Prognostic Significance of Biologic Factors in Patients with a Modest Radiologic Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancers: Impact of the Combination Index of Sialyl-Lewis Antigen-Related Tumor Markers.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate re-evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is important for optimal treatment selection. Nonetheless, determining the operative eligibility of patients with a modest radiologic response remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of biologic factors for patients showing a modest radiologic response to NAT and investigate the tumor markers (TMs), CA19-9 alone, DUPAN-II alone, and their combination, to create an index that combines these sialyl-Lewis antigen-related TMs associated with treatment outcomes. METHODS: This study enrolled patients deemed to have a "stable disease" by RECIST classification with slight progression (tumor size increase rate, ≤20%) as their radiologic response after NAT. A sialyl-Lewis-related index (sLe index), calculated by adding one fourth of the serum DUPAN-II value to the CA19-9 value, was created. The prognostic significances of CA19-9, DUPAN-II, and the sLe index were assessed in relation to postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: An sLe index lower than the cutoff value (45.25) was significantly associated with favorable disease-free survival. Moreover, the post-NAT sLe index had a higher area under the curve value for recurrence within 24 months than the post-NAT levels of CA19-9 or DUPAN-II alone. Multivariable analysis showed that a post-NAT sLe index higher than 45.25 was the single independent predictive factor for recurrence within 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Additional evaluation of biologic factors can potentially enhance patient selection, particularly for patients showing a limited radiologic response to NAT. The authors' index is a simple indicator for the biologic evaluation of multiple combined sialyl-Lewis antigen-related TMs and may offer a better predictive significance.

DUPAN-II normalisation as a biological indicator during preoperative chemoradiation therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Duke pancreatic mono-clonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-II) is a famous tumour maker for pancreatic cancer (PC) as well as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). We evaluated the clinical implications of DUPAN-II levels as a biological indicator for PC during preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). METHODS: This retrospective analysis included data from 221 consecutive patients with resectable and borderline resectable PC at diagnosis who underwent preoperative CRT between 2008 and 2017. We focused on 73 patients with elevated pre-CRT DUPAN-II levels (> 230 U/mL; more than 1.5 times the cut-off value for the normal range). Pre- and post-CRT DUPAN-II levels and the changes in DUPAN-II ratio were measured. RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified normalisation of DUPAN-II levels after CRT as a significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.06, confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-4.24, p = 0.042). Total normalisation ratio was 49% (n = 36). Overall survival (OS) in patients with normalised DUPAN-II levels was significantly longer than that in 73 patients with elevated levels (5-year survival, 55% vs. 21%, p = 0.032) and in 60 patients who underwent tumour resection (5-year survival, 59% vs. 26%, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Normalisation of DUPAN-II levels during preoperative CRT was a significant prognostic factor and could be an indicator to monitor treatment efficacy and predict patient prognosis.

Comparison of the prognostic impact of pre- and post-operative CA19-9, SPan-1, and DUPAN-II levels in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), s-pancreas antigen-1 (SPan-1), and duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-II) are commonly utilized tumor markers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), it is still unclear which is the most useful for predicting prognosis after surgical resection. Here, we aimed to compare the prognostic impact of pre- and post-operative serum CA19-9, SPan-1, and DUPAN-II levels in patients with resectable PDAC. METHODS: Pre-operative CA19-9, SPan-1, and DUPAN-II levels were analyzed to compare their prognostic values for resectable PDAC in 198 patients whose pre-operative tumor markers were available. The relationships of clinicopathological factors, including pre- and postoperative CA19-9, SPan-1, and DUPAN-II levels, with overall survival (OS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses in 149 patients for whom both pre- and postoperative tumor markers were available. RESULTS: Elevated pre-operative CA19-9 (≥37 U/mL), SPan-1 (≥30 U/mL), and DUPAN-II (≥150 U/mL) levels were found in 113 (60%), 96 (51%), and 82 (43%) patients, respectively. In multivariate analysis, absence of adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 4.17; p = 0.001), R1 resection (HR, 1.90; p = 0.03), higher histological grade (HR, 1.99; p = 0.02), advanced UICC T factor (HR, N/A; p = 0.04) and elevated postoperative CA19-9 (HR, 3.39; p = 0.009) were identified as independent predictors for worse OS. CONCLUSION: When the prognostic impacts of pre- and post-operative serum CA19-9, SPan-1, and DUPAN-II levels in patients with resectable PDAC were compared, elevated postoperative CA19-9 was the strongest predictive marker of poor survival in the pre- and post-operative period.