Non-contrast free-breathing 3D cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using REACT (relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast) compared to contrast-enhanced steady-state magnetic resonance angiography in complex pediatric congenital heart disease at 3T.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the great vessels in young children with complex congenital heart disease (CHD) using non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) based on three-dimensional relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast (REACT) in comparison to contrast-enhanced steady-state CMRA. METHODS: In this retrospective study from April to July 2021, respiratory- and electrocardiogram-gated native REACT CMRA was compared to contrast-enhanced single-phase steady-state CMRA in children with CHD who underwent CMRA at 3T under deep sedation. Vascular assessment included image quality (1 = non-diagnostic, 5 = excellent), vessel diameter, and diagnostic findings. For statistical analysis, paired t-test, Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, Wilcoxon test, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were applied. RESULTS: Thirty-six young children with complex CHD (median 4 years, interquartile range, 2-5; 20 males) were included. Native REACT CMRA was obtained successfully in all patients (mean scan time: 4:22 ± 1:44 min). For all vessels assessed, diameters correlated strongly between both methods (Pearson r = 0.99; bias = 0.04 ± 0.61 mm) with high interobserver reproducibility (ICC: 0.99 for both CMRAs). Native REACT CMRA demonstrated comparable overall image quality to contrast-enhanced CMRA (3.9 ± 1.0 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9, P = 0.018). With REACT CMRA, better image quality was obtained at the ascending aorta (4.8 ± 0.5 vs. 4.3 ± 0.8, P < 0.001), coronary roots (e.g., left: 4.1 ± 1.0 vs. 3.3 ± 1.1, P = 0.001), and inferior vena cava (4.6 ± 0.5 vs. 3.2 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). In all patients, additional vascular findings were assessed equally with native REACT CMRA and the contrast-enhanced reference standard (n = 6). CONCLUSION: In young children with complex CHD, REACT CMRA can provide gadolinium-free high image quality, accurate vascular measurements, and equivalent diagnostic quality compared to standard contrast-enhanced CMRA.

High-resolution non-contrast free-breathing coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery disease: validation against invasive coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the single most common cause of death worldwide. Recent technological developments with coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CCMRA) allow high-resolution free-breathing imaging of the coronary arteries at submillimeter resolution without contrast in a predictable scan time of ~ 10 min. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution CCMRA for CAD detection against the gold standard of invasive coronary angiography (ICA). METHODS: Forty-five patients (15 female, 62 ± 10 years) with suspected CAD underwent sub-millimeter-resolution (0.6 mm3) non-contrast CCMRA at 1.5T in this prospective clinical study from 2019-2020. Prior to CCMR, patients were given an intravenous beta blockers to optimize heart rate control and sublingual glyceryl trinitrate to promote coronary vasodilation. Obstructive CAD was defined by lesions with ≥ 50% stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography on ICA. RESULTS: The mean duration of image acquisition was 10.4 ± 2.1 min. On a per patient analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (95% confidence intervals) were 95% (75-100), 54% (36-71), 60% (42-75) and 93% (70-100), respectively. On a per vessel analysis the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (95% confidence intervals) were 80% (63-91), 83% (77-88), 49% (36-63) and 95% (90-98), respectively. CONCLUSION: As an important step towards clinical translation, we demonstrated a good diagnostic accuracy for CAD detection using high-resolution CCMRA, with high sensitivity and negative predictive value. The positive predictive value is moderate, and combination with CMR stress perfusion may improve the diagnostic accuracy. Future multicenter evaluation is now required.