Analysis of odontoid parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with different curve types.

Introduction: Odontoid incidence (OI) is an important parameter that has recently been developed. However, there are currently no studies on OI in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. We aimed to examine the significance of OI in describing cervical sagittal alignment in AIS patients, explore the differences in cervical sagittal parameters among these patients with different curve types, and investigate the correlations between coronal deformity and cervical sagittal parameters in AIS patients. Methods: The whole-spine anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs of AIS patients were retrospectively analyzed. The parameters, including OI, odontoid tilt (OT), C2 slope, cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), and others, were measured. The AIS patients were grouped based on different curve types. Measurement parameters were compared between different groups. Pearson correlation analysis was performed for cervical sagittal parameters and Cobb angle. Results: Ninety AIS patients were included, consisting of 14 males and 76 females. The main thoracic curve group exhibited a smaller OI compared to the main thoracolumbar/lumbar curve group (P < 0.05). In the AIS patients with a main thoracic curve, there was a significant correlation between Cobb angle and OI (r = -0.371, p < 0.01). The odontoid parameters exhibited significant correlations with several classic cervical sagittal parameters in AIS patients with different curve types. The validation of the formula CL = 0.36 × OI-0.67 × OT-0.69 × T1S showed a significant correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.917) between the actual measurements and the predicted values, with a determination coefficient of 0.842. Conclusion: There may be a difference in OI between AIS patients with a main thoracic curve and those with a main thoracolumbar/lumbar curve. Odontoid parameters could be used to describe cervical sagittal alignment in AIS patients with different curve types.

Influence of the type of atlantoaxial dislocation secondary to os odontoideum on sagittal alignment and balance of the subaxial cervical spine after posterior atlantoaxial fusion.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aims to investigate the effect of the type of atlantoaxial dislocation due to os odontoideum on the sagittal alignment and balance of the cervical spine after posterior atlantoaxial fusion. METHODS: Data of 48 consecutive patients who underwent posterior C1-C2 fusion to treat atlantoaxial dislocation/instability due to os odontoideum were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic variables, namely the T1 slope (T1S), C1-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, C1-C2 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2-C7 SVA, and modified atlas-dens interval (MADI), were measured preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Patients were divided into three groups based on the preoperative MADI. Differences within and between groups in radiographic variables and relationships between the investigated variables were analyzed. RESULTS: The MADI was correlated with the preoperative to postoperative changes in the C1-C2 angle (r = 0.776, P < 0.05) and C2-C7 angle (r = - 0.357, P < 0.05). In the group with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation, the C1-C2 angle and C2-C7 SVA were significantly enlarged at final follow-up (P < 0.05), while the C2-C7 angle was significantly reduced (P < 0.05). The changes in C1-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle were opposite between the posterior group and the anterior dislocation group. CONCLUSION: The direction/type of atlantoaxial subluxation correlates with the changes in lower cervical curvature after atlantoaxial fusion. Patients with atlantoaxial posterior dislocation and atlantoaxial instability are less likely than those with atlantoaxial anterior dislocation to develop loss of lordosis after posterior atlantoaxial fusion.

Influence of cranium orientation on cervical sagittal alignment during radiographic examination: a radiographic analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: During the radiographic examination, the cranium orientation varies not only individually but also within the same subject, in different imaging sessions. Knowing how changes in the orientation of the cranium influences cervical sagittal alignment during the radiographic examination of the cervical spine can aid clinicians in the accurate evaluation for cervical sagittal alignment in clinical practice. PURPOSE: To radiographically examine the influence of cranium orientation on cervical sagittal alignment during radiographic examination in an asymptomatic cohort. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective radiographic study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Eighty asymptomatic volunteers (mean age, 40.4 years; 50.0% male) were enrolled. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cervical sagittal parameters including the regional slope (C1 slope, C2 slope, C5 slope, C7 slope, and T1 slope), Cobb angle (O-C1 angle, C1-C2 angle, C2-C5 angle, C5-C7 angle, and C7-T1 angle), and cranial/cervical offset (sella turcica tilt [ST tilt] and C2 tilt). METHODS: In all participants, standing lateral radiographs of the cervical spine were taken in 3 forward-gazing positions: anteverted-cranium (AC) position; neutral-cranium (NC) position; and retroverted-cranium (RC) position. Cervical sagittal parameters, including the regional slope, Cobb angle, and cranial/cervical offset, in these 3 positions were statistically compared. RESULTS: The C1 and C2 slopes were anteverted and retroverted in the AC and RC positions, respectively, compared to those in the NC position. The C5 slope, C7 slope, and T1 slope were constant among the 3 positions. In O-C2 and C2-C5, statistically significant differences in the regional Cobb angles were identified among the 3 positions; however, there were no significant differences in the C5-C7 or C7-T1 segments. Cranial and cervical offsets of ST tilt and C2 tilt increased and decreased when the cranium was anteverted and retroverted, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that the adjustment of the cranium orientation when taking cervical spine radiographs is mainly controlled at the upper cervical spine of the O-C2 segment in an asymptomatic cohort. On radiograph, alignment in the upper cervical segment of O-C2 changes; accordingly, the middle cervical segment of C2-C5 can change during the adjustment of cranium orientation. However, alignment in the lower cervical segment of C5-C7 and the cervicothoracic junction of C7-T1 remains constant. Further, cranial/cervical offset increases and decreases when the cranium is anteverted and retroverted, respectively. Our results can help the accurate evaluation of cervical sagittal alignment on plain radiographs in clinical practice.

Correlation between axial symptoms and cervical sagittal alignment parameters in patients with two-level or three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervcial discectomy and fusion versus hybird surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To comparatively analyze the correlation between axial symptoms (AS) and cervical sagittal alignment parameters after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and hybrid surgery (HS). METHODS: From January 2018 to June 2023, 74 patients who underwent ACDF (n = 36) or HS (n = 38) for two-level or three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy were retrospectively analyzed. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI) were recorded to assess clinical outcomes. Cervical sagittal alignment parameters (Cobb's angle C2-7, C7 slope [C7S], and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis [C2-7 SVA]) were measured preoperatively, 3 days postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. The range of motion (ROM) of C2-7 and ROM of surgical segment were measured. The occurrence of AS was observed at the last follow-up. Logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation between postoperative AS and cervical sagittal alignment parameters. RESULTS: Both in ACDF group and HS group, VAS, JOA and NDI scores showed significant improvements at 3-day postoperation and at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The Cobb's angle C2-7 and C7S were significantly increased at 3 days postoperation compared with pre-operatively in both groups (P < 0.05). C2-7SVA was increased in both groups 3 days after surgery compared with pre-operatively, but there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the ROM of C2-7 in ACDF group was significantly smaller than HS group (P < 0.05). The prevalence of postoperative AS in the ACDF group and HS group was 41.7 and 18.4%, respectively, with statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). When simple Logistic regression analysis was used, the last Cobb's angle C2-7 (ß = -0.088), the last C2-7SVA (ß = 0.099) in ACDF group and the last C2-7SVA (ß = 0.222) in HS group were all correlated with the occurrence of postoperative AS. When multiple Logistic regression analysis was used, only the last C2-7SVA (ß = 0.181) in the HS group was positively correlated with the occurrence of postoperative AS. CONCLUSIONS: Both ACDF and HS can achieve satisfied clinical outcomes. ACDF and HS can improve cervical sagittal balance to a certain extent, and HS is superior to ACDF in maintaining ROM. The decrease of the last Cobb's angle C2-7 and the increase of the last C2-7SVA may be related to the occurrence of AS after ACDF. The increase of the last C2-7SVA was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of AS after HS.

Change of cervical flexion range of motion influences postoperative sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The relationships between preoperative cervical spine range of motion (ROM) and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment (CSA), and clinical outcomes after laminoplasty (LMP) have been widely studied. However, the impact of ROM changes on postoperative CSA and clinical outcomes after LMP remains unclear. Herein, patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) were retrospectively analyzed to explore the association between postoperative cervical ROM changes and CSA and surgical outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent cervical LMP at our hospital between January 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. CSA parameters were measured before the surgery and at the final follow-up. Loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) was defined as preoperative cervical lordosis (CL) - postoperative CL. An increase in the cervical sagittal vertical axis (I-cSVA) was defined as postoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) - preoperative cSVA. We defined the changes in cervical flexion range of motion (△Flex ROM, preoperative Flex ROM minus postoperative Flex ROM) > 10° as L- Flex ROM group, and △Flex ROM ≤ 10° as S- Flex ROM group. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog score (VAS) were used to assess the surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The study comprised 74 patients and the average follow-up period was 31.83 months. CL, total ROM, and Flex ROM decreased and cSVA increased after cervical LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were positively correlated with △Flex. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that a decrease in the Flex ROM was a risk factor for LCL and I-cSVA after LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were higher in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group. Postoperative JOA and the JOA recovery rate were worse in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical total and Flex ROM decreased after cervical LMP. The reduction of Flex ROM was associated with LCL and I-cSVA after surgery. The preservation of cervical Flex ROM helps maintain CSA after LMP. Therefore, more attention should be paid to maintaining cervical ROM to obtain good CSA and surgical effects after cervical LMP.

How does cervical sagittal profile change after the spontaneous compensation of global sagittal imbalance following one- or two-level lumbar fusion.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the cervical sagittal profile after the spontaneous compensation of global sagittal imbalance and analyze the associations between the changes in cervical sagittal alignment and spinopelvic parameters. METHODS: In this retrospective radiographic study, we analyzed 90 patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) and sagittal imbalance who underwent short lumbar fusion (imbalance group). We used 60 patients with DLS and sagittal balance as the control group (balance group). Patients in the imbalance group were also divided into two groups according to the preoperative PI: low PI group (≤ 50°), high PI group (PI > 50°). We measured the spinal sagittal alignment parameters on the long-cassette standing lateral radiographs of the whole spine. We compared the changes of spinal sagittal parameters between pre-operation and post-operation. We observed the relationships between the changes in cervical profile and spinopelvic parameters. RESULTS: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) occurred spontaneous compensation (p = 0.000) and significant changes were observed in cervical lordosis (CL) (p = 0.000) and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) (p = 0.023) after surgery in the imbalance group. However, there were no significant differences in the radiographic parameters from pre-operation to post-operation in the balance group. The variations in CL were correlated with the variations in SVA (R = 0.307, p = 0.041). The variations in cSVA were correlated with the variations in SVA (R=-0.470, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cervical sagittal profile would have compensatory changes after short lumbar fusion. The spontaneous decrease in CL would occur in patients with DLS after the spontaneous compensation of global sagittal imbalance following one- or two-level lumbar fusion. The changes of cervical sagittal profile were related to the extent of the spontaneous compensation of SVA.

Quantitatively assessing the effect of cervical sagittal alignment on dynamic intervertebral kinematics by video-fluoroscopy technique.

BACKGROUND: Cervical sagittal alignment is crucial for distributing the head load to lower cervical segments and maintaining normal cervical spine function, but its biomechanical effect on the cervical spine was not fully elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of cervical sagittal alignment on dynamic intervertebral kinematics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Healthy participants without neck pain were recruited and divided into lordosis, straight and kyphosis groups according to the C2-C7 Cobb angle at the neutral position. The anti-directional and total joint motions were extracted across 10 epochs of dynamic cervical flexion and extension movements. RESULTS: /findings: The overall anti-directional joint motion during flexion is larger in the kyphosis group when compared with the lordosis group (p = 0.021), while the range of flexion is smaller in the kyphosis group than that in the lordosis group (p = 0.017). The C2/C3 anti-directional joint motion during extension in the straight group is larger than that in the lordosis group (p = 0016). The range of extension in the kyphosis group (p < 0.001) and the straight group (p = 0.002) are larger than that in the lordosis group. The increased range of extension in the kyphosis and straight groups were mainly from the C3/C4, C4/C5, and C5/C6 joints(p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Changes in cervical sagittal alignment alter both the quality and quantity of the individual joint motions. More adjustments are required by the cervical joints to complete neck movements with the loss of lordosis. The lordotic curvature is a relatively effort-saving mode for the cervical spine from a biomechanical perspective.

The association of cervical sagittal alignment with anterior bone loss following single-level anterior cervical surgery.

Background: Anterior bone loss (ABL) is a common phenomenon after cervical disc replacement (CDR), which can also be observed after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). This study aimed to investigate the incidence and severity of ABL in single-level CDR and ACDF and explore the association of cervical sagittal alignment with ABL. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. A total of 113 patients treated with CDR and 99 patients treated with ACDF were retrospectively reviewed from January 2014 to December 2018 in West China Hospital. Radiological data were collected at pre-operation, 1 week, 3 months postoperatively, and the last follow-up. The incidence and severity of ABL after both CDR and ACDF were evaluated. Cervical sagittal alignment parameters, including C0-C2 angle, cervical lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope, functional spinal unit angle, disc angle, and surgical level slope, were evaluated. Results: ABL was identified in 75 (66.4%) patients in the CDR group and 57 (57.6%) patients in the ACDF group. There were no significant differences in the incidence, severity, and location of ABL between the ACDF and CDR groups. For patients who underwent ACDF, the proportion of females was significantly higher in the ABL group (64.9% vs. 33.3%, P=0.002), whereas the body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in the ABL group compared to the non-ABL group (22.72±3.09 vs. 24.60±3.04, P=0.002). No effect of ABL on the short-term clinical outcomes of ACDF and CDR was observed. In the ACDF group, patients with ABL had significantly smaller postoperative CL (11.83°±8.24° vs. 15.25°±8.32°, P=0.04) and cSVA (17.77±10.08 vs. 23.35±9.86 mm, P=0.007). In the CDR group, no significant differences were found in the cervical sagittal parameters between patients with and without ABL (CL: 12.58±8.70 vs. 15.46±8.50, P=0.10; cSVA: 20.95±8.54 vs. 19.40±9.43, P=0.38). Conclusions: ABL is common after both CDR and ACDF with comparable incidence and severity. Cervical sagittal alignment was closely related to ABL after ACDF yet had less influence on ABL after CDR.

What Happens to Sagittal Alignment Following Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion?

OBJECTIVE: Laminectomy and fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are 2 sucessful posterior decompression techniques for cervical myelo-radiculopathy. There is also a growing body of evidence describing the importance of cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) and its importance in outcomes. We investigated the difference between pre- and postoperative CSA parameters in and between LF or LP. Furthermore, we studied predictive variables associated with change in cervical mismatch (CM). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with cervical myeloradiculopathy in a single healthcare system. The primary outcomes are intra- and inter-cohort comparison of LF versus LP radiographic parameters at pre- and postoperative time points. A secondary multivariable analysis of predictive factors was performed evaluating factors predicting postoperative CM. RESULTS: Eighty nine patients were included; 38 (43%) had LF and 51 (57%) underwent LP. Both groups decreased in lordosis (LF 11.4° vs. 4.9°, P = 0.01; LP 15.2° vs. 9.1°, P < 0.001), increased in cSVA (LF 3.4 vs. 4.2 cm, P = 0.01; LP 3.2 vs. 4.2 cm, P < 0.001), and increased in CM (LF 22.0° vs. 28.5°, P = 0.02; LP 16.8° vs. 22.3°, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the postoperative CSA between groups. No significant predictors of change in pre- and postoperative CM were found. CONSLUSIONS: There were no significant pre-or postoperative differences following the 2 procedures, suggesting radiographic equipoise in well indicated patients. Across all groups, lordosis decreased, cSVA increased, and cervical mismatch increased. There were no predictive factors that led to change in cervical mismatch.

Usefulness of the preoperative thoracic inlet angle in comparison to the T1 slope for predicting cervical kyphosis after laminoplasty.

PURPOSE: Thoracic inlet angle (TIA) is a sagittal radiographic parameter with a constant value regardless of posture and is significantly correlated with the sagittal balance of the cervical spine. However, the practical use of TIA has not been studied. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the preoperative TIA for predicting the development of kyphotic deformity after cervical laminoplasty in comparison to the preoperative T1 slope (T1S). METHODS: A total of 98 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty without preoperative kyphotic alignment were included (mean age, 73.7 years; 41.8% female). Radiography was evaluated before surgery and at the 2-year follow-up examination. The cervical sagittal parameters were measured on standing radiographs, and the TIA was measured on T2-weighted MRI in a supine position. Cervical alignment with a C2-C7 angle of ≥ 0° was defined as lordosis, and that with an angle of < 0° was defined as kyphosis. RESULTS: Postoperative kyphosis occurred in 11 patients (11.2%). Preoperatively, the kyphosis group showed significantly lower values in the T1S (23.5° vs. 30.3°, p = 0.034) and TIA (76.1° vs. 81.8°, p = 0.042). We performed ROC curve analysis to clarify the impact of the preoperative TIA and T1S on kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty. The optimal cutoff angles for TIA and T1S were 68° and 19°, respectively, with similar diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the clinical utility of the preoperative TIA for predicting the risk of postoperative kyphotic deformity after cervical laminoplasty. These findings suggest the importance of the preoperative assessment of thoracic inlet alignment in cervical spine surgery.

C4 constant vertebra: a novel benchmark of physiological cervical sagittal alignment.

BACKGROUND: Cervical sagittal alignment is essential, and there is considerable debate as to what constitutes physiological sagittal alignment. The purpose of this study was to identify constant parameters for characterizing cervical sagittal alignment under physiological conditions. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in which asymptomatic subjects were recruited to undergo lateral cervical spine radiographs. Each subject was classified according to three authoritative cervical sagittal morphology classifications, followed by the evaluation of variations in radiological parameters across morphotypes. Moreover, the correlations among cervical sagittal parameters, age, and cervicothoracic junction parameters were also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 183 asymptomatic Chinese subjects were enrolled with a mean age of 48.4 years. Subjects with various cervical sagittal morphologies had comparable C4 endplate slope angles under all three different typing systems. Among patients of different ages, C2-C4 endplate slope angles remained constant. Regarding the cervicothoracic junction parameters, T1 slope and thoracic inlet angle affected cervical sagittal parameters, including cervical lordosis and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis, and were correlated with the endplate slope angles of C5 and below and did not affect the endplate slope angles of C4 and above. In general, the slope of the C4 inferior endplate ranges between 13° and 15° under different physiological conditions. CONCLUSIONS: In the asymptomatic population, the C4 vertebral body maintains a constant slope angle under physiological conditions. The novel concept of C4 as a constant vertebra would provide a vital benchmark for diagnosing pathological sagittal alignment abnormalities and planning the surgical reconstruction of cervical lordosis.

Early radiographic outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anatomic versus lordotic cages.

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) interbody implants are shaped anatomically, with a convex superior aspect, or lordotically, with an angle and flat surfaces. However, the effect of implant shape on cervical sagittal balance (CSB) is not well described. Methods: Of the 192 cases reviewed from 2018 to 2019, 118 were included with matching pre- and postoperative imaging. Cases were categorized by interbody implant type (anatomic or lordotic) and number of levels fused (1-level, 2-level, etc.). SurgiMap was used to measure cervical lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope (T1S), and T1S minus CL (T1S-CL) on pre- and postoperative imaging. Pre- and postoperative parameters were compared within and between each cohort. Change in CL (ΔCL), cSVA (ΔcSVA), and T1S-CL (ΔT1S-CL) were calculated as the difference between pre- and postoperative values and were compared accordingly (1) anatomic versus lordotic and (2) 1-level versus 2-level versus 3-level fusion. Results: Thirty-nine (33.1%), 57 (48.3%), and 22 (18.6%) cases comprised the anatomic, lordotic, and mixed (anatomic and lordotic) groups, respectively. ACDFs improved CL and T1S-CL by 5.71° (p<.001) and 3.32° (p<.01), respectively. CL was improved in the lordotic (5.27°; p<.01) and anatomic (4.57°; p<.01) groups, while only the lordotic group demonstrated improvement in T1S-CL (3.4°; p=.02). There were no differences in ΔCL (p=.70), ΔcSVA (p=.89), or ΔT1S-CL (p=.1) between the groups. Two- and 3-level fusions improved CL by 7.48° (p<.01) and 9.62° (p<.01), and T1S-CL by 4.43° (p<.01) and 5.96° (p<.01), respectively. Conclusions: Overall, ACDFs significantly improved CL and T1S-CL however, there were no differences in CSB correction between the anatomic and lordotic groups. Two- and 3-level fusions more effectively improved CL (vs. single-level) and T1S-CL (vs. 3-level). These results suggest that implants should continue to be personalized to the patient's anatomy, however, future research is needed to validate these findings and incorporate the effects of preoperative deformities.

Correlation Between Cervical Spine Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcome After Standalone Intersomatic Titanium Cage CeSPACE for Cervical Anterior Discectomy and Fusion in Cervical Degenerative Disk Diseases.

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes after using a standalone intersomatic titanium cage CeSPACE for anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis. We present our clinical experience in a group of 180 patients with a mean follow-up for at least 2 years. Patients were evaluated by clinical and radiological assessment preoperatively, immediately after surgery and at regular follow-up. There were 97 male and 83 female patients (average age: 56.6 years) who were preoperatively affected by cervical radiculomyelopathy that was due to spondylosis or cervical disk herniation and who underwent surgical treatment. All patients underwent an anterior discectomy and interbody fusion through the positioning of one or more levels of the CeSPACE device. Compared with the preoperative scores, improvement was seen in postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI) values. The standalone intersomatic titanium cage CeSPACE for anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis improved radiculomyelopathy and increased the probability of cervical kyphotic alignment. However, cervical sagittal alignment after surgery was not significantly associated with clinical outcomes in terms of postoperative improvement in VAS scores and NDI values. Similarly, the change in cervical sagittal alignment was not related to visual analog scale scores or Neck Disability Index values.

Restore cervical sagittal alignment by cervical disc arthroplasty and systematic total bilateral uncuscectomy in severe spondylosis: A prospective study.

Introduction: Severe spondylosis is common and represents contraindication to achieve cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). Research question: Is it possible to restore cervical sagittal alignment using an adequate prosthetic model and performing systematic bilateral total uncuscectomy (or uncinectomy), even in cases of severe spondylosis ? Material and methods: We propose a prospective clinical and radiological study comparing the evolution of preoperative and postoperative cervical sagittal balance 1 year after the interposition of a prosthesis with mobile bearing and systematic total uncuscectomy. VAS for brachialgia and cervicalgia, NDI, Odom's criteria, C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 SVA, T1 slope, C2 slope, C1-C2 Cobb angle, and segmental Cobb angle were analyzed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Results: 73 patients for a total of 129 levels treated were analyzed. Patients showed significant improvements in VASb, VASc, NDI, and Odom's criteria one year after surgery without clinical differences in the severe spondylosis subgroup (41 patients for 77 levels treated). Our results showed an increase in the C2-C7 Cobb angle postoperatively and a better correlation between T1 slope and C2-C7 Cobb angle postoperatively than preoperatively. Postoperative radiological results were similar between the spondylosis and non-spondylosis subgroups. However preoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle and preoperative ROM were lower in the severe spondylosis subgroup. Discussion and conclusion: This study showed the possibility of restoring cervical sagittal balance by performing cervical disc arthroplasty with systematic uncuscectomy, even in cases of severe spondylosis. Moreover, we propose a simplified mathematical formula to preoperatively evaluate the lack of angulation to restore sagittal cervical alignment.

Reciprocal Change of Cervical Spine after Posterior Spinal Fusion for Lenke Type 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Reciprocal sagittal alignment changes after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) posterior corrective surgery have been reported in the cervical spine, but the evidence is not yet sufficient. Furthermore, much remains unknown about the effects of cervical kyphosis on clinical outcomes in AIS. Forty-five consecutive patients (4 males and 41 females) with AIS and Lenke type 1 or 2 curves underwent a posterior spinal fusion, and a minimum of 24-month follow-up was collected from our prospective database. We investigated radiographic parameters and SRS-22r. Before surgery, cervical kyphosis (cervical lordosis < 0°) was present in 89% and cervical hyperkyphosis (cervical lordosis < -10°) in 60%. There were no significant differences in age, sex, or Lenke type between the hyperkyphosis and the non-hyperkyphosis groups. Although cervical lordosis increased significantly after surgery, cervical kyphosis was observed in 73% of patients 2 years after surgery. We found a significant correlation between Δthoracic kyphosis (TK) and Δcervical lordosis. Preoperative cervical kyphosis, ΔT1 slope, and ΔTK were independently associated factors for postoperative cervical hyperkyphosis. The cervical hyperkyphosis group had significantly lower SRS-22r domains. In AIS corrective surgery, restoring TK leading to a gain of T1 slope may lead to an improvement of cervical sagittal alignment. Remaining cervical hyperkyphosis after AIS surgery may affect clinical outcomes.

The Sagittal Balance of Cervical Spine : Comprehensive Review of Recent Update.

The cervical spine plays a critical role in supporting the skull, maintaining horizontal gaze, and facilitating walking. Its unique characteristics, including the widest range of motion among spinal segments, have led to extensive research on cervical sagittal alignment. Various parameters have been proposed to evaluate cervical alignment, with studies investigating their clinical significance, correlation with symptoms, and implications for surgical interventions. Recent findings suggest that cervical sagittal alignment not only impacts the cervical spine but also influences global spine-pelvic alignment through compensatory mechanisms. This comprehensive review examines classical and new parameters of cervical sagittal alignment and considers the dynamic and muscular factors associated with it.

Clinicoradiological Risk Factors Associated with Inability to Achieve Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Operated Cases of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the clinicoradiological risk factors associated with the inability to achieve minimum clinically important difference (MCID) on the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) Scale in operated cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Only a few studies have evaluated the outcomes of surgery performed for CSM using MCID on the mJOA scale. METHODS: We analyzed 124 operated CSM cases from March 2019 to April 2021 for preoperative clinical features, cervical sagittal radiographic parameters, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensities (SI). The risk factors associated with missing the MCID (poor outcome) on mJOA at the final follow-up were identified using binary logistic regression. Multivariate analysis was used to find significant risk factors, and odds ratios (OR) were computed. RESULTS: A total of 110 men (89.2%) and 14 women (10.8%) with an average age of 53.5±13.2 years were included in the analysis. During the last follow-up, 89 cases (72.1%) achieved MCID (meaningful gains following surgery) while 35 (27.9%) could not. The final model identified the following parameters as significant risk factors for poor outcome: increased duration of symptoms (OR, 6.77; p=0.001), lower preoperative mJOA scale (OR, 0.75; p=0.029), the presence of multilevel T2-weighted (T2W) MRI SI (OR, 4.79; p=0.004), and larger change in cervical sagittal vertical axis (ΔcSVA) (OR, 1.06; p=0.013). Also, an increase in cSVA postoperatively correlated with a reduced functional recovery rate (r=-0.4, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for CSM leads to significant functional benefits. However, poorer outcomes are observed in cases of greater duration of symptoms, higher preoperative severity with multilevel T2W MRI SI, and a larger increase in the postoperative cSVA (sagittal imbalance).

Effect of preoperative dynamic cervical sagittal alignment on the loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty.

PURPOSE: Cervical laminoplasty (CLP) is a developed surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), but only a few of those studies focus on preoperative dynamic cervical sagittal alignment and the study of different degrees of loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) is lacking. This study aimed to analyze patients who underwent CLP to investigate the effect of cervical extension and flexion function on different degrees of LCL. METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, we analyzed 79 patients who underwent CLP for CSM between January 2019 and December 2020. We measured the cervical sagittal alignment parameters on lateral radiographs (neutral, flexion, and extension positions) and used Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score to assess clinical outcomes. We defined the extension ratio (EXR) as 100 × Ext ROM (cervical range of extension)/ROM (cervical range of motion). We observed the relationships between collected variables (demographic and radiological variables) and LCL. Patients were classified into the following three groups according to the LCL: stability group: (LCL ≤ 5°); mild loss group (5° < LCL ≤ 10°); and severe loss group (LCL > 10°). We compared the differences of collected variables (demographic, surgical and radiological variables) among the three groups. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled (mean age 62.92 years; 51 men, 28 women) in the study. Among the three groups, cervical Ext ROM was the best in the stability group (p < 0.01). Compared with the stability group, range of flexion (Flex ROM) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) and EXR was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in the severe loss group. Compared with the severe loss group, JOA recovery rates were better (p < 0.01) in the stability group. Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis to predict LCL > 10° (area under the curve = 0.808, p < 0.001). The cutoff value for EXR was 16.80%, with sensitivity and specificity of 72.5% and 82.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CLP should be carefully considered for patients with a preoperative low Ext ROM and high Flex ROM, as a significant kyphotic change is likely to develop after surgery. EXR is a useful and simple index to predict significant kyphotic changes.

Cervical sagittal alignment changes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, laminectomy with fusion, and laminoplasty for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical sagittal alignment changes (CSACs) influence outcomes and health-related quality-of-life. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), laminectomy with fusion (LCF), and laminoplasty (LP) are common treatments for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy; however, these approaches need to be compared. METHODS: Our study included 167 patients who underwent ACDF, LCF, or LP. Patients were divided into four groups according to C2-C7 Cobb angle (CL): kyphosis (CL < 0°), straight (0° ≤ CL < 10°), lordosis (10° ≤ CL < 20°), and extreme lordosis (20° ≤ CL) groups. CSACs consist of two parts. CSAC from the preoperative period to the postoperative period is surgical correction change (SCC). CSAC from the postoperative period to the final follow-up period is postoperative lordosis preserving (PLP). Outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and the neck disability index. RESULTS: ACDF, LCF, and LP had equivalent outcomes. ACDF had greater SCC than LCF and LP. During follow-up, lordosis decreased in the ACDF and LCF groups but increased in the LP group. For straight alignment, ACDF had greater CSAC and greater SCC than the LCF and LP groups but similar PLP. For lordosis alignment, ACDF and LP had positive PLP, and LCF had negative PLP. For extreme lordosis, ACDF, LP, and LCF had negative PLP; however, cervical lordosis in the LP group was relatively stable during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ACDF, LCF, and LP have different CSAC, SCC, and PLP according to a four-type cervical sagittal alignment classification. Preoperative cervical alignment is an important consideration in deciding the type of surgical treatment in CSM.

Loss of cervical sagittal alignment worsens the cervical spinal lesions in patients with Hirayama disease.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the cervical sagittal alignment in patients with Hirayama disease (HD) and to investigate the effect of loss of cervical sagittal alignment upon the cervical spinal lesions in HD. METHODS: Cervical sagittal alignments were measured in 253 HD patients and 63 healthy subjects by C2-C7 Cobb and a modified method of Toyama et al. Motor unit number estimation (MUNE) was performed in bilateral abductor pollicis brevis (APB) in all HD patients, and 31 patients further underwent cervical diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). RESULTS: Compared with healthy subjects, HD patients showed lower C2-C7 Cobb (P < 0.05), and 83.4% patients showed loss of cervical lordosis (cervical straight or kyphosis), which was greater than healthy subjects (55.6%, P < 0.05). Compared with lordotic/straight group, patients with cervical kyphosis showed lower MUNE values and greater single motor unit potential (SMUP) in bilateral APB, and higher apparent dispersion coefficient (ADC) and lower fractional anisotropy were observed at C4/C5 level in the latter than the former (P < 0.05). C2-C7 Cobb was associated with both C4/C5 ADC and bilateral SMUP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Most HD patients showed loss of cervical sagittal alignments, and both MUNE and DTI detections demonstrated a positive correlation between loss of cervical sagittal alignments and cervical spinal lesions in HD. These findings supported that loss of cervical sagittal alignments may worsen motor impairments in HD. Therefore, it is necessary for clinicians to be aware of restoring cervical sagittal alignments during HD treatment.