatous and papillary pattern. By immunohistochemistry, we found that moderate/high TrkA expression was detected in 47% (28/60) CP and was significantly higher in adult patients (p = 0.018). Interestingly, TrkA is more expressed in "whorled epithelium" cells in ACP, similar to the localization of abnormal ß-catenin. The abnormal expression rate of ß-catenin was 70% (43/61), and the medium/high cyclin D1 expression rate was 73% (44/60), both of which were significantly higher in ACP than in PCP. Of the CP, 41% (21/51) had a moderate/strong P16-positive signal; 58% (34/59) showed a high Ki-67 expression, and there was a significant correlation between high Ki-67 L.I. and high tumor recurrence (p = 0.021). NTRK1 fusion was not found in CP by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). By PCR, 26% (15/58) CP showed BRAF V600E gene mutation, which mainly occurred in PCP (100%, 14/14) except one case of mixed CP. Moreover, TrkA expression was negatively correlated with Ki-67 index and positively correlated with P16 expression. There was a significantly negative correlation between BRAF V600E mutation and abnormal ß-catenin expression. Our results demonstrate for the first time that TrkA expression might occur in CP, especially in adult CP patients, and suggest that cyclin D1 could be used for ACP histological classification in addition to ß-catenin and BRAF V600E mutation, while Ki-67 could be used as a marker to predict CP recurrence.

Pediatric Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis with BRAF Mutation Affecting Sacral Vertebra: A Case Report and Disease Review.

BACKGROUND: Histiocytoses are rare diseases affecting mainly children and can occur in any organ of the body. They are divided into Langerhans type and non-Langerhans type. Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) mainly affects skin, bones, and lymph nodes but can also affect the hematopoietic system. Bone lesions can be critical when they involve skull base, orbit, or vertebrae and can cause permanent neurological sequelae or death. Histopathological diagnosis and molecular markers are the mainstay for accurate diagnosis. Sixty percent of LCH cases show mutation in the BRAF oncogene. They are treated with multimodality treatment which includes surgery, chemotherapy, and BRAF inhibitor therapy. Owing to the rarity of the disease and paucity of cases, the understanding and standardization of treatment is still evolving. CASE REPORT: A 14-year-old boy presented with backache, and his imaging showed erosion of first sacral vertebral body with soft tissue component impinging and compressing the spinal canal. Histopathology and molecular diagnosis showed LCH which was positive for BRAF gene mutation. Adequate canal decompression and near-total removal of the disease load with fixation of weight-bearing axis resulted in symptomatic relief and good outcome. Systemic chemotherapy was given for the small residual disease due to fear of recurrence and impending neurological complications. He responded well to first-line therapy with vinblastine and prednisolone with complete resolution of disease on a follow-up scan. CONCLUSION: Accurate diagnosis with molecular markers is essential for a good outcome of LCH. Treatment of lesions at critical locations like skull base, orbit, or vertebral axis needs to be tailored to prevent permanent neurological deficits. Newer therapies in the form of BRAF inhibitors are on the way, but the efficacy and benefit need to be tested.

BRAF mutation may have different prognostic implications in early- and late-stage colorectal cancer.

The prognostic implication of BRAF mutant colorectal cancer remains paradoxical. Records of BRAF mutant and wild-type colorectal cancer patients at all stages were reviewed. Clinicopathologic features, including microsatellite instability, CpG islands methylator phenotype, and overall survival, of these patients were analyzed. Between 2005 and 2013, 428 colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in this study. The overall survival between BRAF mutant and wild-type patients with early-stage (stages I and II) colorectal cancer differed nonsignificantly (P = 0.99). By contrast, in late-stage (stages III and IV) patients, the median overall survival of BRAF mutant patients (N = 25) was significantly poorer than that of BRAF wild-type (N = 207) patients (BRAF mutant: 21.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.1-35.5); BRAF wild-type: 53.5 months (95% CI 37.5-69.5), P < 0.0001). In early-stage patients, we found that BRAF mutation was significantly associated with CpG island methylator phenotype-positive (P < 0.001), and microsatellite instability-high status (P = 0.0013). Conversely, in late-stage patients, BRAF mutation was significantly associated with CpG island methylator phenotype-positive (P = 0.0015) and the right-side colon (P = 0.014). BRAF mutation may have different prognostic implications in early- and late-stage colorectal cancer.

Clinicopathological features of nonsmall cell lung carcinomas with BRAF mutations.

BACKGROUND: Recently, driver tyrosine kinase gene mutations have been detected in malignant tumors, including lung tumors. Notwithstanding their attractiveness as targets for molecular therapy, limited information is available regarding BRAF-mutated lung carcinomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BRAF mutation status was determined in 2001 surgically resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases using high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) followed by Sanger sequencing and/or deep sequencing using next generation sequencer. RESULTS: BRAF mutations were detected in 26 (1.3%) of 2001 NSCLC cases (25 adenocarcinomas and 1 squamous cell carcinoma). In the 26 cases, 13 mutation genotypes were identified, including V600E (8 of 26; 30.8%), G469A (6 of 26; 23.1%), K601E (4 of 26; 15.4%), and other residual mutations (1 of 26; 0.04%). Of the 13 genotypes, 4 genotypes (G464E, G596R, A598T, and G606R) had not been previously reported in lung cancer. The overall survival rate was not significantly different between patients with wild-type BRAF and those with V600E or non-V600E BRAF mutations (P = 0.49 and P = 0.15, respectively). Histomorphological analysis revealed that focal clear cell changes were present in 75% of V600E-mutated tumors. All V600E BRAF-mutated tumors were negative for other driver gene alterations including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS mutations and the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene translocation, whereas five tumors with non-V600E BRAF mutations (four G469A and one G464E/G466R) showed concomitant EGFR mutations. CONCLUSION: The frequency of BRAF mutations in lung cancer was low in an Asian cohort. Furthermore, BRAF mutation status lacked prognostic significance in this patient population.