Impact of Estetrol Combined with Drospirenone on Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis in Patients with Endometriosis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study.

Venous thromboembolism is a serious safety concern in women using combined oral contraceptives; ethinyl estradiol (EE) is widely used as an estrogen. Estetrol (E4) is a native estrogen with selective tissue activity and exclusively produced by the fetal liver. This study used a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group design to evaluate the effects of E4 combined with drospirenone (DRSP) on coagulation and fibrinolysis in Japanese patients with endometriosis. Participants were randomized to receive either E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg or EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg for 12 weeks. E4/DRSP and EE/DRSP were administered orally once a day in a cyclic regimen, ie, 24-day active use followed by a 4-day hormone-free period, and a flexible extended regimen, respectively, and blood coagulation and fibrinolysis markers were measured. The effect on coagulation and fibrinolysis was considerably less in the E4/DRSP group than in the EE/DRSP group. Major anticoagulant proteins, protein S (free, total) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (free), were reduced following EE/DRSP treatment. Consequently, thrombin generation determined by the activated protein C sensitivity ratio was increased by approximately 4-fold in the EE/DRSP group than in the E4/DRSP group. Eventually, the fibrinolysis cascade was triggered to compensate for disturbed coagulation, and D-dimer levels were 4.7-fold higher in the EE/DRSP group than in the E4/DRSP group. This study demonstrated that the effect of E4/DRSP on the blood coagulation and fibrinolysis cascades was significantly less than that of EE/DRSP in participants with endometriosis, a disease of women of advanced and reproductive age (jRCT2080225090, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2080225090).

Efficacy and safety of the combination of estetrol 15 mg/drospirenone 3 mg in a cyclic regimen for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain and objective gynecological findings: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 24-week cyclic administration of estetrol (E4) (15 mg)/drospirenone (DRSP) (3 mg) in Japanese patients with endometriosis. DESIGN: A 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. SETTING: Twenty-five study centers in Japan. PATIENT(S): A total of 162 Japanese women diagnosed with endometriosis. INTERVENTION(S): Participants were randomly allocated to the E4/DRSP group or the placebo group. In the E4/DRSP group, participants were orally administered one tablet containing E4 (15 mg) and DRSP (3 mg) daily for 24 days, followed by one placebo tablet for 4 days for a hormone-free interval, constituting a 1-cycle regimen. One placebo tablet was administered once daily for 28 days to participants in the placebo group. The treatments were continued for six cycles (24 weeks) throughout the confirmatory period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Changes in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for the most severe pelvic pain (lower abdominal and back pain) from baseline to six treatment cycles at the end of the confirmatory study period. RESULT(S): Estetrol/drospirenone showed changes in the mean VAS scores for the most severe pelvic pain (-33.2 mm) from baseline to the end of the 6-cycle treatment. The between-group difference was significant (-8.5 mm; 2-sided 95% confidence interval, -16.1 to -0.9 mm), showing superiority to placebo. The responder rates, ≥30% and ≥50% reductions in the VAS scores from baseline, were higher in the E4/DRSP group than in the placebo group: 53.2% vs. 29.6% and 36.4% vs. 12.3%. Objective gynecological findings (induration of the cul-de-sac, pelvic tenderness, and limited uterine mobility) were significantly improved by E4/DRSP treatment, and the proportions of stable and worsened participants were significantly lower than in the placebo group. Estetrol/drospirenone decreased the size of endometriomas and improved quality of life, on the basis of quality of life-related questionnaires and global impression scores. No safety concerns were observed with E4/DRSP treatment. Few differences were observed in the proportion of participants with hemostasis parameters outside the reference range between the E4/DRSP and placebo groups. CONCLUSION(S): Estetrol/drospirenone effectively treats endometriosis-associated pain and improves gynecological findings. Estetrol/drospirenone may be a safe, new option for endometriosis treatment with a potentially decreased risk of thromboembolic events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCT2011210027.

El papel del estetrol en la anticoncepción: una revisión integral / The role of estetrol in contraception: a comprehensive review

Esta revisión narrativa explora el papel potencial del estetrol (E4), un esteroide estrogénico natural, en la anticoncepción, analizando sus propiedades farmacológicas, su efectividad y su seguridad. Se revisaron estudios preclínicos, ensayos clínicos y evaluaciones de seguridad del E4 como anticonceptivo oral combinado (AOC). Se investigó el impacto en parámetros endocrinos, metabólicos y hemostáticos, así como su tolerabilidad. En los resultados, el E4 tiene menor afinidad por el receptor de estrógeno-α de membrana, pero mantiene la actividad agonista en los receptores nucleares. E4/DRSP (drospirenona) demostró ser un AOC eficaz, con ciclos de sangrado regulares y predecibles en la mayoría de las mujeres. La tolerabilidad fue favorable, con eventos adversos leves o moderados y bajas tasas de interrupción. El sangrado fue el evento adverso más común, y se reportaron casos raros de migrañas con aura, trombosis venosa profunda, hiperpotasemia y depresión. E4/DRSP tuvo mínimo impacto en los parámetros lipídicos, hepáticos, de globulina fijadora de hormonas sexuales y de metabolismo de hidratos de carbono, y efecto neutral o mínimo en los parámetros hemostáticos. Se concluye que E4/DRSP parece ser una opción anticonceptiva eficaz y segura, con reducido riesgo trombótico y mínimo impacto en los parámetros endocrinos y metabólicos. Se requiere más investigación para confirmar su seguridad y eficacia a largo plazo.

This narrative review explores the potential role of estetrol (E4), a natural estrogenic steroid, in contraception, analyzing its pharmacological properties, effectiveness, and safety. Preclinical studies, clinical trials, and safety assessments of E4/DRSP (drospirenone) as a combined oral contraceptive (COC) were reviewed. The impact on endocrine, metabolic, and hemostatic parameters, as well as tolerability, was investigated. In results, E4 exhibits lower affinity for estrogen transmembrane receptor-α but maintains agonistic activity on nuclear receptors. E4/DRSP proved to be an effective COC with regular and predictable bleeding cycles in most women. Tolerability was favorable with mild or moderate adverse events and low discontinuation rates. Bleeding was the most common adverse event, and rare cases of aura migraines, deep vein thrombosis, hyperkalemia, and depression were reported. E4/DRSP had minimal impact on lipid, hepatic, sex hormone-binding globulin, and carbohydrate metabolism parameters, with a neutral or minimal effect on hemostatic parameters. The conclusion is that E4/DRSP seems to be an effective and safe contraceptive option, with reduced thrombotic risk and minimal impact on endocrine and metabolic parameters. Further research is needed to confirm long-term safety and efficacy.

Effects of E4/DRSP on self-reported physical and emotional premenstrual and menstrual symptoms: data from the phase 3 clinical trial in Europe and Russia.

PURPOSE: To describe the effects of estetrol (E4) 15 mg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg on physical and emotional premenstrual and menstrual symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ) data from a phase-3 trial (NCT02817828) in Europe and Russia with participants (18 - 50 years) using E4/DRSP for up to 13 cycles. We assessed mean changes in MDQ-t-scores from baseline to end of treatment in premenstrual (4 days before most recent flow) and menstrual (most recent flow) scores for 4 MDQ domains in starters and switchers (use of hormonal contraception in prior 3 months) and performed a shift analysis on individual symptoms within each domain. RESULTS: Of 1,553 treated participants, 1,398(90.0%), including 531(38%) starters, completed both MDQs. Starters reported improvements for premenstrual Pain (-1.4), Water Retention (-3.3) and Negative Affect (-2.5); and for menstrual Pain (-3.5), Water Retention (-3.4), and Negative Affect (-2.7) (all p < 0.01). For switchers, no changes were significant except an increase in premenstrual (+1.0, p = 0.02) and menstrual (+1.5, p = 0.003) Water Retention. We observed a change in symptom intensity in >40% of participants for Cramps, Backache and Fatigue (domain Pain), Painful or Tender Breast and Swelling (domain Water Retention) and Mood Swings and Irritability (domain Negative Affect). CONCLUSION: E4/DRSP starters experienced significant improvements in the domains Pain, Water Retention and Negative Affect particularly benefiting those with more severe baseline symptoms. Switchers showed minimal changes.

A phase 3 study in Europe and Russia showed that Estetrol/Drospirenone, a new combined oral contraceptive, significantly improved the MDQ scores for domains Pain, Water Retention and Negative Affect in women starting COC use, while switchers showed minimal changes.

The Loss of Estradiol by Androgen Deprivation in Prostate Cancer Patients Shows the Importance of Estrogens in Males.

The role of estradiol (E2; an estrogen) in men needs to be more appreciated. In this review, we address the clinical situations that allow the study of the clinical consequences of E2 deficiency in men and discuss the effects of restoration of levels of this reproductive steroid hormone. In men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), E2 is suppressed along with testosterone, leading to side effects affecting the quality of life. These include hot flashes, arthralgia, fatigue, mood changes, cognition problems, weight gain, bone loss, and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Transdermal E2 alone for ADT has shown equivalent testosterone suppression compared to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists while also preventing estrogen-deficiency side effects, including hot flashes and bone loss. Co-treatment of ADT with fetal estrogen estetrol (E4) has shown significant improvements of estrogen-deficiency symptoms. These observations emphasize the need to raise awareness of the importance of estrogens in men among clinicians and the lay public.

Metabolism of endogenous and exogenous estrogens in women.

Estrogens regulate important processes in reproductive, skeletal, cardiovascular, and central nervous systems that impact women's overall health. Understanding endogenous and exogenously administered estrogen metabolism is vital to determining therapeutic estrogen levels. The present review provides an overview of estrogen metabolites formed in non-pregnant and pregnant women, and those resulting from exogenous estrogen administration. There are four principal endogenous estrogens: estrone (E1), estradiol (E2), estriol (E3), and estetrol (E4). E4, which is produced only in pregnancy, has emerged recently as an estrogen with significant therapeutic potential. E1, E2, and E3 undergo extensive metabolism primarily through phase I (hydroxylation, oxidation, reduction) and phase II (primarily conjugation) reactions, whereas E4 undergoes only phase II reactions. Exogenous estrogens commonly used for menopausal treatment and/or contraception, including micronized E2, conjugated equine estrogens, and ethinyl estradiol, also undergo phase I and phase II reactions, but differ widely in the types of metabolites formed. The mechanisms by which estrogen metabolites are formed and their excretion in urine, bile, and feces, are still poorly understood. We highlight areas that require further research to foster a better understanding of how estrogen metabolism impacts dosing of oral estrogens for therapeutic use, as well as the physiological regulation of endogenous estrogens.

Estetrol/GPER/SERPINB2 transduction signaling inhibits the motility of triple-negative breast cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: Estetrol (E4) is a natural estrogen produced by the fetal liver during pregnancy. Due to its favorable safety profile, E4 was recently approved as estrogenic component of a new combined oral contraceptive. E4 is a selective ligand of estrogen receptor (ER)α and ERß, but its binding to the G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) has not been described to date. Therefore, we aimed to explore E4 action in GPER-positive Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) cells. METHODS: The potential interaction between E4 and GPER was investigated by molecular modeling and binding assays. The whole transcriptomic modulation triggered by E4 in TNBC cells via GPER was explored through high-throughput RNA sequencing analyses. Gene and protein expression evaluations as well as migration and invasion assays allowed us to explore the involvement of the GPER-mediated induction of the plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 (SERPINB2) in the biological responses triggered by E4 in TNBC cells. Furthermore, bioinformatics analysis was aimed at recognizing the biological significance of SERPINB2 in ER-negative breast cancer patients. RESULTS: After the molecular characterization of the E4 binding capacity to GPER, RNA-seq analysis revealed that the plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 (SERPINB2) is one of the most up-regulated genes by E4 in a GPER-dependent manner. Worthy, we demonstrated that the GPER-mediated increase of SERPINB2 is engaged in the anti-migratory and anti-invasive effects elicited by E4 in TNBC cells. In accordance with these findings, a correlation between SERPINB2 levels and a good clinical outcome was found in ER-negative breast cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our results provide new insights into the mechanisms through which E4 can halt migratory and invasive features of TNBC cells.

Estetrol Inhibits Endometriosis Development in an In Vivo Murine Model.

Endometriosis is characterized by the growth of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, and it is associated with alterations in the expression of hormone receptors and inflammation. Estetrol (E4) is a weak estrogen that recently has been approved for contraception. We evaluated the effect of E4 on the growth of endometriotic-like lesions and the expression of TNF-α, estrogen receptors (ERs), and progesterone receptors (PRs) in an in vivo murine model. Endometriosis was induced surgically in female C57BL/6 mice. E4 was delivered via Alzet pump (3 mg/kg/day) from the 15th postoperative day for 4 weeks. E4 significantly reduced the volume (p < 0.001) and weight (p < 0.05) of ectopic lesions. Histologically, E4 did not affect cell proliferation (PCNA immunohistochemistry) but it did increase cell apoptosis (TUNEL assay) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, it modulated oxidative stress (SOD, CAT, and GPX activity, p < 0.05) and increased lipid peroxidation (TBARS/MDA, p < 0.01). Molecular analysis showed mRNA (RT-qPCR) and protein (ELISA) expression of TNF-α decreased (p < 0.05) and mRNA expression of Esr2 reduced (p < 0.05), in contrast with the increased expression of Esr1 (p < 0.01) and Pgr (p < 0.05). The present study demonstrates for the first time that E4 limited the development and progression of endometriosis in vivo.

Interrogating Estrogen Signaling Pathways in Human ER-Positive Breast Cancer Cells Forming Bone Metastases in Mice.

Breast cancer bone metastases (BMET) are incurable, primarily osteolytic, and occur most commonly in estrogen receptor-α positive (ER+) breast cancer. ER+ human breast cancer BMET modeling in mice has demonstrated an estrogen (E2)-dependent increase in tumor-associated osteolysis and bone-resorbing osteoclasts, independent of estrogenic effects on tumor proliferation or bone turnover, suggesting a possible mechanistic link between tumoral ERα-driven osteolysis and ER+ bone progression. To explore this question, inducible secretion of the osteolytic factor, parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), was utilized as an in vitro screening bioassay to query the osteolytic potential of estrogen receptor- and signaling pathway-specific ligands in BMET-forming ER+ human breast cancer cells expressing ERα, ERß, and G protein-coupled ER. After identifying genomic ERα signaling, also responsibility for estrogen's proliferative effects, as necessary and sufficient for osteolytic PTHrP secretion, in vivo effects of a genomic-only ER agonist, estetrol (E4), on osteolytic ER+ BMET progression were examined. Surprisingly, while pharmacologic effects of E4 on estrogen-dependent tissues, including bone, were evident, E4 did not support osteolytic BMET progression (vs robust E2 effects), suggesting an important role for nongenomic ER signaling in ER+ metastatic progression at this site. Because bone effects of E4 did not completely recapitulate those of E2, the relative importance of nongenomic ER signaling in tumor vs bone cannot be ascertained here. Nonetheless, these intriguing findings suggest that targeted manipulation of estrogen signaling to mitigate ER+ metastatic progression in bone may require a nuanced approach, considering genomic and nongenomic effects of ER signaling on both sides of the tumor/bone interface.

Evaluating the toxicity of estetrol, 17α-ethinylestradiol, and their combination with drospirenone on zebrafish larvae: A behavioural and proteomic study.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise and compare the toxicity of estetrol (E4) and 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), and their respective mixture with the progestin drospirenone (DRSP) in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. METHODS: Zebrafish embryos were exposed to E4, EE2, DRSP, E4+DRSP, and EE2+DRSP in a fish embryo acute toxicity (FET) test. A second test examined behavioural responses and, using label-free proteomics, identified changes in protein expression in response to hormonal treatments, across a range of concentrations, including those that are considered to be environmentally relevant. RESULTS: In the FET test, no effects were found from E4 at concentrations ≤100 mg/L, while EE2 induced mortality and morphological abnormalities at concentrations of 1-2 mg/L. In the behavioural test, exposure to 30 ng/L EE2 (∼200 × predicted environmental concentration - PEC) resulted in hypoactivity in fish larvae and exposure to 0.3 ng/L EE2 (∼2 × PEC) led to quantitative changes in protein abundance, revealing potential impacts on RNA processing and protein synthesis machinery. Exposure to E4 did not alter behaviour, but several groups of proteins were modulated, mainly at 710 ng/L (∼200 × PEC), including proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation. When combined with DRSP, EE2 induced reduced effects on behaviour and proteomic responses, suggesting an antagonistic effect of DRSP. E4+DRSP induced no significant effects on behaviour or proteomic profiles at tested concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that E4-based combined oral contraceptives present a more favourable environmental profile than EE2-based contraceptives, particularly during the early developmental stages of fish.

Correlation of sexual desire with sexual hormone binding globulin and free androgen index in women using combined contraceptives.

PURPOSE: To correlate the sexual desire levels with sexual hormone binding globulin and free androgen index in women taking different types of hormonal contraceptives (HCs) containing ethinylestradiol (EE), oestradiol valerate (E2V), 17ß-oestradiol (E2), or estetrol (E4), combined or in phasic formulation with different progestogens having antiandrogenic properties. METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-seven women (age range 18-46) participated in the study. SHBG and total testosterone (TT) were measured, and the Free Androgen Index (FAI) was calculated. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS) questionnaires were used to assess sexual function and distress, respectively. RESULTS: The highest SHBG values and the lowest FAIs were obtained of women on HCs containing EE than those of women on HCs containing E2V/17ß E2 or E4 (p < 0.001). Desire scores and FSFI total scores were lower in women on HCs with EE than in those using HCs containing E2V, 17ß E2, or E4 (p ≤ 0.001). The women who were on HCs containing EE reported FSDS levels higher than those containing all the other types of oestrogen. Finally, sexual desire and FSFI total scores had a negative correlation with the SHBG values and a positive correlation with FAI percentage (p ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A minority of women using HCs with EE might experience a decreased sexual desire. This was not observed in women on HCs containing E2V, 17 E2, or E4. To avoid HC discontinuation, due to sexual desire reduction, HCs having minor antiandrogenic effects could be taken into consideration.

Oestrogens in oral contraception: considerations for tailoring prescription to women's needs.

BACKGROUND: The oestrogenic component of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) has changed over years with the aim of reducing oestrogen-related side effects and risks, whilst maintaining oestrogen beneficial effects, particularly on cycle control. PURPOSE: To describe the pharmacological profiles of different oestrogens commonly used in COCs to provide insights on contraceptive prescription tailored to women's needs. RESULTS: All COCs ensure a high contraceptive efficacy. COCs containing the natural oestrogens oestradiol (E2), oestradiol valerate (E2V) and estetrol (E4) have limited impact on liver metabolism, lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, haemostasis and sex hormone binding globulin levels, compared with ethinylestradiol (EE). COCs with E2 and E2V appear also to entail a lower elevation of the risk of venous thromboembolism vs. EE-containing pills. No epidemiological data are available for E4-COC. E2- and E2V-containing COCs seem to exert a less stabilising oestrogenic effect on the endometrium compared with EE-COCs. The E4-COC results in a predictable bleeding pattern with a high rate of scheduled bleeding and minimal unscheduled bleeding per cycle. Based on in vitro and in vivo animal data, E4 seems to be associated with a lower effect on cell breast proliferation. CONCLUSION: Today various COCs contain different oestrogens. Prescribers must be familiar with the different properties of each oestrogen for a tailored contraceptive recommendation, considering their safety and contraceptive efficacy, as well as women's needs and preferences.

For contraceptive pills physicians can choose among different oestrogens, besides many progestins. Natural oestrogens have less metabolic impact vs EE, while EE and E4 seem to provide a better cycle control. Knowing the different oestrogen characteristics is crucial for adjusting pill prescription to women's needs and desires.

Estetrol/drospirenone versus 17α-ethinylestradiol/drospirenone: An extended one generation test to evaluate the endocrine disruption potential on zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Combined oral contraceptives, comprising of both an oestrogen and a progestin component, are released in aquatic environments and potentially pose a risk to aquatic wildlife by their capacity to disrupt physiological mechanisms. In this study, the endocrine disruptive potential of two mixtures, 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), a synthetic oestrogen, or estetrol (E4), a natural oestrogen, with the progestin drospirenone (DRSP) have been characterised in three generations of zebrafish, according to an adapted Medaka Extended One Generation Reproduction Test. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) were exposed to a range of concentrations of EE2/DRSP and E4/DRSP (∼1×, ∼3×, ∼10× and ∼30× predicted environmental concentration, PEC). Survival, growth, hatching success, fecundity, fertilisation success, vitellogenin (VTG), gonad histopathology, sex differentiation, and transcriptional analysis of genes related to gonadal sex steroid hormones synthesis were assessed. In the F0 generation, exposure to EE2/DRSP at ∼10 and ∼30× PEC decreased fecundity and increased male VTG concentrations. The highest concentration of EE2/DRSP also affected VTG concentrations in female zebrafish and the expression of genes implicated in steroid hormones synthesis. In the F1 generation, sex determination was impaired in fish exposed to EE2/DRSP at concentrations as low as ∼3× PEC. Decreased fecundity and fertility, and abnormal gonadal histopathology were also observed. No effects were observed in the F2 generation. In contrast, E4/DRSP induced only minor histopathological changes and an increase in the proportion of males, at the highest concentration tested (∼30× PEC) in the F1 generation and had no effect on hatching success of F2 generation. Overall, this study suggests that the combination E4/DRSP has a more favourable environmental profile than EE2/DRSP.

Low thrombin generation in postmenopausal women using estetrol.

OBJECTIVE: Estetrol (E4) represents a novel estrogen of interest to relieve vasomotor symptoms. E4 activates the nuclear estrogen receptor α (ERα) but antagonizes the estradiol ERα-dependent membrane-initiated steroid signaling pathway. The distinct pharmacological properties of E4 could explain its low impact on hemostasis. This study aimed to assess the effect of E4 on coagulation in postmenopausal women, using the thrombin generation assay (TGA). METHODS: Data were collected from a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study in postmenopausal women (NCT02834312). Oral E4 (2.5 mg, n = 42; 5 mg, n = 29; 10 mg, n = 34; or 15 mg, n = 32) or placebo (n = 31) was administered daily for 12 weeks. Thrombograms and TGA parameters were extracted for each subject at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, all treatment groups showed a mean thrombogram (±95% confidence interval [CI] of the mean) within the reference ranges, that is, the 2.5th-97.5th percentile of all baseline thrombograms (n = 168), as well as for TGA parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The intake of E4 15 mg for 12 weeks led to significant but not clinically relevant changes compared to baseline as the mean values (±95% CI of the mean) remained within reference ranges, demonstrating a neutral profile of this estrogen on hemostasis.

Inhibitory effects of estetrol on the invasion and migration of immortalized human endometrial stromal cells.

Endometriosis, a common gynecological disorder characterized by the growth of endometrial gland and stroma outside the uterus, causes several symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, hypermenorrhea, and chronic abdominal pain. 17ß estradiol (E2) stimulates the growth of endometriotic lesions. Although estetrol (E4), produced by human fetal liver, is also a natural estrogen, it may have the opposite effects on endometriotic cells. We investigated different effects of E4 and E2 on the invasion and migration of immortalized human endometrial stromal cells (HESCs) and evaluated whether E4 affects the expression of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) family member 1 (WASF-1). We measured the invasion of HESCs by a Matrigel chamber assay. Cell migration was measured by wound healing assay and cell tracking analysis. The expression of WASF-1 was confirmed by independent real-time PCR analysis. Transfection of cells with siRNAs was carried out to knock down the expression of WASF-1 in HESCs. E4 significantly inhibited E2-induced invasion and migration of HESCs. WASF-1 was found to be a potential mediator based on metastasis PCR array. WASF-1 was upregulated by E2 and downregulated by E4. Knockdown of WASF-1 inhibited migration. Our results suggest that E4 may inhibit E2-induced growth of endometriotic lesions. Downregulation of WASF-1 is involved in the inhibitory effects of E4 on migration. The use of E4 combined with progestins as combined oral contraceptives may cause endometriotic lesions to regress in women with endometriosis.

Comparison of estrogenic components used for hormonal contraception.

Attempts have been made over the years to replace ethinyl estradiol (EE) in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) with the less potent natural estrogen estradiol (E2), or its prodrug, E2 valerate (E2V), to improve their safety and tolerability. Recently, a COC incorporating a novel weak natural estrogen, estetrol (E4), combined with drospirenone, has become available. We present a comparative analysis of the three prevailing estrogens used in COCs, focusing on their structure-function relationships, receptor-binding affinity, potency, metabolism, pharmacokinetic parameters, and pharmacodynamics. The binding affinity of EE to estrogen receptor (ER)α is twice that of E2, whereas its affinity for ERß is about one-half that of E2. E4 has a lower binding affinity for the ERs than E2. The high potency of EE is notable in its dramatic increase in estrogen-sensitive hepatic globulins and coagulation factors. EE and E2 undergo extensive and comparable metabolism, while E4 produces only a very limited number of metabolites. E4 has the highest bioavailability among the three estrogens, with E2 having <5%. Studies demonstrate consistent ovulation inhibition, although a higher dose of E4 (15 mg) in COCs is required to achieve follicular suppression compared to E2 (1-3 mg) and EE (0.01-0.035 mg). E2 and E4 in COCs may be less stimulatory of coagulant proteins than EE. Studies with E2/dienogest suggest a comparable risk of venous thromboembolism to EE/levonorgestrel, while data assessing risk with an E4-based COC are insufficient. Nevertheless, the E4-based formulation shows promise as a potential alternative to EE and E2 due to its lower potency and possibly fewer side effects.

Effectiveness of estrogen and its derivatives over dexamethasone in the treatment of COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and dexamethasone is a glucocorticoid widely used for its treatment. Dexamethasone is not used in non-severe cases due to its immunosuppressant action. So, considering this, Estrogen and Estetrol were tested for the treatment of COVID-19 as they all possess a common steroid ring and dislike dexamethasone, they are immunoenhancer. Virtual screening of test ligands was performed through molecular docking, MM-GBSA, simulations, in silico ADMET and drug-likeness prediction to identify their potential to inhibit the effects of SARS-CoV-2. Results showed that test ligands possess drug-like properties and they are safe as drug candidates. The protein-ligand interaction study revealed that they bind with the amino acid residues at the active site of the target proteins and the test ligands possess better binding potential than Dexamethasone. With protein Mpro, Estetrol and Estrogen showed docking score of -7.240 and -5.491 kcal/mol, and with protein ACE2, Estetrol and Estrogen showed docking score of -5.269 and -4.732 kcal/mol, respectively. Further, MD Simulation was carried out and most of the interactions of molecular docking are preserved during simulation. The prominent interactions that our test ligands showed during MD Simulation are similar to drugs that possess in vitro anticovid activity as shown in recent studies. Hence, our test ligands possessed potential for anticovid activity and they should be further tested through in vitro and in vivo studies for their activity against COVID-19.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Combined oral contraceptive with estetrol plus drospirenone: from pharmacokinetics to clinical applications.

INTRODUCTION: Drospirenone/estetrol (DRSP/E4) is a combined oral contraceptive (COC) recently approved in several countries. It is composed of 15 mg of E4, a natural estrogen produced by human fetal liver throughout pregnancy, and 3 mg of DRSP, the first synthetic progestin used in oral contraception derived from 17-α-spirolactone. E4 and DRSP synergistically prevent pregnancy by inhibiting ovulation. E4 differs from 17-ß-estradiol or ethinylestradiol because it represents a native estrogen with selective action in tissues (NEST), therefore it displays both agonist and antagonist estrogenic effects in different tissues. AREAS COVERED: In this paper, we reviewed the scientific literature published in English prior to April 2023 and gathered information on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DRSP, E4 and their combination for contraception. We also proposed possible clinical applications based on the characteristics of the components of this COC. EXPERT OPINION: E4/DRSP-based COC has shown high tolerability, safety and satisfaction and may represent a viable choice in young girls in need of oral contraception and pill users who suffer from high cholesterol, breast tenderness or water retention. Moreover, this new COC shows higher scheduled bleeding rate compared to other pills containing natural estrogens. All the data are reassuring, permitting long-term use.

The benefits of estetrol addition to drospirenone for contraception.

Ethinylestradiol and drospirenone combined oral contraceptive formulations have been marketed for >20 years. Drospirenone has antimineralocorticoid and anti-androgenic effects that may offer several health benefits. Recently, 2 new drospirenone-containing oral contraceptives entered the market, 1 as a progestin-only pill containing 4 mg drospirenone and the other as a combined oral contraceptive containing 15 mg estetrol and 3 mg drospirenone. Estetrol has a unique differential effect on nuclear and membrane estrogen α-receptors when compared with other estrogens, leading to low impact on the liver, breast, and hemostasis parameters and a beneficial effect on the endometrium, vagina, cardiovascular system, bone, and brain. Phase 3 clinical studies demonstrated that the Pearl Index (pregnancies per 100-woman-years) for drospirenone alone is 4.0 in the United States and 0.93 in the European Union and for the estetrol-drospirenone combination it is 2.65 and 0.44, respectively. Drospirenone alone demonstrates high rates of unscheduled bleeding and low rates of scheduled bleeding, whereas the estetrol-drospirenone combination demonstrates a predictable and regular bleeding profile for most users with a high stable rate of scheduled bleeding and a low rate of unscheduled bleeding, reported primarily as spotting only. The adverse event profiles and discontinuation rates owing to adverse events are comparable, and no clinically significant effects were observed on metabolic parameters with either product. Hemostatic assays for drospirenone do not fully evaluate all parameters although the testing that is available suggests negligible effects, whereas validated hemostatic assays demonstrate that the estetrol-drospirenone combination has limited impact on hemostasis. The introduction of 4 mg drospirenone and 15 mg estetrol with 3 mg drospirenone are valuable additions to the contraceptive market. Adding estetrol to 3 mg drospirenone provides advantages of contraceptive efficacy and a regular, predictable bleeding profile with minimal impact on hemostasis parameters.