Multiple sclerosis treatments a review of current biomedical engineering approaches.

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune condition targeting the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by focal demyelination with inflammation, causing neurodegeneration and gliosis. This is accompanied by a refractory period in relapsing MS or chronic progression in primary progressive MS. Current MS treatments target disease relapses and aim to reduce further demyelination and disability. These include the treatment of acute exacerbations through global immunomodulation upon corticosteroid administration, which are accompanied by adverse reactions. Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) which provide targeted immunosuppression of T and B cells, and sequestration of leukocytes out of CNS, have led to further improvements in demyelination prevention and disease burden reduction. Despite their efficacy, DMTs are ineffective in remyelination, pathology reversal and have minimal effects in progressive MS. The advent of modern biomedical engineering approaches in combination with a better understanding of MS pathology, has led to the development of novel, regenerative approaches to treatment. Such treatments utilize neural stem cells (NSCs) and can reduce disease relapses and reverse damage caused by the disease through localized tissue regeneration. While at initial stages, pre-clinical and clinical studies utilizing NSCs and immune modulation have shown promising outcomes in tissue regeneration, creating a potential new era in MS therapy.

Long-term analysis of infections and associated risk factors in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab: pooled analysis of 13 interventional clinical trials.

Background: Patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) have an increased risk of infections. Objectives: To characterize incidence, clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors of infections, and serious infections (SIs) in ocrelizumab (OCR)-treated PwMS. Design: Post-hoc analysis of pooled data from 6155 patients in 13 clinical trials. Methods: Descriptive analyses of clinical characteristics and outcomes were reported over ⩽14 years. A Poisson Generalized Estimating Equation model was constructed to examine risk factors in a subgroup of patients with longer exposure to OCR (n = 2092). Results: Over a median (max) treatment period of 3.7 (13.9) years, 420/6155 patients (6.8%) experienced 583 SIs, excluding coronavirus disease 2019. Incidence rates in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS; 1.50 per 100 patient years [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.68]) and progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS; 3.70 [95% CI: 3.27-4.17]) remained stable over this period. Lower respiratory tract, urinary tract, abdominal and gastrointestinal, and skin infections were the most commonly reported SIs. Most SIs (~90%) resolved, and treatment with OCR was continued in >80% of cases. The presence of 1 or ⩾2 comorbidities (rate ratio = 1.66, 2.73, respectively), recent relapse activity (2.06), and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ⩾6.0 (2.02) were significant risk factors for SIs in patients with RMS treated over a median (max) period of 8.3 (11.2) years. In patients with primary PMS treated over a median (max) period of 7.1 (11.8) years, an EDSS score ⩾6.0 was associated with the greatest risk of SIs, a 4-fold increase (rate ratio, 4.31), followed by abnormal immunoglobulin (Ig)M levels (1.89), the presence of ⩾2 comorbidities (1.80), and having overweight/obesity (1.46). Time on OCR and abnormal IgG levels were not significantly associated with an increased SI risk. Conclusion: Continuous long-term treatment with OCR is associated with a manageable infection risk profile. Optimal disease control and addressing modifiable risk factors may reduce the risk of infections.

Is continued treatment with ocrelizumab associated with a higher risk of infections and serious infections in patients with multiple sclerosis? Patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) are at an increased risk of infections compared with the general population. Infections are also among the most frequently reported side effect in PwMS treated with ocrelizumab. Initial analyses have shown that serious infection (SI) rates in PwMS treated with ocrelizumab were stable over 6 years, but there is concern that this rate may increase with continued treatment. This study aimed to describe infections and SIs in PwMS treated with ocrelizumab and look into factors that increase patients' susceptibility to infections. We analyzed the largest population of PwMS ever treated with ocrelizumab, including 6155 patients from 13 clinical trials. Some of these patients received ocrelizumab for as long as 14 years. Approximately 7 out of every 100 patients experienced SIs, excluding COVID-19 infections, with no increase in yearly rates of SIs over time. Pneumonia and urinary tract infections were the most common SIs. Almost all patients recovered from their infections (>9 out of 10 cases), and continued treatment with ocrelizumab (>8 out of 10 cases). When looking at factors that made PwMS more prone to SIs, we found that patients with relapsing MS had an increased risk if they had experienced recent MS relapses, severe walking difficulties, or other health conditions like diabetes and bladder problems. Patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) with severe walking difficulties were four times more likely to have SIs. Having other health conditions like heart or bladder problems, low levels of immunoglobulin M, or excess weight also increased the risk of SIs in patients with PPMS. In conclusion, continued treatment with ocrelizumab did not increase the risk of SIs, and most of those infections resolved without stopping ocrelizumab treatment. Addressing certain health conditions and achieving a good control of the MS disease may help to reduce the risk of SIs.

TNF-α inhibitors for type 1 diabetes: exploring the path to a pivotal clinical trial.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of insulin-producing ß-cells in the pancreas. This destruction leads to chronic hyperglycemia, necessitating lifelong insulin therapy to manage blood glucose levels. Typically diagnosed in children and young adults, T1D can, however, occur at any age. Ongoing research aims to uncover the precise mechanisms underlying T1D and to develop potential interventions. These include efforts to modulate the immune system, regenerate ß-cells, and create advanced insulin delivery systems. Emerging therapies, such as closed-loop insulin pumps, stem cell-derived ß-cell replacement and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), offer hope for improving the quality of life for individuals with T1D and potentially moving towards a cure. Currently, there are no disease-modifying therapies approved for stage 3 T1D. Preserving ß-cell function in stage 3 T1D is associated with better clinical outcomes, including lower HbA1c and decreased risk of hypoglycemia, neuropathy, and retinopathy. Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy at preserving ß-cell function by measurement of C-peptide in two clinical trials in people with stage 3 T1D. However, TNF-α inhibitors have yet to be evaluated in a pivotal trial for T1D. To address the promising clinical findings of TNF-α inhibitors in T1D, Breakthrough T1D convened a panel of key opinion leaders (KOLs) in the field. The workshop aimed to outline an optimal clinical path for moving TNF-α inhibitors to a pivotal clinical trial in T1D. Here, we summarize the evidence for the beneficial use of TNF-α inhibitors in T1D and considerations for strategies collectively identified to advance TNF-α inhibitors beyond phase 2 clinical studies for stage 3 T1D.

Therapy concepts in type 1 diabetes mellitus treatment: disease modifying versus curative approaches.

For many autoimmune diseases, including type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), efforts have been made to modify the disease process through pharmacotherapy. The ultimate goal must be to develop therapies with curative potential by achieving an organ without signs of parenchymal cell destruction and without signs of immune cell infiltration. In the case of the pancreas, this means regenerated and well-preserved beta cells in the islets without activated infiltrating immune cells. Recent research has opened up the prospect of successful antibody combination therapy for autoimmune diabetes with curative potential. This goal cannot be achieved with monotherapies. The requirements for the implementation of such a therapy with curative potential for the benefit of patients with T1DM and LADA (latent autoimmune diabetes in adults) are considered.

Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in Therapeutic Clinical Trials in Alzheimer's Disease: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research.

The integration of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has revolutionized the landscape of Alzheimer's disease (AD) research and therapeutic interventions. By combining structural and functional imaging, PET/CT provides a comprehensive understanding of disease pathology and response to treatment assessment. PET/CT, particularly with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG), facilitates the visualization of glucose metabolism in the brain, enabling early diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of neurodegenerative disease progression. The advent of amyloid and tau PET imaging has further propelled the field forward, offering invaluable tools for tracking pathological hallmarks, assessing treatment response, and predicting clinical outcomes. While some therapeutic interventions targeting amyloid plaque load showed promising results with the reduction of cerebral amyloid accumulation over time, others failed to demonstrate a significant impact of anti-amyloid agents for reducing the amyloid plaques burden in AD brains. Tau PET imaging has conversely fueled the advent of disease-modifying therapeutic strategies in AD by supporting the assessment of neurofibrillary tangles of tau pathology deposition over time. Looking ahead, PET imaging holds immense promise for studying additional targets such as neuroinflammation, cholinergic deficit, and synaptic dysfunction. Advances in radiotracer development, dedicated brain PET/CT scanners, and Artificial Intelligence-powered software are poised to enhance the quality, sensitivity, and diagnostic power of molecular neuroimaging. Consequently, PET/CT remains at the forefront of AD research, offering unparalleled opportunities for unravelling the complexities of the disease and advancing therapeutic interventions, although it is not yet enough alone to allow patients' recruitment in therapeutic clinical trials.

Risk of cancer development associated with disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies.

BACKGROUND: The association between cancer and multiple sclerosis has long been investigated. Several studies and reviews have examined the risk of cancer among patients with multiple sclerosis treated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) but with conflicting results. This study will aim to investigate the association between DMTs for multiple sclerosis and subsequent cancer risk using research synthesis methods. METHODS/DESIGN: We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. We will include randomised and non-randomised trials, prospective or retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies of treatment with DMTs compared with placebo, no treatment, or another active agent. The primary outcome will be the risk of cancer (all-malignant neoplasms) in association with the exposure of DMTs. Secondary outcomes will include site-specific cancers (e.g. breast cancer). Literature searches will be conducted in multiple electronic databases (from their inception onwards), including the following: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Two researchers will screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data independently. The risk of bias (quality) of individual studies will be appraised using an appropriate tool. If feasible, we will use a two-stage approach to evidence synthesis: (1) Peto's method for meta-analysis of data from randomised trials alone; and (2) Random-effects model for meta-analysis adding data from non-randomised studies. We will calculate odds ratios and their associated 95% confidence intervals. Potential sources of heterogeneity will be explored in additional analyses (e.g. subgroups considering different DMTs individually, mechanism of action, type of control, length of follow-up, mode of treatment). DISCUSSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies will provide an updated synthesis of the risk of cancer associated with DMTs for adult patients with multiple sclerosis. This study will also examine some factors that may explain potential variations across studies. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/v4sez ).

Insights into the use of biomarkers in clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease.

Biomarkers have been instrumental in population selection and disease monitoring in clinical trials of recently FDA-approved drugs targeting amyloid-ß to slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). As new therapeutic strategies and biomarker techniques emerge, the importance of biomarkers in drug development is growing exponentially. In this emerging landscape, biomarkers are expected to serve a wide range of contexts of use in clinical trials focusing on AD and related dementias. The joint FDA-NIH BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) framework provides standardised terminology to facilitate communication among stakeholders in this increasingly complex field. This review explores various applications of biomarkers relevant to AD clinical trials, using the BEST resource as a reference. For simplicity, we predominantly provide contextual characterizations of biomarkers use from the perspective of drugs targeting amyloid-ß and tau proteins. However, general definitions and concepts can be extrapolated to other targets.

Agreement of Medication Information Derived From EHR Data Compared to Medicare Insurance Claims: An Analysis of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs.

PURPOSE: Few studies have reported the agreement between medication information derived from ambulatory EHR data compared to administrative claims for high-cost specialty drugs. We used data from a national EHR-enabled registry, the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE), with linked Medicare claims in a population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to investigate variations in agreement for different biologic disease-modifying agents (bDMARDs) between two data sources (RISE EHR data vs. Medicare claims), categorized by drug, route of administration, and patient insurance factors (dual eligibility). METHODS: Patients ≥ 65 years old, with ≥ 2 visits in RISE with RA ICD codes ≥ 30 days apart, and continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts B and D in 2017-2018 were included. We classified patients as bDMARD users or nonusers in Medicare claims or EHR data in 2018, and we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV), and negative predicted value (NPV) of EHR data for identifying bDMARD users, using Medicare as the reference standard. We also calculated these metrics after stratifying by clinic-administered (Part B) versus. pharmacy-dispensed (Part D) bDMARDs and by patient dual-eligibility. RESULTS: A total of 26 097 patients were included in the study. Using Medicare claims as the reference standard, EHR data had a sensitivity of 75.0%-90.8% for identifying patients with the same medication and route. PPV for Part B bDMARDs was higher compared with Part D bDMARDs (range 94.3%-97.3% vs. 51.0%-69.6%). We observed higher PPVs for Part D bDMARDs among patients who were dual-eligible (range 82.4%-95.1%). CONCLUSION: The risk of misclassification of drug exposure based on EHR data sources alone is small for Medicare Part B bDMARDs but could be as high as 50% for Part D bDMARDs, in particular for patients who are not dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.

Brain volume loss in relapsing multiple sclerosis: indirect treatment comparisons of available disease-modifying therapies.

BACKGROUND: Brain volume loss (BVL) has been identified as a predictor of disability progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). As many available disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) have shown an effect on slowing BVL, this is becoming an emerging clinical endpoint in RMS clinical trials. METHODS: In this study, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify BVL results from randomized controlled trials of DMTs in RMS. Indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) were conducted to estimate the relative efficacy of DMTs on BVL using two approaches: a model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) with adjustment for measurement timepoint and DMT dosage, and a network meta-analysis (NMA). RESULTS: In the MBMA, DMTs associated with significantly reduced BVL versus placebo at two years included fingolimod (mean difference [MD] = 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15 - 0.36), ozanimod (MD = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.12 - 0.41), teriflunomide (MD = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.20 - 0.55), alemtuzumab (MD = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.10 - 0.67) and ponesimod (MD = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.48 - 0.95), whereas interferons and natalizumab performed the most poorly. The results of NMA analysis were generally comparable with those of the MBMA. CONCLUSIONS: Limitations of these analyses included the potential for confounding due to pseudoatrophy, and a lack of long-term clinical data for BVL. Our findings suggest that important differences in BVL may exist between DMTs. Continued investigation of BVL in studies of RMS is important to complement traditional disability endpoints, and to foster a better understanding of the mechanisms by which DMTs can slow BVL.

Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Dementia Prevention: A Systematic Review of Observational Evidence in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Many observational studies have examined the association of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with dementia risk, but the evidence has been mixed, possibly due to methodological reasons. This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023432122) aims to assess existing observational evidence and to suggest if repurposing DMARDs for dementia prevention merits further investigation. METHODS: Four electronic databases up to October 26, 2023, were searched. Cohort or case-control studies that examined dementia risk associated with DMARDs in people with rheumatoid arthritis were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) criteria. Findings were summarized by individual drug classes and by risk of bias. RESULTS: Of 12,180 unique records, 14 studies (4 case-control studies, 10 cohort studies) were included. According to the ROBINS-I criteria, there were 2 studies with low risk of bias, 1 study with moderate risk, and 11 studies with serious or critical risk. Among studies with low risk of bias, one study suggested that hydroxychloroquine versus methotrexate was associated with lower incident dementia, and the other study showed no associations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, tocilizumab, and tofacitinib, compared to abatacept, with incident dementia. CONCLUSION: Studies that adequately addressed important biases were limited. Studies with low risk of bias did not support repurposing TNF inhibitors, tocilizumab, abatacept or tofacitinib for dementia prevention, but hydroxychloroquine may be a potential candidate. Further studies that carefully mitigate important sources of biases are warranted, and long-term evidence will be preferred.

Recommendations for clinical implementation of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.

Blood-based biomarkers (BBM) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are being increasingly used in clinical practice to support an AD diagnosis. In contrast to traditional diagnostic modalities, such as amyloid positron emission tomography and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, BBMs offer a more accessible and lower cost alternative for AD biomarker testing. Their unique scalability addresses the anticipated surge in demand for biomarker testing with the emergence of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) that require confirmation of amyloid pathology. To facilitate the uptake of BBMs in clinical practice, The Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease convened a BBM Workgroup to provide recommendations for two clinical implementational pathways for BBMs: one for current use for triaging and another for future use to confirm amyloid pathology. These pathways provide a standardized diagnostic approach with guidance on interpreting BBM test results. Integrating BBMs into clinical practice will simplify the diagnostic process and facilitate timely access to DMTs for eligible patients.

Considerations for widespread implementation of blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.

Diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses significant challenges to health care, often resulting in delayed or inadequate patient care. The clinical integration of blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) for AD holds promise in enabling early detection of pathology and timely intervention. However, several critical considerations, such as the lack of consistent guidelines for assessing cognition, limited understanding of BBM test characteristics, insufficient evidence on BBM performance across diverse populations, and the ethical management of test results, must be addressed for widespread clinical implementation of BBMs in the United States. The Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer's Disease BBM Workgroup convened to address these challenges and provide recommendations that underscore the importance of evidence-based guidelines, improved training for health-care professionals, patient empowerment through informed decision making, and the necessity of community-based studies to understand BBM performance in real-world populations. Multi-stakeholder engagement is essential to implement these recommendations and ensure credible guidance and education are accessible to all stakeholders.

The origins of ADNI.

A brief history of events surrounding the conceptualization and original implementation of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) as a public-private partnership (PPP) is provided from the perspective of three individuals directly involved from the outset. Potential barriers and how they were addressed are summarized, especially the decision to make all data freely accessible in real-time. Decisions made at the beginning of ADNI are revisited in light of what has been learned over the past 20 years, especially the importance of the investment in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood measures and the commitment to data sharing. The key elements of ADNI's success from the authors' perspective are also summarized. HIGHLIGHTS: Informal interactions among colleagues were the beginning of something big. An NIH Director's personal decision on open data sharing has had perhaps the greatest impact of any single decision in the past several decades in terms of advancing clinical biomarker research. After 20 years, blood-based biomarkers of brain disease may soon take the place of brain imaging for purposes of diagnosis and drug development.

Allergen Immunotherapy for the Prevention and Treatment of Asthma.

Allergic asthma is the predominant phenotype among asthmatics. Although conventional pharmacotherapy is a central component in the management of asthma, it does not enable control of asthma symptoms in all patients. In recent decades, some uncontrolled asthmatic patients, especially those with allergic asthma, have benefited from biological therapies. However, biologics do not address all the unmet needs left by conventional pharmacotherapy. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that neither conventional pharmacotherapy nor biological therapies have disease-modifying properties. In this context, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) represents an indispensable component of the therapeutic arsenal against allergic asthma, due to its disease-modifying immunological effects. In this review article, funded by an AIT manufacturer, we find clinical trials support AIT as the only treatment option able both to improve allergic asthma symptoms and to prevent the onset and worsening of the condition. For patients with severe asthma or other safety concerns, the combination of AIT and biologics offers very promising new treatment modalities for the management of allergic asthma. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06027073.

Public perceptions related to healthcare preparedness to anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer's Disease in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The approval of lecanemab, an anti-amyloid therapy for Alzheimer's disease (AD), necessitates addressing healthcare preparedness for disease-modifying treatment (DMT) to ensure appropriate, safe, and sustainable drug administration. Understanding public perceptions on this matter is crucial. We aimed to assess discrepancies and similarities in the perceptions of Japanese trial-ready cohort study ('J-TRC webstudy') participants and clinical specialists in the fields of dementia treatment and radiology, concerning affairs related to challenges in DMT preparedness. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional prospective observational study conducted in November-December 2023. The J-TRC webstudy participants were invited to participate in an online survey using Google Forms, and clinical specialists were invited to complete a mail-based survey. Main questionnaire items had been designed to be common in both surveys, and their responses were analyzed for participant attributes, interests, attitudes, expectations, and concerns about DMTs without specifying lecanemab. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from n = 2,050 J-TRC webstudy participants and n = 1,518 clinical specialists. Compared to specialists, more J-TRC respondents perceived the eligible proportion for DMT as smaller (59.1% versus 30.7%), perceived the eligible severity for DMT as more limited (58.0% versus 24.5%), and perceived the efficacy of DMT as slightly more encouraging (29.3% versus 34.8%). In terms of treatment prioritization, both J-TRC respondents and specialist respondents exhibited similar levels of acceptance for prioritizing patients to treat: e.g., approximately two-thirds endorsed patient prioritization under hypothetical resource constraints or other reasons. A medical rationale emerged as the most compelling reason for acceptance of patient prioritization across the surveys. In contrast, the need to address vulnerable populations was the reason that led to the least acceptance of prioritization, followed by economic considerations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings offer valuable insights into the discrepancies in knowledge and perception between patients and healthcare providers. This could enhance the delivery of patient information in clinical settings and inform the discussion surrounding patient prioritization strategies.

Progress in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease Is Needed - Position Statement of European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) Investigators.

ß-amyloid-targeting antibodies represent the first generation of effective causal treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and can be considered historical research milestones. Their effect sizes, side effects, implementation challenges and costs, however, have stimulated debates about their overall value. In this position statement academic clinicians of the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) discuss the critical relevance of introducing these new treatments in clinical care now. Given the complexity of AD it is unlikely that molecular single-target treatments will achieve substantially larger effects than those seen with current ß-amyloid-targeting antibodies. Larger effects will most likely only be achieved incrementally by continuous optimization of molecular approaches, patient selection and combinations therapies. To be successful in this regard, drug development must be informed by the use of innovative treatments in real world practice, because full understanding of all facets of novel treatments requires experience and data of real-world care beyond those of clinical trials. Regarding the antibodies under discussion we consider their effects meaningful and potential side effects manageable. We assume that the number of eventually treated patient will only be a fraction of all early AD patients due to narrow eligibility criteria and barriers of access. We strongly endorse the use of these new compound in clinical practice in selected patients with treatment documentation in registries. We understand this as a critical step in advancing the field of AD treatment, and in shaping the health care systems for the new area of molecular-targeted treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Medical Costs and Caregiver Burden of Delivering Disease-Modifying Alzheimer's Treatments with Different Duration and Route of Administration.

BACKGROUND: Multiple disease modifying treatment for Alzheimer's disease are currently in clinical development or have been recently approved for use. They have vastly different treatment properties but so far, little work has been done to quantify the impact of treatment properties on the treatment's value in terms of medical and social care costs and caregiver burden. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze how the mode of treatment administration, treatment frequency and duration, and monitoring requirements affect the value of disease modifying treatments. In order to isolate these effects, we compare five hypothetical disease modifying treatments with equal efficacy and safety: (1) chronic bi-weekly intravenous infusion, (2) chronic four-weekly intravenous infusion, (3) 52 weeks fixed duration four-weekly intravenous infusion, (4) chronic subcutaneous injections, and (5) chronic oral prescription on their direct medical costs, caregiver burden, and preservation of treatment value. DESIGN: Survey of Alzheimer's disease treatment clinics and retrospective data analysis. SETTING: United States. MEASUREMENTS: Direct medical cost and caregiver burden of treatment administration and monitoring compared to gross treatment benefit. RESULTS: Chronic bi-weekly infusion treatment had the highest direct medical cost ($45,208) and caregiver burden ($6,095), reducing the treatment value by 44%, while oral treatment with the lowest direct medical cost ($1,983) and caregiver burden ($457) reduced the treatment value by only 2%. Substantial caregiver burden was reported from the survey, with a reported average of 2.3 hours for an office visit and infusion, 44 minutes of round-trip travel time, and 78% of patients being accompanied by a caregiver for treatment. CONCLUSION: Burden of chronic intravenous treatments exceed the gross medical and social care cost savings and value of caregiver benefit. The results suggest the need for less complex treatments that require fewer clinic visits to preserve the economic value of disease modifying treatments.

Exploring the association of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis and BTK inhibitors with epilepsy.

Background: Multiple lines of evidence suggest a role of inflammation in epilepsy. Seizure incidence in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is twofold to threefold higher than the age-matched general population. Objectives: To explore the association of MS disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and FDA-approved Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (for lymphocytic malignancies) with the occurrence of epilepsy using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Design: Secondary analysis of the FAERS database. Methods: We conducted a disproportionality analysis of FAERS between 2003-Q4 and 2023-Q3. MS DMTs and the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, ibrutinib, were included in the analysis. An inverse association was defined by a 95% confidence interval (CI) upper limit of reporting odds ratio (ROR) <1. Results: We found an inverse association of ibrutinib, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab, and teriflunomide with epilepsy. The strongest inverse association was seen with ibrutinib (ROR: 0.338; 95% CI: 0.218-0.524). Conclusion: Our findings suggest the possibility of considering these medications for repurposing opportunities in epilepsy and support a potential pathogenic role of leukocyte subsets in seizure perpetuation.

How multiple sclerosis treatments and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be linked to epilepsy The research presented in this manuscript attempts to elucidate the potential relationship between inflammation and epilepsy. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common inflammatory disorder of the brain and spinal cord in humans. There are over 20 FDA-approved disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS. Other anti-inflammatory agents called Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are in clinical development. We show that the use of some DMTs and a BTK inhibitor appear to be associated with a lower chance of epilepsy.

COVID-19 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis: what you need to know - a review.

Background: The appearance of severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) initiated the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in millions of confirmed cases and numerous fatalities. In response, rapid vaccine development efforts were launched to mitigate the pandemic's impact. Despite the high efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, they are also associated with several common side effects/complications, some of them specific to the multiple sclerosis population. Our goal is to review various types of COVID-19 vaccines, assessing their efficacy, adverse events, their association with an MS relapse following vaccination, and the influence of disease modifying therapies (DMTs) on vaccines' efficacy. Methods: The review was based on a database search that included PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Web of Science conducted from January 2020 to July 2024 using the following MeSH terms: MS, COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine side effects, and vaccine hesitancy. Results: Receiving any type of COVID-19 vaccine is a safer and more reliable approach to building immunity compared to becoming infected with the virus. Complications tend to be mild to moderate, occasionally severe. DMTs could affect the humoral response to the COVID-19 vaccine. Among all DMTs, a notable reduction in the humoral response has been observed in patients who received anti-CD20 and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator drugs after their COVID-19 vaccination. Conclusion: Despite certain drawbacks, the benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine significantly outweigh the associated risks, making it a recommended course of action for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). However, physicians need to be mindful of potential complications especially in patients undergoing anti CD20 and manage them appropriately.

Iodine Deficiency as a Risk Factor for Postpartum Depressive Disorder in Women.

Nutritional support is considered as one of the components of disease-modifying therapy for postpartum depressive disorder. Such nutrients include iodine, which is an important trace element in the development and functioning of the central nervous system. The brief review presents updated knowledge about the relationship of iodine deficiency with the development and severity of postpartum depressive disorders in women, based on the analysis and generalization of the results of domestic and international studies.