Exploring the mortality and cardiovascular outcomes with SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with T2DM at dialysis commencement: a health global federated network analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) have demonstrated associations with lowering cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the impact of SGLT-2is on individuals at dialysis commencement remains unclear. The aim of this real-world study is to study the association between SGLT-2is and outcomes in patients with T2DM at dialysis commencement. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of electronic health records (EHRs) of patients with T2DM from TriNetX Research Network database between January 1, 2012, and January 1, 2024. New-users using intention to treatment design was employed and propensity score matching was utilized to select the cohort. Clinical outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Safety outcomes using ICD-10 codes, ketoacidosis, urinary tract infection (UTI) or genital infection, dehydration, bone fracture, below-knee amputation, hypoglycemia, and achieving dialysis-free status at 90 days and 90-day readmission. RESULTS: Of 49,762 patients with T2DM who initiated dialysis for evaluation, a mere 1.57% of patients utilized SGLT-2is within 3 months after dialysis. 771 SGLT-2i users (age 63.3 ± 12.3 years, male 65.1%) were matched with 771 non-users (age 63.1 ± 12.9 years, male 65.8%). After a median follow-up of 2.0 (IQR 0.3-3.9) years, SGLT-2i users were associated with a lower risk of MACE (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] = 0.52, p value < 0.001), all-cause mortality (aHR = 0.49, p < 0.001). SGLT-2i users were more likely to become dialysis-free 90 days after the index date (aHR = 0.49, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of ketoacidosis, UTI or genital infection, hypoglycemia, dehydration, bone fractures, below-knee amputations, or 90-day readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated a lower incidence of all-cause mortality and MACE after long-term follow-up, along with a higher likelihood of achieving dialysis-free status at 90 days in SGLT-2i users. Importantly, they underscored the potential cardiovascular protection and safety of SGLT-2is use in T2DM patients at the onset of dialysis.

Timing and Modality of Kidney Replacement Therapy in Children and Adolescents.

Introduction: The choice and timing of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is influenced by clinical factors, laboratory features, feasibility issues, family preferences, and clinicians' attitudes. We analyzed the factors associated with KRT modality and timing in a multicenter, multinational prospective pediatric cohort study. Methods: A total of 695 pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) enrolled into the Cardiovascular Comorbidity in Children with CKD (4C) study at age 6 to 17 years with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 10 to 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were investigated. Competing risk regression was performed to identify factors associated with initiation of dialysis or preemptive transplantation (Tx), including primary renal diagnosis, demographics, anthropometrics, and laboratory parameters. Results: During the 8-year observation period, 342 patients (49%) started KRT. Of these, 200 patients started dialysis, whereas 142 patients underwent preemptive Tx. A lower eGFR at enrolment (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.78]), a steeper eGFR slope (HR: 0.90 [0.85-0.95], and a higher systolic blood pressure SD score (SDS) (HR: 2.07 [1.49-2.87]) increased the likelihood of KRT initiation. Patients with glomerulopathies were more likely to start dialysis than children with congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tracts (CAKUT) (HR: 3.81 [2.52-5.76]). Lower body mass index (BMI) SDS (HR: 0.73 [0.6-0.89]) and lower hemoglobin (HR: 0.8 [0.72-0.9]) were associated with higher likelihood of dialysis. A significant center effect was observed, accounting for 6.8% (dialysis) to 8.7% (preemptive Tx) of explained variation. Conclusion: The timing and choice of KRT in pediatric patients is influenced by the rate of kidney function loss, the underlying kidney disease, nutritional status, blood pressure, anemia and center-specific factors.

Serum calciprotein particle-to-phosphate ratio as a predictor of cardiovascular events in incident hemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have identified increased blood calciprotein particle (CPP) levels as risk factors for vascular calcification and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Although positively correlated with serum phosphate levels, serum CPP levels vary considerably among patients with similar serum phosphate levels. We investigated the capacity of the ratio of serum CPP levels to serum phosphate levels (CPP/Pi ratio) to predict cardiovascular events in incident hemodialysis patients compared to the serum calcification propensity test (T50). METHODS AND RESULTS: The association between the CPP/Pi ratio and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was investigated in 174 incident hemodialysis patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that the CPP/Pi ratio was independently associated with MACCE [hazard ratio 1.60, 95% confidence interval (1.15-2.23), p = 0.006] but serum T50 levels were not. CONCLUSIONS: The CPP/Pi ratio is a useful, novel biomarker for predicting the risk of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing incident hemodialysis.

The Impact of Frailty and Severe Cognitive Impairment on Survival Time and Time to Initiate Dialysis in Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Background and objectives Frailty and cognitive impairment significantly impact survival time and time to initiate dialysis in older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aims to evaluate the effects of frailty and cognitive impairment on these outcomes and determine the most effective assessment tool for predicting early dialysis initiation and short survival time. Materials and methods This prospective observational cohort study involved 240 patients aged ≥65 years with stage 4 or 5 CKD, recruited from a nephrology outpatient department (ambulatory care) between March 2020 and March 2021. Frailty was assessed using the Physical Frailty Phenotype (PFP), PRISMA-7, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and FRAIL scale. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The primary outcomes were time to initiate dialysis and survival time, with secondary outcomes including hospitalization rates, length of stay, and mortality after dialysis initiation. Results Frail patients only showed significantly shorter time to dialysis initiation when identified by the PFP and FRAIL scale (28.3 months for frail vs. 31.2 months for non-frail, p = 0.028; 26.9 months for frail vs. 30.9 months for non-frail, p = 0.038). The PFP, FRAIL, and CFS tools indicated significantly shorter survival times for frail patients compared to non-frail patients (26.8 months for frail vs. 30.6 months for non-frail, p = 0.003). Frailty is strongly correlated with severe cognitive impairment, as 45.5% of frail patients (according to the FRAIL scale) have dementia compared to 15.1% of non-frail patients (p<0.001). However, cognitive impairment did not significantly affect the time to dialysis initiation or survival time. Hospitalization rates and length of stay in the hospital were significantly higher only for frail patients identified by PRISMA-7, with a median hospital length of stay of 9.15 days for frail patients vs 6.37 days for non-frail patients (p = 0.044). Overall, 37.5% of the patients did not survive during the study follow-up, with frail patients having a higher mortality rate. Conclusion Frailty, mainly when assessed by PFP and FRAIL, is a significant predictor of early dialysis initiation and reduced survival time in older adults with advanced CKD. Cognitive impairment, while prevalent, did not independently predict these outcomes. Regular frailty screening should be incorporated into CKD management to tailor interventions and improve patient outcomes.

Exposure and outcomes of aortic valve change in patients initiating dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic valve calcification (AVC) are occasionally observed in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. However, their prevalence and factors associated with them in patients undergoing dialysis remain unknown. We aimed to elucidate the aortic valve status at the time of dialysis initiation and patient prognosis based on aortic valve status. METHODS: We analyzed 289 patients initiating dialysis (hemodialysis: peritoneal dialysis = 275:14) between 2016 and 2023. "AS and/or AVC" was detected using echocardiography. AS was defined as a maximum transaortic velocity > 2.0 m/s. Statistical analyses including multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression were used to assess the association between patient characteristics and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Aortic valve changes were observed in 121 (42%) patients, among which 33 (11%) met the AS criteria. The mean age of patients in the AS, AVC without AS, and control groups was 79.1 ± 8.9, 75.9 ± 9.2, and 68.3 ± 12.9, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression models showed that only age was associated with aortic valve changes (P < 0.001). Age and other important factor-adjusted multivariable Cox regression models showed that AS was an independent risk factor for death after dialysis initiation (hazard ratio (HR): 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06 - 3.59, P = 0.04). However, aortic valve changes ("AS and/or AVC") were not a risk factor for death (HR: 1.51, 95% CI 0.95 - 2.39, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: With the growing older population undergoing dialysis, aortic valve changes should be closely monitored. Particularly, AS is crucial because of its impact on patient prognosis.

Nutritional Status of Patients Starting on Peritoneal Dialysis: A Comparison Between Planned and Unplanned Dialysis Initiation.

OBJECTIVE: A suboptimal dialysis initiation with insufficient or no planning before urgent start of dialysis remains a common problem associated with increased morbimortality. Whether nutritional markers differ between patients starting peritoneal dialysis (PD) in unplanned and planned modes has not yet been explored. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether the nutritional status at the start of dialysis differed between patients with unplanned and planned PD initiation. METHODS: In this observational study comprising 47 adult patients starting PD (age 58 ± 15 years, 51% female), 29 patients had unplanned (starting dialysis up to 72 hours after peritoneal catheter implantation) and 18 planned (follow-up predialysis >90 days) dialysis initiation. Within 30 days of PD initiation, nutritional status was evaluated using anthropometric measurements, multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, appetite assessment, handgrip strength, laboratory markers, and the malnutrition-inflammation score. Physical activity and performance were also evaluated. RESULTS: Patients with an unplanned PD initiation had a higher frequency of diabetes, higher blood glucose, urea, and glycated hemoglobin levels, and lower hemoglobin and albumin levels. Furthermore, they had a lower calf circumference, slower gait speed, higher protein intake, and greater malnutrition-inflammation score, while their physical activity level and appetite did not differ. CONCLUSION: Patients with an unplanned PD had unfavorable clinical and nutritional markers compared with those with planned PD. These findings indicate that a lack of follow-up prior to dialysis initiation can influence the clinical and nutritional statuses of patients, reinforcing the importance of conservative treatment prior to dialysis initiation.

Evaluating shared decision making for dialysis initiation: A qualitative study on patient refusal of long-term dialysis in Taiwan.

RATIONALE: Previous studies have explored shared decision making (SDM) implementation to determine the renal replacement therapy modality; however, the SDM approach for dialysis initiation, especially when patients refuse physician suggestions for long-term dialysis, remains unclear. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore physicians' responses towards patients' refusal of long-term dialysis during the SDM process and the thinking processes of both physicians and patients regarding dialysis refusal. METHOD: We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 10 patients diagnosed with end-stage renal disease, each of whom refused long-term dialysis after physicians employed the SDM framework, and nine nephrologists at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, from March to May 2020. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated from Mandarin to English. They were then thematically analysed. RESULTS: Three main themes on dialysis initiation SDM implementation and the differences between physician and patient perceptions on patient treatment refusal were yielded. While the SDM approach for dialysis initiation developed by nephrologists in Taiwan respects patient decisions, physicians often actively persuade patients to undergo dialysis in case of treatment refusal. The motivation behind this approach is to promote the patient's best medical interests, particularly post-dialysis life quality, and to ensure a 'rational' medical decision is made. However, patients' perceptions of treatment refusal differ significantly from those of physicians, and their decision-making process is often iterative and based on comprehensive evaluation of immediate concerns beyond biomedical factors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the current physician-led SDM approach for dialysis initiation characterises active persuasion with physicians' perspectives predominating the clinical encounter. To improve SDM implementation, we propose that physicians should acknowledge and understand patients' reasoning for dialysis refusal and the distinction between objective health and subjective well-being during the decision-making process.

Rapid Initiation of Peritoneal Dialysis by Automated Peritoneal Dialysis or Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Introduction: It is still controversial whether automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) or hemodialysis (HD) is a more favorable choice for the rapid initiation of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Methods: A pilot randomized prospective controlled trial was carried out in Shanghai Ruijin Hospital. Sixty-seven patients who chose long-term PD treatment and needed unplanned dialysis were enrolled and randomized into HD-CAPD group (33 cases) or APD-CAPD group (34 cases) based on the dialysis modality during the transition period (within 14 days from the day PD catheter was implanted). Continuous ambulatory PD started after the transition period. The primary outcome was the decline rates of residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Secondary outcomes included the rates of mechanical complications, the rates of infectious complications, and complications of end-stage renal disease. Results: We found residual GFR decline was faster in HD-CAPD group than in APD-CAPD group (0.06 mL/min/w vs. 0.03 mL/min/w, p < 0.01). The incidences of mechanical complications were similar in APD-CAPD group comparing with HD-CAPD group, including hernia (2.9% vs. 3.0%, p = 1.00), catheter malposition (0.02 episodes/patient-months vs. 0.02 episodes/patient-months, p = 0.70), leakage (5.9% vs. 6.1%, p = 1.00), and omental wrap (0 episode vs. 3 episodes, p = 0.368). Though the 1-year overall infection rates were similar (0.03 episodes/patient-months vs. 0.05 episodes/patient-months, p = 0.10), APD-CAPD group had lower rate of bacteremia compared to HD-CAPD group (0 episodes/patient-months vs. 0.02 episodes/patient-months, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Both APD and HD could be used for patients who need to start dialysis in an unplanned manner. APD may have the advantage in protecting residual renal functions among these patients.

Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision Making in Vascular Access Selection: A Qualitative Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Collaborative approaches to vascular access selection are being increasingly encouraged to elicit patients' preferences and priorities where no unequivocally superior choice exists. We explored how patients, their caregivers, and clinicians integrate principles of shared decision making when engaging in vascular access discussions. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative description. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, their caregivers, and clinicians from outpatient hemodialysis programs in Alberta, Canada. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We used a thematic analysis approach to inductively code transcripts and generate themes to capture key concepts related to vascular access shared decision making across participant roles. RESULTS: 42 individuals (19 patients, 2 caregivers, 21 clinicians) participated in this study. Participants identified how access-related decisions follow a series of major decisions about kidney replacement therapy and care goals that influence vascular access preferences and choice. Vascular access shared decision making was strengthened through integration of vascular access selection with dialysis-related decisions and timely, tailored, and balanced exchange of information between patients and their care team. Participants described how opportunities to revisit the vascular access decision before and after dialysis initiation helped prepare patients for their access and encouraged ongoing alignment between patients' care priorities and treatment plans. Where shared decision making was undermined, hemodialysis via a catheter ensued as the most readily available vascular access option. LIMITATIONS: Our study was limited to patients and clinicians from hemodialysis care settings and included few caregiver participants. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that earlier, or upstream, decisions about kidney replacement therapies influence how and when vascular access decisions are made. Repeated vascular access discussions that are integrated with other higher-level decisions are needed to promote vascular access shared decision making and preparedness.

Workplace- and Residence-Associated Leptospirosis: A Case Report and Review of Current Literature.

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic infection most commonly occurring in tropical regions through contact with water or soil contaminated with animal urine. In New York, approximately one to three cases occur annually, the majority occurring through workplace exposure to animal reservoirs. In cases of the more severe presentation of leptospirosis, Weil's disease, it is important to identify the infection promptly to allow for early antibiotic initiation as well as early initiation of daily dialysis in cases in which it is necessary. We present a case of Weil's disease in a 64-year-old male with presumed exposure through his combined workplace and residential environment. The resolution of symptoms occurred through a combination of hemodialysis, doxycycline, and meropenem antibiotic treatment. We also discuss the barriers to diagnosis, including the non-specific presentation of leptospirosis, the limitation of access to testing centers, and the limitations to antibody testing within the first week of symptom presentation due to low antibody levels.

Dialysis Disequilibrium Syndrome: A Red Flag to Check Post Hemodialysis.

Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome (DDS) is a neurological disorder with varying severity which is primarily caused by the rapid removal of urea during hemodialysis, which was first described in the literature in 1962. Common risk factors are extreme age, high blood urea nitrogen, sudden change in dialysis regimen, presence of other conditions causing cerebral edema, preexisting neurological diseases, and increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier. Understanding these risk factors and preventing the syndrome is crucial as no specific treatment guideline has been established yet. In this case report, we are presenting a case with a conglomeration of clinical attributes suggesting DDS.

Social Deprivation Is Associated With Lower Access to Pre-emptive Kidney Transplantation and More Urgent-Start Dialysis in the Pediatric Population.

Introduction: Socioeconomic status (SES) is recognized as an important determinant of kidney health. We aimed to evaluate the association of social deprivation with different indicators at kidney replacement therapy (KRT) initiation in the French pediatric metropolitan population. Methods: All patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who started KRT before 20 years old in France between 2002 and 2015 were included. We investigated different indicators at KRT initiation, which are as follows: KRT modality (dialysis vs. pre-emptive transplantation), late referral to a nephrologist, and dialysis modality (hemodialysis [HD] vs. peritoneal dialysis [PD], urgent vs. planned start of dialysis, use of catheter vs. use of fistula for HD vascular access). An ecological index (European Deprivation Index [EDI]) was used as a proxy for social deprivation. Results: A total of 1115 patients were included (males 59%, median age at dialysis 14.4 years, glomerular/vascular diseases 36.8%). The most deprived group represented 38.7% of the patients, suggesting pediatric patients with ESKD come from a more socially deprived background. The most deprived group was more likely to initiate KRT with dialysis versus kidney transplantation. Among patients on HD, the odds of starting treatment in emergency with a catheter was >2-fold higher for the most deprived compared with the least deprived children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.35, 95% CI 1.16-4.78). Conclusion: Children from the most deprived area have lower access to pre-emptive transplantation, have lower access to PD, tend to be late referred to a nephrologist, and have more urgent initiation of HD with a catheter.

Study protocol and baseline characteristics of newly induced dialysis patients: a prospective multi-center cohort study with a biological sample bank, the Ibaraki Dialysis Initiation Cohort (iDIC) study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) face higher risks of life-threatening events including cardiovascular disease. Various risk factors are identified as agents influencing the life prognosis of ESKD patients. Herein, we evaluated the risk factors related to the outcomes of Japanese patients with dialysis induction. We present the study protocol, the patients' baseline characteristics, and their outcomes. METHODS: The Ibaraki Dialysis Initiation Cohort (iDIC) Study is a prospective multi-center cohort study in collaboration with 60 tertiary-care facilities in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. We collected baseline data from clinical records and analyzed blood and urine samples of these facilities' patients with diabetic nephropathy, hypertensive nephrosclerosis, and chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN). The study's primary outcome was the survival rate at 24 months after dialysis induction. We performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis for cumulative survival and a Cox proportional hazards analysis for all-cause mortality and hospitalization. RESULTS: We analyzed 636 patients' cases (424 males, 212 females, age 67.4 ± 13.1 yrs. [mean ± SD]). We compared the patients' baseline data with those of similar cohort studies. As the primary kidney disease, 327 cases (51.4%) were diagnosed as diabetic nephropathy, 101 (15.9%) as hypertensive nephrosclerosis, and 114 (17.9%) as CGN. The mean serum creatinine value was 9.1 ± 2.9 mg/dL. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 5.6 ± 1.8 mL/min/1.73m2. The cumulative survival rates at 6 months and 24 months after dialysis induction were 95.2 and 87.7%, respectively. The cumulative survival rate was significantly lower with increasing age. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that high age was significantly associated with all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding the clinical characteristics of these newly induced dialysis patients, the same trend as in other cohort studies was observed. Another study is underway to explore prognostic factors based on the iDIC Study's findings.

Shared Decision Making Among Older Adults With Advanced CKD.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) face difficult decisions about dialysis initiation. Although shared decision making (SDM) can help align patient preferences and values with treatment options, the extent to which older patients with CKD experience SDM remains unknown. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis of patient surveys examining decisional readiness, treatment options education, care partner support, and SDM. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 70 years or older from Boston, Chicago, San Diego, or Portland (Maine) with nondialysis advanced CKD. PREDICTORS: Decisional readiness factors, treatment options education, and care partner support. OUTCOMES: Primary: SDM measured by the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) instrument, with higher scores reflecting greater SDM. Exploratory: Factors associated with SDM. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We used multivariable linear regression models to examine the associations between SDM and predictors, controlling for demographic and health factors. RESULTS: Among 350 participants, mean age was 78 ± 6 years, 58% were male, 13% identified as Black, and 48% had diabetes. Mean SDM-Q-9 score was 52 ± 28. SDM item agreement ranged from 41% of participants agreeing that "my doctor and I selected a treatment option together" to 73% agreeing that "my doctor told me that there are different options for treating my medical condition." In multivariable analysis adjusted for demographic characteristics, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and diabetes, being "well informed" and "very well informed" about kidney treatment options, having higher decisional certainty, and attendance at a kidney treatment options class were independently associated with higher SDM-Q-9 scores. LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional study design limits the ability to make temporal associations between SDM and the predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Many older patients with CKD do not experience SDM when making dialysis decisions, emphasizing the need for greater access to and delivery of education for individuals with advanced CKD.

Effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on the incidence of unplanned dialysis.

Unplanned dialysis initiation is associated with poor outcomes. It is controversial whether patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) should receive renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of RAS inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced CKD on the incidence of unplanned dialysis initiation. This single-center, retrospective study included patients who started maintenance dialysis at our hospital between April 2014 and March 2021. Patients who initiated dialysis within 6 months of nephrology referral or after kidney transplant were excluded. Among 334 patients (aged 70.0 [59.0-79.0] years; 28.4% women), 186 (55.7%) and 148 (44.3%) had planned and unplanned dialysis initiation, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of RAS inhibitors was significantly associated with a lower incidence of unplanned dialysis initiation (odds ratio [OR], 0.36; P < 0.01). Female sex (OR, 0.41; P < 0.05), use of potassium binders (OR, 0.28; P < 0.001), earlier referral to nephrology (OR, 0.39; P < 0.01), and earlier discussion of renal replacement therapy (OR, 0.33; P < 0.001) were also significantly associated with a lower incidence, whereas older age (OR, 1.28; P < 0.05), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR, 1.24; P < 0.05), and faster decline in kidney function (OR, 1.29; P < 0.01) were associated with a higher risk of unplanned dialysis initiation. RAS inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced CKD is associated with a lower risk of unplanned dialysis initiation.

Caregiver perspectives of dialysis initiation for children with kidney disease: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: To better support family-centered care surrounding dialysis initiation, greater understanding of caregiver experience is necessary. METHODS: Using thematic analysis, we conducted a secondary analysis of semi-structured interview data from a qualitative study of caregivers of children receiving dialysis recruited from 3 pediatric centers. Prominent themes in caregiver experience of caring for a child initiating dialysis were identified. RESULTS: Thirty-five caregivers participated. Three major themes emerged from qualitative analysis: (1) parenting disrupted - caregivers experienced an acute disruption in their parenting role due to the unexpected, emergent circumstances and vast information accompanying their child's diagnosis; (2) redefining parenting - caregivers sought to reestablish their innate parental role and foster their evolving medical provider role through reassurance that their child could survive, communication with the medical team, and engaging in care plan development; and (3) leveraging dual identities - to positively impact their child's experience and enable flourishing, caregivers leveraged their established caregiver role and newly realized medical provider role through voicing their perspectives, watching over their child's care, and preparing for future changes in their child's health. If caregivers' evolution was not nurtured and enabled, acute fluctuations in their child's care could contribute to future disruption and need to restore their parental role. However, if caregiver development was fostered, caregivers acquired increased ability to prepare for vacillations in their child's care. CONCLUSIONS: Improving delivery of family-centered care and support of caregivers at dialysis initiation will require directed efforts by nephrology care teams to foster caregiver evolution and resilience and respond to the family's changing experience of kidney disease. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Predicting 3-month and 1-year mortality for patients initiating dialysis: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the continual improvements in dialysis treatments, mortality in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) remains high. Many mortality prediction models are available, but most of them are not precise enough to be used in the clinical practice. We aimed to develop and validate two prediction models for 3-month and 1-year patient mortality after dialysis initiation in our population. METHODS: Using population-based data of insurance claims in Taiwan, we included more than 210,000 patients who initiated dialysis between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2015. We developed two prognostic models, which included 9 and 11 variables, respectively (including age, sex, myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, chronic pulmonary disease, peptic ulcer disease, malignancy, moderate to severe liver disease, and first dialysis in intensive care unit). RESULTS: The models showed adequate discrimination (C-statistics were 0.80 and 0.82 for 3-month and 1-year mortality, respectively) and good calibration. In both our models, the first dialysis in the intensive care unit and moderate-to-severe liver disease were the strongest risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSION: The prediction models developed in our population had good predictive ability for short-term mortality in patients initiating dialysis in Taiwan and could help in decision-making regarding dialysis initiation, at least in our setting, supporting a patient-centered approach to care.

Initiation of dialysis for kidney graft failure: A retrospective single-center cohort study.

Few studies have focused on the outcome of dialysis for kidney graft failure. We investigated the outcomes of dialysis for graft failure. We retrospectively studied 52 patients undergoing dialysis for graft failure at our facility from January 2004 to December 2018. The mean age at initiation of dialysis was 51.8 ± 13.5 years. The patient survival rates after initiation of dialysis at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96.0%, 93.8%, and 82.4%, respectively. The rate of unplanned initiation was 44.2%. In multivariate logistic analysis, lack of follow-up by nephrologists and pre-emptive kidney transplantation (PEKT) tended to be risk factors for unplanned initiation (P = 0.065 and P = 0.014, respectively). Our study suggests that the prognosis of patients with dialysis for graft failure is acceptable. Dialysis for graft failure, especially in patients with PEKT, tends to be unplanned, and for safe initiation, early involvement of nephrologists may be necessary.

A massive natural disaster, the Great East Japan Earthquake, and the incidence of dialysis due to end-stage kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Disaster-related stress can increase blood pressure and the incidence of cardiovascular diseases. However, the role of massive disasters in the development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) remains unknown. We investigated the incidence and different causes of dialysis initiation in patients with chronic kidney disease in a city affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective observational study. All patients who initiated or were treated with dialysis at Kesennuma City Hospital between 2007 and 2020 were enrolled. The year of dialysis initiation was retrospectively determined based on the initiation date. The causative renal diseases that led to the need for dialysis initiation were divided into four groups: diabetic nephropathy, hypertensive renal disease, glomerulonephritis, and others. RESULTS: Age at dialysis initiation differed significantly among the four groups (p = 0.0262). There was a significant difference in the numbers of the four groups before and after the Great East Japan Earthquake (p = 0.0193). The age of hypertensive renal disease patients was significantly higher than those of patients with diabetic nephropathy (p = 0.0070) and glomerulonephritis (p = 0.0386) after the disaster. The increasing number of dialysis initiations after the Great East Japan Earthquake appeared to be associated with changes in hypertensive renal diseases; the number peaked after 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: There was an increase in the number of dialysis initiations, especially caused by hypertensive renal diseases, for up to 10 years after the Great East Japan Earthquake.

Recovery From Dialysis-Treated Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Population-Based Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The decision to initiate kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis remains controversial because it is unclear which patients will benefit. We sought to characterize factors associated with recovery from KRT-treated AKI in patients with cirrhosis to inform shared clinical decision-making. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients from Ontario, Canada, identified using administrative data to have cirrhosis at the time of hospital admission with AKI (based on serum creatinine level) who were treated with KRT (January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2016) and followed up until the end of 2017. EXPOSURES: Demographic characteristics and comorbidities before admission. OUTCOMES: Kidney recovery defined as the absence of KRT for at least 30 days. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: The cumulative incidences of kidney recovery, death, and liver transplant were calculated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and independent predictors of kidney recovery were evaluated using Fine and Gray competing risk regression models that generated subdistribution hazards ratios (sHRs). RESULTS: Overall, 722 patients were included (median age, 61 [interquartile range, 54-68] years; Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-Na score, 26 [interquartile range, 22-34]; 66% were male; 52% had viral hepatitis, 25% nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, 18% alcohol-associated liver disease). The cumulative incidences of kidney recovery at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 3%, 22%, 25%, and 26%, respectively. Higher MELD-Na score (sHR per 5 units greater, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.65-0.80]), acute-on-chronic liver failure (sHR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43-0.86]), and sepsis (sHR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.41-0.81]) were associated with a lower hazard of kidney recovery, whereas those on a liver transplant waitlist (sHR, 3.10 [95% CI, 1.96-4.88]) and who were admitted to a teaching hospital (sHR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.05-2.08]) were more likely to experience kidney recovery. LIMITATIONS: Observational design, AKI etiology not identified. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney recovery from KRT occurred in only one quarter of patients and was very unlikely after 3 months. These findings provide information regarding prognosis that may guide decisions regarding KRT initiation and continuation.