Development of tungsten trioxide nano-flakes intercalated on tannic acid-functionalized reduced graphene oxide for flexible acebutolol sensors.

Acebutolol (ACE) is commonly used to treat hypertension and high blood pressure. Large doses of ACE can have adverse effects with potentially life-threatening consequences. It is, therefore, essential to develop a simple, low-cost, reliable, and reproducible device for detecting ACE in biofluids. This study explores the potential of unique two-dimensional nano-flakes, such as tungsten trioxide (WO3). Graphene oxide (GO) typically exhibits lower electrical conductivity than pristine graphene due to the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups that interfere with the π-conjugated structure. Functionalizing GO with tannic acid (TA) can partially reinstate the π-conjugation and limit the amount of oxygen, resulting in enhanced electrical conductivity. Ultrasonic techniques were utilized to create WO3 NFs@TA-rGO, and a range of spectroscopic and microscopic methods were applied to examine the formation of the resulting WO3 NFs@TA-rGO nanocomposites. Under optimal conditions, modified sensors resulted in lower limits of detection (0.0055 µM) and good sensitivity (0.40 µA µM-1 cm-2). They also exhibited a broad linear range spanning from 0.009 to 568.6 µM. Fabricated sensors have significant anti-interference properties with high specificity and excellent storage stability (RSD = 4.3 %), reproducibility (RSD = 3.9 %), and repeatability (RSD = 3.3 %). Ultimately, the sensor's efficacy was confirmed through the successful detection of ACE in biological samples (with recoveries ranging from 99.1 to 99.6 %). Lastly, this study highlights the substantial potential of ACE detection and extends its applications in biomedical diagnostics and pharmaceutical research.

Propranolol to decrease time to delivery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of propranolol on time to delivery among patients undergoing induction or augmentation of labor. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and CINAHL (EBSCO) were searched from inception to December 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the impact of propranolol on time to delivery among patients undergoing induction or augmentation of labor were included. RCTs that included stillbirth before randomization, non-randomized trials, observational, cohort, case control, or studies in which the control group included an intervention other than standard care were excluded. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Primary outcome was time to delivery after administration of propranolol among patients undergoing induction or augmentation of labor. The summary measures were reported as summary mean difference (MD) or relative risk with 95% of confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Nine RCTs including 1,182 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Five studies investigated the effect of propranolol among patients undergoing induction of labor (IOL) and demonstrated a significant decrease in time to delivery (MD, -91.5 minutes, 95% CI -110.6 to -72.4). Four studies investigated the effect of propranolol among patients undergoing augmentation of labor and showed no significant decrease in time to delivery (MD, -2.98 minutes, 95% CI -21.6 to 15.6). Our pooled analysis demonstrated that the use of propranolol in IOL and augmentation was associated with a decrease in time to delivery from administration of propranolol compared to placebo (mean difference, -46.15 minutes, 95% CI -59.48 to -32.81). The meta-analysis found no increased risk of PPH, blood transfusion, cesarean delivery rates, or NICU admission with the use of propranolol during labor. CONCLUSION: The use of propranolol during induction of labor shortens overall time to delivery by about 91 minutes and did not significantly decrease time to delivery in those undergoing augmentation of labor.

Does atenolol use during pregnancy cause small for gestational age neonates? A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Atenolol is a commonly used beta bloscker in non-pregnant women. Many providers are hesitant in prescribing atenolol in pregnancy because of a possible association with poor fetal growth. We aimed to assess the association between atenolol and the occurrence of small for gestational age neonates compared to other beta blockers, as described in the existing literature. METHODS: We used the meta-analytic method to generate a forest plot for risk ratios (RR) of small for gestational age in patients who used atenolol vs. other beta blockers. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Two studies were included, with a resultant RR of 1.94 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.60; 2.35]. A study by Duan et al. in 2018 noted the following rate of small for gestational age for each beta blocker use: 112/638 atenolol, 590/3,357 labetalol, 35/324 metoprolol, and 50/489 propranolol. A study by Tanaka et al. in 2016 noted the following rate of small for gestational age: 8/22 for propranolol, 2/12 for metoprolol, 2/6 for atenolol, 0/5 for bisoprolol. Heterogeneity (I2) was 0 %. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested an elevated risk of small for gestational age associated with atenolol use in comparison to other beta blockers, specifically labetalol, propranolol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol.

Systemic and cerebro-cardiac biomarkers following traumatic brain injury: an interim analysis of randomized controlled clinical trial of early administration of beta blockers.

This is an interim analysis of the Beta-blocker (Propranolol) use in traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on the high-sensitive troponin status (BBTBBT) study. The BBTBBT is an ongoing double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial with a target sample size of 771 patients with TBI. We sought, after attaining 50% of the sample size, to explore the impact of early administration of beta-blockers (BBs) on the adrenergic surge, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and the TBI biomarkers linked to the status of high-sensitivity troponin T (HsTnT). Patients were stratified based on the severity of TBI using the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and HsTnT status (positive vs negative) before randomization. Patients with positive HsTnT (non-randomized) received propranolol (Group-1; n = 110), and those with negative test were randomized to receive propranolol (Group-2; n = 129) or placebo (Group-3; n = 111). Propranolol was administered within 24 h of injury for 6 days, guided by the heart rate (> 60 bpm), systolic blood pressure (≥ 100 mmHg), or mean arterial pressure (> 70 mmHg). Luminex and ELISA-based immunoassays were used to quantify the serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18), TBI biomarkers [S100B, Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE), and epinephrine]. Three hundred and fifty patients with comparable age (mean 34.8 ± 9.9 years) and gender were enrolled in the interim analysis. Group 1 had significantly higher baseline levels of IL-6, IL-1B, S100B, lactate, and base deficit than the randomized groups (p = 0.001). Group 1 showed a significant temporal reduction in serum IL-6, IL-1ß, epinephrine, and NSE levels from baseline to 48 h post-injury (p = 0.001). Patients with severe head injuries had higher baseline levels of IL-6, IL-1B, S100B, and HsTnT than mild and moderate TBI (p = 0.01). HsTnT levels significantly correlated with the Injury Severity Score (ISS) (r = 0.275, p = 0.001), GCS (r = - 0.125, p = 0.02), and serum S100B (r = 0.205, p = 0.001). Early Propranolol administration showed a significant reduction in cytokine levels and TBI biomarkers from baseline to 48 h post-injury, particularly among patients with positive HsTnT, indicating the potential role in modulating inflammation post-TBI.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04508244. It was registered first on 11/08/2020. Recruitment started on 29 December 2020 and is ongoing. The study was partly presented at the 23rd European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ECTES), April 28-30, 2024, in Estoril, Lisbon, Portugal.

Clinical presentation and genetic characterization of early-onset atrial fibrillation in patients affected by long QT syndrome: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) has already been observed in approximately 2% of patients with genetically proven long QT syndrome (LQTS). This frequency is higher than population-based estimates of early-onset AF. However, the concomitant expression of AF in LQTS is likely underestimated. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical presentation, genetic background, and outcomes of a cohort of patients with LQTS and early-onset AF referred to a single tertiary center. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients diagnosed with congenital LQTS were included in the study based on the documentation of early-onset (age ≤50 years) clinical or subclinical AF episodes in all available medical records, including standard electrocardiograms, wearable monitor or cardiac implantable electronic devices. RESULTS: Seventeen patients experienced clinical AF during the follow-up period. Subclinical AF was detected in 10 patients through insertable or wearable cardiac monitors. In our series, the mean heart rate during AF episodes was found to be relatively low despite the patients' young age and the low or minimal effective doses of beta-blockers used for QTc interval control. All patients exhibiting LQTS and early-onset AF were genotype positive, carrying mutations in the KCNQ1 (66%), KCNH2, KCNE1, and SCN5A genes. Notably, most of these patients carried the same p.(R231C) mutation in the KCNQ1 gene (59%) and were from the same families, suggesting concurrent expression of familial AF and LQTS. CONCLUSION: LQTS patients are prone to developing clinical and subclinical AF, even at a younger age. The occurrence of early-onset AF in the LQTS population could be more frequent than previously assumed. AF should be considered as a potential dysrhythmia related to LQTS. Our study emphasizes the importance of carefully researching clinical and/or subclinical episodes of AF through strict heart rhythm monitoring in the LQTS population.

Comparison of allergy prevalence using brinzolamide 1.0% / brimonidine 0.2% fixed combination with and without ß-blocker in glaucoma patients: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma treatment often involves multi-drug regimens, which can lead to poor adherence and side effects. Fixed-dose combinations aim to improve adherence and reduce side effects compared to traditional therapies. This study aimed to compare the prevalence and clinical characteristics of ocular allergy in glaucoma patients using brinzolamide 1.0%/brimonidine 0.2% fixed combination (BBFC), with and without concurrent ß-blocker. METHODS: Of these, 176 patients used a ß-blocker concurrently, whereas 96 patients did not. Allergy prevalence, allergy type, and allergy occurrence time were compared between the concurrent and non-concurrent ß-blocker-usage groups. Ocular allergies were classified and evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: Allergy prevalence was 10.23% and 15.63% (p = 0.193), whereas allergy occurrence time was 15.92 ± 13.80 months and 6.26 ± 6.20 months (p = 0.04) in the concurrent and non-concurrent ß-blocker-usage groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that half of the allergies in the concurrent ß-blocker-usage group occurred within 12.5 months, with the BBFC discontinuation rate gradually increasing up to 36 months. Contrarily, half of the allergies in the non-concurrent ß-blocker-usage group occurred within 3.3 months, with a rapid increase in BBFC discontinuation rate the first 6 months. Intergroup differences in allergy types were significant (p = 0.015). Among all patients with allergy, the average allergy occurrence time of blepharoconjunctivitis, papillary conjunctivitis, and follicular conjunctivitis was 12.52, 9.53, and 13.23 months, respectively. Follicular conjunctivitis tended to occur later than papillary conjunctivitis (p = 0.042). In the concurrent ß-blocker-usage group, follicular conjunctivitis was the most prevalent allergy type (61.1%), whereas papillary conjunctivitis was the most common (66.7%) in in the non-concurrent ß-blocker-usage group. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent use of ß-blocker with BBFC decreases allergy prevalence, delays allergy onset, and predominantly results in follicular conjunctivitis, thereby facilitating longer treatment duration. Understanding these characteristics of allergy in BBFC users is useful to manage patients and improve treatment adherence. This study provides insights into the role of ß-blockers in modulating ocular allergy in BBFC-treated glaucoma patients, highlighting implications for clinical practice and patient education.

Effect of beta-blockade on mortality in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: The efficacy of beta-blockers in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is unclear, and concerns persist that neurohormonal blockade could worsen symptoms of heart failure. We aimed to assess whether beta-blocker therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with CA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the impact of beta-blocker therapy on mortality in patients with CA. A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed in August 2023. Data were extracted from observational studies and synthesized with pooling and random effects meta-analysis. Thirteen studies including 4215 patients with CA were incorporated in this review (3688 transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), 502 light chain amyloid cardiomyopathy (AL-CM), 25 not specified; age 74.8 ± 5.5 years, 76% male). Over half of the cohort (52%) received beta-blockers and the rate of beta-blocker withdrawal was 28%. All-cause mortality was 33% (range: 13-51%) after a median follow-up ranging from 13 to 36 months. There was an inverse association between the pooled risk of mortality and the use of beta-blocker therapy at any time point (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.80, I2 = 83%, P = 0.005, seven studies). There was no association between mortality and beta-blocker use (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.29-1.47, I2 = 88%, P = 0.30) in the three studies that only included patients with ATTR-CM. The three studies that included patients with both ATTR-CM and AL demonstrated an association of beta-blocker use with reduced mortality (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29-0.63, I2 = 4%, P < 0.001). The only study that solely included 53 patients with AL-CM, demonstrated improved survival among the 53% who were able to tolerate beta-blocker therapy (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.79, P = 0.02). The absence of information on staging of CA is an important limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with beta-blockers may be associated with a survival benefit in patients with CA, but these findings are subject to selection and survivor biases. Definitive prospective randomized trials of conventional heart failure therapies are needed in CA.

Silent and Cold: A Case of Bradycardia Associated With Isolated Hypothermia.

Sinus bradycardia is defined as a heart rate of less than 60 beats per minute and can occur as an adaptive response but can also be pathologic. Sinus bradycardia can be a normal finding in children, individuals who exercise often, and as a physiologic response during sleep. Pathologic causes of sinus bradycardia include sinus node dysfunction, medications, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea, exaggerated vagal activity, increased intracranial hypertension, infection, hypothyroidism, hypothermia, anorexia nervosa, and prolonged hypoxia. When pathologic, addressing the underlying cause will lead to an improvement in heart rate. Here, we present a case of sinus bradycardia in a 61-year-old female with hypothermia. Evaluation for common causes of bradycardia including cardiac evaluation was unremarkable. Treatment of hypothermia led to the resolution of bradycardia. The importance of the case is to help clinicians recognize hypothermia as a cause of bradycardia.

Comparison of ß-blocker agents and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients: an international cohort study.

Background: Despite a lack of clinical trial data, ß-blockers are widely prescribed to dialysis patients. Whether specific ß-blocker agents are associated with improved long-term outcomes compared with alternative ß-blocker agents in the dialysis population remains uncertain. Methods: We analyzed data from an international cohort study of 10 125 patients on maintenance hemodialysis across 18 countries that were newly prescribed a ß-blocker medication within the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). The following ß-blocker agents were compared: metoprolol, atenolol, bisoprolol and carvedilol. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between the newly prescribed ß-blocker agent and all-cause mortality. Stratified analyses were performed on patients with and without a prior history of cardiovascular disease. Results: The mean (standard deviation) age in the cohort was 63 (15) years and 57% of participants were male. The most commonly prescribed ß-blocker agent was metoprolol (49%), followed by carvedilol (29%), atenolol (11%) and bisoprolol (11%). Compared with metoprolol, atenolol {adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.90]} was associated with a lower mortality risk. There was no difference in mortality risk with bisoprolol [adjusted HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.82-1.20)] or carvedilol [adjusted HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.82-1.09)] compared with metoprolol. These results were consistent upon stratification of patients by presence or absence of a prior history of cardiovascular disease. Conclusions: Among patients on maintenance hemodialysis who were newly prescribed ß-blocker medications, atenolol was associated with the lowest mortality risk compared with alternative agents.

Holter study of heart rate variability in children and adolescents with long QT syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to retrospectively assess cardiac autonomic activity in children with LQTS, considering genotype, symptoms, sex, age, and beta-blocker therapy (BB) and compare it to healthy controls. METHODS: Heart rate variability (HRV), using power spectrum analysis, was analyzed in 575 Holter recordings from 116 children with LQTS and in 69 healthy children. The data were categorized into four age-groups and four heart rate (HR) ranges. RESULTS: In LQT1 and LQT2, increasing HR corresponded to significantly lower low (LF) and high frequency (HF) compared to controls. Total power (PTOT) was lower in all LQT1 age-groups compared to controls at HR 120-140 bpm (1-15 years: p < .01; 15-18 years: p = .03). At HR 80-100, LQT1 patients aged 1-10 years had lower HF than LQT2 patients (1-5 years: p = .05; 5-10 years: p = .02), and LQT2 patients aged 15-18 years had lower HF than LQT1 patients (p < .01). Symptomatic patients aged 10-15 years had lower PTOT at HR 100-120 bpm than asymptomatic patients (p = .04). LQT1 girls aged 10-15 and 15-18 years had a lower PTOT (10-15 years: p = .04; 15-18 years: p = .02) than boys. CONCLUSION: This study shows a correlation between HR and changes in HRV parameters. At higher HRs, LQTS patients generally had lower HRV values than controls, suggesting an abnormal autonomic response. These results may strengthen the link between physical activity and arrhythmias in LQTS.

Clinical outcome in hypertensive patients treated with amlodipine plus bisoprolol or plus valsartan.

OBJECTIVE: Several guidelines do not recommend beta-blocker as the first-line treatment for hypertension because of its inferior efficacy in stroke prevention. Combination therapy with beta-blocker is commonly used for blood pressure control. We compared the clinical outcomes in patients treated with amlodipine plus bisoprolol (A + B), a ß1-selective beta-blocker and amlodipine plus valsartan (A + V). METHODS: A population-based cohort study was performed using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. From 2012 to 2019, newly diagnosed adult hypertensive patients who received initial amlodipine monotherapy and then switched to A + V or A + B were included. The efficacy outcomes included all-cause death, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and coronary revascularization), hemorrhagic stroke, and heart failure. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between outcomes and different treatments. RESULTS: Overall, 4311 patients in A + B group and 10980 patients in A + V group were included. After a mean follow-up of 4.34 ± 1.79 years, the efficacy outcomes were similar between the A + V and A + B groups regarding all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.18), ASCVD event (aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84-1.12), and heart failure (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 0.87-1.30). The risk of hemorrhagic stroke was lower in A + B group (aHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.94). The result was similar when taking death into consideration in competing risk analysis. The safety outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference of all-cause death, ASCVD event, and heart failure in A + B vs. A + V users. But A + B users had a lower risk of hemorrhagic stroke.

Beta-blockade for the treatment of refractory hypoxaemia during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An in-silico study.

INTRODUCTION: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is used for refractory hypoxemia, although despite this, in high cardiac output states, hypoxaemia may persist. The administration of beta-blockers has been suggested as an approach in this scenario, however the physiological consequences of this intervention are not clear. METHODS: We performed an in-silico study using a previously described mathematical model to evaluate the effect of beta-blockade on mixed venous and arterial saturations (Sv¯O2, SaO2), in three different clinical scenarios and considered the potential effects of beta-blockers on, cardiac output, oxygen consumption and recirculation. Additionally we assessed the interaction of beta-blockade with haemoglobin concentration. RESULTS: In scenario 1: simulating a patient with high cardiac output and partial lung shunt Sv¯O2 decreased from increased 53.5% to 44.7% despite SaO2 rising from 74.2% to 79.2%. In scenario 2 simulating a patient with high cardiac output and complete lung shunt Sv¯O2 remained unchanged at 52.2% and SaO2 rose from 71.9% to 85%. In scenario 3 a patient with normal cardiac output and high recirculation Sv¯O2 fell from 50.8% to 25.5% and also fell from 82.4% to to 78.3%. Across the remaining modelling examples the effect on Sv¯O2 varied but oxygen delivery was consistently reduced across all scenarios. CONCLUSION: The administration of beta-blockers for refractory hypoxemia during VV ECMO are unpredictable and may reduce oxygen delivery, although this will vary with patient and circuit features. This study does not support the use of beta-blockers for this indication.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Portal Hypertension.

Portal hypertension is the key mechanism driving the transition from compensated to decompensated cirrhosis. In this review, the authors described the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in cirrhosis and the rationale of pharmacologic treatment of portal hypertension. We discussed both etiologic and nonetiologic treatment of portal hypertension and the specific clinical scenarios how nonselective beta-blocker can be used in patients with cirrhosis. Finally, the authors summarized the evidence for emerging alternatives for portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis.

Maintenance of beta-blockers and cardiac surgery-related outcomes: a prospective propensity-matched multicentre analysis.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the effects of maintaining beta-blockers on the day of surgery on the incidence of atrial fibrillation and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre prospective observational study with propensity matching on patients treated with beta-blockers. We collected their baseline patient characteristics, comorbidities, and operative and postoperative outcomes. The endpoints were postoperative atrial fibrillation and AKI after cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Of the 1789 included patients, propensity matching led to 583 patients in each group. Maintenance of beta-blockers was not associated with a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation (odds ratio: 0.86 [95% confidence interval 0.66-1.14], P=0.335; 141 patients [24.2%] vs 126 patients [21.6%]). Sensitivity analysis did not demonstrate association between beta-blocker maintenance and atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (odds ratio: 0.93 [95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.22], P=0.625). Maintenance of beta-blockers was associated with a higher rate of norepinephrine use (415 [71.2%] vs 465 [79.8%], P=0.0001) and postoperative AKI (124 [21.3%] vs 159 [27.3%], P=0.0127). No statistically significant difference was observed in ICU length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance of beta-blockers on the day of surgery was not associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation. However, maintenance of beta-blockers was associated with increased usage of vasopressors, potentially contributing to adverse postoperative renal events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04769752.

The perpetual need of randomized clinical trials: challenges and uncertainties in emulating the REDUCE-AMI trial.

Trial emulations in observational data analyses can complement findings from randomized clinical trials, inform future trial designs, or generate evidence when randomized studies are not feasible due to resource constraints and ethical or practical limitations. Importantly, trial emulation designs facilitate causal inference in observational data analyses by enhancing counterfactual thinking and comparisons of real-world observations (e.g. Mendelian Randomization) to hypothetical interventions. In order to enhance credibility, trial emulations would benefit from prospective registration, publication of statistical analysis plans, and subsequent prospective benchmarking to randomized clinical trials prior to their publication. Confounding by indication, however, is the key challenge to interpreting observed intended effects of an intervention as causal in observational data analyses. We discuss the target trial emulation of the REDUCE-AMI randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03278509; beta-blocker use in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction after myocardial infarction) to illustrate the challenges and uncertainties of studying intended effects of interventions without randomization to account for confounding. We furthermore directly compare the findings, statistical power, and clinical interpretation of the results of the REDUCE-AMI target trial emulation to those from the simultaneously published randomized clinical trial. The complexity and subtlety of confounding by indication when studying intended effects of interventions can generally only be addressed by randomization.

Sex differences in the prognostic role of achieving target doses of heart failure medications: Data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry.

AIMS: Guidelines recommend target doses (TD) of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) medications regardless of sex. Differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may explain heterogeneity in treatment response, adverse reactions, and tolerability issues across sexes. The aim of this study was to explore sex-based differences in the association between TD achievement and mortality/morbidity in HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with HFrEF and HF duration ≥6 months registered in the Swedish HF Registry between May 2000 and December 2020 (follow-up until December 2021) were analysed. Treatments of interest were renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), and beta-blockers. Multivariable Cox regression models were performed to explore the risk of cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for HF across dose categories in females versus males. A total of 17 912 patients were analysed (median age 77.0 years, interquartile range [IQR] 70.0-83.0), 29% were female. Over a median follow-up of 1.33 years (IQR 0.29-3.22), for RASI/ARNI there was no significant difference in outcome for females achieving 50-99% versus 100% of TD (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.83-1.03), whereas males showed a gradual lowering in risk together with the achievement of higher % of TD (p-interaction = 0.030). For beta-blockers the achievement of TD was associated with the lowest risk of outcome regardless of sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that females and males might differently benefit from the same dose of RASI/ARNI, and do represent a general call for randomized controlled trials to consider sex-specific up-titration schemes when testing HFrEF treatments in need of up-titration.

The effect of sustained-release CARvedilol in patients with hypErtension and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial (CARE-preserved HF).

Background: Although beta-blockers improve clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the benefit of beta-blockers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a robust predictor of heart failure outcomes, and recent studies have shown that beta-blockers are associated with improved survival in those with low GLS (GLS <14%) but not in those with GLS ≥14% among patients with LVEF ≥40%. Therefore, the objective of this trial is to evaluate the effect of sustained-release carvedilol (carvedilol-SR) on the outcome [N-terminal pro-B-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration] in patients with hypertension and HFpEF and will assess the differential effects of these drugs on the outcome, according to the GLS categories. Methods: This prospective randomized double-blind multicenter trial (CARE-preserved HF) will include 100 patients with HFpEF from three tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Patients with HFpEF and hypertension aged ≥20 years who have evidence of functional and structural heart disease on echocardiography and elevated natriuretic peptide will be enrolled. Eligible participants will be randomized 1:1 to either the carvedilol-SR group (n = 50) or the placebo group (n = 50). Patients in the carvedilol-SR group will receive 8, 16, 32, or 64 mg carvedilol-SR once daily for 6 months, and the dose of carvedilol will be up-titrated at the discretion of the treating physicians. The primary efficacy outcome was the time-averaged proportional change in N-terminal pro-B-natriuretic peptide concentration from baseline to months 3 and 6. We will also evaluate the differential effects of carvedilol-SR on primary outcomes according to GLS, using a cut-off of 14% or the median value. Discussion: This randomized controlled trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of carvedilol-SR in patients with HFpEF and hypertension. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov, identifier NCT05553314.

Association between types of antihypertensive medication and the risk of atrial fibrillation: a nationwide population study.

Background: Patients with hypertension are at a high risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). Recent research has indicated the varying effects of antihypertensive medications on developing AF. Objectives: We investigated the relationship between different types of antihypertensive medications and the risk of AF occurrence. Methods: We analyzed data from 113,582 subjects with national health screening examinations between 2009 and 2014. The study population was categorized according to antihypertensive medication type. The primary outcome was the incidence of AF. Results: Among 113,582 subjects (mean age 59.4 ± 12.0 years, 46.7% men), 93,557 received monotherapy [angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCB), or diuretics], while 34,590 received combination therapy (ARB/beta-blockers, ARB/CCB, ARB/diuretics, or ARB/CCB/diuretics). During a mean follow-up duration of 7.6 ± 2.1 years, 3.9% of patients were newly diagnosed with AF. In monotherapy, ACEi and CCB had similar AF risks as ARB, while beta-blockers and diuretics showed higher AF risks than ARB. In combination therapy, ARBs/CCBs and ARBs/diuretics had the lowest AF risk, whereas ARBs/beta-blockers had the highest compared to ARB/CCB. Among the specific ARBs, the AF risk varied insignificantly, except for telmisartan and candesartan. Conclusions: In hypertensive patients receiving monotherapy, ACEi and CCB showed a similar AF risk as ARBs, while beta-blockers and diuretics were associated with a higher risk. Among those receiving combination therapy, ARBs/CCBs and ARBs/diuretics had the lowest AF risk, whereas ARBs/beta-blockers showed the highest risk. Various types of ARBs have different associations with AF risk.

Association of preoperative beta-blocker use and cardiac complications after major noncardiac surgery: a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac complications after major noncardiac surgery are common and associated with high morbidity and mortality. How preoperative use of beta-blockers may impact perioperative cardiac complications remains unclear. METHODS: In a multicentre prospective cohort study, preoperative beta-blocker use was ascertained in consecutive patients at elevated cardiovascular risk undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Cardiac complications were prospectively monitored and centrally adjudicated by two independent experts. The primary endpoint was perioperative myocardial infarction or injury attributable to a cardiac cause (cardiac PMI) within the first three postoperative days. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, life-threatening arrhythmia, and cardiovascular death and all-cause death after 365 days. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to account for differences between patients receiving beta-blockers and those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 3839/10 272 (37.4%) patients (mean age 74 yr; 44.8% female) received beta-blockers before surgery. Patients on beta-blockers were older, and more likely to be male with established cardiorespiratory and chronic kidney disease. Cardiac PMI occurred in 1077 patients, with a weighted odds ratio of 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-1.12, P=0.55) for patients on beta-blockers. Within 365 days of surgery, 971/10 272 (9.5%) MACE had occurred, with a weighted hazard ratio of 0.99 (95% CI 0.83-1.18, P=0.90) for patients on beta-blockers. CONCLUSION: Preoperative use of beta-blockers was not associated with decreased cardiac complications including cardiac perioperative myocardial infarction or injury and major adverse cardiac event. Additionally, preoperative use of beta-blockers was not associated with increased all-cause death within 30 and 365 days. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02573532.

Administration and effects of beta blockers and oxandrolone in severely burned adults: a post hoc analysis of the RE-ENERGIZE trial.

Background: Prospective randomized trials in severely burned children have shown the positive effects of oxandrolone (OX), beta blockers (BB) and a combination of the two (BBOX) on hypermetabolism, catabolism and hyperinflammation short- and long-term post-burn. Although data on severely burned adults are lacking in comparison, BB, OX and BBOX appear to be commonly employed in this patient population. In this study, we perform a secondary analysis of an international prospective randomized trial dataset to provide descriptive evidence regarding the current utilization patterns and potential treatment effects of OX, BB and BBOX. Methods: The RE-ENERGIZE (RandomizEd Trial of ENtERal Glutamine to minimIZE Thermal Injury, NCT00985205) trial included 1200 adult patients with severe burns. We stratified patients according to their receipt of OX, BB, BBOX or none of these drugs (None) during acute hospitalization. Descriptive statistics describe the details of drug therapy and unadjusted analyses identify predisposing factors for drug use per group. Association between OX, BB and BBOX and clinical outcomes such as time to discharge alive and 6-month mortality were modeled using adjusted multivariable Cox regressions. Results: More than half of all patients in the trial received either OX (n = 138), BB (n = 293) or BBOX (n = 282), as opposed to None (n = 487, 40.6%). Per study site and geographical region, use of OX, BB and BBOX was highly variable. Predisposing factors for the use of OX, BB and BBOX included larger total body surface area (TBSA) burned, higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores on admission and younger patient age. After adjustment for multiple covariates, the use of OX was associated with a longer time to discharge alive [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, confidence interval (CI) (0.47-0.82) per 100% increase, p = 0.001]. A higher proportion of days on BB was associated with lower in-hospital-mortality (HR: 0.5, CI 0.28-0.87, p = 0.015) and 6-month mortality (HR: 0.44, CI 0.24-0.82, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The use of OX, BB and BBOX is common within the adult burn patient population, with its use varying considerably across sites worldwide. Our findings found mixed associations between outcomes and the use of BB and OX in adult burn patients, with lower acute and 6-month-mortality with BB and longer times to discharge with OX. Further research into these pharmacological modulators of the pathophysiological response to severe burn injury is indicated.