Exceptional sustained long-term complete response to Tepotinib in a MET-amplified advanced intrahepatic biliary tract cancer failing Durvalumab plus Cisplatin and Gemcitabine.

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a diverse group of malignancies with varied genetic backgrounds. The prevalence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) is increasing, particularly in Western countries. Despite advancements in treatments, the prognosis for BTC remains poor. Recent molecular profiling has revealed that up to 40% of iCC cases have targetable genetic alterations. MET amplification, although rare, presents a significant target for therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old female with a history of ulcerative colitis presented with shoulder pain and a positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan revealed an enlarged liver and multiple metastases. Histopathological analysis diagnosed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. First-line therapy with Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Durvalumab resulted in disease progression. Molecular profiling identified a TP53 mutation and MET amplification. Based on these findings, Tepotinib was initiated. Tepotinib treatment led to a significant reduction in tumor size and normalization of CA 19-9 levels within 2 months, achieving a complete metabolic remission lasting up to 17 months. The treatment was well tolerated with minimal side effects. DISCUSSION: MET-amplified BTCs are exceedingly rare, and evidence for targeted treatment is limited. This case demonstrates the efficacy of Tepotinib in a young patient with MET-amplified iCC, showing a long-term response and suggesting a potential new standard treatment option for this molecularly defined entity. This case also highlights the aggressive nature of MET-amplified tumors and the need for targeted second-line therapies. CONCLUSION: Tepotinib showed remarkable efficacy in treating MET-amplified intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, underscoring the importance of molecular profiling in BTCs and suggesting a potential new therapeutic approach for this rare cancer subtype.

89Zr-Labeled DFO@Durvalumab-HSA nanoparticles: In vitro potential for triple-negative breast cancer.

This study presents the development and evaluation of a DFO@mAb-NP (DFO@Durvalumab-HSA-DTX nanoparticle) nanoplatform for imaging in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The nanoplatform demonstrated significant changes postconjugation with DFO, evidenced by increased particle size from 178.1 ± 5 nm to 311 ± 26 nm and zeta potential alteration from -31.9 ± 3 mV to -40.5 ± 0.8 mV. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and ultraviolet spectral analyses confirmed successful DFO conjugation, with notable shifts in peak wavelengths. High labeling efficiency was achieved with 89Zr, as indicated by thin layer radio chromatography and high-performance liquid radio chromatography results, with labeling efficiencies of 98 ± 2% for 89Zr-DFO@mAb and 96 ± 3% for 89Zr-DFO@mAb-NP. The nanoplatforms maintained stability over 24 h, showing less than 5% degradation. Lipophilicity assays revealed logP values of 0.5 ± 0.03 for 89Zr-DFO@mAb-NP and 0.98 ± 0.2 for 89Zr-DFO@mAb, indicating a higher lipophilic tendency in the radiolabeled Durvalumab. Cell uptake experiments showed an initial high uptake in MDA-MB-468 cells (45.1 ± 3.2%), which decreased over time, highlighting receptor-specific interactions. These comprehensive findings suggest the promising potential of the DFO@mAb-NP nanoplatform for targeted imaging in TNBC, with implications for improved diagnostic accuracy and treatment strategies.

Exploring the impact of durvalumab on biliary tract cancer: insights from real-world clinical data.

INTRODUCTION: This study assesses the effectiveness of durvalumab with platinum and gemcitabine for biliary tract cancers (BTC). It aims to confirm the TOPAZ-1 trial results in a real-world context and explore the link between BTC molecular profiles and patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 102 BTC patients treated with durvalumab, platinum, and gemcitabine at five cancer centers in Austria and one in Germany from 2022 to 2024. Molecular profiling used targeted DNA and RNA assays. Clinical endpoints, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were assessed using log-rank tests and Cox regression, with correlations to second-line molecular-targeted therapies. RESULTS: Among 102 patients, 60.8% had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The treatment achieved a disease control rate of 71.57% and an overall response rate of 35.11%. Median PFS was 6.51 months, and OS was 13.61 months. Patients under 65 had significantly better OS. Alterations in chromatin remodeling or homologous recombination repair genes were not predictive of survival benefit (HR: 0.45; p = 0.851 and HR: 1.63; p = 0.26, respectively). Patients with molecular-informed second-line therapy showed a trend toward survival benefit (HR: 0.23; p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the phase 3 trial results of durvalumab with platinum and gemcitabine, providing a substantial real-world dataset with detailed molecular characterization. No specific patient subgroup showed a markedly better response to durvalumab based on conventional NGS panels. Further research is needed to explore the link between immunotherapy responses and molecular subgroups.

Association Between the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Durvalumab and Myasthenia Gravis: A Comprehensive Review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including Imfinzi (durvalumab), have revolutionized cancer treatment by stimulating the body's immune system to target cancerous cells. Although pharmaceuticals offer therapeutic benefits, several drugs have been associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including the uncommon but serious condition known as myasthenia gravis (MG). This review synthesizes data from pertinent research to offer a thorough evaluation of the literature on the underlying mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and therapeutic approaches for durvalumab-induced MG. The incidence of MG in patients on durvalumab and other ICIs is typically low, with less than 1% documented, despite the potential for severe problems associated with the disease. Durvalumab disrupts immunological tolerance by stimulating autoreactive T-cells and inducing the production of autoantibodies. The clinical consequences of MG need meticulous monitoring, prompt identification, and suitable management to efficiently control the condition. Medical practitioners must carefully weigh the positive effects of ICIs against the possible hazards, emphasizing the necessity for more extensive investigation to improve patient results and establish uniform treatment protocols.

Case report: hypertrophic osteoarthropathy improves with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

We report a case of a 66 year-old male with recurrent stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no prior arthritis or bone disease who developed hypertrophic osteoarthropathy (HOA) prior to immunotherapy treatment. Approximately one month after the first durvalumab infusion and without other interventions for symptom management, the patient reported improvements to his hand pain, with complete resolution of symptoms after five durvalumab treatments. Repeat x-ray after nine cycles of durvalumab showed decreased periosteal thickening of the phalanges bilaterally. He had no evidence of recurrent NSCLC based on serial computed tomography one year after durvalumab initiation. To our knowledge, there are no documented reports on the isolated effect of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy on HOA. This case suggests that durvalumab may have a positive role in the management of HOA in NSCLC patients. Further research is needed to better understand the interaction of ICIs, HOA and other paraneoplastic syndromes.

Initial treatment efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice.

Background and Aims: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur + Tre) combination therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 37 patients with uHCC from our institutions between April 2023 and January 2024. Patients were divided into first- and later-line groups for analysis of antitumor efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and transition rate to second-line treatment according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Results: The disease control rate (DCR) for the first-line group was 80.9%, which was significantly higher than that for the later-line group (50%). The incidence of immune-related AEs (irAEs) was 24.3%, with grade 3 or higher irAEs including increased transaminase (8.1%), diarrhea (8.1%), and adrenal insufficiency (2.7%). The rates of drug withdrawal and discontinuation owing to AEs were 23.8% and 19%, respectively, in the first-line treatment and 31.2% and 12.5%, respectively, in the later-line treatment, with no significant difference. Analysis of changes in liver reserve using the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score showed no obvious loss of liver reserve for up to 12 weeks. The transition rate from first- to second-line therapy after progressive disease (PD) was as high as 94.7%. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of Dur + Tre in clinical practice were comparable to those reported in a recent phase III trial. The first-line Dur + Tre therapy had a higher DCR than that of the later lines, and the transition rate to second-line therapy was considerably high, suggesting that Dur + Tre therapy would be more beneficial in first-line treatment.

A phase II study of daily carboplatin plus irradiation followed by durvalumab therapy for older adults (≥75 years) with unresectable III non-small-cell lung cancer and performance status of 2: NEJ039A.

BACKGROUND: Standard care for unresectable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) involves chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab. The clinical significance of durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in patients with LA-NSCLC having a performance status of 2 or aged ≥75 years, however, remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the clinical benefit of durvalumab after daily carboplatin plus thoracic concurrent radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective phase II study, daily low-dose carboplatin (30 mg/m2) was administered before radiotherapy for the first 20 fractions and concurrent radiotherapy (60 Gy) followed by durvalumab. The primary endpoint was 12 months progression-free survival (PFS) rate from durvalumab initiation. The secondary endpoints included rate of therapeutic completion, PFS, overall survival, objective response rate, and safety. RESULTS: Of 86 patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy with daily carboplatin from September 2019 to October 2021, 61 (70.9%) received durvalumab consolidation. The performance status was 0, 1, and 2 in 28 (45.9%), 26 (42.6%), and 7 (11.5%) patients, respectively. The rate of therapeutic completion for durvalumab was 26.2% (16/61). The PFS rate of 12 months after durvalumab initiation was 51.0%, indicating that the primary endpoint was achieved because the expected value of 35% calculated from previous studies was exceeded. The objective response rate after chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab was 47.0% and 57.4%, respectively. The median PFS and overall survival were 12.3 and 28.1 months, respectively. The most common adverse event in grades 3 or 4 was pneumonitis (8.2%). One patient died because of interstitial pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab consolidation after daily carboplatin with radiotherapy was effective and tolerable for LA-NSCLC vulnerable patients.

Disseminate Cutaneous Vasculitis Associated with Durvalumab Treatment-Case Report, Mini-Review on Cutaneous Side Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies with Machine Learning Perspectives.

Durvalumab is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody that has efficacy in many advanced-stage cancers, especially in small-cell lung cancer. The efficacy of durvalumab can be enhanced by chemotherapy. Cutaneous side effects due to treatment with durvalumab are usually self-limiting and easily manageable. We present a clinical case of a female patient aged 61, with small-cell lung carcinoma in stage III B, cT3N2M, who developed a disseminated cutaneous vasculitis after seven months of durvalumab monotherapy, having previously been treated with polychemotherapy according to oncological protocols. To the best of our knowledge, based on a comprehensive search in leading databases, like Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and some others, ours is the first published case of disseminated cutaneous vasculitis as a result of Durvalumab treatment. Anticancer immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has transformed the treatment and evolution of patients with multiple varieties of hematologic cancers. In this context, the cutaneous side effects due to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies are very few in the scientific literature. Based on this need, we have performed a mini-review of cutaneous side effects due to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies that treat actual aspects in this sense. We also present some artificial intelligence challenges and future perspectives in the combination of human reasoning and reasoning based on Artificial Intelligence for study of the very rare Disseminate cutaneous vasculitis associated with Durvalumab treatment.

Durvalumab with etoposide and carboplatin for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease: A multicenter, open-label prospective trial.

OBJECTIVES: Certain guidelines recommend caution when administering immunotherapy in patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) owing to the high incidence of pneumonitis induced by anti-cancer therapy. A prospective clinical trial assessing the safety of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and pre-existing ILD is warranted. Therefore, this study evaluated the safety and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC and mild idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). METHODS: In this multicenter prospective trial, patients with ES-SCLC and pre-existing mild chronic fibrosing IIP were recruited. Mild IIP was defined as the exclusion of poor pulmonary function, a definite usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, and positivity for autoantibodies in blood tests. The patients received durvalumab, etoposide, and carboplatin every three weeks (induction phase), followed by 1,500 mg durvalumab every four weeks (maintenance phase). The primary endpoint was severe pneumonitis-free rate. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 13 patients displayed a probable UIP pattern, whereas eight patients exhibited an indeterminate for UIP pattern. Two patients (9.5 %) had pneumonitis of any grade during the induction phase; one had Grade 1 and the other had Grade 5 pneumonitis. No other patient developed pneumonitis during the maintenance phase. The severe pneumonitis-free rate was 95.2 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 77.3-99.2 %). The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95 % CI: 3.6-6.4 months). Median overall survival was 10.7 months (95 % CI: 6.0 months to not reached). CONCLUSIONS: Chemoimmunotherapy is a feasible treatment approach for patients with ES-SCLC and mild IIP.

An evaluation of durvalumab across the spectrum of urothelial carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Urothelial carcinoma is a common malignancy affecting the urinary system, with the spectrum of disease encompassing non-muscle invasive, muscle-invasive and metastatic disease. On a background of almost half a century of immunogenic management with BCG, various immune checkpoint inhibitors, including durvalumab, have now demonstrated clinical efficacy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the available literature on durvalumab in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma for all stages of the disease including mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety and covers a broad portfolio of reported and ongoing trials. EXPERT OPINION: The management of UC is rapidly evolving, which is reflected in the diverse range of upcoming pivotal trials incorporating durvalumab with additional immunomodulatory agents and therapeutics targeting key oncogenic pathways, each with the potential to change the standard of care. As the complexity of UC management increases, future efforts should be directed at identifying better predictive biomarkers and selecting rational synergistic combinations from the novel treatments available. This will allow the addressing of existing gaps, facilitate the exploitation of new techniques of treatment delivery and ultimately deliver more personalized and efficacious care to the individual patient.

PD-L1 as a Biomarker for the Efficacy of Durvalumab in Stage III EGFR Mutant NSCLC.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Durvalumab consolidation is less effective in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutant (EGFR M+) NSCLC. Studies of durvalumab on EGFR M+ NSCLC as an expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of durvalumab on PD-L1 expression in EGFR M+ patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 249 unresectable stage III NSCLC patients treated with durvalumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Cox multivariate analysis was performed based on EGFR and PD-L1 statuses: EGFR M-, PD-L1 ≥50% (cohort A); EGFR M-, PD-L1 <50% (cohort B); EGFR M+, PD-L1 ≥50% (cohort C); and EGFR M+, PD-L1 <50% (cohort D). RESULTS: Overall, 31 of 249 (12.4%) and 218 of the 249 (87.6%) patients had EGFR M+ and EGFR M- NSCLC, respectively. Median PFSs and OSs did not differ (PFS: 16.6 vs. 18.7 months, p=0.591; OS: 37.4 vs. 35.7 months, p=0.271). Median PFS of cohort A did not significantly differ from the median PFSs of cohorts B and C, but it was significantly longer than the median PFS of cohort D (23.7 vs. 15.2 months, p=0.045). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that cohort D exhibited a worse PFS (adjusted hazard ratio=2.27, 95% confidence interval=1.11-4.66, p=0.025) compared with cohort A. Median OSs were not different between the four cohorts. CONCLUSION: Durvalumab consolidation provided similar benefit in EGFR M+ patients with PD-L1 ≥50% compared with EGFR M- patients. A therapeutic role of durvalumab in patients with EGFR M+, high PD-L1 unresectable stage III NSCLC should be considered.

Safety and Efficacy of Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Antinuclear Antibody-positive Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pneumonitis during durvalumab consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a major cause of treatment discontinuation. Although previous studies have revealed an association between antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity and the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there are no reports on durvalumab consolidation therapy. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of durvalumab after CRT in ANA-positive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with unresectable NSCLC treated with durvalumab after CRT between August 2018 and July 2022 at our institution. We evaluated the association among ANA positivity, treatment-related adverse events (AEs), and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 80 patients were enrolled, 39 of whom were ANA-positive. Although there were no significant differences in the incidence of each AE of any grade, ANA-positive patients tended to have a higher frequency of pneumonitis of grade 3 to 5 than ANA-negative patients (12.8% vs. 2.4%, p=0.104). ANA-positive patients had a significantly shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than ANA-negative patients [14.9 months vs. not reached (NR), p=0.005; NR vs. NR, p=0.013]. Multivariate analysis revealed that ANA positivity was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (HR=2.23; 95% CI=1.16-4.29; p=0.016) and OS (HR=2.28; 95% CI=1.01-5.12; p=0.046). CONCLUSION: ANA-positive patients receiving durvalumab after CRT tended to have a higher frequency of severe pneumonitis and significantly worse PFS and OS compared with ANA-negative patients.

Efficacy, safety and differential outcomes of immune-chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin and durvalumab in patients with biliary tract cancers: A multicenter real world cohort.

BACKGROUND: Combined Immuno-chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine, cisplatin and the programmed death-ligand one inhibitor durvalumab (GCD) is the new standard of care for patients with biliary tract cancers (BTC) based on positive results of the TOPAZ-1 study. OBJECTIVE: We here evaluated the efficacy and safety of GCD for BTC in a German multicenter real-world patient cohort. METHODS: Patients with BTC treated with GCD from 9 German centers were included. Clinicopathological baseline parameters, overall survival (OS), response rate and adverse events (AEs) were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic impact was determined by Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients treated with GCD between 2021 and 2024 were included in the study. Median OS and median progression-free survival were 14 months (95% CI 10.3-17.7) and 8 months (95% CI 6.8-9.2), respectively. The best overall response rate was 28.5% and disease control rate was 65.5%. While extrahepatic and intrahepatic BTC showed similar outcomes, mOS was significantly shorter in patients with gall bladder cancer (GB-CA) with 9 months (95% CI 5.5-12.4; p = 0.02). In univariate analyses age ≥70 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥1, status post cholecystectomy, GB-CA and high baseline CRP values were significantly associated with OS. ECOG PS ≥ 1 and GB-CA remained independent prognostic factors for OS in multivariable cox regression analysis. AEs have been reported in 130 patients (78.8%), including 149 grade 3-4 AEs (25.5%). One patient died of severe infectious pneumonia. Immune-related (ir)AEs occurred in 17 patients (10.3%), including 9 grade 3-4 irAEs (2.2%), which led to treatment interruption in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Immuno-chemotherapy in patients with BTC was feasible, effective and safe in a real-life scenario. Our results were comparable to the phase 3 clinical trial results (TOPAZ-1). Reduced efficacy was noted in patients with GB-CA and/or a reduced performance status that warrants further investigation.

DARES: A Phase II Trial of Durvalumab and Ablative Radiation in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy is first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Growing evidence suggests that radiation, specifically stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), may enhance the immunogenic response as well as cytoreduce tumor burden. The primary objective of the study is to determine the progression free survival for patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC treated with combination multisite SBRT and chemo-immunotherapy (carboplatin, etoposide, and durvalumab). METHODS: This is a multicenter, single arm, phase 2 study. Patients with treatment-naïve, ES-SCLC will be eligible for this study. Patients will receive durvalumab 1500mg IV q3w, carboplatin AUC 5 to 6 mg/mL q3w, and etoposide 80 to 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 q3w for four cycles, followed by durvalumab 1500mg IV q4w until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Ablative radiation will be delivered 1 to 4 extracranial sites in 3 or 5 fractions, determined by location, during cycle 2. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, measured from day 1 of chemoimmunotherapy. Secondary endpoints include grade ≥3 toxicity by CTCAE v5.0 within three months of RT, overall survival, response rate, time to second line systemic therapy, and time to new distant progression. CONCLUSIONS: Now that immunotherapy is an established part of ES-SCLC management, it is important to further optimize its use and effect. This study will investigate the progression-free survival of combined SBRT and chemo-immunotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC. In addition, the data from this study may further inform the immunogenic role of SBRT with chemo-immunotherapy, as well as identify clinical, biological, or radiomic prognostic features.

Efficacy of durvalumab plus chemotherapy in advanced biliary duct cancer and biomarkers exploration.

BACKGROUND: The anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab has been approved for use in first-line advanced biliary duct cancer (ABC). So far, predictive biomarkers of efficacy are lacking. METHODS: ABC patients who underwent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with or without durvalumab were retrospectively enrolled, and their baseline clinical pathological indices were retrieved from medical records. Overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated and analyzed. The levels of peripheral biomarkers from 48 patients were detected with assay kits including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Genomic alterations in 27 patients whose tumor tissues were available were depicted via targeted next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: A total of 186 ABC patients met the inclusion criteria between January 2020 and December 2022 were finally enrolled in this study. Of these, 93 patients received chemotherapy with durvalumab and the rest received chemotherapy alone. Durvalumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated significant improvements in PFS (6.77 vs. 4.99 months; hazard ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.48-0.88]; P = 0.005), but not OS (14.29 vs. 13.24 months; hazard ratio 0.91 [95% CI 0.62-1.32]; P = 0.608) vs. chemotherapy alone in previously untreated ABC patients. The objective response rate (ORR) in patients receiving chemotherapy with and without durvalumab was 19.1% and 7.8%, respectively. Pretreatment sPD-L1, CSF1R and OPG were identified as significant prognosis predictors in patients receiving durvalumab. ADGRB3 and RNF43 mutations were enriched in patients who responded to chemotherapy plus durvalumab and correlated with superior survival. CONCLUSION: This retrospective real-world study confirmed the clinical benefit of durvalumab plus chemotherapy in treatment-naïve ABC patients. Peripheral sPD-L1 and CSF1R are promising prognostic biomarkers for this therapeutic strategy. Presence of ADGRB3 or RNF43 mutations could improve the stratification of immunotherapy outcomes, but further studies are warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms.

Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy for locoregional recurrence of completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ056).

Locoregional recurrence of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after complete resection lacks standard treatment. Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or CRT alone is often selected in daily clinical practice for patients with locoregional recurrence; however, the therapeutic efficacy of these treatments remains unclear, and we aimed to assess this. This retrospective observational study used data from patients with NSCLC diagnosed with locoregional recurrence after complete resection who subsequently underwent concurrent CRT followed by durvalumab (CRT-D group) or CRT alone (CRT group). We employed propensity score analysis with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for various confounders and evaluate efficacy in the CRT-D group. After IPTW adjustment, the CRT-D group contained 119 patients (64.7% male; 69.7% adenocarcinoma), and the CRT group contained 111 patients (60.5% male; 73.4% adenocarcinoma). Their mean ages were 66 and 65 years, respectively. The IPTW-adjusted median progression-free survival was 25.4 and 11.5 months for the CRT-D and CRT groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.64); the median overall survival was not reached in either group favoring CRT-D (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.99). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in 48.8% of patients during CRT, 10.7% after initiating durvalumab maintenance therapy in the CRT-D group, and 57.3% in the CRT group. Overall, the sequential approach of CRT followed by durvalumab is a promising treatment strategy for locoregional recurrence of NSCLC after complete resection.

Safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy in biliary cancer patients with peritoneal metastases.

Biliary tract cancers are a rare diagnosis with a rising incidence. Up to 20% of patients have peritoneal metastases, resulting in symptoms of ascites, abdominal pain and potential bowel obstruction. A standard of care systemic treatment comprises gemcitabine, cisplatin and durvalumab (gem/cis/durva). However, the clinical benefit among patients with peritoneal metastases remains unknown. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) delivers chemotherapy directly to the peritoneal space, which could potentially improve efficacy with minimal systemic toxicity. We describe the design of a Phase I study investigating PIPAC with nab-paclitaxel plus systemic gem/cis/durva among biliary tract cancer patients with peritoneal metastases who have not received prior systemic treatment. The primary end point is safety of PIPAC with nab-paclitaxel in combination with systemic gem/cis/durva.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05285358 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

[Box: see text].

The Significance of Longitudinal Psoas Muscle Loss in Predicting the Maintenance Efficacy of Durvalumab Treatment Following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Sarcopenia assessed at a single time point is associated with the efficacy of immunotherapy, and we hypothesized that longitudinal changes in muscle mass may also be important. This retrospective study included patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received durvalumab treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) between January 2017 and April 2023. Muscle loss and sarcopenia were assessed based on the lumbar skeletal muscle area. Patients with a decrease in muscle area of 10% or more during CCRT were categorized into the muscle loss group, while those with a decrease of less than 10% were categorized into the muscle maintenance group. We evaluated the relationship between muscle changes during CCRT and the efficacy of durvalumab treatment. Among the 98 patients, the muscle maintenance group had a significantly longer PFS of durvalumab treatment compared to the muscle loss group (29.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 17.2-not reached] versus 11.3 months [95% CI: 7.6-22.3]; p = 0.008). The multivariable analysis confirmed that muscle change was a significant predictor of a superior PFS (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.25-0.90]; the p-value was less than 0.05). In contrast, the OS between the groups did not differ significantly (not reached [95% CI: 21.8 months-not reached] and 36.6 months [95% CI: 26.9-not reached]; p = 0.49). Longitudinal muscle changes during CCRT are a predictor of durvalumab's efficacy in patients with NSCLC after CCRT.

Immune-related osteoblastic bone alterations mimicking bone metastasis in a small-cell lung cancer patient treated with durvalumab: a case report.

Background: Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy is currently the standard first-line treatment for advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Immunotherapy can induce specific adverse events, called immune-related adverse events (irAEs). IrAEs of bones have rarely been reported. However, identifying bone irAEs could be important in avoiding misdiagnosis and ensuring appropriate patient management. This is the first report describing the diagnosis of irAEs of osteoblastic bone changes mimicking bone metastasis in a SCLC patient treated with durvalumab. Case Description: In this report, we describe a unique and challenging case in which a 54-year-old female patient with SCLC treated with durvalumab, an immunotherapy drug, exhibited osteoblastic bone changes that appeared similar to bone metastasis on imaging but were actually a side effect of immunotherapy. Before treatment, imaging revealed no bone metastasis. In the third month after treatment with durvalumab, computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple bone alterations, predominantly osteoblastic lesions with minor osteolytic changes. Various imaging tests suggested bone metastasis, but she had no symptoms related to bone disease. Notably, the lesions in the chest had achieved a partial response. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the CT-guided pathological biopsy results, the patient's symptoms, and the biological characteristics of SCLC, we determined that these bone changes were irAEs occurring in the skeletal system. The patient was followed up for 10 months, during which time the bone lesions remained stable. Conclusions: IrAEs of bones are rare, and their manifestations vary. Sometimes, the imaging manifestations of bone irAEs are difficult to distinguish from bone metastasis. If patients show variable treatment responses between different lesions, careful evaluation (including a pathological biopsy) is necessary.

Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy in First-Line Metastatic NSCLC: Five-Year Overall Survival Outcomes From the Phase 3 POSEIDON Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The primary analysis (median follow-up 34.9 mo across all arms) of the phase 3 POSEIDON study revealed a statistically significant overall survival (OS) improvement with first-line tremelimumab plus durvalumab and chemotherapy (T+D+CT) versus CT in patients with EGFR and ALK wild-type metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). D+CT had a trend for OS improvement versus CT that did not reach statistical significance. This article reports prespecified OS analyses after long-term follow-up (median >5 y). METHODS: A total of 1013 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to T+D+CT, D+CT, or CT, stratified by tumor cell programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (≥50% versus <50%), disease stage (IVA versus IVB), and tumor histologic type (squamous versus nonsquamous). Serious adverse events were collected during follow-up. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 63.4 months across all arms, T+D+CT had sustained OS benefit versus CT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.89; 5-y OS: 15.7% versus 6.8%). OS improvement with D+CT versus CT (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-1.00; 5-y OS: 13.0%) was consistent with the primary analysis. OS benefit with T+D+CT versus CT remained more pronounced in nonsquamous (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.85) versus squamous (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.65-1.10) mNSCLC. OS benefit with T+D+CT versus CT was still evident regardless of PD-L1 expression, including patients with PD-L1 tumor cell less than 1%, and remained evident in STK11-mutant (nonsquamous), KEAP1-mutant, and KRAS-mutant (nonsquamous) mNSCLC. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: After a median follow-up of more than 5 years, T+D+CT had durable long-term OS benefit versus CT, supporting its use as first-line treatment in mNSCLC, including in patient subgroups with harder-to-treat disease.