RESUMO
Here we report a rare case of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related pleural disease diagnosed using a thoracoscopic pleural biopsy. A 66-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with right-dominant bilateral pleural effusions and gradually worsening dyspnoea. Chest radiographs revealed right-dominant pleural effusions, while chest computed tomography showed bilateral pleural effusions without parenchymal lesions. Although the bilateral pleural effusions were exudative with an increased number of lymphocytes, the definitive diagnosis was initially elusive. High IgG4 levels in the serum and pleural effusions were observed. A pathological evaluation of a right pleural biopsy specimen collected via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery showed fibrosis-associated lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, 45-60 IgG4-positive plasma cells per high-power field, and an IgG4/immunoglobulin G ratio of 40%. Consequently, the patient was diagnosed with IgG4-related pleural disease. The bilateral pleural effusions improved after corticosteroid therapy.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to report pain during and following injection for trigger finger as well as failure to resolve triggering. We hypothesized that a corticosteroid injection alone would be equally or less painful compared with the standard combination of corticosteroid and lidocaine for the treatment of trigger fingers, and there would be no difference in the resolution of triggering. METHODS: Our study was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single institution, comprising 76 patients with a diagnosis of trigger finger. Each treatment group consisted of 38 patients. Patients were randomized to receive either a betamethasone (1 mL, 6 mg) injection without lidocaine or a betamethasone injection (1 mL, 6 mg) with 1% lidocaine (1 mL). Patients were assessed during injection and at 1 hour, 6 hours, 2 days, and 6 weeks after the injection. The primary outcome was pain measured using a numerical rating scale. The secondary outcome was the rate of failure to resolve symptoms at 6 weeks. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in pain scores between the lidocaine and betamethasone versus betamethasone-only injections during administration (4.6 vs 6.2) and after 1 hour (1.3 vs 2.5). There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores after 6 hours (1.5 vs 2.0) and 2 days (0.7 vs 0.6) or in failure rate at the 6-week time point (21% vs 18%). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there is a statistically significant difference in pain during and shortly after injection when using a steroid with lidocaine versus steroid alone for the treatment of trigger finger, but that difference may not be clinically relevant. There was no significant difference in the failure rate between the treatments. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Approximately 1% of the UK population take oral corticosteroids for ≥ 28 days each year, for broadly two reasons: deficiency in corticosteroid requiring replacement; or therapeutic corticosteroid for inflammatory conditions. Acute deficiency can occur at times of physiological stress (e.g. surgery), potentially leading to major complications. The Association of Anaesthetists' 2020 consensus guideline provides detailed advice for the management of glucocorticoids during the peri-operative period for patients with adrenal insufficiency. This national audit aimed to assess compliance with this guideline. METHODS: Data were collected from 59 Trusts over 14 consecutive days for all eligible patients undergoing procedures under the care of an anaesthetist. Patients who were prescribed ≥ 5 mg oral prednisolone equivalents pre-operatively, in whom supplementary corticosteroid would be indicated, were compared with those prescribed < 5 mg oral prednisolone equivalents. RESULTS: Operations for 21,731 patients were audited: 277 (1.3%) patients were taking therapeutic corticosteroids. Detailed peri-operative data were collected for all patients receiving therapeutic corticosteroids: 201/277 (73%) were ASA physical status ≥ 3; 184/277 (66%) underwent elective procedures; and 252/277 (91%) were prescribed prednisolone pre-operatively, of whom 219/277 (79%) were prescribed ≥ 5 mg oral prednisolone equivalents. In the patients who were prescribed ≥ 5 mg oral prednisolone equivalents, 186/219 (85%) received pre-operative glucocorticoid supplementation and 97/219 (42%) received it postoperatively; however, only 67/219 (31%) and 43/219 (20%) respectively received glucocorticoid supplementation according to the guidelines. Overall, peri-operative prescribing was compliant in 19/219 (9%) patients. A similar proportion, 30/219 (14%), received no supplementation. In the patients taking < 5 mg oral prednisolone equivalents pre-operatively, 28/58 (48%) received inappropriate supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite 125/277 (45%) of anaesthetists reporting Association of Anaesthetists' guidelines use, compliance remained low, with adherence in only 27/125 (22%) patients. Further research is required to identify the correct peri-operative strategy for patients taking therapeutic corticosteroids.
RESUMO
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), is a severe type of cutaneous adverse reaction. The gold standard therapy for DRESS involves the discontinuation of the culprit drug, supportive therapies, and administration of corticosteroids. However, in cases of primary treatment failure or suboptimal response, there arises an urgent need for alternative interventions. This review focuses on exploring alternative systemic therapies for patients with steroid-resistant DRESS, steroid-dependent DRESS, or refractory DRESS, encompassing immunosuppressive agents, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, biologics, and small molecule drugs, with an emphasis on their clinical efficacy and the underlying mechanisms in the treatment of DRESS. Furthermore, this review provides a summary of potential management strategies and laboratory workup during the treatment of DRESS.
RESUMO
Pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis (PICGN) is one of the pathologies causing rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, often associated with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA); however, in 10-30% of cases, ANCAs are negative. While a relatively large number of cases of ANCA-positive PICGN complicated with malignancy have been previously reported, the number of cases of ANCA-negative PICGN with malignancy is limited. The prognosis for such cases was poor, and many patients died within a relatively short period. Here, we report the case of ANCA-negative PICGN complicated with malignancy successfully treated by corticosteroid and radiation therapy. A 63-year-old Japanese man was admitted to our hospital due to spiking fevers in the previous 3 months. Based on the findings of imaging and pathological tests, he was diagnosed with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma with mediastinal involvement. After admission, his renal function rapidly deteriorated, and urinalysis showed heavy proteinuria. In serological tests, serology for autoantibodies, including ANCAs, was negative. The kidney biopsy revealed PICGN with prominent endocapillary proliferation. We administered corticosteroid therapy for glomerulonephritis and subsequent radiation therapy for lung carcinoma, both of which were effective. He has been alive without progression of malignancy or kidney disease for 5 years after discharge. In patients with malignancy presenting with acute deterioration of kidney function, although infrequent, one of the conceivable pathological conditions to consider is ANCA-negative PICGN associated with malignancy. In such cases, even with negative antibodies such as ANCA, pathological examination is warranted, and a combination of anti-tumor therapy and immunosuppressive therapy is expected to be effective.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of cytomegalovirus infection as an opportunistic pathogen in exacerbating ulcerative colitis and its response to treatment remain a topic of ongoing debate. Clinicians encounter numerous challenges, including the criteria for differentiating between an acute ulcerative colitis flare and true cytomegalovirus colitis, the diagnostic tests for identifying cytomegalovirus colitis, and determining the appropriate timing for initiating antiviral therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old Syrian female with a seven-year history of pancolitis presented with worsening bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, and tenesmus despite ongoing treatment with azathioprine, mesalazine, and prednisolone. She experienced a new flare of acute severe ulcerative colitis despite recently completing two induction doses of infliximab (5 mg/kg) initiated four weeks prior for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. She had no prior surgical history. Her symptoms included watery, bloody diarrhea occurring nine to ten times per day, abdominal pain, and tenesmus. Initial laboratory tests indicated anemia, leukocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin levels, and positive CMV IgG. Stool cultures, Clostridium difficile toxin, testing for Escherichia coli and Cryptosporidium, and microscopy for ova and parasites were all negative. Sigmoidoscopy revealed numerous prominent erythematous area with spontaneous bleeding. Biopsies demonstrated CMV inclusions confirmed by immunohistochemistry, although prior biopsies were negative. We tapered prednisolone and azathioprine and initiated ganciclovir at 5 mg/kg for ten days, followed by valganciclovir at 450 mg twice daily for three weeks. After one month, she showed marked improvement, with CRP and fecal calprotectin levels returning to normal. She scored one point on the partial Mayo score. The third induction dose of infliximab was administered on schedule, and azathioprine was resumed. CONCLUSION: Concurrent cytomegalovirus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease presents a significant clinical challenge due to its associated morbidity and mortality. Diagnosing and managing this condition is particularly difficult, especially regarding the initiation or continuation of immunosuppressive therapies.
Assuntos
Colite , Infecções por Citomegalovirus , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/complicações , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/tratamento farmacológico , Colite/virologia , Colite/diagnóstico , Colite/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/diagnóstico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Citomegalovirus/isolamento & purificação , Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , BiópsiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is lack of research on corticosteroid use for severe and critical COVID-19 patients with Omicron variant infection. METHODS: This multi-center retrospective cohort study involved 1167 patients from 59 ICUs across the mainland of China diagnosed with severe or critical SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection between November 1, 2022, and February 11, 2023. Patients were segregated into two groups based on their corticosteroid treatment-usual dose (equivalent prednisone dose 30-50 mg/day) and higher dose (equivalent prednisone dose > 50 mg/day). The primary outcome was 28-day ICU mortality. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between cohorts. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 520 patients in the usual dose corticosteroid group and 260 patients in the higher dose corticosteroid group were included in the analysis, respectively. The mortality was significantly higher in the higher dose corticosteroid group (67.3%, 175/260) compared to the usual dose group (56.0%, 291/520). Logistic regression showed that higher doses of corticosteroids were significantly associated with increased mortality at 28-day (OR = 1.62,95% CI 1.19-2.21, p = 0.002) and mortality in ICU stay (OR = 1.66,95% CI 1.21-2.28, p = 0.002). Different types of corticosteroids did not affect the effect. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that higher-dose corticosteroids may lead to a poorer prognosis for severe and critical COVID-19 patients with Omicron variant infection in the ICU. Further research is needed to determine the appropriate corticosteroid dosage for these patients.
RESUMO
Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) represents a spectrum of myeloid disorders occasionally linked to autoimmune diseases. Here, we present a case of a 60-year-old man demonstrating an unusual coexistence of MDS with warm-autoantibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA). Diagnostic evaluation, including positive direct antiglobulin testing, confirmed the autoimmune etiology of his anemia despite his low-risk MDS classification. Prompt initiation of prednisone therapy resulted in significant hematological and clinical improvement, allowing for a conservative management approach without transfusion requirements. This case underscores the importance of identifying the relationship between wAIHA and MDS, particularly in low-risk scenarios. Moreover, these findings suggest the efficacy of corticosteroids in managing autoimmune anemia in the context of concomitant wAIHA and MDS.
Assuntos
Anemia Hemolítica Autoimune , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas , Humanos , Anemia Hemolítica Autoimune/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia Hemolítica Autoimune/complicações , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Teste de Coombs , Autoanticorpos/sangue , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (IRF) is a rare condition characterized by fibrous tissue proliferation in the retroperitoneal space, commonly affecting the ureters and other abdominal structures. This case report describes a previously undocumented presentation of IRF in a 52-year-old female, who presented with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding and severe anemia over six months. Diagnostic workup included endoscopy, colonoscopy, abdominal computed tomography (CT), and biopsy, revealing fibrous encasement of the mesenteric vessels leading to ischemic damage and gastrointestinal bleeding. Treatment involved high-dose corticosteroids and surgical resection of the fibrotic tissue, which resulted in complete resolution of symptoms. The aim of this case report is to highlight this unique presentation of IRF, discuss the diagnostic challenges, and explore effective treatment strategies for managing this rare but significant complication.
RESUMO
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent inflammatory skin condition impacting both children and adults globally, with a prevalence of 15-30%. It ranks as the most prevalent skin disorder based on disability-adjusted life-years by the World Health Organization. It presents with symptoms like skin irritation, redness, dryness, itchiness, and vesicular blisters and commonly coexists with other atopic symptoms like allergic rhinitis, asthma, and food allergies. The pathophysiology involves a complex interplay of genetic predispositions, immunological dysfunctions, and environmental factors leading to tissue inflammation and disrupted skin barrier integrity. Alopecia areata is characterized by nonscarring hair loss and shares correlations with AD including a higher prevalence of atopic diseases, shared intracellular mechanisms involving the JAK-STAT pathway, and potential treatment overlap such as dupilumab. These correlations could direct new areas of research and increased insight for both diseases. Treatment of AD requires a personalized approach due to its complex, multifactorial nature integrating nonpharmacological interventions like skin hydration and trigger avoidance as well as topical and systemic approaches, if necessary, with topical corticosteroids being the first line for flares; long term corticosteroid use poses risk for adverse effects like skin atrophy. Severe cases may require systemic treatments or phototherapy. Future treatment prospects include targeting the dysbiotic microbiome and identifying biomarkers for tailored therapeutic strategies, emphasizing the importance of personalized medicine in optimizing AD management.
RESUMO
Objective: Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI) have been shown to be effective at improving arthritis across juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) categories. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommends IACI use as primary and adjunctive therapy for JIA patients. However, there remains minimal data describing actual IACI use in North America. The objective of this study was to describe and to evaluate IACI use in JIA, utilizing the Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network (PR-COIN) registry. Methods: Study participants from 13 sites were enrolled in the PR-COIN registry from 2011 to 2015. Demographic and clinical variables were summarized and Chi-squared and t-tests were used to evaluate differences between participants who did or did not receive IACI. Multiple logistic regression models were used to evaluate characteristics associated with IACI treatment. Results: Our study included 3,241 participants, the majority of whom were white (85%), female (71%) and had oligoarticular JIA (39%). IACI was administered at least once in 23% of participants, the majority of whom had oligoarticular disease (52.5%), but overall use in oligoarticular participants was low at 30.8%. IACI use varied significantly between treatment centers and use was associated with oligoarticular disease, ANA positivity, and use of other systemic medications. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that participants with JIA enrolled in the PR-COIN registry between 2011 and 2015 with persistent oligoarticular disease, ANA positivity, and use of other systemic medications were more likely to receive IACI. However, IACI use was lower than expected for oligoarticular participants.
RESUMO
A 78-year-old woman presented to the dermatologist with linear hypopigmentation four weeks after a local corticosteroid injection. Corticosteroid injections are commonly used for various musculoskeletal conditions refractory to other conventional treatments. We discuss a case report of a patient with linear hypopigmentation in the perilymphatic distribution due to local corticosteroid injection for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Providers who routinely inject corticosteroids should discuss this rare complication prior to injections.
RESUMO
Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare inflammatory disease characterized by skin and fascial thickening. Unlike systemic sclerosis, EF lacks internal organ involvement and specific autoantibodies, with peripheral eosinophilia as a hallmark feature. Patients may exhibit joint pain and contractures due to fibrosis. We present a case of a patient who presented with skin thickening involving her upper and lower extremities and was ultimately diagnosed with EF based on a skin biopsy. This case underscores the importance of recognizing the unique clinical and histological features of EF.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim was to elaborate a predictive model to find responders for the corticosteroid switch (from prednisolone to dexamethasone) at the first prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (≥25% increase) during abiraterone acetate (AA) treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. METHODS: If PSA has decreased (≥25%) after switch, patients were considered responders. Logistic regression of 19 dichotomized parameters from routine laboratory and patients' history was used to find the best model in a cohort of 67 patients. The model was validated in another cohort of 42 patients. RESULTS: The model provided 92.5% and 90.5% accuracy in the testing and the validation cohorts, respectively. Overall the accuracy was 91.7%. The AUC of ROC curve was 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.96). After a median follow-up of 27.9 (26.3-84) months, the median AA+dexamethasone treatment duration (TD) in non-responders and responders was 4.7 (3.1-6.5) and 11.1 (8.5-12.9) months and the median overall survival (OS) was 23.2 (15.6-25.8) and 33.5 (26.1-38) months, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that responsiveness was an independent marker of TD and OS. CONCLUSIONS: A high accuracy model was developed for mCRPC patients in predicting cases which might benefit from the switch. For non-responders, induction of the next systemic treatment is indicated.
RESUMO
Background: The impact of corticosteroids on humoral responses in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors during the acute phase and subsequent 6-month period remains unknown. This study aimed to determine how the use of corticosteroids influences the initiation and duration of humoral responses in COVID-19 survivors 6 months after infection onset. Methods: We used kinetic antibody data from the lopinavir-ritonavir trial conducted at Jin Yin-Tan Hospital in January 2020, which involved adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19 (LOTUS, ChiCTR2000029308). Antibody samples were collected from 192 patients during hospitalization, and kinetic antibodies were monitored at all available time points after recruitment. Additionally, plasma samples were collected from 101 COVID-19 survivors for comprehensive humoral immune measurement at the half-year follow-up visit. The main focus was comparing the humoral responses between patients treated with systemic corticosteroid therapy and the non-corticosteroid group. Results: From illness onset to day 30, the median antibody titre areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of nucleoprotein (N), spike protein (S), and receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) were significantly lower in the corticosteroids group. The AUCs of N-, S-, and RBD-IgM as well as neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were numerically lower in the corticosteroids group compared with the non-corticosteroid group. However, peak titres of N, S, RBD-IgM and -IgG and NAbs were not influenced by corticosteroids. During 6-month follow-up, we observed a delayed decline for most binding antibodies, except N-IgM (ß -0.05, 95% CI [-0.10, 0.00]) in the corticosteroids group, though not reaching statistical significance. No significant difference was observed for NAbs. However, for the half-year seropositive rate, corticosteroids significantly accelerated the decay of IgA and IgM but made no difference to N-, S-, and RBD-IgG or NAbs. Additionally, corticosteroids group showed a trend towards delayed viral clearance compared with the non-corticosteroid group, but the results were not statistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.50-1.00; P = 0.0508). Conclusion: Our findings suggested that corticosteroid therapy was associated with impaired initiation of the antibody response but this did not compromise the peak titres of binding and neutralizing antibodies. Throughout the decay phase, from the acute phase to the half-year follow-up visit, short-term and low-dose corticosteroids did not significantly affect humoral responses, except for accelerating the waning of short-lived antibodies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) can be managed with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEis; e.g., pyridostigmine), corticosteroids, other immunosuppressive drugs (e.g., tacrolimus), and their combinations. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or plasmapheresis (PLEX) may be administered if symptoms persist. PLEX and IVIg are also mainstays of treatment for myasthenic crisis. Recently, efgartigimod was approved in Japan for treating adults with gMG (irrespective of the antibody status) who do not have a sufficient response to corticosteroids and nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapies. Efgartigimod is generally safe and well tolerated. However, since phase III trials of efgartigimod excluded those with myasthenic crisis, the efficacy of efgartigimod in treating myasthenic crisis is still unclear. Moreover, there are no reports that efgartigimod therapy can reduce the dose of corticosteroids needed to achieve a minimal manifestation status. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 70-yeat-old woman with gMG who developed a myasthenic crisis. After she was diagnosed with gMG, the patient had been treated with oral corticosteroids and tacrolimus for 1 year. However, she refused to continue taking the medication, and two weeks later, she developed ptosis, dysphagia and dyspnea. The patient was intubated and treated with efgartigimod in combination with steroid therapy, and she recovered without PLEX or IVIg. Afterward, when she experienced worsening of fatigue and increased levels of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, efgartigimod therapy was effective. The patient achieved minimal manifestation status even after the reduction of corticosteroids and showed improvements in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scales after 4 cycles of efgartigimod infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Our case suggests that efgartigimod can be an alternative drug for achieving minimal manifestation status in patients with myasthenic crisis. Considering its strong efficacy and safety, efgartigimod could be expanded to use as bridging therapy in the acute and chronic phases of gMG.
Assuntos
Miastenia Gravis , Humanos , Miastenia Gravis/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Idoso , Quimioterapia Combinada , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), are respiratory diseases with high morbidity and mortality. Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of corticosteroids in the treatment of ARDS often yield contradictory results. We hereby conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a search for randomized clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies that utilized corticosteroids for patients with ARDS in Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase. The primary outcome was mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane or NOS scales. Statistical effect size was analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies, comprising 11 observational studies and 9 RCTs, were eligible for analysis. In RCTs, corticosteroids were associated with a reduction of mortality in ARDS patients (relative risk [RR] = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.71-0.91, p = 0.001). Further subgroup analysis indicated that specific variables, such as low-dose (RR = 0.81; 95%CI: 0.67-0.98; p = 0.034), methylprednisolone (RR = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.49-0.98; p = 0.035), and dexamethasone (RR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.69-0.98; p = 0.029) were associated with mortality among patients receiving corticosteroids. However, in observational studies, corticosteroids increased the risk of death (RR = 1.16, 95%CI: 1.04-1.29; p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the use of high-dose corticosteroids was associated with higher patient mortality (RR = 1.20; 95%CI: 1.04-1.38; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of corticosteroids on the mortality of ARDS differed by the type and dosage of corticosteroids used, as well as the etiologies. Current data do not support routine use of corticosteroids in ARDS since protective effects were observed in RCTs but increased mortality was found in observational studies. More well designed and large clinical trials are needed to specify the favorable subgroups for corticosteroid therapy.
Corticosteroid use may reduce the risk of death in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) according to randomized controlled trials.Observational studies indicate that corticosteroid use may increase the risk of death in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients but not in COVID-19 ARDS patients.Both regular and low-dose corticosteroids show benefits in reducing mortality in RCTs, but observational studies associate these doses with increased mortality.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides , Dexametasona , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/mortalidade , Humanos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies indicate a possible bidirectional stimulatory relationship between parathyroid hormone (PTH) and adrenocortical hormones, but the pattern of adrenocortical secretion in hypoparathyroidism is unknown. We aimed to characterize the adrenocortical secretion in patients with postsurgical hypoparathyroidism, and whether continuous subcutaneous PTH (1-34) infusion alters secretion patterns. DESIGN: Crossover interventional study. METHODS: We recruited ten patients with postsurgical hypoparathyroidism with very low PTH levels on stable treatment with active vitamin D and calcium. Cortisol, cortisone and aldosterone levels were measured in microdialysate from subcutaneous tissue over 24h, before and during continuous subcutaneous PTH (1-34) infusion. Cortisol was also assayed in serum, saliva and urine, and aldosterone and ACTH in serum and plasma, respectively. Ten patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and ten healthy volunteers matched for sex and age served as controls. RESULTS: Hypoparathyroid patients displayed both ultradian and circadian rhythmicity for tissue cortisol, cortisone and aldosterone. Tissue aldosterone and cortisone levels were significantly lower in hypoparathyroid patients than in healthy controls, with no difference in tissue cortisol, but a higher cortisol to cortisone ratio. Treatment with PTH (1-34) increased tissue levels of aldosterone, cortisol and cortisone and reduced the ratio of cortisol to cortisone. CONCLUSION: Adrenocortical hormone levels are reduced in postsurgical hypoparathyroidism, and partly restored by short-term continuous subcutaneous PTH (1-34) therapy.
RESUMO
Background: The role of corticosteroids in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains contentious. This study aims to investigate the prognostic significance of immune deficiency in patients with ARDS and its response to varying doses of corticosteroids. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study enrolled 657 ARDS patients from January 24, 2008, to September 12, 2022, at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. The patients were categorized into a discovery dataset (n=357) and a validation dataset (n=300), based on admission date. Further validation of the results in the validation dataset was used to enhance the credibility of the study conclusions. The study examined the association between immune deficiency and the patients' clinical characteristics, treatment measures, and prognosis. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality post disease onset. Data analysis was conducted from June 15, 2023 to August 15, 2023. Results: The initial risk factor analysis in the discovery dataset was primarily based on the clinical characteristics, and the results suggested that immune deficiency likely impacted overall survival among patients receiving different doses of corticosteroid treatment. Multivariate analysis identified immune deficiency as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in both the discovery and validation datasets. The final analysis revealed that patients with mild to moderate ARDS [discovery dataset: hazard ratio (HR) =1.719; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.229-2.406; log-rank test P=0.001; validation dataset: HR =1.874; 95% CI: 1.238-2.837; log-rank test P=0.002] or severe ARDS (discovery dataset: HR =1.874; 95% CI: 1.007-3.488; log-rank test P=0.04; validation dataset: HR =1.698; 95% CI: 1.042-2.768; log-rank test P=0.03) with immune deficiency exhibited lower overall survival rates. Patients with mild to moderate ARDS and immune deficiency showed greater benefits from low-dose corticosteroid treatment (HR =0.409; 95% CI: 0.249-0.671; P<0.001 for interaction), whereas those with severe ARDS and immune deficiency benefitted from both low and high-dose treatments (low corticosteroid: HR =0.299; 95% CI: 0.136-0.654; high corticosteroid: HR =0.458; 95% CI: 0.214-0.981; P=0.005 for interaction). Conclusions: Immune deficiency is an independent risk factor in ARDS. Incorporating it into the disease severity grading system based on the Berlin criteria may enhance personalized treatment approaches for ARDS patients. These findings warrant further validation through prospective, large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
RESUMO
Background: Ventilator-dependent neonates are at risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a chronic lung disease. Dexamethasone may be used to facilitate extubation and reduce the incidence of BPD. Objectives: To determine the efficacy of dexamethasone in reducing the incidence of established BPD at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA); to establish the rate of extubation success; to determine the factors affecting extubation success; and to describe complications associated with dexamethasone therapy. Methods: A chart review was conducted at Surrey Memorial Hospital, in Surrey, British Columbia, for neonates who received dexamethasone to reduce the development of BPD between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2022. Results: A total of 47 neonates met the inclusion criteria. Of the 45 neonates still alive at 36 weeks PMA, all (100%) had BPD. Use of dexamethasone led to extubation success for 21 (47%) of these 45 neonates. The mean PMA at dexamethasone initiation was 30.7 weeks for neonates with extubation success, compared with 28.6 weeks for those with extubation failure (p = 0.001). Complications occurred in 43 (91%) of the 47 neonates. Conclusions: BPD occurred in all of the neonates, despite a 47% extubation success rate. The timing of dexamethasone initiation was associated with extubation success. Further research is required to determine the dose and timing of dexamethasone needed to reduce the incidence of BPD.
Contexte: Les nouveau-nés qui dépendent d'un ventilateur sont exposés à un risque de dysplasie broncho-pulmonaire (DBP), une maladie pulmonaire chronique. La dexaméthasone peut être utilisée pour faciliter l'extubation et réduire l'incidence de cette maladie. Objectifs: Déterminer l'efficacité de la dexaméthasone pour réduire l'incidence de la DBP établie à 36 semaines d'âge postmenstruel (APM); établir la réussite de l'extubation; déterminer les facteurs ayant une incidence sur cette dernière; et décrire les complications associées au traitement par la dexaméthasone. Méthodologie: Un examen des dossiers a été effectué à l'hôpital Surrey Memorial, à Surrey (Colombie-Britannique) pour les nouveau-nés ayant reçu de la dexaméthasone entre le 1er juillet 2016 et le 30 juin 2022 afin de réduire le risque de DBP. Résultats: Au total, 47 nouveau-nés répondaient aux critères d'inclusion. Sur les 45 nouveau-nés encore en vie à 36 semaines d'APM, tous (100 %) souffraient de DBP. L'utilisation de dexaméthasone a permis de réussir l'extubation chez 21 (47 %) de ces 45 nouveau-nés. L'APM moyen au début de l'administration de la dexaméthasone était de 30,7 semaines pour les nouveau-nés dont l'extubation avait été réussie, contre 28,6 semaines pour ceux chez qui ce n'était pas le cas (p = 0,001). Des complications sont survenues chez 43 (91 %) des 47 nouveau-nés. Conclusions: La DBP est survenue chez tous les nouveau-nés, malgré un taux de réussite d'extubation de 47 %. Le moment du début de l'administration de la dexaméthasone était associé à la réussite de l'extubation réussie. Des recherches supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour déterminer la dose de dexaméthasone requise et le moment opportun de l'administration pour réduire l'incidence de la BPD.