Diagnostic reference levels in interventional neuroradiology procedures - a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The establishment of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) is challenge for interventional neuroradiology (INR) due to the complexity and variability of its procedures. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this systematic review is to analyse and compare DRLs in fluoroscopy-guided procedures in INR. METHODS: An observational study reporting DRLs in INR procedures, specifically cerebral arteriography, cerebral aneurysm embolisation, cerebral thrombectomy, embolisation of arteriovenous malformations (AVM), arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), retinoblastoma embolisation, and spinal cord arteriography. Comprehensive literature searches for relevant studies published between 2017 and 2023 were conducted using the Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. RESULTS: A total of 303 articles were identified through an extensive literature search, with 159 removed due to duplication. The title and abstract of 144 studies were assessed and excluded if they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Thirty-one out of the 144 articles were selected for a thorough full-text screening. Twenty-one articles were included in the review after the complete text screening. CONCLUSION: The different conditions of patients undergoing INR procedures pose a barrier to the standardization of DRLs; nevertheless, they are extremely important for monitoring and optimising radiological practices.

Screening Mammography Diagnostic Reference Level System According to Compressed Breast Thickness: Dubai Health.

Screening mammography is considered to be the most effective means for the early detection of breast cancer. However, epidemiological studies suggest that longitudinal exposure to screening mammography may raise breast cancer radiation-induced risk, which begs the need for optimization and internal auditing. The present work aims to establish a comprehensive well-structured Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) system that can be confidently used to highlight healthcare centers in need of urgent action, as well as cases exceeding the dose notification level. Screening mammographies from a total of 2048 women who underwent screening mammography at seven different healthcare centers were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The typical DRL for each healthcare center was established and defined as per (A) bilateral image view (left craniocaudal (LCC), right craniocaudal (RCC), left mediolateral oblique (LMLO), and right mediolateral oblique (RMLO)) and (B) structured compressed breast thickness (CBT) criteria. Following this, the local DRL value was established per the bilateral image views for each CBT group. Screening mammography data from a total of 8877 images were used to build this comprehensive DRL system (LCC: 2163, RCC: 2206, LMLO: 2288, and RMLO: 2220). CBTs were classified into eight groups of <20 mm, 20-29 mm, 30-39 mm, 40-49 mm, 50-59 mm, 60-69 mm, 70-79 mm, 80-89 mm, and 90-110 mm. Using the Kruskal-Wallis test, significant dose differences were observed between all seven healthcare centers offering screening mammography. The local DRL values defined per bilateral image views for the CBT group 60-69 mm were (1.24 LCC, 1.23 RCC, 1.34 LMLO, and 1.32 RMLO) mGy. The local DRL defined per bilateral image view for a specific CBT highlighted at least one healthcare center in need of optimization. Such comprehensive DRL system is efficient, easy to use, and very clinically effective.

Let's talk about radiation dose and radiation protection in children.

Children are more sensitive to ionizing radiation than adults. Even though the risk is very low, exposure from radiological examinations can possibly cause them long-term side effects. Recent large epidemiological studies involving children and young adults have added evidence suggesting that even small doses of radiation, such as those from computed tomography scans, might slightly increase the risk of developing cancer later in life. Therefore, even though radiologic studies are essential for an accurate diagnosis and management of various conditions, it is crucial to minimize radiation exposure. This article addresses radiation protection for children in the medical use of ionizing radiation and it is set in the context of the European legislative framework regarding radiation protection. It advocates for a holistic approach to paediatric radiological tests. This approach includes the key principles of radiation protection, such as the justification of imaging procedures supported by referral guidelines, as well as the optimization of techniques (according to the ALARA principle) and effective communication with parents about the benefits and the risks of radiologic procedures. Protecting children from unnecessary radiation is not only a technical challenge, but also a moral obligation and a legal requirement.

Assessment of image quality and establishment of local acceptable quality dose for computed tomography based on patient effective diameter.

Purpose: We aim to develop modified clinical indication (CI)-based image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for assessing image quality (IQ) and establishing acceptable quality doses (AQDs) in adult computed tomography (CT) examinations, based on CIs and patient sizes. Approach: CT images, volume CT dose index ( CTDI vol ), and dose length product (DLP) were collected retrospectively between September 2020 and September 2021 for eight common CIs from two CT scanners at a central hospital in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Using the modified CI-based IQSC and a Likert scale (0 to 4), three radiologists assessed the IQ of each examination. AQDs were then established as the median value of CTDI vol and DLP for images with an average score of 3 and compared to national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs). Results: Out of 581 examinations, 60 were excluded from the study due to average scores above or below 3. The established AQDs were lower than the NDRLs for all CIs, except AQDs / CTDI vol for oncologic follow-up for large patients (28 versus 26 mGy) in scanner A, besides abdominal pain for medium patients (16 versus 15 mGy) and large patients (34 versus 27 mGy), and diverticulitis/appendicitis for medium patients (15 versus 12 mGy) and large patients (33 versus 30 mGy) in scanner B, indicating the need for optimization. Conclusions: CI-based IQSC is crucial for IQ assessment and establishing AQDs according to patient size. It identifies stations requiring optimization of patient radiation exposure.

Radiation Doses in Routine CT Examinations for Adult Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.

Computed tomography (CT) is an important imaging technique that produces detailed cross-sectional images for diagnosing medical conditions. However, the associated radiation exposure raises concerns. Establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) helps identify unusual radiation doses and optimize exposure while maintaining diagnostic image quality. The purpose of this systematic review is to review the radiation doses received by adult patients in the head, chest, abdomen, pelvis, abdomen-pelvis (AP), and combined chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CAP) CT scans in Saudi Arabia. A search was conducted in several databases including PubMed and Google Scholar to identify studies that have established DRLs or determined radiation dose for adult CT examinations. Only studies that specifically assessed DRLs in actual adult patients were considered for inclusion. Out of a total of 31 articles that were identified as eligible, 13 were included after a thorough screening process. The values of CTDIv, DLP, and effective doses were determined. The review discovered that CTDIv and DLP were the most frequently used dosimetric quantities. The mean values in terms of CTDIv for head, chest, abdomen, pelvis, AP, and CAP ranged from 40.67 to 61.80 mGy, 5.80 to 14.90 mGy, 8.60 to 16.15 mGy, 10.80 to 17.35 mGy, 14.10 to 16.84 mGy, and 12.00 to 22.94 mGy, respectively. The mean values in terms of DLP for head, chest, abdomen, pelvis, AP, and CAP ranged from 757 to 1212 mGy.cm, 243 to 657 mGy.cm, 369.5 to 549 mGy.cm, 379.6 to 593 mGy.cm, 658 to 940.43 mGy.cm, and 740 to 1493.8 mGy.cm, respectively. There is a fluctuation in radiation dose among CT centers, highlighting a need to provide proper education and training to radiographers. It is recommended to establish a universally accepted standardized protocol based on weight, equivalent diameter, or cross-sectional area for accurate comparisons with national and international DRLs.

Multicenter, international study of CT practices and radiation doses from 10 African countries: An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) baseline study.

PURPOSE: The objective of our IAEA-coordinated international study was to assess CT practices and radiation doses from multiple hospitals across several African countries. METHODS: The study included 13 hospitals from Africa which contributed information on minimum of 20 consecutive patients who underwent head, chest, and/or abdomen-pelvis CT. Prior to the data recording step, all hospitals had a mandatory one-hour training on the best practices in recording the relevant data elements. The recorded data elements included patient age, weight, protocol name, scanner information, acquisition parameters, and radiation dose descriptors including phase-specific CT dose index volume (CTDIvol in mGy) and dose length product (DLP in mGy.cm). We estimated the median and interquartile range of body-region specific CTDIvol and DLP and compared data across sites and countries using the Kruskal-Wallis H Test for non-normal distribution, analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total of 1061 patients (mean age 50 ± 19 years) were included in the study. 16 % of CT exams had no stated clinical indications for CT examinations of the head (32/343, 9 %), chest (50/281, 18 %), abdomen-pelvis (67/243, 28 %), and/or chest-abdomen-pelvis CT (24/194, 12 %). Most hospitals used multiphase CT protocols for abdomen-pelvis (9/11 hospitals) and chest CT (10/12 hospitals), regardless of clinical indications. Total median DLP values for head (953 mGy.cm), chest (405 mGy.cm), and abdomen-pelvis (1195 mGy.cm) CT were above the UK, German, and American College of Radiology Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). CONCLUSIONS: Concerning variations in CT practices and protocols across several hospitals in Africa were demonstrated, emphasizing the need for better protocol optimization to improve patient safety.

Standardized diagnostic reference levels for paediatric interventional cardiology: Data from an Italian referral centre.

PURPOSE: To provide data on radiation exposure in paediatric interventional cardiology procedures, addressing the scarcity of valuable Local Diagnostic Reference Levels (LDRLs),established according to the standardized approach proposed by the Radiation Protection 185 report (RP185). METHODS: Paediatric catheterization procedures conducted at the University-Hospital of Padua from September 2019 to December 2022 were stratified by body weight (BW) classes and procedure type. LDRLs were calculated for groups with at least 20 patients as the 75th percentile of Kerma-Area Product (PKA) and Air Kerma at reference point (Ka,r) values. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to evaluate differences in the dose-related quantities among BW groups for a selected procedure and among procedures for the same BW class. Results were compared with recent literature. RESULTS: A total of 838 procedures were analysed. LDRL were provided for five therapeutic procedures. The 75th percentile of PKA and Ka,r increases with weight, regardless procedure type. PKA and Ka,r are generally statistically different between BW groups, for both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and between different procedures at fixed weight group. Angioplasty and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract treatments (PVR) showed exposure values approximately doubled then other procedures. PKA/(BW·FT) is not statistically different among procedures except for Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) closures. LDRL values from this study are generally lower than the published ones. CONCLUSIONS: The study stands out as one of the few that presents a considerable number of LDRLs for weight categories and procedure types with a sample size of at least 20 patients per group, in agreement with RP185. PKA shows strong correlation with the product BW·FT.

Development of Acceptable Quality Dose (AQD) and image quality-related diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography investigations in a tertiary care public sector hospital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

PURPOSE: To describe the first experience of patient dose optimization in developing AQD, SSDE and image quality-related DRLs for common CT examinations in the adult age group using the concept of AQD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The recent published IQSC from 0 to 4 were used by radiologists for the assessment of image quality. The entire data were collected for five types (brain CT, chest CT, chest HRCT, abdomen KUB CT and abdomen + pelvic CT) CT investigations based on anatomic region (head, chest and abdomen + pelvic). The entire datasets of 264 patients were categorized into three groups based on their weights: group-1 (41-60 kg), group-2 (61-80 kg) and group-3 (81-100 kg). Only score-3 images were considered to assess median and 75th percentile values of CTDIvol and DLP to obtain AQDs and DRLs, respectively. RESULTS: Following the practical training of four radiologists on image quality scoring criteria for CT images, 264 (92%) out of 288 patient images were clinically acceptable as per IQSC for the study. The AQD (median) values in terms of CTDIvol for the mentioned weight groups were 25.8, 2.7, and 30.6 mGy, while the median DLP values for these groups were 496, 510 and 557 mGycm, respectively, for brain CT. The 75th percentile values in terms of CTDIvol were 30.2, 35.3 and 36.2 mGy, while in terms of DLP, they were 583, 619 and 781 mGycm for brain CT, respectively. Similar results are presented for the above-mentioned procedures, as well as in terms of SSDE. CONCLUSION: The first ever experience in obtaining AQD, SSDE and DRLs values for specific CT procedures couples image quality with dose indices, showing comparable values with other relevant studies. Hence, it will provide a baseline for comparison within the facility for future studies and facilitate dose optimization for other facilities aiming for improvement.

Proposing Multiregional Diagnostic Reference Levels for Common CT Angiography Examinations in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are crucial tools for optimizing radiation exposure during different radiological examinations. This study aimed to establish preliminary DRLs for commonly performed computed tomographic angiography (CTA) examinations in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Data for three types of CTA examinations (cerebral, pulmonary, and lower-extremity) were collected from six medical cities across Saudi Arabia. Data sets related to 723 CTAs with a mean patient weight of 75 kg were analysed in detail. The DRL values were determined based on the 75th, median, and 25th CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) values. RESULTS: The established DRLs were 1221 mGy cm for cerebral CTAs, 475 mGy cm for pulmonary CTAs, and 1040 mGy cm for lower-extremity CTAs. These values were comparable to those reported in other studies. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary DRLs for three common CTA procedures in Saudi Arabia. The widespread implementation of a low kVp and a high level of image reconstruction (IR) presents an opportunity for further dose reduction. These findings can serve as a foundation for future nationwide DRL surveys and the optimization of CTA imaging protocols in Saudi Arabia.

Diagnostic Reference Levels in PET Imaging at Chulabhorn Hospital, Thailand.

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are an important tool for controlling radiation exposure and ensuring safety in medical applications. In Thailand, DRL data have been gathered and established for nuclear medicine diagnostics since 2021. However, there is a lack of information on PET imaging examinations. At the National Cyclotron and PET Scan Centre, Chulabhorn Hospital, radiopharmaceuticals are produced for medical imaging and research, and a wide range of PET/CT and PET/MRI examinations are performed. Our objective was to investigate the administered activity of radiopharmaceuticals in patients undergoing PET imaging, especially the existing data on DRLs in medical diagnostic imaging. Methods: This was a retrospective study on nuclear medicine patients at the National Cyclotron and PET Scan Centre in 2023. Statistical analysis, including the mean and the 75th percentile values, was conducted to determine DRLs according to the International Commission on Radiological Protection guidelines. Results: The center performed 8,711 PET/CT and PET/MRI studies with 13 protocols in 2023. The most commonly administered activity was 18F-FDG in oncology and neurology examinations, with DRLs of 186.11 and 136.16 MBq, respectively. These values were notably almost twice lower than several reports in other countries. Conclusion: There is a lack of comprehensive data on most DRLs for PET imaging at this center because of the nonwidespread use of several radiopharmaceuticals. However, the lower DRLs for 18F-FDG can highlight the need for ongoing investigation toward the establishment of local DRLs, as well as assurance on the safety and efficiency of radiation used in nuclear medicine.

Radiation doses and diagnostic reference levels for common CT scans in adults in Northwest region of Iran.

This study aims to estimate organ dose and cancer risks, establish region-specific diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), and determine achievable doses (ADs) for common CT procedures in adults in the northwest of Iran. Effective and organ doses were estimated using VirtualDoseCT software in a sample of 480 adult patients who underwent head, sinus, chest, and abdomen-pelvis (AP) CT scans. The guidelines provided by the BEIR VII report were utilized to estimate cancer risks. Effective and organ doses for specific procedures were determined, with the highest mean organ dose being observed in the brain during head CT examinations, with a value of 54.02 mGy. It was observed that the lungs in chest examinations and the colon in AP examinations had the highest risk of cancer, with rates of 30.72 and 21.37 per 100,000 persons, respectively. Higher cancer risk values were generally exhibited by females compared to males. The DRLs for common CT examinations were established as follows: Head CT (CTDIvol 41 mGy, DLP 760 mGy cm), Sinus CT (CTDIvol 16 mGy, DLP 261 mGy cm), Chest CT (CTDIvol 8 mGy, DLP 287 mGy cm), and AP CT (CTDIvol 9 mGy, DLP 508 mGy cm). Significant variations in dose distribution among facilities were identified, indicating the need for optimization. The study highlights the importance of minimizing radiation exposure to critical organs and promoting patient safety in CT examinations. The establishment of region-specific DRLs and ADs can help optimize radiation doses and reduce cancer risks for patients.

Expansion of Typical Values for Paediatric Patients in Ireland and Comparison with Published DRLs - Experiences of a Single Institution.

INTRODUCTION: To reduce the risks involved with ionising radiation exposure, typical values (TVs) and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) have been established to help keep radiation doses 'as low as reasonably practicable. TVs/DRLs provide standardised radiation dose metrics that can be used for comparative purposes. However, for paediatrics, such values should consider the size of the child instead of their age. This study aimed to establish and compare paediatric TVs for chest, abdomen and pelvis radiography. METHODS: Study methods followed processes for establishing paediatric DRLs as outlined by the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA). Kerma-area product (KAP) values, excluding rejected images, were retrospectively acquired from the study institution's Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS). Paediatric patients were categorised into the following weight-based groupings (5 to <15 kg, 15 to <30 kg, 30 to <50 kg, 50 to 80 kg) and stratified based on the examination that was performed (chest, abdomen, and pelvis), and where it was performed (the different X-ray rooms). Anonymised data were inputted into Microsoft Excel for analysis. Median and 3rd quartile KAP values were reported together with graphical illustrations. RESULTS: Data from 407 X-ray examinations were analysed. For the previously identified weight categories (5 to <15 kg, 15 to <30 kg, 30 to <50 kg, 50 to 80 kg), TVs for the chest were 0.10, 0.19, 0.37 and 0.53 dGy.cm2, respectively. For the abdomen 0.39, 1.04, 3.51 and 4.05 dGy.cm2 and for the pelvis 0.43, 0.87, 3.50 and 7.58 dGy.cm2. Between X-ray rooms TVs varied against the institutional TVs by -60 to 119 % (chest), -50 to 103 % (abdomen) and -14 and 24 %% (pelvis). CONCLUSION: TVs in this study follow established trends with patient weight and examination type and are comparable with published literature. Variations do exist between individual examination rooms and reasons are multifactorial. Given that age and size do not perfectly correlate further work should be undertaken around weight-based TVs/DRLs in the paediatric setting.

Lowest reported dose area product of 2.4 Gy∗cm2 for ultra-low-dose endovascular aortic aneurysm repair of a standard infrarenal aortic aneurysm.

This is a report of successful treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm via standard endovascular aortic repair with an ultra-low dose (ULD) of 2.4 Gy∗cm2 using the latest imaging software in a hybrid operating room. To the best of our knowledge, no case has yet been reported achieving a successful outcome with such ULD values to date. The key factors to achieving an ULD regarding the dose area product comprise the right technology, procedural standardization, and team education and training. This case highlights the potential for reducing the radiation dose routinely for patients and staff alike, especially for operating room staff with daily radiation exposure.

Characterisation of Portuguese radiotherapy departments: Organisation, occupational exposure values and diagnostic reference levels for breast and prostate computed tomography planning.

INTRODUCTION: Portugal currently hosts 24 active radiotherapy departments, 8 public and 16 privates, presenting potential radiation exposure risks to multidisciplinary teams. Patients in these treatments also face ionising radiation during treatment planning and verification. METHODS: Authorisation and ethical approval were secured for a national online survey, disseminated to radiotherapy departments across Portugal. The survey encompassed three sections: equipment, staff, and radiographer role characterisation; occupational exposure values for one month; and exposure parameters, including computed tomography (CT) dose values [CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP)] for breast and prostate cancer CT planning. Local Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) derived were based on the 75th percentile of median dose values. RESULTS: The study garnered a 50% response rate from public institutions, 12,5% from private and 25% from all active radiotherapy institutions in Portugal. All departments employ Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT) and incorporate Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and/or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) irradiation techniques. Additionally, half of the departments also perform Brachytherapy (BT). Radiographers demonstrated an occupational dose of zero mSv. CT planning dose values were 13 mGy and 512 mGy cm for breast CT and 16 mGy and 689 mGy cm for prostate CT, pertaining to CTDIvol and DLP, respectively. CONCLUSION: Most aspects of national radiotherapy characterisation align with the established literature. Occupational exposure values exhibited consistency across radiotherapy modalities. An approach to national DRLs was formulated for breast and prostate CT planning, yielding values congruent with recent European studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study offers vital insights for analysing occupational contexts and risk prevention, serving as the initial characterisation of the national radiotherapy landscape. It also pioneers the calculation of DRLs for CT planning in radiotherapy to optimise procedures.

Optimization of CT pulmonary angiography for pulmonary embolism using task-based image quality assessment and diagnostic reference levels: A multicentric study.

PURPOSE: To establish size-specific diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for pulmonary embolism (PE) based on patient CT examinations performed on 74 CT devices. To assess task-based image quality (IQ) for each device and to investigate the variability of dose and IQ across different CTs. To propose a dose/IQ optimization. METHODS: 1051 CT pulmonary angiography dose data were collected. DRLs were calculated as the 75th percentile of CT dose index (CTDI) for two patient categories based on the thoracic perimeters. IQ was assessed with two thoracic phantom sizes using local acquisition parameters and three other dose levels. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of a 2 mm low perfused vessel was assessed with a non-prewhitening with eye-filter model observer. The optimal IQ-dose point was mathematically assessed from the relationship between IQ and dose. RESULTS: The DRLs of CTDIvol were 6.4 mGy and 10 mGy for the two patient categories. 75th percentiles of phantom CTDIvol were 6.3 mGy and 10 mGy for the two phantom sizes with inter-quartile AUC values of 0.047 and 0.066, respectively. After the optimization, 75th percentiles of phantom CTDIvol decreased to 5.9 mGy and 7.55 mGy and the interquartile AUC values were reduced to 0.025 and 0.057 for the two phantom sizes. CONCLUSION: DRLs for PE were proposed as a function of patient thoracic perimeters. This study highlights the variability in terms of dose and IQ. An optimization process can be started individually and lead to a harmonization of practice throughout multiple CT sites.

Proposed DRLs for mammography in Switzerland.

The aim of this study is to propose diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) values for mammography in Switzerland. For the data collection, a survey was conducted among a sufficient number of centres, including five University hospitals, several cantonal hospitals, and large private clinics, covering all linguistic regions of Switzerland to be representative of the clinical practice. The data gathered contained the mean glandular dose (MGD), the compressed breast thickness (CBT), the mammography model and the examination parameters for each acquisition. The data collected was sorted into the following categories: 2D or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) examination, craniocaudal (CC) or mediolateral oblique (MLO) projection, and eight categories of CBT ranging from 20 mm to 100 mm in 10 mm intervals. A total of 24 762 acquisitions were gathered in 31 centres on 36 mammography units from six manufacturers. The analysis showed that the data reflects the practice in Switzerland. The results revealed that the MGD is larger for DBT than for 2D acquisitions for the same CBT. From 20-30 mm to 90-100 mm of CBT, the 75th percentile of the MGD values obtained increased from 0.81 mGy to 2.55 mGy for 2D CC acquisitions, from 0.83 mGy to 2.96 mGy for 2D MLO acquisitions, from 1.22 mGy to 3.66 mGy for DBT CC acquisitions and from 1.33 mGy to 4.04 mGy for DBT MLO acquisitions. The results of the survey allow us to propose Swiss DRLs for mammography according to the examination type (2D/DBT), projection (CC/MLO) and CBT. The proposed values are very satisfactory in comparison with other studies.

Enhancing Nuclear Medicine Practice in Saudi Arabia: Advocating for Comprehensive Guidelines and Local Diagnostic Reference Levels.

INTRODUCTION:  Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) were initially introduced by the International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP). It refers to the measured quantity of administered activity (MBq) in nuclear medicine imaging studies and is a type of investigation level. DRL is recommended to prevent excessive radiation exposure to patients while maintaining adequate image quality. It should not be implemented as a dose constraint or dose limit. The Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) is the primary government body responsible for reporting national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) for diagnostic medical imaging technologies in Saudi Arabia. Only NDRLs for computed tomography, general X-ray, and mammography have been published and enforced locally. This study aims to establish local DRLs for nuclear medicine imaging procedures at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Saudi Arabia, preparing for compliance proof once required by local authorities. METHOD:  Data were collected from all machines, and six common protocols were studied, with data from 50 patients of standard body size for each identified protocol. The study was conducted retrospectively, and the 50th percentile was then calculated for each scan. RESULTS: Both protocols for renal scans administered the lowest doses to patients (130 MBq and 148 MBq), respectively. The highest dose administered to patients was found to be in bone scans (1110 MBq). CONCLUSION: The study establishes local DRLs for nuclear medicine imaging in our institution. Median activity dosages in renal, thyroid, and parathyroid imaging were comparable to locally and internationally published DRLs. However, they are higher in cardiac and bone imaging compared to local Saudi DRL and DRL in the European Union and the USA, likely due to the adopted protocols. These highlight the need for modifying the protocols to fulfill optimization efforts. These findings serve as a foundation for compliance with future regulatory requirements, ensuring patient safety and maintaining imaging quality in Saudi healthcare.

Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Adult Computed Tomography Urography Exams.

A Computed Tomography Urography (CTU) scan is a medical imaging test that examines the urinary tract, including the bladder, kidneys, and ureters. It helps diagnose various urinary tract diseases with precision. However, patients undergoing CTU imaging receive a relatively high dose of radiation, which can be a concern. In our research paper, we analyzed the Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDIvol) and Dose-Length Product (DLP) for 203 adult patients who underwent CTU at one of the most important regional centers in Bosnia and Herzegovina that sees a large number of patients. Our study included the distribution of age and sex, the number of phases within one examination, and different clinical indications. We compared our findings with the results available in the scientific literature, particularly the recently published results from 20 European countries. Furthermore, we established the local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) that can help set the national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs). We believe our research is a significant step towards optimizing the protocols used in different hospitals in our country.

Towards the establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for abdomen, KUB, and lumbar spine x-ray examinations in Sri Lanka: a multi-centric study.

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable doses (ADs) provide guidance to optimise radiation doses for patients undergoing medical imaging procedures. This multi-centre study aimed to compare institutional DRLs (IDRLs) across hospitals, propose ADs and multi-centric DRLs (MCDRLs) for four common x-ray examinations in Sri Lanka, and assess the potential for dose reduction. A prospective cross-sectional study of 894 adult patients referred for abdomen anteroposterior (AP), kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) AP, lumbar spine AP, and lumbar spine lateral (LAT) x-ray examinations was conducted. Patient demographic information (age, sex, weight, BMI) and exposure parameters (tube voltage, tube current-exposure time product) were collected. Patient dose indicators were measured in terms of kerma-area product (PKA) using a PKAmeter. IDRLs, ADs, and MCDRLs were calculated following the International Commission on Radiological Protection guidelines, with ADs and MCDRLs defined as the 50th and 75th percentiles of the median PKAdistributions, respectively. IDRL ranges varied considerably across hospitals: 1.42-2.42 Gy cm2for abdomen AP, 1.51-2.86 Gy cm2for KUB AP, 0.83-1.65 Gy cm2for lumbar spine AP, and 1.76-4.10 Gy cm2for lumbar spine LAT. The proposed ADs were 1.82 Gy cm2(abdomen AP), 2.03 Gy cm2(KUB AP), 1.27 Gy cm2(lumbar spine AP), and 2.21 Gy cm2(lumbar spine LAT). MCDRLs were 2.24 Gy cm2(abdomen AP), 2.40 Gy cm2(KUB AP), 1.43 Gy cm2(lumbar spine AP), and 2.38 Gy cm2(lumbar spine LAT). Substantial intra- and inter-hospital variations in PKAwere observed for all four examinations. Although ADs and MCDRLs in Sri Lanka were comparable to those in the existing literature, the identified intra- and inter-hospital variations underscore the need for dose reduction without compromising diagnostic information. Hospitals with high IDRLs are recommended to review and optimise their practices. These MCDRLs serve as preliminary national DRLs, guiding dose optimisation efforts by medical professionals and policymakers.

Updating national diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography in Greece: Challenges on patient protection optimisation.

The escalating use of Computed Tomography (CT) imaging necessitates establishment and periodic revision of Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) to ensure patient protection optimization. This paper presents the outcomes of a national survey conducted from 2019 to 2022, focusing on revising DRLs for adult CT examinations. Dosimetric data from 127 scanners in 120 medical facilities, representing 25% of the country's CT scanners, were collected, emphasizing geographic distribution and technology representation. Τhe parameters used for DRLs were the CTDIvol and the DLP of a typical acquisition of the region of interest (scan DLP). In addition to the 7 CT examination for which the DRL values were revised, establishment of DRLs for neck, cervical spine, pelvic bones-hips, coronary artery calcium (Ca) score and cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) examinations was performed. Revised DRLs exhibited a 15 % average decrease in CTDIvol and a 7 % average decrease in scan DLP from the initial DRLs. This reduction of dosimetric values is relatively low compared to other national studies. The findings revealed wide variations in dosimetric values and scan lengths among scanners, emphasizing the need for standardization and optimization. Incorporation of advanced technologies like Iterative Reconstruction (IR) showcased potential for further dose reduction, yet challenges in uniform implementation persist. The study underscores the importance of ongoing optimisation efforts, particularly in the context of increased CT utilization and evolving technology. The revised DRLs have been officially adopted in Greece, emphasizing the commitment to safe and effective CT practices.